G7 expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability
The air war between Iran and Israel - which began on Friday when Israel attacked Iran with air strikes - has raised alarms in a region that had already been on edge since the start of Israel's military assault on Gaza in October 2023.
"We affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel," G7 leaders said in the statement.
"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror," the statement added and said the G7 was "clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon."
Israel attacked Iran on Friday in what it called a preemptive strike to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. Since then the two Middle Eastern rivals have exchanged blows, with Iranian officials reporting over 220 deaths, mostly civilians, while Israel said 24 civilians were killed.
Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and has said it has the right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, as a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Israel, which is not a party to the NPT, is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that.
President Donald Trump planned to leave the G7 summit in Canada early to return to Washington due to the Middle East situation.
The United States has so far maintained that it is not involved in the Israeli attacks on Iran although Trump said on Friday the U.S. was aware of Israel's strikes in advance and called them "excellent." Washington has warned Tehran not to attack U.S. interests or personnel in the region.
"We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza," the G7 statement said, adding the nations were also ready to coordinate on safeguarding stability in energy markets.
An Israeli strike hit Iran's state broadcaster on Monday while Trump said in a social media post that "everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran."
Separately, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also discussed the Israel-Iran war in phone calls with his British, French and European Union counterparts on Monday.
Washington said Trump was still aiming for a nuclear deal with Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How Trump's big bill will supercharge his immigration crackdown
Thousands of new immigration enforcement officers. Tens of thousands of new detention beds. New fees on asylum applications. And new construction on the border wall. Donald Trump's sweeping spending bill would vastly expand the federal government's immigration enforcement machinery and, if passed by the House, supercharge the president's plan to carry out what he has vowed will be the largest deportation campaign in US history. The measure would authorize what analysts and advocates describe as a level of immigration enforcement spending without precedent in American history. Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' dedicates roughly $170bn for immigration and border-related operations – a staggering sum that would make US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) the most heavily funded law enforcement agency in the federal government, and that critics warn will unleash more raids, disrupt the economy and severely restrict access to humanitarian protections like asylum. 'We've already seen aggressive, indiscriminate immigration enforcement across the country – and protests in reaction to how horribly it's been carried out,' said Daniel Costa, director of immigration law and policy research at the liberal Economic Policy Institute. 'And we're going to see such a massive increase that most people can't even begin to wrap their heads around it.' The 940-page bill passed the Senate on Tuesday, with JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. It now returns to the House, which approved an initial draft by a single vote in May. While some elements of the spending package could still change, the immigration-related provisions in the House and Senate versions are largely aligned. And despite mounting public backlash over the Trump administration's sprawling immigration crackdown – which has separated families and even swept up US citizens – the proposal's 'unimaginable' border enforcement spending has received notably less scrutiny than its tax cuts and deep reductions to social safety net programs like Medicaid. 'It's going to fundamentally transform the immigration system,' said Adriel Orozco, senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council (AIC). 'It's going to transform our society.' The Senate-passed bill would authorize $45bn to build and operate new immigration detention centers – including facilities for families – marking a 265% increase over Ice's current detention budget and enabling the detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens daily, according to an analysis by theAIC. Experts say language in the bill could allow families to be detained indefinitely, in violation of the Flores settlement, the 1997 consent decree that limits the amount of time children can be detained by immigration officials. The measure would allocate $46.6bn for border wall construction – more than three times what was spent on the barrier during Trump's first term – and provide billions in grant funding to support and expand state and local cooperation with Ice. Though the legislation allots $3.3bn to the agency that oversees the country's immigration court system, it caps the number of immigration judges at 800, despite a massive backlog with millions of pending cases. It also imposes a series of new or elevated fees on immigration services. Asylum seekers – those fleeing persecution – would now be subject to a $100 application fee, plus an additional $100 for every year the application is pending. (The original House bill proposed a $1,000 fee.) Currently there is no fee, and experts warn that the added financial burden would in effect restrict asylum access to those who can afford it. The legislation would also levy new or heightened fees on work permits, nonimmigrant visas and Temporary Protected Status applications, essentially imposing what Orozco calls a 'wealth test' on some of the world's most vulnerable people. An analysis by David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, argues