
The benefits Bill debacle offered a valuable lesson for politicians
Terence Gabriel
Herne Bay, Kent
SIR – The inevitable consequence of Sir Keir Starmer's latest U-turn on benefits is that the 'working people' he is allegedly anxious to represent are going to have to pay for it.
David Nunn
West Malling, Kent
SIR – According to figures from the Office for National Statistics, the Government borrows about £285,000 (and rising) every single minute, £200,000 of which (also rising) is immediately used to pay interest on the nation's debt. The remainder doesn't even account for the cost of disability benefit (about £105,000 a minute).
Advice to those in financial trouble would be categorical: maxing out the credit card and borrowing to pay interest has no future, and has to stop.
Set against this, the emotional – some might say hysterical – contributions from several MPs to Tuesday's welfare debate in the House of Commons could be viewed as reckless.
If the Prime Minister, who claims he finds it easy to be ruthless, is incapable of convincing his MPs to show financial restraint, he is failing this great nation – and I fear we all face a very dark future as a consequence.
Robert Jowitt
Dulverton, Somerset
SIR – We have been told countless times of the £22 billion 'black hole' inherited by the Labour Government after 14 years of Conservative rule.
It is worth noting that, in that time, the Tories had to find funds to restore the economy after the last Labour government departed, as well as meet the costs arising from the Covid pandemic and the Ukraine war.
Now you report (June 29) that the Government's many U-turns have added to a £40 billion 'black hole', which the Chancellor needs to fill at the next Budget . This was before the announcement of the latest amendments to the benefits Bill.
So, in her first year, Rachel Reeves has managed to turn a 'black hole' of £22 billion into one of more than £40 billion. One wonders how soon this Labour Government, like its predecessor, will have to admit that there's no money left.
In the meantime, how much more damage will be inflicted upon the British economy?
Adam Massingham
Ashford, Kent
Connolly's conviction
SIR – Apart from the severity of the sentence, which our judicial establishment is yet to justify, to my mind there are two problems with Lucy Connolly's 'incitement' conviction ('Beware calls to change British justice in the wake of the Lucy Connolly case', Letters, June 29).
The first is that Mrs Connolly, upon reflection, deleted the offending tweet. This seems to confirm that there was no intention to incite. Unless the deletion was merely a tactic, I believe that most jurors would struggle to find the defendant guilty.
Secondly, one might expect a minimal requirement for a conviction to be that the Crown Prosecution Service should provide evidence that someone was incited. Has anyone convicted of crime in the post-Southport chaos cited Mrs Connolly's contribution as a motivator?
Without such evidence, Mrs Connolly seems to stand accused of a fantasy crime, and is now suffering the consequences of a judgment that is at odds with most people's understanding of British justice.
The criminal hurdle of 'beyond reasonable doubt' has not even been approached, let alone overcome, in my opinion.
Jeremy Hosking
Bantry, Co Cork, Ireland
VAT on school fees
SIR – The decision to add VAT to independent school fees was originally framed as a targeted measure to support state education, with the revenue ringfenced for that purpose. More recently, however, the Prime Minister has described this policy as a 'tough decision' that underpins the largest investment in affordable housing in a generation.
Given that the projected income from VAT on school fees was £1.5 billion, it is surprising to hear it linked to a £39 billion housing programme, as well as to the recruitment of 6,500 new teachers and the expansion of free school meals. The scale of return being attributed to this policy appears ambitious.
Meanwhile, just six months into implementation, estimates of the number of pupils leaving the independent sector have risen from 3,000 to more than 11,000. That means thousands of families are no longer paying VAT, and are instead entering a state system already under strain.
The resulting disruption in the independent sector is no longer hypothetical. Several schools have closed, and prominent institutions across the UK are being taken over by private investors. Is this the intended consequence of the policy?
If difficult decisions must be taken, surely it is reasonable to ask whether they are producing meaningful outcomes. In this case, many in the education sector are wondering if the social and financial cost of disruption is proportionate to the return.
Andrew J McGarva
Rector, Morrison's Academy
Crieff, Perthshire
SIR – Regarding Rhidian Llewellyn's letter (July 1), perhaps the money used to fund cricket bursaries for non-academic pupils to attend public schools could be better spent on encouraging pupils at state schools to play cricket.
Susan A Smith
Ashburnham, East Sussex
Heatwave hysterics
SIR – I totally agree with Philip Johntson ('Welfarism has made Britain so soft we can't even handle a heatwave', Comment, July 2).
