Provincial deficits to narrow in coming years despite trade war: report
OTTAWA — Under pressure from the U.S. trade war and a slowing economy, Canada's provinces are all expected to run fiscal deficits this year — but a Conference Board of Canada report predicts those deficits will narrow in the coming years.
The report released Tuesday paints a picture of provinces struggling to balance their books.
Not long after emerging from a pandemic that caused deficits to balloon, Canada's provinces are now staring down the barrel of a trade war.
Most provinces have put up contingency funds in this year's budgets to support workers and critical industries through the tariff dispute.
Many are also aligning with the federal government to push forward major infrastructure projects in the coming years, putting pressure on capital spending.
Just as provinces are drawing down their coffers, they're also bracing for a hit to the economy.
'When we see a slowdown in economic activity, that leads to less job creation, less spending, less incomes and less corporate profits,' said Richard Forbes, principal economist at the Conference Board.
'And these are … major drivers of provincial revenues.'
Also hampering provincial revenues is a slowdown in population growth as Ottawa tamps down on the flow of immigration.
Many provinces are also facing demographic woes due to an aging population and baby boomers exiting the workforce — another drag on income tax revenue. A growing number of retirees also drives up demand for health-care spending.
Forbes said that with the federal government's new immigration caps, population growth is likely to hit a wall in the coming years. That would limit any relief newcomers offer the labour market as older Canadians exit the workforce.
The Conference Board report cites the example of Newfoundland and Labrador, which it says is expected to see its population shrink by 10,000 over the next five years. Quebec and most of the Maritimes are also expected to feel the 'sting' of an aging population, the report said.
Prince Edward Island, meanwhile, is experiencing the strongest population growth of any province in recent years. A 25-per cent increase in population over 10 years has helped to lower P.E.I.'s median age by 2.6 years, the report said.
The Conference Board's forecast assumes the economy contracted in the second quarter of the year as tariffs and uncertainty sank manufacturing activity. The think tank predicts a modest return to growth through the rest of the year.
At the tail end of the provinces' planning horizons, the Conference Board report sees governments reining in spending, which is expected to narrow those deficits by the end of the decade.
The federal government has announced plans to balance the operating side of its budget over the next three years. Forbes said he expects to see similar trimming by the provinces in areas such as public administration.
'Speaking broadly, of course, we are seeing provinces showing more prudence when it comes to their spending plans over the last couple of years,' he said.
Some provinces, including Saskatchewan and Alberta, are forecast to return to annual budget surpluses before 2030. The Conference Board says Canada's Prairie provinces are in relatively secure fiscal positions, thanks in part to younger demographics and some insulation from tariffs.
Provinces like Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador are expected to pivot their economies towards renewable energy in the years ahead, but Forbes noted that prospects for the oil and gas sector will continue to weigh heavily on the fiscal outlooks in those provinces.
Ontario is also expected to see a balanced budget by the end of the decade. The Conference Board says accelerated infrastructure spending will drive up debt in the short term but planned moderation in health care and education expenditures will support deficit elimination.
Quebec is in a 'difficult position,' the report says, with the province particularly penned in by weak demographic momentum, heightened economic uncertainty and growing demand for health-care and education spending.
But the Conference Board says Quebec can find its way back to a modest surplus by 2029 if the province can deliver on spending restraint.
British Columbia also faces a steep deficit, the Conference Board says, but a slowdown in spending and rising natural gas royalties are expected to help it climb out of that fiscal hole in the coming years.
The federal government's infrastructure agenda could also be a boon for the province, the report notes.
While New Brunswick is praised in the report for its displays of fiscal restraint in recent years, the Conference Board points to an aging population and the forestry industry's tariff exposure as serious revenue challenges.
Nova Scotia is also expected to face challenges tied to a slowing economy, particularly as a lack of private sector investment and housing activity weigh on growth.
Forbes said that while the Conference Board's forecast assumes trade uncertainty will diminish next year, the provinces' fiscal pictures could deteriorate further if Canada's tariff dispute with the United States persists.
Part of the value of the Conference Board's exercise is that it puts all provincial budget plans through a uniform scenario, he said — unlike the various hypotheticals that underpin each individual province's spending plan.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025.
Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
27 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Donald Trump's next target could be deal that shields most Canadian imports from tariffs, experts warn
Canada's biggest shield against U.S. tariffs is still intact after Donald Trump's latest trade deadline, but that could change by next year, experts warn, as Prime Minister Mark Carney prepares for a new round of talks with the mercurial American president. While Trump raised the tariff on Canadian goods to 35 per cent in an executive order Thursday night, an exemption for goods which comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) was maintained. The order was signed after Ottawa and Washington failed to reach an economic and security deal.
