
New dawn for NeuroScientific with stem cell acquisition
Stem cell therapies have long promised to press the body's reset button - potentially reversing injuries and damage from disease, regenerating tissue and reshaping modern medicine. For ASX-listed NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals, that promise starts now thanks to its $5.1 million acquisition of unlisted Perth-based stem cell therapy company Isopogen.
The deal will hand NeuroScientific the keys to Isopogen's patented 'StemSmart' technology, which innovatively prepares a specific type of stem cell, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), for use as an intravenous infusion. MSC are universal donor cells, meaning that there is no need for matching between a donor and recipient. The are effectively an 'off-the shelf' cell therapy.
Over the past 20 years, haematology medical scientist Dr Marian Sturm, NeuroScientific's incoming chief scientific officer, pioneered the development of MSCs in her former role as facility director of Royal Perth Hospital's Cell and Tissue Therapies centre.
The cells have so far been used in many patients, including as a last-line treatment for critically ill patients suffering severe immune complications from bone marrow transplantation and in kidney and lung transplant rejection, through early phase clinical trials and studies and on compassionate grounds, with promising results.
The MSC technology has also been employed to treat patients with severe Crohn's disease, an inflammatory autoimmune condition that affects the gut. The disease can develop into very difficult-to-manage and treat forms, including refractory Crohn's, in which patients experience persistent uncontrolled flare-ups, and fistulising Crohn's, in which patients develop an open wound from a gut flare-up out to the skin.
In a phase two trial targeting refractory Crohn's disease, a condition that no longer responds to standard treatments, of 18 patients treated with StemSmart MSC, 78 per cent of patients experienced clinical improvement and 44 per cent achieved full remission. That level of efficacy is considered impressive in the MSC field, particularly for refractory Crohn's.
With the global market for refractory Crohn's treatment alone estimated to be worth about US$7.5 billion, it's no wonder StemSmart's new owner quickly hailed the system as a potential game-changer. StemSmart technology offers a step up from traditional MSC manufacturing in that the cells are grown in a special media, becoming activated in the process. The platform technology was developed at Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) and manufactured using RPH's processes.
Notably, the manufacturing methodology can yield more than 200 cryopreserved clinical doses from just 10 millilitres of precious donated bone marrow, giving it both clinical flexibility and manufacturing scale.
Based on the early results in Crohn's disease and in other conditions, Sturm now sees hope in employing MSCs to treat other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, possibly including lupus, multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. As the cells can grow into skin, bone, fat and other tissue cells, they also offer potential applications for tissue repair, such as bone repair for skull or long bone injuries, for example.
The clinical development of MSC stretches back to 2002, when a Swedish paediatric haematologist used MSCs for the first time to treat a child gravely ill with complications from the treatment of leukaemia. The cells were isolated and grown in the doctor's laboratory from bone marrow donated by the child's mother. The child's clinical response to the cells was striking.
No doubt, the successful experimental treatment would have caught the attention of immunology and haematology researchers and clinicians worldwide, including Sturm, an expert in blood, cell and tissue transplant manufacturing for clinical applications, who was the then-director of RPH's cutting-edge Cell and Tissue Therapy facility.
At the time, Sturm was particularly focused on delivering MSCs as safely as possible into healthcare areas of unmet need. She began experimenting with ways to process the cells into a safe infusion that could be used to treat diseases and transplant complications where there were few or no existing clinical options.
In 2007, Dr Sturm was approached by her clinical colleagues, who wanted to use the MSC product on compassionate grounds to treat a critically ill man with complications of bone marrow transplant to treat blood cancer.
At the time, about 60 per cent of bone marrow transplant patients, who received donor marrow, developed a serious complication, known as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), where the new blood system created by the bone marrow transplant rejects the recipient's body. It usually presents with symptoms that affect the gut, skin and liver, and is treated with steroids. With recent advancements in transplant practices, the incidence of acute GVHD has fallen to now occurring in about 25-30 per cent of cases. However, these medicines fail in about 30 per cent of acute GVHD cases – and most of this group die.
After receiving MSC treatment, the man quickly recovered, spurring Sturm to keep working to develop a scalable, commercial-grade MSC product and patenting the manufacturing process.
After an agreement was reached between Isopogen and the State Government's East Metropolitan Health Service (EMHS) giving Isopogen control of the MSC technology, NeuroScientific struck a deal with Isopogen to progress StemSmart.
The all-scrip acquisition sees Isopogen shareholders receive 85.7 million NeuroScientific shares and 57.1 million performance shares tied to future clinical and commercial milestones. The market welcomed the move, with NeuroScientific's share price surging 97 per cent on the day of the announcement. A $3.5 million capital raise led by Perth corporate advisor Westar Capital, after existing funds, creates a war chest of about $7.5 million. This will support further development, including for a special access program or bigger phase 2/3 trials for patients with refractory and fistulising Crohn's, and will enable regulatory engagement with Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration with a long-term goal of partial or full registration for StemSmart MSC, first up as a Crohn's treatment.