When I was five or six, I was often sent away to my grandparents for the summer, either in London or Bournemouth. I recall running around in the heat, which I understood from my grandparents was 'nearly 100 degrees' (Fahrenheit, of course). There was no need for expensive bottled water, as most parks had at least one drinking fountain. These have sadly been done away with.
It's time the Met Office stopped issuing panic-stricken warnings.
Mike Salter
Aberdeen
SIR – The BBC weather forecast, once the most gentle adjunct to the news, has over the past 10 years become an intense drama, where death and destruction are predicted on an almost daily basis.
Those who have worked in the hotter parts of the world, or travelled to countries nearer the equator, must be bemused by the dire warnings given out when temperatures are due to rise to the low thirties.
Perhaps the Government should introduce a summer cooling allowance for the frail and elderly, as air-conditioning is very expensive to install and run.
Brian Farmer
Carmarthen
SIR – I was astounded to read of the 'heat strike' motion put forward by members of the British Medical Association (BMA), demanding that NHS staff should not be forced to work in conditions above a certain temperature (report, June 20). Unfortunately, patients do not stop being ill in hot weather.
As a veteran of the Royal Army Medical Corps, I think of our motto, In Arduis Fidelis (faithful in adversity). Perhaps those in the medical profession who want to desert their patients should ponder these words, and demonstrate a little more commitment and resilience for their patients.
Mike Gillingham
Chelmsford, Essex
Power of tablecloths
SIR – The decline in restaurant standards (Letters, June 29) started when tablecloths were removed.
Dining at a bare table smacks of the canteen or public bar, and leads to quick eating. This may be convenient, but there are times when only the grace of a properly set table, laid with cloth, real flowers, large napkins, sparkling glasses and several pieces of cutlery, including a dessert fork, will do.
Trying to find a restaurant that provides such an arrangement can take considerable effort. A recent attempt was unsuccessful, so we settled for lunch at a five-star hotel to celebrate a family event – with a bare, incompletely set table. It did not enhance our dining experience, and we will not return.
Heather Erridge
Weston-super-Mare, Somerset
SIR – During a visit to Simpson's in the Strand many years ago, one of my lunch guests asked for steak tartare (Letters, June 29), but added, 'Please can I have it well done?' The seasoned waiter, oozing experience and diplomacy, and without a moment's pause, highly recommended another dish from the bill of fare, which was gratefully accepted.
Tim Oldfield
Wye, Kent
Dubious claims about gender in Shakespeare
SIR – Ruth Fernando's assertion that Macbeth is a gender-fluid play (report, June 29) made me laugh out loud.
The famous lines uttered in desperation by Lady Macbeth – 'unsex me here,/And fill me, from the crown to the toe, top-full/Of direst cruelty' – surely relies upon the fact that she is a woman alone and in crisis, in a world of strong, violent and unpredictable men.
David Hunter
St Columb Minor, Cornwall
SIR – If the Royal Shakespeare Company wants to know how to interest today's youngsters in the Bard's work (Comment, June 17), it has only to consult Mrs Burrows, who taught English Literature to girls in Kent in the 1970s.
Minute dissection of the language revealed plenty of insults and sexual references that ensured total attention and aided comprehension.
Gillian Courage
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
British philanthropy
SIR – With the Giving and Impact Summit returning to the London Stock Exchange on Tuesday, we write to highlight the vital role of philanthropy in British society, and the importance of unlocking the full potential of high-net-worth giving.
The UK is a generous nation. Last year, the public donated over £15 billion to charity, maintaining our position as the fourth most generous country internationally. Successful entrepreneurs and wealth creators can leverage their full range of assets – financial resources, strategic skills, time and leadership experience – to tackle society's most urgent problems.
With the greatest wealth transfer in history underway, as fortunes pass to younger generations, we have a unique opportunity to embed a culture of significant giving among emerging philanthropists.
The Government should make more use of matched funding schemes, and simplify the gift aid process. The wealth management sector should better equip advisers to discuss philanthropy with clients, and we should explore other innovative solutions, such as introducing optional donations from lottery winners.
Philanthropy built Britain's great universities, museums and cultural institutions. As we face unprecedented global challenges, we need today's successful wealth creators and wealth holders to step forward with the same boldness and vision. The opportunity for change has never been greater.