National Post
27 minutes ago
- National Post
Adam Zivo: Media miss the mark on case of non-binary American fighting deportation from Canada
Earlier this month, a federal judge paused the deportation of Angel Jenkel, a non-binary American, after determining that the immigration officer evaluating their case failed to properly consider the Trump administration's recent transgender policies. The ruling was narrowly focused on procedural fairness and was agnostic about whether non-binary people actually face persecution in the United States. Nonetheless, some Canadian media outlets misleadingly implied that the judge had found that gender minorities are intolerably unsafe in the United States. Article content Article content While activists have celebrated Jenkel's story as a victory for LGBTQ rights, what we have here is a case study of poor journalism. Article content Article content Jenkel, a 24-year-old multimedia artist from Minnesota, arrived in Canada in August 2022 on a six-month visitor visa to spend time with their then-boyfriend, now common-law spouse, in Thunder Bay, Ont. During this visit, the spouse's epilepsy suddenly worsened, causing frequent grand mal seizures that led Jenkel to become his primary source of at-home care. Article content Jenkel told the Times Colonist this month that, although they had originally planned to leave before their visa expired in February 2023, they 'lost track of time' for two whole years due to their caregiving duties. Being the spouse of a Canadian, they could have applied for permanent residency during this period, but failed to do so. As such, the Canada Border Services Agency summoned Jenkel for an interview this February and issued a deportation order a month later. Article content Article content Jenkel subsequently asked for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA), which is a mechanism that allows individuals facing deportation to stay in Canada if they have a well-founded belief that they will face persecution, torture or other serious harms in their home country. Article content While a PRRA is not the same as a refugee claim, the two systems overlap considerably. Uniquely, a PRRA can grant protection to individuals who, despite not counting as refugees, face special personal dangers in their home country — e.g. in 2024, an applicant avoided deportation to El Salvador because gang members there had been targeting him. However, a PRRA may also grant protection to individuals who are found to meet the definition of a refugee. In this case, the applicant does not need to show that they have experienced any specific threats, as general persecution of their minority group is sufficiently dangerous. Article content Ultimately, an immigration officer determined that Jenkel could not demonstrate that they would face the general risks needed to justify refugee status, nor the personalized risks that would justify non-refugee protection. However, in making this determination, the officer made a grave procedural error.
National Post
27 minutes ago
- National Post
Terry Glavin: Is Trump's lionization of James Polk an ominous sign of things to come?
Shortly after his January inauguration, U.S. President Donald Trump made the peculiar decision to remove a portrait of the great Thomas Jefferson from the Oval Office and replace it with a portrait of James Polk. Article content Jefferson was the primary author of the Declaration of Independence and the third American president. Polk, the eleventh president, launched the Mexican-American War and expanded the reach of American sovereignty from what is now Texas to Washington State, and from Wyoming to California. Article content Article content Article content This history is directly relevant to the origins of British Columbia's August holiday weekend, which uniquely intertwines the August 1 celebration of Emancipation Day, commemorating the end of slavery in the British Empire in 1834, and the establishment of the Crown Colony of British Columbia, on August 2, 1858. Article content Article content The story is about how Canada very nearly lost the opportunity to extend its dominion from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. It was a very close call, and it's an instructive lesson in the radical differences between Canada and the United States — differences that tend to get completely papered over by the current fashion for historical revisionism and the stupidity of the 'settler colonialism' paradigm. Article content The thing about Trump is that, in his persistent expressions of territorial covetousness — most exuberantly in his public meditations on taking Greenland by military force and annexing Canada as the 51st state by economic coercion — you never really know if he's being serious or if he's just being a jackass. Article content Article content In determining Trump's preference for Polk over Jefferson, for instance, there are a couple of explanations. Article content Article content The first is his admiration for Polk as 'sort of a real estate guy,' and his esteem for Polk because ' he got a lot of land.' It could also be because he found the frame around Polk's portrait more pleasing than the frame around Jefferson's. 'I'm a frame person,' Trump told a cabinet meeting in early July. 