The company is also eyeing the United States, where inflammatory bowel disease is forecast to grow into a lucrative US$13.8 billion market by 2026. About 30 per cent of Crohn's patients fail to respond to current gold-standard treatments, such as biologics, making them prime candidates for a new approach, such as StemSmart. The takeover signals a bold pivot for NeuroScientific, which previously focused on peptide-based drugs for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's. Those drugs showed promise, but the timelines to market were long. By contrast, StemSmart's progress and results over decades of development position the product closer to near-term commercialisation, helped along by NeuroScientific's healthy bank balance. Nor will NeuroScientific be walking away from its roots completely. Two current directors will remain on the company's revamped board, and management will explore crossover applications for StemSmart, particularly to tackle the neuroinflammation that is a hallmark of inflammatory diseases such as Alzheimer's. That convergence could open a dual-front therapeutic pipeline, leveraging both peptide and cellular approaches. While competition in the stem cell space is fierce, the upside is enormous. Importantly, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the first mesenchymal stromal cell therapy by ASX-listed, regenerative medicine company Mesoblast. While MSC products have been approved in other jurisdictions, the FDA approval of an allogeneic, bone marrow-derived MSC product for paediatric, steroid-refractory, acute graft-versus-host disease is momentous.
According to NeuroScientific, StemSmart is differentiated by its purity, potency and consistency. In preclinical and early human data, the platform has shown enhanced potency over conventional MSCs. The recent regulatory FDA approval of MSC also tilt the momentum in StemSmart's favour, suggesting regulators are warming to well-characterised stem cell platforms with rigorous clinical data.
Is your ASX-listed company doing something interesting? Contact:
matt.birney@wanews.com.au
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Patients seek reassurances after IVF mix ups
Alarms firing off in an IVF lab as work grinds to a halt may sound like the start of a technology meltdown but at many of Australia's major fertility clinics it's actually a sign safety systems are kicking into gear. Known as electronic witnessing, the mechanism prevents tissue mix ups and involves multiple layers of identity-document checks by humans and computers. While rarely needed, it's a safeguard standard that's becoming the norm in an industry suddenly needing to win back public trust following revelations of two devastating errors at one of Australia's biggest facilities. The first saw a mother give birth to another couple's biological child after she was impregnated with the wrong embryo at Monash IVF in Brisbane some years ago. The other involved a woman incorrectly receiving her own embryo instead of one from her same-sex partner as requested, which happened at the company's Melbourne clinic earlier in June. The bungles have sparked a rush of patients reaching out to fertility clinics seeking reassurances about their own sperm, eggs, embryos and children. "At the moment, the trust in the industry has been eroded," says Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser. "It certainly opened up the conversation again. "I do believe those questions inherently are always there but it's probably made patients verbalise it a little." She's found explaining electronic and human witnessing practices at her own facility in Sydney have put patients' minds at ease but knows it will take time for confidence to return. Monash IVF has repeatedly apologised and vowed to introduce additional verification processes over and above normal practices. Official probes into what happened are under way, with the company yet to offer explanations for how the mix ups occurred beyond two ASX announcements. Pink Elephants Support Network chief operating officer Jen Tupaea is among many Monash IVF patients wanting to know more. She's noticed a general sense of uneasiness set in among IVF parents across Australia and believes patients need more reassurances that all due diligence is done. "There's already a lot of uncertainty and worry and sort of lack of control and I think this just adds another element to that," Ms Tupaea says. 'Patchwork' is a term often used to describe the 40-odd pieces of legislation affecting IVF in Australian states and territories. There's variations on anything from how long embryos can be stored to how many families can use the same sperm donor and even certain states banning overseas donor eggs. Until now, the industry has largely been left to regulate itself through yearly accreditations but the mix ups spurred health ministers including Victoria's Mary-Anne Thomas to unite behind a push to explore national regulation. It's something Pink Elephants supports, with Ms Tupaea describing IVF regulation as "a bit of a black box". She's aware of parents worried about what would happen if a similar devastating mix up occurred at a smaller clinic that doesn't have ASX reporting requirements. "The main concern when something like that comes up is, why are we hearing about it now, and what are we not hearing about?" she says. Australia's first IVF baby was born 45 years ago and now some 20,000 babies conceived through IVF are born here each year. Greater regulation is also something clinicians want, Ms Hiser explains. "We regulated ourselves because no one enforced it upon us and because we saw the need for patient safety," she says. "We've done a very good job of that up until now, and that's why I'm very curious to find out exactly what went wrong (at Monash IVF) because we're having a hard time ... understanding how it did happen." IVF researcher and University of Melbourne Senior Research Fellow Sarah Lensen wants any future regulation to also include greater monitoring of 'add-on' treatments. She specialises in evaluating their safety and effectiveness, saying for the most part there isn't a lot of good evidence they help patients. "The banking industry is highly regulated and I think for the better, so I don't know why we wouldn't accept independent regulation in this space," Dr Lensen says. City Fertility Group's Victorian Scientific Director Jayne Mullen wants patients to have confidence regardless of how big a clinic is, professionals are bound by strict accreditation and licensing requirements so any mistakes must be reported to health authorities. "We're continuously monitored and audited, we are obliged to report any serious adverse event," she