
De Lima defends 4Ps, says beneficiaries are no freeloaders
De Lima, one of the authors of Republic Act 11310, the law that institutionalized 4Ps, issued the statement in response to the suggestion of Senator Erwin Tulfo that the 4Ps should be scrapped and should be replaced by livelihood assistance instead.
The 4Ps program provides cash to poorest households in exchange for complying with conditions promoting human development such as keeping kids in school, attending family development sessions, among others.
'Hindi palamunin ang mga benepisyaryo ng 4Ps. Hindi limos ang programang ito. May mga kondisyon ang programang ito para maipagkaloob sa mga benepisyaryo ang suporta ng gobyerno. Batay ito sa prinsipyo ng shared responsibility – sa pagitan ng pamahalaan at ng bawat pamilyang Pilipino na may hangaring makaahon sa kahirapan,' De Lima said.
(The 4Ps beneficiaries are not freeloaders. The program is not about almsgiving. There are conditions that they should meet to secure the benefit. This is about shared responsibility between the government and the beneficiaries.)
While the program is not perfect, De Lima said that it cannot be resolved with a 'burn the whole house down' solution.
'Yes, there are gaps in implementation. Yes, some abuses have been reported. But that's precisely why we must strengthen, not scrap, the program. The answer is better targeting, better monitoring, and better support systems, not abandoning millions of families who have long relied on this program to survive, recover, and rebuild,' she said.
'Over 1.5 million households have already graduated from poverty under the 4Ps framework, according to the President's own State of the Nation Address. That is not a failure. That is progress that must be sustained,' she added.
De Lima then said that if any, the 4Ps program should be expanded as provided under her proposed House Bill 1434 which seeks to include adult education, livelihood training, employment facilitation, at entrepreneurship development.
'Our goal here is a sustainable program to alleviate their plight, not just to tide them over,' de Lima said.
'Ito ang hinaharap na gusto nating ihatid: kung saan ang tulong ng gobyerno ay hindi nakakababa ng dignidad, kundi nagbibigay-lakas. Hindi perpekto ang 4Ps. Pero huwag nating sirain ang isang programang may mabuting layunin at malinaw na tagumpay, lalo na't may mga kongkretong hakbang para mas mapabuti ito,' she added.
(This is the future that we want to achieve: where the government assistance does not degrade dignity but strengthens. 4Ps is not perfect but let us not destroy a program with a noble aim and clear victory, especially if there are concrete ways to improve it.) —AOL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
13 minutes ago
- GMA Network
House leader: Watchdogs at budget talks won't be token participation
'This is about creating a culture of transparency where civil society has a standing invitation to keep the government on its toes,' Tingog party-list Representative Jude Acidre said. The presence of watchdogs and other people's organizations during the deliberations on the proposed 2026 national budget will not be mere token participation, Tingog party-list Representative Jude Acidre said. Last week, Speaker Martin Romualdez said that watchdogs and other civil society observers will be allowed to observe the proposed national budget deliberations, from the committee and plenary level to the bicameral conference committee. On Tuesday Acidre, as chairperson of the House Committee on Higher and Technical Education, held a consultation with civil society leaders on an inclusive, transparent national budget process at the Batasan. Among those present were lawyer Natasha Daphne Sta. Clara Marcelo of the MoveAsOne Coalition; Rene Santiago of the Foundation for Economic Freedom; Eunice Tanilon of the We Solve Foundation; Raul Montemayor of the Federation of Free Farmers; Danica Supnet of the Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities; Adolfo Jose A. Montesa of the People's Budget Coalition; May R. Cinco of ENet Philippines; John Benedict Felices of the Jesse Robredo Institute/La Salle;, Jeck Cantos of Social Watch, Inc.; Ralph Degoncillo of Health Justice; and Sandino J. Soliman and Bryan Ezra Gonzales of CODE-NGO. 'Under the leadership of Speaker Martin Romualdez, we will open the doors to our people for the national budget deliberations. We believe that involving civil society groups at the very start of budget discussions will help us craft a national budget that is more responsive, inclusive, and aligned with the needs of our people. I am encouraged by the energy and the openness that our civil society partners brought to the table today,' Acidre said. 'This is not token participation. Your expertise is recognized and your insights are valued to help shape the decisions we make on public spending,' he added. Also present during the consultations were House Deputy Secretary General Romulo Emmanuel Miral of the Congressional Policy and Budget Research Department and Muel Romero, Head Executive Assistant of the Office of the Speaker. Romualdez and Acidre were among the authors of House Resolution 94, which provides that bona fide people's organizations and NGOs may be granted official non-voting observer status at the public hearings of the appropriations committee on the national budget and all subsequent general appropriations. The same Resolution also states that accredited observers would be invited to attend budget briefings and deliberations, submit position papers and access relevant budget documents necessary to support their participation. Acidre said the consultation was only the start of a series of engagements with civil society groups, including sectoral and regional consultations, to ensure broad representation and participation. 'This is about creating a culture of transparency where civil society has a standing invitation to keep the government on its toes,' Acidre said. 'In the end, a budget is more than just numbers on a spreadsheet: it is a statement of national priorities. If we are serious about making those priorities serve the people, then the people must have a seat in the room where those decisions are made,' Acidre added. — BM, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