that even without new funding, immigration enforcement spending was already 'extreme'. Congress had allocated nearly $34bn for immigration and border enforcement in fiscal year 2025 – more than double the combined budget for all other federal law enforcement agencies. That amount, according to the report, is about 36 times the IRS's budget for tax enforcement, 21 times the firearms enforcement budget, 13 times the drug enforcement budget, and eight times more than the FBI's. As the bill heads to the House, it has drawn opposition from some fiscal conservatives, who are furious over projections that the package would add $3.3tn to the national deficit over the next decade, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). In a recent report based on the House's plan, Bier said CBO fails to account for the lost tax revenue from millions of immigrants who would otherwise contribute more in taxes than they receive in public benefits. He projects that mass deportations enabled by the bill could add nearly $1tn to the deficit – roughly a quarter of the bill's total price tag. The White House insists the enforcement spending is worth it. Before the Tuesday Senate vote, Vance dismissed concerns about social safety net cuts and deficit projections, writing on X: 'The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits.' He added that the president's policy package 'fixes this problem'. The proposed spending surge comes as the Trump administration moves aggressively to scale up arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants. Despite promising a 'worst first' approach focused on violent offenders, Ice arrests of immigrants without any criminal history have skyrocketed since the start of Trump's term, according to a Guardian analysis of federal data. The number spiked even more dramatically after a meeting in late May, during which Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and chief architect of Trump's hardline immigration policies, set a target of 3,000 arrests a day, or one million per year. 'Right now you have masked agents on the streets, collaborating with other federal law enforcement agencies and local law enforcement agencies, to try to meet these quotas for mass deportation,' Orozco said. 'We're just going to see that at a massively larger scale if this bill gets passed.' Following protests that erupted last month in Los Angeles against the administration's immigration sweeps, Trump has directed immigration officials to prioritize enforcement operations in Democratic-run cities. A new NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found that a majority of Americans – 54% – say they believe Ice operations have gone 'too far' while nearly six in 10 do not agree that the administration's deportation policies are making the country safer. 'There's virtually no support for this mass deportation effort outside of [Trump's] rabid Maga base,' said Matt Barreto, a Democratic pollster who studied Latinos and voter sentiment on immigration for decades. 'Other than that, people want immigrants to work here and to be here and to contribute to America.' As the Senate debated the bill on Tuesday, Trump was in Florida, touring the state's new migrant detention camp built in a remote area of the everglades, known as 'Alligator Alcatraz'. 'This is a model,' Trump declared, 'but we need other states to step up.' Critics say there's little evidence to support the White House's contention that mass deportations will benefit the American workers. 'They're going to be deporting not just workers, but also consumers,' Costa said. 'That's a pretty big share of the workforce that you're going to be impacting.' An analysis published on Tuesday by his colleague at EPI, economist Ben Zipperer, estimates mass deportations would result in the loss of nearly 6 million jobs over the next four years, both for immigrants and US-born workers. 'There is no upside to the mass deportations enabled by the Republican budget bill,' Zipperer wrote. 'They will cause immense harm to workers and families, shrink the economy, and weaken the labor market for everyone.'
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The world's nuclear chief wants the UN's top job. Iran wants him dead
In the days after Israel's war on Iran and the US air strikes on three nuclear sites, the Islamic Republic's most hard-line newspaper called for the trial and execution of the man they held responsible for the conflict. But it was not Benjamin Netanyahu or Donald Trump in the crosshairs of Kayhan, which is said to be supervised by the regime. Instead, it was Rafael Grossi, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief, whose alarming report on Iran's nuclear expansion on May 31 lit the touchpaper that exploded into 12 days of war. Many, including Mr Grossi himself, have said he has his sights set on becoming the next secretary-general of the United Nations. But he risks becoming more famous as the man caught in the crossfire between Mr Trump, Mr Netanyahu and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran's smear campaign against Mr Grossi includes accusing him of being an Israeli spy. Kayhan said: 'It should therefore be officially announced that he will be tried and executed upon arrival in Iran for spying for the Mossad and participating in the murder of the oppressed people of our country.' Mr Grossi is being set up to take the blame if Iran pulls out of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and accelerates efforts to get nuclear weapons. Such a move risks plunging the region into an apocalyptic conflict. It is an invidious position for any diplomat to find themselves in, particularly one with his eye on the top job in New York. The 64-year-old polyglot said his 'work' with the UN agency's nuclear inspectors is his campaign to succeed Antonio Guterres in 2027. That lofty ambition now hangs in the balance as delicately as peace in the Middle East. Who is Grossi? Born to an Italian immigrant family in Buenos Aires, Mr Grossi dedicated his professional life to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons. In 2019, he became the first Latin American to head the Vienna-headquartered IAEA. When Russia occupied the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant after invading Ukraine in 2022, there were fears of another Chernobyl. Mr Grossi, a well-dressed former Argentine ambassador to Austria, took control. William Alberque, of the Pacific Forum think tank and a former director of Nato's Arms Control Centre, said: 'He personally went to the plant when it was under fire and put his life on the line to say we've got to protect this facility. 