
Paranoid Cove man turned from boyfriend to relentless stalker
Martin Gray, 43, was described as displaying a concerning pattern of behaviour towards the woman, whom he had briefly dated.
Aberdeen Sheriff Court was told Gray – who has previous convictions relating to women – had only been seeing his victim for less than a fortnight when his jealous and paranoid behaviour began to emerge.
Fiscal depute Sophia Ramzan told the court early in the relationship, on July 13 2023, Gray was repeatedly calling the woman's phone at 7.15am from outside her flat.
When he wasn't able to get her, he called the woman's sister in the hope she would be able to wake her up.
The woman woke up to numerous missed calls and was given a row by Gray for having her phone on silent and her lack of contact.
The court heard also that when the woman went on a solo spa weekend to Dunkeld, Gray demanded that she make a panoramic video to prove to him she was there alone.
She told him he was 'paranoid' and hung up the phone.
Similarly, when she went on a trip to Kilmarnock to see friends a week later, Gray began calling her incessantly.
When she complained about his behaviour, Gray told her she should be 'putting him first and that he wasn't going to be put second'.
Following this, the woman received a series of messages from Gray, telling her to 'always' answer his phone calls and stop prioritising her friends over him.
That evening Gray called the woman numerous times and sent her numerous texts before repeatedly calling her friends.
He also told her to 'get her f****** a**e up the road'.
'The complainer was described as being distraught by the situation,' Ms Ramzan said, adding that the woman 'struggled to sleep and was distressed throughout the night.'
She received a series of voice messages and missed calls from Gray throughout the night.
On July 21, Gray's attentions turned to the woman's family members.
They began receiving long and 'rambling' voice messages from Gray about her behaviour and who she was 'hanging around with'.
The following day, the woman informed Gray that she no longer wanted to be in a relationship with him.
However, he was not satisfied with this, Ms Ramzan said, telling the woman he would 'see her soon', as well as sending her messages noting his displeasure at her decision.
Gray then sent five Facebook messages to a male family member, stating that the woman had 'blocked him' and 'what the hell is going on?'
He continued to bombard the woman through various means, including email, and message her friends, calling her a 'lying s***'.
The messages and voice notes continued, with Gray demanding to meet face-to-face and 'then he would go'.
The police were contacted and Gray was arrested.
In the dock Gray, of Langdykes Drive, Cove, admitted one charge of engaging in a course of conduct that caused fear and alarm to his victim.
Defence solicitor Emily Bruce told the court that her client had believed the relationship to be a 'happy relationship' but that that had quickly changed.
'Mr Gray knows that what happened then went horribly over the score,' the solicitor said, adding that her client does have 'mental health difficulties'.
'Some of this exhibits as obsessive-compulsive behaviour and he struggles to manage his emotions,' Ms Bruce continued.
'Nevertheless, Mr Gray does take full responsibility for his actions.'
Sheriff Johnston described Gray's offences as 'extremely concerning', especially given the context of his other domestic offending that involved another woman.
'This is a serious charge of stalking,' she said. 'You have made a huge number of contacts with the complainer and people close to her.
'I could easily be imposing a custodial sentence today and I don't think you really understand that.'
As an alternative to a prison sentence, Sheriff Johnston sentenced Gray to a community payback order with supervision for two years and ordered him to carry out 180 hours of unpaid work.
Due to the 'pattern of behaviour that is emerging', the sheriff also made Gray subject to a domestic abuse programme and put a non-harassment order in place, meaning he cannot approach his victim for five years.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Woman arrested in dawn raid by Met Police in a riot van after Facebook post about her cop ex-boyfriend in group warning of men's 'red flag behaviour'
A woman was arrested by police in a riot van at dawn after she posted about her ex-boyfriend, a serving Metropolitan Police officer, in a Facebook group warning of men's 'red flag behaviour'. Sarah, whose name has been changed to protect her identity, had been told by a friend about a Facebook post in a local group which warned about the behaviour of men they have dated. The post reportedly was about her ex-partner and Sarah commented to say that she and him were together for almost five years before he cheated on her and 'gaslit' her. She then wrote her own post in the group on May 6 saying she wanted to warn other women about his behaviour. Sarah told The Guardian that she found out more information about her ex-boyfriend's behaviour through the group and subsequently sent him two messages. She called him a 'pussy' and blocked his number. On May 13, Sarah was awoken at 4.45am to police officers at her door in a dawn raid. She heard a knock on the door and three police officers told her she was being arrested for alleged harassment. She said: 'I knew instantly that it was him.' 'They took me in, they took my phone, they took my computer, they put me in the back of a van.' Sarah was questioned about the messages and her Facebook posts during 12 hours in police custody. She did not dispute any of the evidence which was put to her by the officers. She said: 'I've got nothing to hide. I'm not ashamed of what I've done. I'm doing it to protect women, and if I can just save one woman going through what I've gone through, then I've done something.' She said police asked her if it was true she had called her ex 'a pussy'. She replied: 'I was like, yeah, you can't arrest me for calling someone a pussy, that's ridiculous.' She was released without charge. Sarah said her duty solicitor agreed that she would not have been arrested if her ex was not a police officer. After her release, Sarah was served with civil court papers saying her ex-partner was seeking a non-molestation order. The court rejected her partner's application and expressed concern about an 'abuse of power' when Sarah was arrested at 4.45am by police officers in a riot van as well as a 'request for a detective' to personally serve him. Court papers said the application related to a single Facebook post and no other allegations had been raised. Sarah made a formal complaint to police, saying her ex-boyfriend had abused his power. Nine months later, the complaint was rejected by the Metropolitan Police. In the investigation, her ex-partner said he reported her behaviour as she had shared the police station which he worked at. Sarah said the ordeal has left her having panic attacks when she sees police officers in the street. A Metropolitan police spokesperson said: 'In May 2024 officers arrested a 39-year-old woman on suspicion of harassment. After an interview under caution, she was released without further action. 'Subsequently, allegations were made relating to an abuse of power by a serving Met officer. These were formally investigated and found to be unsubstantiated. 'The action taken in this case was considered to be necessary, proportionate and compliant with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act as officers need to conduct prompt and effective investigations.'


