Brazil still waiting for US reply to May trade proposal, vice president says
Speaking to reporters at the presidential palace, Alckmin said President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had set up a task force to start discussing a response with business leaders on Tuesday.
Last week, Trump imposed what he called a reciprocal tariff targeting Latin America's largest economy, rising to 50% from 10% starting in August, and demanded an end to the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro for allegedly plotting a coup.
Alckmin added on Monday that the Brazilian government would also seek talks with U.S. companies affected by the measure.
He said the government had not yet asked for a delay or reduction in the new tariffs after Trump's announcement, but was instead engaging with the most-affected industries to ensure the private sector mobilizes and coordinates with U.S. counterparts to help reverse Trump's measure.
Lula will sign on Monday a decree setting criteria for his government's response to foreign trade measures hurting the Brazilian economy, his chief of staff Rui Costa told journalists earlier in the day.
His decree regulating the trade reciprocity law, which Brazil's Congress passed in April, should be published in the official gazette on Tuesday, Costa added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
The shrinking circle of support: Here are the few Republicans defending Trump and Bondi over Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and death in prison have been central to the years-long, overlapping conspiracy theories that have put the world's most powerful people at the center of an alleged criminal network of traffickers and child predators. Epstein's case and the conspiracy theories surrounding it were welcomed by Donald Trump's campaigns, with supporters and prominent right-wing media figures demanding the president expose the alleged cabal fueling Epstein's criminal enterprise. But now the president dismisses Epstein's case as a 'hoax,' a 'scam,' and 'bull****', and even asked a room of reporters why anyone is 'still talking' about a sex offender 'nobody cares about.' His dismissive statements — and statements from Department of Justice and FBI officials affirming Epstein died by suicide and that no such 'client list' exists — have triggered a civil war among the president's supporters and a constellation of right-wing figures wondering whether Trump has something to hide. The White House handed over binders of previously disclosed Epstein-related documents to several far-right influencers earlier this year in an apparent effort to prove that the administration was listening to them. But the administration has since reversed course, and the people who once believed Trump would hold Epstein's network accountable are now blaming the president, administration officials or unseen government figures for failing them. Who is sticking with Trump? While Trump repeatedly tries to get his supporters to talk about anything else, top officials at the Justice Department and FBI aren't entertaining questions about ruptures in Trumpworld and criticisms over their handling of the case. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News that Epstein's client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' She later clarified that she was broadly referencing the case files, and she has since brushed aside questions about the case and in-fighting among Trump's allies about their release. 'We're going to fight to keep America safe again and we're fighting together as a team. That's what's so important right now,' she told reporters this week. Trump has also told reporters that Bondi has 'handled that very well' and said she should release 'whatever she thinks is credible.' 'She's really done a very good job,' Trump said Tuesday. 'I think when you look at it, you'll understand that.' In a post on X, FBI director Kash Patel said 'the conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been.' 'It's an honor to serve the President of the United States … and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me,' he said. Last year, podcaster Dan Bongino — now Patel's deputy director — said he didn't trust 'any story they tell me about Jeffrey Epstein.' 'There is a reason this client list is hidden,' he said at the time. He was reportedly 'out of control furious' and threatened to quit over mounting frustrations with the case, but Trump has since called him 'a very good guy.' 'I like Dan,' Trump told reporters this week. Some prominent right-wing figures and influencers who made their names amplifying conspiracy theories to support the president's agenda appear satisfied with Trump's word. 'Even though there are unanswered questions about Epstein, it is in fact time to move on,' Dinesh D'Souza said on his podcast. Activist Charlie Kirk similarly said on Monday he's 'done talking about Epstein for the time being.' 'I'm going to trust my friends in the administration,' said Kirk, specifically naming Bondi, Bongino, Patel and deputy attorney general Todd Blache. 'I'm going to trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, ball's in their hands.' House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan also said he has 'confidence in President Trump' and defended Blanche, Bondi, Bongino and Patel. He said he has 'total confidence' in the administration. Who wants accountability? But many other Republican members of Congress including Trump's staunchest allies aren't satisfied. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he is for 'full transparency' and suggested the Justice Department should 'put everything out there and let the people decide it.' Other prominent far-right lawmakers like Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Anna Paulina Luna and Nancy Mace, among others, are also demanding those documents. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina was among representatives who voted with Democrats to try to forced the Justice Department to release more information on the case. 'I think that the American people need to see what's in there, and that's not hard to understand. Across the board, government's supposed to work for us,' Norman told CNN. 'If there's nothing there, show the blank sheet.' After saying he was 'done' with Epstein, Charlie Kirk later said his full remarks were taken out of context, and he has pushed for the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony Far-right influencers Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, Matt Walsh, Jack Posobiec and Benny Johnson have also remained skeptical of the administration's narrative, and Johnson said on X that 'powerful MAGA voices' should be credited with pressuring the administration to change its approach. Laura Loomer has called on Bondi to resign, warning that her handling of the Epstein case threatens to 'consume' Trump's presidency. Who blames Trump? Elon Musk dropped a bomb in the middle of his feud with the president over a megabill moving through Congress, stating on X that Trump is 'in the Epstein files.' 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he wrote last month. Last week, he posted 'What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again,' with a graphic that read 'The Official Jeffrey Epstein Pedophile Arrest Counter' with several zeroes underneath it. This week, he mocked Trump's claim that the case is a 'hoax.' 