Dame Vivien Duffield
Chair, Clore Duffield Foundation
Gary Lubner
Founder, This Day Charitable Foundation
John Studzinski
Founder and Chair, Genesis Foundation
Lord Verjee (Lib Dem)
Founder, The Rumi Foundation
Lord Browne of Madingley (Crossbench)
Founder, John Browne Charitable Trust
Baroness Rebuck (Lab)
Chair, Somerset House
Lord Stevens of Birmingham (Crossbench)
Chair, Cancer Research UK
Sir Peter Bazalgette
Council Chair, Royal College of Art
Professor Geeta Nargund
Co-founder and Director, Social Impact Enterprises Ltd
Vice Chair, British Red Cross
Ajaz Ahmed
Founder, Studio.One and ajaz.org
Trustee, Mission 44 and Virgin Unite
Alex Chesterman
Amar Shah
Andrew Dixon
Founder of ARC InterCapital, Woodhaven Trust and Fairer Share
Andrew Harrison
Chair of Trustees, Mental Health Innovations
Andrew Law
Chair and CEO, Caxton Associates
Founding Trustee, Law Family Charitable Foundation and Law Family Educational Trust
Andy Wates
Chair, Wates Family Enterprise Trust
Batia Ofer
Chair, Royal Academy of Arts Trust
Co-Founder, Idan and Batia Ofer Family Foundation
Founder and Chair, Art of Wishes
Bill Holroyd
Founder, OnSide YouthZones
Bob Wigley
Chair, UK Finance
Brent Hoberman
Chair and Co-Founder, Founders Forum Group, Founders Factory and firstminute capital
Bruce Carnegie-Brown
Carol Shanahan
Chair, Port Vale Football Club
Trustee, The Port Vale Foundation Trust and EFL in the Community
Founder, The Hubb Foundation
Charles Gurassa
Chair, Oxfam GB
Chair, Migration Museum
Chris Oglesby
CEO, Bruntwood
Trustee, Oglesby Charitable Trust
Jane Oglesby
Chair, Oglesby Charitable Trust
Dame Elizabeth Corley
Chair Emerita, Impact Investing Institute
Chair, Schroders plc
Dame Marit Mohn
Co-Founder, The Mohn Westlake Foundation
Dame Martina Milburn
DMC Philanthropy
Daniel Levy
Co-Chair, The Grove Hotel
President, Jewish Volunteering Network
Chair, Immanuel College
David Dangoor
Chair, The Exilarch's Foundation and Dangoor Education
David Forbes-Nixon
Chair and Founder, DFN Foundation
David Gregson
Chair and Co-Founder, #BeeWell
Chair, Gregson Family Foundation
David Pearl
Chair and Chief Executive, Pearl & Coutts
Founder and Chair, David Pearlman Charitable Foundation
Dinesh Dhamija
Chair, Copper Beech Group
Founder, ebookers.com
Dr Nik Kotecha
Founder, Morningside Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Founder and Chair, Randalsun Capital Ltd and The Randal Charitable Foundation
Dr Robert D Kilgour
Dr Vijay C Patel
CEO, Waymade plc
Chair, Waymade Capital
Dr Vikas Shah
Duke of Richmond and Gordon
Chair, The Goodwood Estate Company Ltd
Trustee, Goodwood Education Trust, Lennox Trust and Goodwood Art Foundation
Earl Cadogan
Cadogan Charitable Trust
Edmund Lazarus
Founder and Managing Partner, EMK Capital
Emma Kane
Deputy Chair, Elton John AIDS Foundation
Gavin Patterson
Chair, Alzheimer's Research UK
Graham Baker
Founder, Butchers Pet Care
Graham Edwards
Chair, Edwards Family Foundation
Trustee, The Pennies Foundation
Grant Gordon
Chair, Ethos Foundation
Harry Hyman
Founder, International Opera Awards
Ian Marcus
Chair, Shurgard Self Storage
Deputy Chair, Saracens Multi Academy Trust
Ian Rosenblatt
Founder, Rosenblatt Law
James Lambert
Founder investor and Deputy Chair, The Bicester Collection
Trustee, The National Gallery
James Reed
Chair and CEO, Reed
Chair, Big Give
Trustee, The Reed Foundation
Jamie Ritblat
Founder and Executive Chairman, Delancey
Trustee, Heritage of London Trust
Trustee, The Ritblat Family Foundation
Trustee, Blenheim Palace
Joanna Barnett
Chair, Fields in Trust
Joe Garner
Chair, Tennis First
John Booth
Chair, The National Gallery
Vice- President, The King's Trust
John Caudwell
Founder, Caudwell Children and Caudwell Youth
John Hartz
Co-Founder, Inflexion Private Equity
Trustee, Inflexion Foundation
Founder, Hartz Family Foundation
Jonathan Straight
Chair, WasteAid
Judy Dewinter
