Shield Law update: Mass. Senate set to make first move against Trump in 2025
Good Monday morning, everyone.
In April, Democrats who control the Massachusetts Senate announced what they described as an aggressive legislative effort to fight back against the Trump White House's attacks on the Bay State.
They dubbed the effort 'Response 2025.' But three months later, that response was starting to look more like a regular glance in President Donald Trump's direction, punctuated by the obligatory rhetorical broadsides.
This week, however, Senate Democrats say they'll bring the first of those bills intended to check Trump to the floor for a vote: It's an update to the 2022 state law that shields reproductive and transgender care from out-of-state legal action.
That news came courtesy of Senate President Karen E. Spilka, who outlined some of the upper chamber's legislative priorities with the end of the current budget year (and Pride Month) just days away on June 30.
" We will protect our residents, defend Massachusetts values, and help lead us out of these dark times," Spilka said, adding that the effort took on some new urgency after last week's U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth.
The shield law update set to come before the Senate this week would, among other things, bolster privacy protections and guarantee that Massachusetts emergency rooms provide care to people seeking emergency reproductive treatment, according to GBH News.
Friedman, who has been leading the Senate's response to Trump's efforts to pull billions of dollars in federal funding for the commonwealth and to restrict the rights of LGBTQ+ residents, called the legislation the " next step in ensuring that people who provide that legal care and who need that legal care get access to it."
'In Massachusetts, when you have an emergency, we're going to make sure that we take care of you,' the Arlington Democrat said.
Asked how many Trump-related bills she thought the Senate could act on before the end of the year, Friedman said the Senate is " looking at a list of issues," that have been brought up by lawmakers.
'There's the Shield Law, there's book banning, there's what's happening with veterans ... there's data privacy,' she said, ticking off some of those issues. 'And what we are doing is trying to take something from those buckets, figuring out how ready they are, and then push them out.'
'But these are big issues. So, how much do we expect to put out? Well, if we have our way, we'd put out one [bill] a month. Right? But ... we can't promise that.'
Chalk that up to the complexity of the legislation and a president who sets policy on a dime, and then pivots in the other direction just as quickly.
'As you know, one day [Trump] says one thing and [he] was going to institute something, not even the next day, the next hour, he reverses it,' Spilka said. 'And he's doing this on purpose to make it harder for any one state, any one country, anyone, anybody to respond.'
The Healey administration has spent nearly $830 million on Massachusetts' emergency shelter system so far this year, according to recently released state data.
Total costs for the system, which houses mainly state residents and a smaller number of migrant new arrivals, are expected to soar past $1 billion by the end of the current budget year, which wraps up on June 30, according to a report the administration regularly sends to budget writers in the state House and Senate.
Some other big numbers from that report:
$679 million: The amount the administration had spent on 'direct shelter costs' in the 2025 budget year.
$149 million: The amount the state has spent on such services as HomeBase, National Guard payroll, education, work programs and other initiatives.
$3,496: The average amount that state taxpayers are spending weekly for each family in the shelter system.
1,583: The number of families who entered the shelter system as migrants, refugees or asylum-seekers.
4,088: The total number of families, as of June 18, that were enrolled in the state's emergency shelter system, according to a state dashboard.
1,143: The total number of families who were in emergency shelter spaces in Boston.
240: The total number of families who were in emergency shelter spaces in Springfield.
208: The total number of families who were in emergency shelter spaces in Worcester.
'As a pastor whose church was burned down, if we don't look at the rhetoric that caused such racism and hatred, we won't get anywhere.'
― Dr. Terrylyn Curry Avery, pastor of MLK Community Presbyterian Church and interim executive director of the Healing Racism Institute.
