3 reasons to buy Costco stock and steer clear of Target
To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here.
Welcome to Good Buy or Good Buy. Our goal here to help cut through the noise and to navigate the best moves for your portfolio. I'm here with Thematica research chief investment officer, that would be Christopher Sacchi. Chris, let's go through the first one you like. This is a buy, and it is Costco. Now, this stock hasn't done a whole lot so far this year, up like both single digits. Most on the street, the majority do say this one's a buy, so you're in good company. Let's go through the reasons. The first reason you say winning consumer wallet share.
So, Costco is a great company to begin with. But as an investor, they give us a lot of information. One of the things I really like, they're still one of the retailers that actually reports monthly revenue numbers. So what we can do is size this up against other data, like what we'll get tomorrow, for example, the June Retail Sales report. Costco's already reported its June revenue. Uh, US comps sales adjusted up about 5%. We have a nice barometer to measure that against. Then if we do that over the last several months, it's clear Costco is taking consumer wallet share, and it makes sense. Folks are trending down, they're concerned about inflation pressures, they're leaning into what Costco has.
Bullet point number two, another reason you say this one's a buy: differentiated membership business model.
Yes. So when we talk about Costco, we have to remember it's a membership warehouse club. So you pay your fee, and off you go to shop. But when we amass those fees, they're a significant piece of the company's overall pre-tax income, depending on the quarter, 50-60%. Very different than a Walmart, very different than a Target. It gives it an air of predictability that we like. And it also kind of says that when things get a little rough, there's a nice rock-solid base for their earnings.
And a final reason you say this is a smart place to commit capital: expanding warehouse footprint.
Absolutely. So, you know, Costco continues to build out the number of their locations, both in the US and internationally. But it's kind of a great feeder business, because as they expand the warehouse footprint, they get more members, they get more members, they continue to build that high-margin membership fee revenue that they have.
Now you made your case convincingly, Chris. Before folks jump in, though, let's talk about the downside risk you have to think of.
Yeah, so a lot of folks will talk about, you know, consumer spending and stuff, but I continue to think that folks are looking to stretch their disposable spending dollars, they're going to Costco. So that's not as big of a risk for me. For me, given the importance of that membership business model, we have to track renewal rates. They're typically above 90%. If we saw a big drop in that, that would be worrisome to me.
All right. So that's our buy. Let's move to one you're not a strong fan of: Target. Now, this one has already been plenty beat up, Chris. You say it's still worth avoiding here. Let's go through the reasons why that. The first reason you say: avoid Target, consumers trading down.
Yeah, absolutely. You know, when we take a look at, you know, various survey data, consumers are trending down, you know, off-price brands, trying to stretch those spending dollars, the very reason we expect them to go to Costco. So, you know, when you look at Target, it's kind of a, um, disposable income type of place. They're not big in grocery, you can't buy in bulk, hard to arguably stretch those dollars. So I see them kind of losing wallet share while Costco gains it.
Second reason you say this is one to avoid: market share concerns.
Well, exactly. So when we talk about consumer wallet share, we already talked about Costco, they're taking it. But we think about Walmart, we think about Amazon, particularly coming off a prime day and expanding that base, adding more digital shopping holidays throughout the year. How does Target compete? It's poised to lose more market share in my view.
And another reason to avoid it here: margin pressure.
Yeah, so, you know, a lot of retailers, what they're trying to do, whether it's Albertsons, Kroger, or even Target, they're trying to hold the line on prices so people continue to come in. Well, if they continue to hold the line on prices and they're losing market share, it's going to hit their margin dollars. Falling margin dollars, not good for EPS outlook. So I think there's some downside EPS risk there.
All right, so before you avoid, though, as we do avoid it, what are some reasons you could be wrong, Chris? What's the upside risk on this one?
So, so the biggest one is, you know, if we think about Target being tied to discretionary spending, if we see a reacceleration in disposable income, that would be a very, that would be a reason to turn around and revisit Target. But to see that, we're going to want to see a pickup in job growth, we're going to see a pickup in wages. Those would be the flags to look for.
All right. Buy Costco, avoid Target, that's what Chris has to say. Thank you, Chris, and thank you all for watching. Good Buy or Good Buy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Union Pacific Corporation (UNP): Jim Cramer Reveals How Its Merger Could Succeed
We recently published . Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) is one of the largest railroad companies in America. The stock has been a central part of Cramer's morning show after co-host David Faber became the first to speculate that the railroad industry could experience mergers due to the business environment in the Trump administration. During this appearance, Faber discussed reports about Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP) and Norfolk Southern in the advanced stages of a business competition. Faber shared that any deal would spur competitors to take similar action. As for Cramer, here's what he said: '[On talks of a merger] 5 year pledge to not raise prices, deal gets done.' Pixabay/Public Domain Cramer previously discussed railroad giant CSX merging with Union Pacific Corporation (NYSE:UNP): 'CSX is going to merge with Union Pacific, am I off the rails? I am in charge of the rails. It's just the way, the people refuse to believe that this is a different government.' While we acknowledge the potential of UNP as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.