Chair, Royal Free Charity
President, Myeloma UK
Justin Byam Shaw
Founder, The Felix Project
Keith Black
CEO and Chair, Regatta
Chair, Regatta Foundation
Trustee, Family Foundation
Chair, Jewish Leadership Council
Keith Breslauer
Vice Patron, The Royal Marines Charity
Chair, PTI, formerly The Prince's Teaching Institute
Koolesh Shah
Founder, London Town Group
Lady Jill Shaw Ruddock
Founder and Chair, The Second Half Foundation
Laurence Geller
Chair, Loveday & Co
Chancellor, University of West London
Founder, Geller Commission on Dementia Care
Laurence Kirschel
Founder, Outernet London; Founder, Adot charity
Leo Noé
Founding Trustee, Rachel Charitable Trust
Chair, Centre for Social Justice Foundation
Trustee, Project Seed
Lord Gadhia (Non-affiliated)
Chair, British Asian Trust
Lord Lupton (Non-affiliated)
Chair, The Ashmolean Museum
Founder Chair, The Lovington Foundation
Lord Kestenbaum (Lab)
Chancellor, University of Plymouth
Trustee, Teach First
Chair, Chief Rabbinate Charitable Trust
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Non-affiliated)
Chair, Letter One
Chair, Glyndebourne Opera House
Lord Levy (Lab)
Life President, Jewish Care, Sense, Barnet and Southgate College, JFS School and JLGB
Lord Wei (Con)
Co-founder and Director, The Shaftesbury Partnership
Co-founder, Teach First
Lord Fink (Con)
Lord Stuart Marks
Malik Karim
Founder and CEO, Fenchurch Advisory Partners
Mark Adlestone
Chair, Beaverbrooks Charitable Trust
Martin Port
Matthew Westerman
Chair, Clocktower Foundation
Meheen Rangoonwala
Global Programme Manager, Rangoonwala Foundation
Michael Samuel
Chair, Anna Freud
Chair, Full Fact
Chair, Somerset Community Foundation
Chair, Family Foundations
Michelle Pinggera
Deputy Chair, The King's Trust International
Mike Still
Mike Welch
Founder, Blackcircles.com
Founder, The Welch Trust
Trustee, King's Trust USA
Neil Blair
Founder and Chair, The Jigsaw Network
Nick Wheeler
Founder and Chair, Charles Tyrwhitt Shirt
Nicola Loftus
Senior Vice President, Jewish Care
Oliver Gregson
CEO, Wealth Management, Schroders plc
Oliver Pawle
Chair, Korn Ferry Board
Paul Drechsler
Trustee, The Felix Project
Peter Samuelson
Chair, First Star Scholars UK
Philip Marsden
Chair, MCC Foundation
Chair, Marsden Family Trust
Trustee, Royal Academy
Ric Lewis
Founder and Chair, The Black Heart Foundation
Richard Huntingford
Vice-President, The King's Trust
Richard Oldfield
Chair, The Christopher and Henry Oldfield Trust
Richard Reed
Partner, JamJar
Richard Ross
Chair, Rosetrees
Rick Sopher
Roland Rudd
Chair, Tate
Chair, Millfield School
Trustee, Speakers for Schools
Ambassador, Alzheimer's Society
Trustee, Royal Hospital Chelsea
Shabir Randeree
Randeree Charitable Foundation
Chair, King's Trust International
Shahzad Malik
General Partner, Advent Life Sciences
Chair, MQ
Shalni Arora
Savannah Wisdom
Sherry Coutu
Chair, Founders4Schools
Shobi Khan
CEO, Canary Whary Group
Trustee, British Library
Simon Collins
Chair, Global Leadership Board, University of Manchester
Simon Turner
Co-Founder, Inflexion Private Equity
Trustee, Inflexion Foundation
Chair, The Roundhouse
Sir Damon Buffini
Chair, National Theatre and Royal Anniversary Trust
Co-Founder, Buffini Chao Foundation
Sir Douglas Flint
Chair, The Royal Marsden Cancer Charity
Sir Jeremy Isaacs
Chair, The J Isaacs Charitable Trust
Honorary Life Chair, Noah's Ark Children's Hospice
Sir John and Lady Sorrell
Co-Founders and Trustees, The Sorrell Foundation and The National Saturday Club
Sir Keith Mills
Patron, Sported
Sir Kenneth Olisa
Founder and Chair, Aleto Foundation
Chair, BusinessLDN
Sir Lloyd Dorfman
Chair, Royal Opera House
Deputy Chair, Community Security Trust
Sir Martin Sorrell
Executive Chair, Founder, S4 Capital
Founder, WPP
Chair, JMCMRJ Sorrell Foundation
Sir Mick Davis
Sir Nicholas Coleridge
Chair, Historic Royal Palaces
Sir Paul Marshall
Chair and CIO, Marshall Wace