7 hours ago
- GMA Network
House QuadComm gets new life in 20th Congress
The House of Representatives has reestablished the House Quad Committee (QuadComm) for the 20th Congress. This developed after the House, via voice vote, adopted House Resolution 106 filed by Manila Rep. Benny Abante, which establishes the mega committee 'to conduct a joint inquiry in need of legislation to address emerging and unresolved issues brought forth by the joint investigation of the previous Quad Committee during the 19th Congress.' The "House QuadComm 2.0" will still be composed of the House Committee on Dangerous Drugs, House Committee on Public Order and Safety, House Committee on Human Rights and the House Committee on Accounts. Abante will still be the chairperson of the House Committee on Human Rights, while the House Committee on Dangerous Drugs is chaired by Bukidnon Rep. Jonathan Keith Flores. The House Committee on Accounts is chaired by Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon, while the House Committee on Public Order and Safety is chaired by Rep. Rolando Valeriano. The House QuadComm in the 19th Congress investigated the drug war deaths during the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte and the Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators-related crimes. In pushing for QuadComm 2.0 Abante said there remains a lot to be investigated, including the case of over 30 missing sabungeros or cockfight enthusiasts. 'May nagsasabi na pulitika lang ito (Some say its political). But this is not a partisan crusade, Mr. Speaker. This is a moral one. Because murder knows no color but one: red—the color of blood unjustly spilled,' Abante said. The House QuadComm inquiries resulted in the filing of the proposed Anti-Extrajudicial Killing Act and the Civil Forfeiture Act, which Abante said are important in curbing 'impunity and seizing the ill-gotten wealth of those involved in state-sponsored abuses.' –VAL, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
7 hours ago
- GMA Network
House to prioritize agency-backed amendments in 2026 budget
The House of Representatives will prioritize the inclusion of amendments backed by government agencies in the proposed 2026 national budget while also hearing out parochial concerns, House appropriations panel chairperson Mikaela Suansing said Tuesday. Suansing said it is understandable for House members to push for government projects to address the needs of their constituents "but on the part of the House, given the limited fiscal space, what we [will] prioritize are institutional amendments." "Parochial amendments are for the needs of a particular locality, while institutional amendments emanate from the [government agencies] themselves. That is what we are looking at,' she told reporters. However, she said, it does not mean that the amendments to be put forward by House members will be readily dismissed. The presence of budget watchdogs and public availability of committee level proceedings, Suansing said, will ensure that the amendments to be included in the national budget will be meritorious whether they are suggested by government agencies or members of Congress. "The deliberation on the new House subcommittee on budget amendments review will be available to the public, including via livestream. So anybody who will sit on this committee and put forward amendments and how will it be resolved will be known by the public,' the lawmaker said. She was referring to the new House appropriations subpanel in charge of budget amendments, replacing the small committee which used to be a tight-knit unit composed of lawmakers collating amendments proposed by House members after the budget is approved at plenary level. 'Because the deliberations are transparent, maiiwasan na po talaga natin 'yung pagkakaroon ng mga insertions na iintindihan naman namin na 'yun 'yung pinagmumulan ng pangamba ng ating mga kababayan,' Suansing added. (Because the deliberations are transparent, we will be able to avoid insertions that cause distrust among the public.) In the same interview, Suansing said President Ferdinand Marcos,Jr.'s statement during his fourth State of the Nation Address that he is willing to delay the signing of the proposed national budget if it does not align with the administration's priorities should not be viewed as an attempt to clip Congress' power of the purse. 'The statement of the President does not undermine the power of the purse of Congress because the the President has very specific priorities in terms of what social services, what projects he would like prioritized. That is the alignment that the President is asking Congress to focus on,' she said. 'I believe it is not undermining the House but rather its a please, ensure that the administration's priority programs are taken cared of. And we saw that the President's priority is human capital development, including education, labor, and health. For our part, those are also the programs that we will support because human capital development is very important in ensuring our country's economic future for many many generations,' she added. In a separate statement, Navotas Rep. Tobias Tiangco welcomed the abolition of the small committee which he earlier flagged for supposed unlawful intervention in the budget process. 'We thank the House committee on appropriations for heeding our call. The small committee was not transparent, so we must abolish it. The fact that they agreed to abolish the small committee proves that I was correct,' he said. Still, Tiangco insisted that all individual amendments of the House members should be discussed in a plenary session. However, he emphasized that the removal of the small committee is just the first step toward promoting transparency in budget deliberations. 'All individual amendments must be discussed in plenary before the approval of the House General Appropriations Bill on second reading. A lengthy line item list [of amendments] is not an excuse. If that is the case, we must work overtime,' Tiangco said in a statement. 'Trabaho namin 'yan. Kahit gaano kahirap, dapat naming gampanan (That is our job so we must do it no matter how hard it is). No ifs and buts," he added. —AOL, GMA Integrated News