'Wow, amazing that Epstein 'killed himself' and Ghislaine is in federal prison for a hoax,' said Musk, referencing Epstein's associate Ghislane Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison after she was found guilty of child sex trafficking and other offences. 'He should just release the files and point out which part is the hoax,' Musk added. Other Trump loyalists have wondered why the president is risking his presidency on his resistance his supporters' demands. 'Why is 47 making the worst moves of his tenure in the last 9 years?' Alex Jones asked on X. Far-right commentator Wayne Allyn Root also pleaded with Trump on X to 'just release' the files. 'Best 6 months for any president in history. Everything he's doing is fantastic. Why risk it all on this stupid file?' he wrote. And who blames the 'deep state' — or Democrats? While prominent voices on the right are demanding more from the Justice Department, they have also suggested that they believe the Trump administration is not solely to blame, reviving long-brewing conspiracy theories that Democratic officials and rogue prosecutors have destroyed evidence or otherwise interfered with the Epstein investigation. Trump himself claimed the case was somehow 'made up' by President Barack Obama and former FBI director James Comey. Epstein was arrested in 2019 during Trump's first administration, and he was found dead that same year in his jail cell. That day, Trump shared a social media post claiming Bill Clinton was involved. 'I want a full investigation, and that's what I absolutely am demanding,' Trump told reporters at the time. 'Was it suicide? Was he killed?' he told Axios in 2020. Longtime Republican operative and Trump ally Roger Stone said Patel is 'telling us the truth' and believes former FBI director Christopher Wray and the Joe Biden-era Justice Department 'destroyed' evidence. Former White House adviser Steve Bannon has gestured to the wider conspiracy theory environment surrounding the Epstein case and its links to QAnon and an alleged 'deep state' threatening Trump's agenda. 'In that arc of looking at how the deep state has tried to stop Trump and the MAGA movement, you can easily fit in,' Bannon told a crowd at a Turning Point US conference this week. 'Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things,' he said. 'Not just individuals, but also institutions. Intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and who was working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.'
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Homeland security officials defend immigration court arrests after being sued
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Thursday defended its policy of having Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrest people at their immigration court hearings after a class-action lawsuit was filed that seeks to stop the practice. The lawsuit filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the agency and ICE says the arrests of thousands of people at court have stripped them of rights afforded to them under immigration law and the U.S. Constitution. Tricia McLaughlin, Homeland Security assistant secretary for public affairs, told The Associated Press on Thursday that arresting people at immigration court is safer for law enforcement officers because the immigrants have gone through security and were screened for weapons. It also conserves law enforcement resources 'because they already know where a target will be," she said. 'We aren't some medieval kingdom, there are no legal sanctuaries where you can hide and avoid the consequences for breaking the law,' McLaughlin said in an email. 'Nothing in the constitution prohibits arresting a lawbreaker where you find them.' The large-scale immigration court arrests that began in May have unleashed fear among asylum-seekers and immigrants. In what has become a familiar scene, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings against an immigrant while ICE officers wait in the hallway to take them into custody. They're then moved to an expedited removal process. Keren Zwick, director of the National Immigrant Justice Center, one of the organizations that filed the lawsuit, said the immigrants who are being arrested at courts are following the law by appearing at their required hearings. Instead, they face detention for abiding by the rules. If a person fails to show up for their court hearing, the judge will issue an order for them to be removed in absentia. The lawsuit represents 12 people who have been arrested at court hearings, along with the Immigrant Advocates Response Collaborative and American Gateways, which provide legal services to people who face potential arrest and deportation when attending court. The immigrants, identified in the lawsuit by their initials, came to the U.S. from Venezuela, the Chechen Republic, Cuba, Ecuador, Liberia and the Republic of Guinea. Many faced persecution, political retaliation, or were kidnapped and assaulted. They had sought asylum through the legal process, but their requests were quashed when the government lawyer dismissed their case and they were placed on expeditated removal. Homeland Security officials say if a person has a credible fear claim, they can continue their immigration proceedings in detention, but if the claim is found uncredible, they'll be subject to swift deportation. Edna Yang, co-executive director of American Gateways, said the lawsuit seeks to challenge the unconstitutional practice of arresting these immigrants and defend their right to be heard in a court of law.
Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
L3Harris unveils new long-range missile with eye on China in the Pacific
WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - L3Harris Technologies (LHX.N), opens new tab has unveiled two new missiles that aim to provide less expensive long-range strike options for the U.S. military as it restocks its supplies while looking for arms to deter China's ambitions in the Pacific. The "Red Wolf" and "Green Wolf" missile launch comes as the concept of "affordable mass" has gained prominence due to the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel, which have underscored the need for plentiful, cost-effective weapons. This strategy focuses on having a large number of relatively inexpensive munitions ready for deployment, ensuring military readiness and adaptability. These multi-role missiles with a range of more than 200 nautical miles can hit moving targets like ships, such as in the Pacific Ocean where range is important. Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab and RTX (RTX.N), opens new tab currently dominate the space in the U.S. market. The most basic version of L3's new missile would cost in the $300,000-range once production has reached full rate, L3 executives told Reuters in an interview. Currently, the low-rate initial production run is being generated in Ashburn, Virginia, with the customers like the Pentagon eyeing buying about 1,000 per year, L3 executives said. The Red Wolf is a traditional missile focused on long-range precision strikes, while the Green Wolf specializes in electronic warfare, equipped with capabilities for electronic attack and intelligence gathering. L3Harris has conducted over 40 successful test flights, demonstrating the reliability and effectiveness of these systems.