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Can't Look Away review – a harrowing, heartbreaking indictment of social media's ruthlessness
'Tweens are herd animals' and have 'an addicts' narrative', according to internal documents revealed by a Facebook whistleblower to congress, making clear the levels of cynicism and obfuscation the company operates with in its quest to hook young people to its platform. Bad though that is, it's not the worst example in this lucidly laid out and often harrowing indictment of social media's ruthlessness; that would be the proliferation of drug dealers on Snapchat, which the company seems to have to some extent turned a blind eye to in the scramble to expand its user base. Based on the investigative work of Bloomberg journalist Olivia Carville, this film covers the attempts of minnow legal outfit Social Media Victims Law Center to net the sharks of Silicon Valley. It represents a host of families who have suffered heartbreaking losses due to unpoliced extreme online content: children and teenagers who fatally copied auto-asphyxiation or pro-suicide videos, ones who killed themselves after falling victim to sextortionists, or who overdosed after buying off-prescription meds from predatory dealers. The battle here is to overcome section 230, a get-out clause in the 1996 Telecommunication Act that gives social media companies immunity for third-party-generated content. Of course, Mark Zuckerberg was still slurping Slush Puppies back then. Matthew Bergman, the center's founder, twice makes the analogy with cigarette companies, arguing that social media companies knowingly prioritise profit over the health of their users. If the film is clear about this causation and the resulting damage, it is not a given that the team can make a longer leap: from establishing a degree of culpability in individual cases and getting justice and closure for these families, to proving that the tech companies systematically predicate their algorithms on fanning our most negative tendencies and impulses. The big victory here is stopping the Snapchat case being dismissed due to section 230; more of a minor triumph that shows the scale of the mountain, but you have to start somewhere. This is a vital piece of public-interest journalism clearly spelling out what we all vaguely intuited. Can't Look Away is in UK cinemas and on Jolt from 8 August In the UK, the youth suicide charity Papyrus can be contacted on 0800 068 4141 or email pat@ and in the UK and Ireland Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is at 988 or chat for support. You can also text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis text line counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at

South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
'Social media giants must obey new law' says RSPCA
The charity claims social media companies, particularly Facebook, are not putting enough resources into ensuring content containing animal cruelty is not being posted or is swiftly removed. The RSPCA is working closely with OfCom to ensure harmful content is removed and will be monitoring the impact of the Online Safety Act 2023 over the next year. From January to May this year, the charity saw 133 reports compared to 104 from the same time period last year. It has received 2,600 reports of cruelty on social media over the last six years and there was an eight per cent increase in cruelty reports from 2023 to 2024. The Online Safety Act 2023 aims to crackdown on social media content glorifying animal abuse for likes and shares - and to protect children and adults from viewing harmful content. Under the new law, enforceable by OfCom, social media platforms had to remove this content from March 17, 2025. David Bowles, head of public affairs at the RSPCA, said: 'It's incredibly worrying to see that reports made to us about cruelty on social media have been increasing and this highlights the progress that social media companies need to make to become compliant with the new law which makes it an offence to post content showing animal cruelty online." Some of the cases reported to the RSPCA include a wild rat placed inside a cage and drowned in a bucket of water - with the video posted on Facebook, a video posted on Facebook showing a woman pouring shampoo into a Koi pond and a TikTok video of a cat being picked up by its neck and thrown roughly into a cage.