'Grossi found a way to get involved without having to take either side in a way that even the Russians had to support.' The self-confessed workaholic has now made five trips to the plant, which, thanks to his diplomatic efforts with Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky, has been monitored by the IAEA ever since. A well-dressed family man who limits his taste for Malbec to the weekends, he is armed with an enviable contact book of world leaders. The Telegraph understands that Grossi has impressed EU leaders with his performance on the Iran file, particularly Germany. German officials with close knowledge of the IAEA said Grossi had done an 'excellent' job, singling out his efforts to verify Iran's nuclear safeguards. They also praised his 'tireless' work ethic. There was speculation Mr Trump, and even Putin, could back him as UN boss. Mr Grossi recently confessed his ambition to run for the role. 'Absent from resolution' He told the FT: 'The UN is in a very bad place at the moment. The original idea is valid, but it has become big and bureaucratised and absent from the resolution of major international crises. It doesn't need to be like that.' All five permanent Security Council members must back a candidate before they can be approved by the General Assembly for a five-year term. But Russia and China, two permanent members of the Council with France, Britain and the US, are allies of Iran, which is determined to prevent Mr Grossi from getting the job. Mr Trump pulled the US out of the Iran nuclear deal, which offered sanctions relief in exchange for nuclear restrictions, a year before Mr Grossi became IAEA boss. Tehran accelerated its uranium enrichment and limited IAEA access to its nuclear programme. Relations were strained. They broke down after an IAEA report said Iran had a 400kg stock of uranium enriched to 60 per cent purity, a short step from the 90 per cent level needed for a nuclear bomb.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Nancy Mace's overnight 'party bus' antics in pink PJs to rush back for vote on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
House lawmakers have rushed back to Washington to vote on President Donald Trump 's sweeping domestic agenda taking planes, trains and even a party bus to make it in time. The Senate passed the president's marquee legislative package dubbed the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on Tuesday setting up the House for a last-second vote on the multi-trillion-dollar tax and spending package before Independence Day on Friday. Trump has repeatedly prodded Congress to pass the bill before then so he can have a signing ceremony at the White House on the federal holiday, but as bad weather snarled Washington's airports, many had their flights canceled. Refusing to let the inclement weather derail her travel plans, Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., decided to ride in style for the overnight drive from her district to D.C. Mace, 47, and her staff posted videos of their half-day journey aboard a decked-out sprinter van with LED lights and plush leather seats. The clips of the impromptu road trip show Mace donning pink heart pajamas while traveling from the Palmetto State to Capitol Hill with her team and her dog named Liberty. 'I'm here to save my country, so come hell or high water, I was gonna get here on time,' she told the Daily Mail just after her arrival. 'We got here five minutes before the first vote.' On the journey Mace and her staffers made stops at road trip staples Wawa and Waffle House. A video posted by the congresswoman's team shows Mace carrying her dog into Wawa and purchasing three Redbull for the overnight voyage. She wanted to keep their driver, a constituent, fueled and alert for the 12-hour ride. When she needed to refuel herself, the South Carolina lawmaker ordered a stop at Waffle House for some breakfast chocolate pie. 'Their chocolate pie is the best,' she admitted, but she was soon disappointed because 'they ran out' of her favorite treat. 'So I had chocolate chip waffles and I had hash browns, and we made sure that they had fresh coffee available,' she told the Daily Mail. It was unclear whether the congresswoman originally had a flight into D.C. that was canceled, as was the case for scores of lawmakers trying to get back in time to vote on Trump's agenda. Fellow South Carolina Republican Rep. Russell Frye, for example, opted to drive to the Capitol from Myrtle Beach after his flight was canceled on Tuesday. Other lawmakers had more harrowing journeys, like Illinois Democrat Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who was forced to drive 14 hours from Chicago to D.C. after his flight was canceled. We made it. Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law. — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (@CongressmanRaja) July 2, 2025 Both sides of the aisle felt the urgency to return to Capitol Hill to vote for or against Trump's mega-bill, which includes no tax on tips or overtime, funding for border security, reforms to Medicaid and SNAP and many other provisions. Nobody wants to talk about growth, which will be the primary reason that the Big, Beautiful Bill will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation ever passed,' the president posted on social media Wednesday. 'Our Country will make a fortune this year, more than any of our competitors, but only if the Big, Beautiful Bill is passed!' And Trump is personally lobbying on-the-fence lawmakers to get in line and support his agenda. The president has planned meetings at the White House on Wednesday to sway lawmakers who are considering voting against the sweeping, nearly 900-page measure. Following the meeting, the House is expected to take a procedural vote to advance the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