Founder, the Marshall Institute for Philanthropy and Social Entrepreneurship
Sir Ron Kalifa
Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou
Founder and President, Stelios Philanthropic Foundation
Sir Victor Blank
Sonal Sachdev Patel
CEO, GMSP Foundation
Philanthropist in Residence, LSE
Stephen Brenninkmeijer
Founder, Willows Investments
Stephen Grabiner
Founder and Chair, The Blue Thread Foundation
Steve Morgan
Founder and Chair of The Steve Morgan Foundation
Steve Rigby
Chair, The Rigby Foundation
Steven Kaye
Director, The Aimwell Charitable Trust
Steven Lewis
Founder, Lewis and Partners
President, Jewish Care
Stuart Gulliver
Chair, Maggie's Cancer Charity
Stuart Roden
Founder and Chair, Roden Family Foundation
Co-Founder and Chair, Unlocking Potential
Chair, the Design Museum
Sunita Arora
Founder, Arora Charitable Foundation
Surinder Arora
Founder and Chair, The Arora Group
Tania Slowe and Paddy Walker
Chair, J Leon Philanthropy Council
Hon Charles Wigoder
Founder and Chair, The Wigoder Family Foundation
William Sieghart
Chair, Henry Smith Foundation
Yan Huo
Founder, Huo Family Foundation
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Parents in Britain to be granted bereavement leave after miscarriage
Parents in Britain will be granted a right to bereavement leave after suffering a miscarriage as part of Labour's workers' rights reforms, it has been confirmed. In a change to the law made via amendments to the employment rights bill, mothers and their partners will be given the legal right to at least one week's bereavement leave if they have suffered a pregnancy loss before 24 weeks' gestation. Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner has said that the change would give 'people time away from work to grieve'. Under current rules, parents are already entitled to up to two weeks of bereavement leave if they experience a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy or a child dies before they turn 18. The exact length of time off to be given to people who lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks will be specified in later legislation, following a consultation. Vicki Robinson, chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'a hugely important step that acknowledges the often very significant impact of pre-24-week loss, not only for those experiencing the physical loss, but for their partners too'. The decision to extend this right to couples marks a victory for the Labour MP Sarah Owen, who has campaigned for the change. The women and equalities select committee, which Owen chairs, concluded in a report in January that the case for it was 'overwhelming'. While a number of employers already offer the leave as an extra benefit, the committee said it should become a universal right given the physical and emotional impacts of baby loss. About 250,000 expectant mothers in the UK suffer a miscarriage every year. Between 10% and 20% of pregnancies end in an early miscarriage within the first 12 weeks of gestation. Ministers have announced they will review the entire system of parental leave, declaring that the current system is 'not working' for families. They plan to investigate support for new parents, including maternity leave, paternity leave and shared arrangements. The bereavement leave changes are part of the employment rights bill, Labour's flagship workers' rights reforms in England, Wales and Scotland, which is entering its final stages in the House of Lords. Many of the new measures it entails, including lowering the earnings limit for statutory sick pay will come into effect from April next year, however the bereavement leave entitlement is part of a final wave of measures slated for introduction in 2027.


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will Keir Starmer cave to pressure on the two-child benefit cap?