'Sometimes I like frames more than I like the pictures.' Article content It has become commonplace to frame British Columbia's colonial origin as an unwelcome intrusion of a foreign power to force the displacement of Indigenous peoples in a process of ongoing, systemic genocide. This is an interpretive paradigm that has the disadvantage of being untrue, masochistic, and fatally corrosive to the persistence of distinctly Canadian comprehensions of sovereignty and nationhood. It also deliberately elides the profound differences between Canada's westward expansion and the way Americans behaved themselves south of the 49th parallel. Article content How British Columbia comes into this story is in Polk's covetousness of the Pacific Northwest, which was known then as the Columbia Territory. Article content An ardent disciple of the American notion of 'manifest destiny,' Polk had campaigned on the slogan ' 54-40 or Fight,' which declared an intention to displace British sovereignty West of the Rockies as far North as the Russian possessions in Alaska, at 54 degrees, forty minutes of latitude. Article content Polk very nearly succeeded. Coupled with American encroachment into the British fur trade realms of what is now Montana, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, Polk's belligerence induced the British colonial office to capitulate with the Oregon Treaty of 1846. The treaty sliced the old Columbia Territory in half by extending the 49th parallel from the Rockies to the Pacific. Article content The treaty forced the Northward migration of thousands of settlers, traders and adventurers under British dominion. They were Orkney Islanders, Scotsmen and Englishmen, Iroquois freemen, Quebecois voltigeurs, 'King George Indians' from a variety of western tribes, and Kanakas, as the Hudson's Bay Company's Hawaiian workers were then known. They would go on to become the first British Columbians. Article content Article content Led by the HBC's James Douglas, who would end up the governor of both the colonies of Vancouver Island and British Columbia, a new and thriving multicultural society sprung up around Fort Camosun, now Victoria, where they'd been welcomed by the local Saanich ad Songhees tribes. Article content Below the 49th parallel, the British and Canadian exodus opened the gates to genocide and anarchy: The Cayuse War, the Klamath War, the Salmon River War, the Yakima War and the Nisqually War. Article content Absolutely nothing remotely like this occurred in the settlement of the Canadian West. For all the injustices and travesties of marginalization, and taking into account the Red River Rebellion and the Northwest Rebellion, it was mostly a collaborative affair between Euro-Canadians, Métis and Indigenous people. Article content The Vancouver Island colony bore absolutely no resemblance to the settlements in the American West. Douglas was a West Indian, as the HBC called him, or an 'octoroon' owing to his mixed Scots and Creole ancestry. His wife, Amelia, was the daughter of a Cree woman and the Irish HBC official William Connolly. South of the 49th parallel, Black people were denied American citizenship. Douglas invited hundreds of Black people North. Article content Meanwhile, wholeheartedly supported by the American slave states, Polk decided to take by force all the Mexican territories North of the Rio Grande in a war that unfolded in unspeakable cruelty. The abolitionist Abraham Lincoln was against the war, and General Ulysses S. Grant, who would go on to succeed the assassinated Lincoln, said he was ashamed of his role as a young soldier on the Mexican frontier. 'I had not moral courage enough to resign,' he once confessed. Article content Two years after the Oregon Treaty of 1846, the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe, which ended the Mexican war, ushered in the same ghastly progression of mass murders and shooting sprees: The Yavapai slaughter, the Sand Creek Massacre, the Mendocino War, the Yuki genocide, the Snake River War, the Colorado War, and on and on. It was a tidal wave of hideous crimes against humanity that lasted decades. That's how the American West was 'won.' It's also how the territory that came to be called British Columbia was very nearly lost. Article content By the late 1850s, American miners were streaming North across the 49th parallel, headed to the Fraser Canyon in a mania for gold. Upon arriving by ship at Victoria, they were greeted by the First African Rifles — a regiment of armed Black men. In Victoria, Emancipation Day was already a civic holiday, although it was more than a century before either B.C. or Canada formally celebrated it. Article content In the Fraser Canyon, the Americans had formed themselves into militias, and scores of dead began to pile up in their encounters with local Indigenous miners. So, Douglas took matters into his own hands, and at Fort Langley, on August 2, 1858, Douglas unilaterally declared the establishment of the Crown Colony of British Columbia. Article content The following year, 1859, an American insurrection very nearly broke out in Yale, in the Canyon, when a Black man filed assault charges against an American. Governor Douglas put down the revolt, but was immediately seized of another crisis, on San Juan Island. Article content In a petty dispute over the shooting of a pig, American troops commanded by the notorious General William Harney invaded the island and settled in for a siege, awaiting orders. Harney was one of the worst war criminals in the US military at the time. His instructions to his troops as they were exterminating the Lipan and Caddo tribes were to 'exterminate all the men and make the women and children prisoners.' Their villages were to be looted and burned. Article content Fortunately, however, by 1859, the presidency had gone to James Buchanan, who was preoccupied by tensions that would soon erupt in the war to free the slaves. The dispute on San Juan Island, ostensibly about the trajectory of the border between the islands, was given over to arbitration. Article content