Harvard researcher's work gives 'hope' for Parkinson's. But the feds cut his funding
How Beacon Hill bosses quietly buried reform bills that threatened their power
Rep. Angelo Puppolo to face challenger in 2026 Democratic primary
MIT joins group of universities suing the DOD over funding cuts
Worcester City Council approves nearly $1B operating budget
Weymouth mayor announces plans to resign next month
Walter Gunn resigns from Longmeadow Planning Board amid town tensions
Democracy fans, this one's for you: U.S. Rep. Jake Auchincloss, D-4th District, is holding a virtual town hall and Q&A at 7 p.m. on Monday. His guest: Justin Florence, the managing director and co-founder of Protect Democracy.
On its website, the advocacy organization describes itself as 'a cross-ideological nonprofit group dedicated to defeating the authoritarian threat, building more resilient democratic institutions, and protecting our freedom and liberal democracy.
The event runs from 7:15 to 8:15 p.m. You can RSVP for the Zoom link here.
Singer-songwriter Hozier opens up a two-night stand at Fenway Park, with shows on Monday and Tuesday nights. Start time for both is 8 p.m. (tickets and more info here). You have probably heard his mega-smash 'Too Sweet' a billion times by now. But here it is for the billionth and one.
We've been reading a lot over the last week about the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Iran — now with the added wrinkle of President Donald Trump launching an attack over the weekend.
But what we haven't heard a lot of are the voices of the Iranian people who are living through the bombing campaign, and whose lives have been upended by it. Writing for The Observer, Rana Rahimpour brings you the sights, the sounds and smells of what appears to be the latest war in the Middle East.
Here's the germane bit:
Tehran has a smell now – a thick, metallic haze that clings to your clothes, your breath, your memory. 'I've just come to understand the smell of war,' writes Nazanin, a journalist who fled the city earlier this week. 'Air defences have a smell. So do the missiles … It's been imprinted in my olfactory memory. Now, forever, I know the smell of war.'
The scent lingers longer than the explosions. It weaves itself into the emptiness of a once-bustling metropolis – 10 million people now adrift. Abandoned pets. Taped windows. Shuttered shops. Petrol queues stretching for miles. Tehran is holding its breath.
So is the rest of the world. 'I may do it, I may not,' said U.S. President Donald Trump when asked on Wednesday about the potential of U.S. strikes on Iran. The threat of intensification is looming. Already, more than 500 people are estimated to have been killed.
On Monday, I fought with time — and with my 80-year-old parents. My deeply spiritual father dismissed any urgency to leave their flat in District 3, saying he was not afraid of death. He had seen bombs before, during the Iran -Iraq war. Fear is not new. When Israel later announced strikes on their district, I called again. My dad, fresh from a shower, laughed: 'Let me put on a shirt to greet Mr Netanyahu.' How typically Iranian to meet an imminent threat with humour.
That's it for today. As always, tips, comments and questions can be sent to jmicek@masslive.com. Have a good week, friends.
How Beacon Hill bosses quietly buried reform bills that threatened their power
Markey Warns: Rural health crisis looms if Big Beautiful Bill passes | Bay State Briefing
Troops in the Streets, Questions in Congress: Mass. reckons with role of military in civil society
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
7 minutes ago
- USA Today
Canada scraps digital services tax to advance stalled US trade talks
OTTAWA, June 29 (Reuters) - Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms late on Sunday, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump will resume trade negotiations in order to agree on a deal by July 21, Canada's finance ministry said in a statement. Trump abruptly called off trade talks on Friday over the tax targeting U.S. technology firms, saying that it was a "blatant attack." He reiterated his comments on Sunday, pledging to set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within the next week, which threatened to push U.S.-Canada relations back into chaos after a period of relative calm. More: Trump says U.S. will end trade talks with Canada, could move deadline for other tariffs The breakdown in trade talks comes after the two leaders met at the G7 in mid-June and Carney said they had agreed to wrap up a new economic agreement within 30 days. Canada's planned digital tax was 3% of the digital services revenue a firm takes in from Canadian users above $20 million in a calendar year, and payments were to be retroactive to 2022. It would have impacted U.S. technology firms, including Amazon AMZN.O, Meta META.O, Alphabet's Google GOOGL.O and Apple AAPL.O, among others. Monday collection will be halted, the Canada's finance ministry statement said, and Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne will bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act. "The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians," the