says. The scientist is also fielding more calls than usual from concerned parents, offering to take them through laboratories. While fully confident in their use of electronic witnessing and human verification, she says the Monash IVF mix ups still cause her to pause and review protocols. "Doctors, nurses, scientists, everyone that's working in our IVF industry, we have the best of intentions, we want everyone to walk away with a happy, healthy baby," she says. "Mistakes are so rare." Both Ms Mullen and Ms Hiser find explaining safety controls has put many patients at ease, urging anyone still feeling nervous about treatments to reach out to their providers. "If they don't, say, have an electronic witnessing system in place ask them why don't you, why do my fees not cover you having this extra layer of security?" Ms Hiser says. "If you don't have that, fine, that's okay but tell me how you control (safety). "If you still have questions after that, then maybe ask yourself are they the people that I want to be doing my IVF journey with?"


West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Patients seek reassurances after IVF mix ups
Alarms firing off in an IVF lab as work grinds to a halt may sound like the start of a technology meltdown but at many of Australia's major fertility clinics it's actually a sign safety systems are kicking into gear. Known as electronic witnessing, the mechanism prevents tissue mix ups and involves multiple layers of identity-document checks by humans and computers. While rarely needed, it's a safeguard standard that's becoming the norm in an industry suddenly needing to win back public trust following revelations of two devastating errors at one of Australia's biggest facilities. The first saw a mother give birth to another couple's biological child after she was impregnated with the wrong embryo at Monash IVF in Brisbane some years ago. The other involved a woman incorrectly receiving her own embryo instead of one from her same-sex partner as requested, which happened at the company's Melbourne clinic earlier in June. The bungles have sparked a rush of patients reaching out to fertility clinics seeking reassurances about their own sperm, eggs, embryos and children. "At the moment, the trust in the industry has been eroded," says Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser. "It certainly opened up the conversation again. "I do believe those questions inherently are always there but it's probably made patients verbalise it a little." She's found explaining electronic and human witnessing practices at her own facility in Sydney have put patients' minds at ease but knows it will take time for confidence to return. Monash IVF has repeatedly apologised and vowed to introduce additional verification processes over and above normal practices. Official probes into what happened are under way, with the company yet to offer explanations for how the mix ups occurred beyond two ASX announcements. Pink Elephants Support Network chief operating officer Jen Tupaea is among many Monash IVF patients wanting to know more. She's noticed a general sense of uneasiness set in among IVF parents across Australia and believes patients need more reassurances that all due diligence is done. "There's already a lot of uncertainty and worry and sort of lack of control and I think this just adds another element to that," Ms Tupaea says. 'Patchwork' is a term often used to describe the 40-odd pieces of legislation affecting IVF in Australian states and territories. There's variations on anything from how long embryos can be stored to how many families can use the same sperm donor and even certain states banning overseas donor eggs. Until now, the industry has largely been left to regulate itself through yearly accreditations but the mix ups spurred health ministers including Victoria's Mary-Anne Thomas to unite behind a push to explore national regulation. It's something Pink Elephants supports, with Ms Tupaea describing IVF regulation as "a bit of a black box". She's aware of parents worried about what would happen if a similar devastating mix up occurred at a smaller clinic that doesn't have ASX reporting requirements. "The main concern when something like that comes up is, why are we hearing about it now, and what are we not hearing about?" she says. Australia's first IVF baby was born 45 years ago and now some 20,000 babies conceived through IVF are born here each year. Greater regulation is also something clinicians want, Ms Hiser explains. "We regulated ourselves because no one enforced it upon us and because we saw the need for patient safety," she says. "We've done a very good job of that up until now, and that's why I'm very curious to find out exactly what went wrong (at Monash IVF) because we're having a hard time ... understanding how it did happen." IVF researcher and University of Melbourne Senior Research Fellow Sarah Lensen wants any future regulation to also include greater monitoring of 'add-on' treatments. She specialises in evaluating their safety and effectiveness, saying for the most part there isn't a lot of good evidence they help patients. "The banking industry is highly regulated and I think for the better, so I don't know why we wouldn't accept independent regulation in this space," Dr Lensen says. City Fertility Group's Victorian Scientific Director Jayne Mullen wants patients to have confidence regardless of how big a clinic is, professionals are bound by strict accreditation and licensing requirements so any mistakes must be reported to health authorities. "We're continuously monitored and audited, we are obliged to report any serious adverse event," she says. The scientist is also fielding more calls than usual from concerned parents, offering to take them through laboratories. While fully confident in their use of electronic witnessing and human verification, she says the Monash IVF mix ups still cause her to pause and review protocols. "Doctors, nurses, scientists, everyone that's working in our IVF industry, we have the best of intentions, we want everyone to walk away with a happy, healthy baby," she says. "Mistakes are so rare." Both Ms Mullen and Ms Hiser find explaining safety controls has put many patients at ease, urging anyone still feeling nervous about treatments to reach out to their providers. "If they don't, say, have an electronic witnessing system in place ask them why don't you, why do my fees not cover you having this extra layer of security?" Ms Hiser says. "If you don't have that, fine, that's okay but tell me how you control (safety). "If you still have questions after that, then maybe ask yourself are they the people that I want to be doing my IVF journey with?"

ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Woman feels abandoned by WA health system amid year-long chronic pain battle
Jayde Guest spends most evenings in extreme pain. For almost a year, the mother of two from Esperance, 700 kilometres south-east of Perth, has barely been able to work or socialise. She feels as though her life has been stripped of all its best parts. "I'm at the end of my tether right now. "Day-to-day life is a real challenge." While she has turned to Western Australia's health system numerous times for help, she said the process had only compounded her suffering. The pain, which "feels like her chest wall is caving in", arrived out of the blue on a normal winter's morning. It has returned each day since, intensifying the more active she is and often becoming unbearable by night. Her doctor's first suspicion was cancer, as she had been in remission from an aggressive form called osteosarcoma for about 20 years. But the medical system was at a loss when tests ruled out cancer. She made the journey to Perth, seeing five different specialists on separate occasions, none of whom could produce the answers she sought. Ms Guest said she was then twice rejected from the WA Health Department's central referral service — designed to triage and allocate cases — and the hospital stopped calling her back. "I [was] in the too-hard basket," she said. Ms Guest said she turned to support groups on social media and sought out experts in London, America, Melbourne and Sydney. Finally, she found someone who might have an answer to her pain. During her previous bone cancer battle, she had five ribs removed and replaced with a Gore-Tex mesh. A doctor in Sydney believes the 20-year-old mesh is now shrinking and pulling against her chest wall. The doctor, who specialises in mesh removal, told Ms Guest they were confident of being able to remove hers but is still working out how to rebuild her chest wall. Ms Guest is relieved to have a way forward, but the wait continues as they work on a solution. She said the uncertainty of her experience felt harder than the 16 rounds of chemotherapy she endured in her 20s. "The lack of communication from the medical system has been really disappointing," she said. "And I think that's what makes people feel really alone. Clare Mullen, executive director at WA's Health Consumers Council, said experiences like Ms Guest's happened "too often". But Ms Mullen said cases involving regional patients and chronic pain could be particularly difficult. She said this was due to the disconnect between country GPs and metropolitan health professionals and the scepticism that could follow chronic pain. "Unfortunately, it's one of the areas where we see a lot of people having to convince the clinicians … that their pain is real." Ms Mullen said anyone feeling like their case was not progressing or who had been rejected from the service should contact the GP who made their first referral. "It's not ideal, particularly in a case like this [where] someone is living with chronic pain," she said. "It's a time-consuming process." Ms Mullen said if they still had no luck, they should contact the Health Consumers Council. Monika Boogs, chief executive of Pain Australia, said the number of Australians suffering chronic pain was about 3.7 million and growing. But Ms Boogs said there were only about 200 pain specialists in the country, with access proving particularly difficult for regional residents. She said a national action plan for pain management was done six years ago, but many programs were still unfunded. "Pain is like mental health was 20 years ago. It's something that's growing. It's impacting so many people," she said. WA Health Minister Meredith Hammat said the health system aimed to provide world-class care to all West Australians. "We will never stop working to advance the care our health system provides," she said. A WA Health spokesperson said initiatives were in progress to improve access to public specialist outpatient services. To help others, Ms Guest started blogging about her experience. She said she was a big believer in documenting experiences and helping others to advocate within the medical system. "By me sharing it, I've had people open up to me and hopefully I've helped them to see that they're not alone. "And Facebook groups, as much as they can be a little bit negative sometimes, I've found some great people and great friends going through similar things to me. "And that's definitely helped." Ms Guest said it also kept her sane, as the wait for a cure continued. "I think it's hard for people to understand because I look kind of normal, I don't walk around going, 'Oh, my gosh, I'm in so much pain.' "I just have to carry on."