K's first big showdown with the Labour left in government came as a group of rebels voted for a King's Speech amendment calling for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped. The ruthless prime minister, with the confidence of a man who had just led Labour to a landslide election win, suspended seven of his own MPs. Starmer wanted to instil fear in those who might not be on board with his agenda in the future that rebellion would have consequences. But a year on, Starmer is weakened. Labour MPs are emboldened after forcing their leader's hand over his controversial welfare cuts, and the two-child cap on benefits is likely to be next. Implemented by austerity architect George Osborne, the limit, which restricts parents from claiming certain benefits for more than two of their children, is hated across the Labour Party. Critics say the cap punishes children, with experts predicting 470,000 could be lifted from poverty if Starmer scrapped it. But how likely is it that the prime minister will give in to pressure and axe the cap? Bridget Phillipson on Sunday warned that future spending commitments – including on Labour's child poverty plans – had been made harder by the £5bn U-turn on welfare. The education secretary said ministers are 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. But, pushed on whether a change to the two-child cap was now less likely, Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder.' Alternatives to scrapping the cap entirely, such as lifting it to a three-child cap, are also believed to have been floated in government. The Resolution Foundation has said increasing the two-child cap to three children could reduce child poverty by 320,000 by the next general election, costing £3.2bn per year by 2030. It said this would be 'preferable' to the current system, but that benefits should be allocated in line with need, which would require fully scrapping the two-child limit at a cost of around £4.5bn. The chancellor is already braced for tax hikes in the autumn Budget, having warned the cabinet last week they could be more painful than last year's punishing increases. And any move to scrap or alter the two-child limit would need to be paid for by more tax increases or spending cuts elsewhere. Downing Street figures have been pointing rebels demanding a change to the welfare U-turn they forced, arguing the £5bn cost of that has derailed any plans to scrap the benefit cap. But the argument has already sparked anger among left-wing MPs, with Labour's Jon Trickett saying: 'The suggestion that the Labour government will leave children in poverty because they couldn't take welfare benefits from the disabled is truly shocking.' Phillipson and work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall are currently leading a Child Poverty Taskforce, which was due to report in the spring, but has been delayed to this autumn to coincide with the Budget. The taskforce is looking at 'all the available levers we have across government' to deliver the 'ambitious' child poverty strategy promised in Labour's manifesto. Senior Labour figures have also reportedly warned that tax hikes are on the horizon after the benefits climbdown, with the chance of a change in the controversial cap looking increasingly remote. 'My assessment is that is now dead in the water,' a No 10 source told The Sunday Times. Even Starmer, who previously let it be known that he wanted to scrap the cap, ordering the Treasury to find a way to fund the plan, dampened expectations of a change last week. He said: 'I personally don't think there is a silver bullet… we have got to look at a range of things.' As long as Starmer is prime minister, he will face round after round of calls for the two-child cap to be scrapped. The question is, will he give in?


Scotsman
33 minutes ago
- Scotsman
How Labour's NHS reforms in England pose a real threat to the SNP
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Given the Labour government's performance in recent weeks, it was refreshing to hear some genuine vision in the Health Secretary's ten-year health plan for England and Wales. Don't get me wrong, I have questions about the deliverability. The lack of social care. The expense. But when Wes Streeting opened his speech by saying, 'there are moments in our national story when our choices define who we are', I knew we were about to hear something momentous. What I had not anticipated was that the 'Fit for the Future' Plan he was about to unveil for England would not only set out a new vision and direction for the NHS there, but throw down the gauntlet for the Scottish Government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On the anniversary of the announcement of a National Health Service by the Attlee Government, Streeting revealed what he claimed will be a reformed neighbourhood health service. That it was largely welcomed, sometimes cautiously, on all sides of the Commons speaks not just to the plan itself but to the widespread belief that major reform is needed if we are to safeguard one of our country's proudest achievements for the next generation. Getty Images Comparing waiting lists Of course, there were questions from the Tories on detail and from my own party, the Liberal Democrats, on how it will impact on social care specifically. We have long called for free personal care, based on the model introduced by the Scottish Liberal Democrats in government, better support for unpaid carers and help for those struggling with accommodation costs. But the general feeling was that this plan has the community-based approach and ambition which is required. And as Tory Shadow Health Secretary Ed Argar put it, we need it to stick. While that ambition might currently be contained within England by devolution legislation, there's surely no doubt it will invite comparison with Scotland as waiting times and other targets often do. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It's also likely that the pressure faced by the current service and staff in Scotland and the SNP's abject failure to produce the same sort of ambitious vision will be a major issue in the 2026 election. Learning from England Given that importance, it was disappointing the only contribution from that party in the debate in parliament was an self-congratulatory comment on our medicines agency. Surely those of us who have benefited from a health service and staff coping with unacceptable under resourcing and often crumbling facilities are entitled to expect better of our Holyrood ruling party. The SNP would now do well to spend time reading what Streeting has laid out. I have a sneaking suspicion that Labour in Scotland will want to promote something similar. They may well see it as the key to electoral success, as well as the key to securing the future of the NHS. In times of crisis especially, there is nothing wrong with looking across the Border to see what is possible elsewhere. We have often examined the work of European or Nordic countries for examples of how to tackle issues with housing, education and beyond. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To refuse to look to our nearest neighbours for a health service cure would be churlish at best. And this time, it might just be terminal for the SNP.