statement said. "Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation." Stocks index futures rose after the news the digital tax will be rescinded and the bullish sentiment spilled over into Asian markets. Canada is the second-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico, and the largest buyer of U.S exports. It bought $349.4 billion of U.S. goods last year and exported $412.7 billion to the U.S., according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The Biden administration had requested trade dispute settlement consultations over the tax in 2024, saying it was inconsistent with Canada's North American trade deal obligations. Canada had escaped Trump's broad tariffs imposed in April but faces 50% duties on steel and aluminum. (Reporting by Kanjyik Ghosh in Bengaluru and Promit Mukherjee in Ottawa; Writing by Caroline Stauffer; Editing by Christopher Cushing and Michael Perry)
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mary Trump Gives 'Miserable' Don Jr. A Brutal Lesson On The Only Thing He's Accomplished
Mary Trump blasted Donald Trump Jr. this week over his response to New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's win in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. Donald Trump's niece slammed her cousin, the president's eldest son, as 'a vile human being who's accomplished nothing in his meaningless, miserable little life.' Mamdani, a democratic socialist and Muslim American, has been the target of a wave of right-wing attacks following his victory. If elected, he'll become New York City's first Muslim mayor. Trump Jr. reposted a viral comment on X, formerly Twitter, that read, 'I'm old enough to remember when New Yorkers endured 9/11 instead of voting for it,' with the caption: 'New York City has fallen.' Speaking with radio host Dean Obeidallah, Mary Trump tore into her cousin and said that 'one of the things I most resent about Donald, my uncle' is how he's subjected people to those like his son 'not because their opinions matter but because millions of people listen to them because they have a platform by virtue of their relationship with Donald.' Mary Trump, who has been a fierce critic of her uncle for years, warned the attacks on Mamdani are 'extraordinarily dangerous' and predicted the vitriol will only get worse as the mayoral race becomes 'nationalized in a way we may not have seen happen before.' Watch the exchange here: Trump Family Member Reportedly 'Seriously Considering' Run For Senate Trump's Self-Congratulatory Rant On Fox News Gets Roasted In Real Time


USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is unsuitable for office. But he was right to bomb Iran.
Do you think Trump was right to bomb Iran? Do you think he should have waited for approval from Congress? Are you concerned about the threat of nuclear war? Here's what readers told us. It's been more than a week since the United States entered the conflict between Iran and Israel on June 21, dropping more than a dozen 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Iran retaliated on June 23 with an attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar. The days that followed have brought with them a fragile ceasefire, first announced on Truth Social – and seemingly without the approval of Iran and Israel – by President Donald Trump. Since then, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others in the Trump administration have been engaged in a back-and-forth about how much damage those bombs really did to Iran's nuclear capabilities – and while the world is breathing a little easier than it was nine days ago, tensions in the Middle East remain high. We wanted to know what you thought about all this. So, we asked. Do you think Trump was right to bomb Iran? Do you think he should have waited for approval from Congress? Are you concerned about the threat of nuclear war? Hundreds of readers wrote in for this installment of USA TODAY's Opinion Forum, sharing their opinions from across the country and political spectrum. Here's what they said. Trump is immoral and unsuitable for office. But bombing Iran was right. The air strikes were the right decision. Iran cannot be permitted to develop nuclear weapons. We should believe its leaders when they say 'Death to America." I should also mention that I normally vote Republican, but I've never voted for Donald Trump. I believe him to be an immoral, intemperate man unsuited for any public office. Presidents have been ordering military actions without congressional authorization for some time. However, that doesn't make it right. Still, as divided as Congress is, I don't believe he would have gotten the green light and we very much needed to act. Further retaliation by Iran is always a possibility. One has to know that once the act is completed, the other side may retaliate. Sometimes, however, the risk must be taken. While the U.S. intelligence community said Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon, the intelligence community has been wrong before. Trump is going to do whatever he wants to do. He is a bit of a loose cannon. — Kevin O'Grady, Columbus, Ohio Trump said he'd think about it for 2 weeks, then bombs! I do not think Trump made the right decision in bombing three Iranian nuclear sites. There was no emergency and no reason to do it. He said on June 19 he was going to consider it for two weeks and then, two days later, bombs! He has no idea what that little stunt costs – to deploy those types of weapons. He did it to show that he was powerful enough to do it. He has no idea what could result from it. He is an ignoramus! I think the fact that he acted on his own, without authorization from Congress, is a good reason to impeach him. He has already walked all over Congress and the court systems, doing things he does not have the authority to do. He should be impeached. In terms of him saying Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, the U.S. intelligence community said otherwise. I think Trump is dumb and has no idea what the truth is. I am slightly concerned about Iran's nuclear capabilities or the possibility of them receiving nuclear weapons from an ally. And I am slightly concerned about the threat of nuclear war. — Diane Whitlock, Waynesville, North Carolina Iran strikes are better than kumbaya attitudes in Congress I absolutely think Trump made the right decision in bombing the Iranian nuclear sites. Iran and many other bad state actors, and their proxies, represent existential threats to the U.S. Bad behavior must not be tolerated. We are neither empire building, nor are we regime changing in our defensive actions. I'm not in the least concerned about Trump ordering the strikes without congressional authorization. He was elected by a majority of American voters to stop the passive, kumbaya attitudes prevailing in the White House and Congress. Congress needs term limits, because the polarization is cause and effect of lobbyists being catalysts for wealth and power acquisition through longer seniority. As for the intelligence community's different assessment than Trump about how close Iran was to developing a nuclear weapon, who cares? When your public posture and oft-stated goals are the destruction of America, the degree of 'close to having' is a euphemism for panty waists to wring their hands and experience angst until it's not close, but NOW. — Robert Jarrard, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts Israel goaded Trump into military action This administration is the least equipped to make complex foreign policy decisions than any other one in this history of the U.S. At least in the first Trump administration there were some competent Cabinet officers and advisers, but now there is nobody to stop him from his worst impulses. Israel very effectively goaded Trump into this war action and it helped Trump domestically, at least in the short run, by taking attention away from his low approval ratings, the unlawful immigration raids, the protests and the lack of any tariff deals. It concerns me that Trump did not get congressional approval before the strikes. There was no urgency or exigency to having to make this decision. Even though the GOP Congress might well have rubber-stamped his decision, Trump is taking every avenue to consolidate his executive power, and Congress is aiding and abetting this by not asserting its constitutional rights. Iran has already performatively fired missiles at U.S. military installations in Qatar, with pre-warning. The supreme leader of Iran has to save face, and this might well be enough for him. I am more concerned that Trump is a loose cannon, and if he feels that his power is slipping he will escalate this to try to get a "rally round the flag" approval bump. In short, I simply do not trust him to act in the best interest of anyone but himself, certainly not in the interest of the American people. Israel has a vested interest in making it seem like a nuclear weapon is imminent. I believe the U.S. intelligence community on this. Trump notoriously refuses to hear briefings or pay any attention to actual facts, but instead relies on "his instincts," which are basically messages from Fox News. — Patricia Gotschalk, Wailuku, Hawaii Limits on bombing helped make it acceptable I do think President Trump made the right decision in bombing the three Iranian nuclear sites. It seems like it was limited in scope to only neutralizing the nuclear threats. And I'm not concerned about him acting on his own presidential authority, without authorization from Congress. There's a long history of presidents launching attacks like this one. As for additional retaliation by Iran, I'm not concerned because it's too far away and it's not a military power. With Trump's disagreement with the the U.S. intelligence community about whether Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, I think its nuclear program exceeds civilian use. Why have it secluded in the mountains unless it's to weaponize it? And while I'm slightly concerned about Iran's nuclear capabilities and the possibility it could receive nuclear weapons from an ally, I'm not at all concerned about the threat of nuclear war. — Scott Forrester, Phoenix, Arizona