People are only just learning what the ‘Disney Hug Rule' is
They really get you every time, but if you look closely, you might notice a familiar pattern – the Disney character will keep hugging the child until they break off the hug.
While it's not an officially mandated rule (although many others exist … more on that later), it's an informal guideline that many Disney theme park staff have embraced, so it's now become a standard practice.
5 A child hugs 'Anna' during a recent trip to Disneyland. The embrace lasted for over a minute and a half.
@mccallcook/TikTok
The adorable guideline helps ensure that the child feels their beloved character isn't pulling away.
According to the Disney fan site Inside the Magic, the practice dates back to Walt Disney himself, who apparently said, 'You never know how much that child may need that hug.'
TikTok features countless videos of this rule in action, including one heartwarming clip from @flickdash, showing a montage of kids hugging the characters for as long as they wish, and the characters patiently hold on until they let go.
5 A girl hugs Mickey Mouse at a Holiday Spectacular in Los Angeles, California on Dec. 18, 2021.
Getty Images
5 A woman hugs Mickey Mouse at Tokyo Disneyland on April 15, 2011.
AFP/Getty Images
In another clip by @mccallcook, liked by 3.3 million people, a girl called Hazel is seen running up to Anna from Frozen and refusing to 'Let It Go' for more than two minutes.
The character is seen chatting with Hazel and asking her questions endlessly until her parents finally manage to guide her away.
'I THINK SHE BROKE THE RECORD WHAT DO YOU THINK?' Hazel's mum wrote in the caption.
'I think Hazie would've sat there all day long if there wasn't a line behind us.'
In the comments, people were getting teary over the adorable moment.
'This is so pure and innocent,' said one.
'I'm sorry, but how do you not break down crying every time this happens?' another asked.
However, some wondered whether the parents should've stepped in to break the hug sooner and let another child have their turn.
'As a parent, I would have stopped it earlier,' said one.
'The parents should know that the hug went on for way too long as they put the Disney worker in an awkward position,' added someone else.
Other official rules at the parks include that characters must never eat in public, tattoos need covering, staff must be able to sign autographs as their character, and no staff member can say 'I don't know' in response to a question.
5 Tigger embraces a dog during a day at the theme park.
@flickdash/TikTok
5 A little girl hugs Mickey Mouse at Disney.
@flickdash/TikTok
Also, if a staff member wears glasses and their character doesn't, they'll need to wear contact lenses to keep it authentic.
For guests, no one over 14 is allowed to wear costumes so they aren't mistaken for real characters, and guests staying at the Disney Hotel aren't permitted to hang wet towels, swimmers, or clothes off their balconies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
43 minutes ago
- Fox News
Man goes viral on TikTok for claiming his home rental guests demanded 'weight accessible' accommodations
A man on TikTok has gone viral for claiming that he received a two-star review by guests online because his rental home was deemed not "weight accessible." In a video that garnered over 20,000 likes and hundreds of comments, the host shared the grievances his guests supposedly communicated to him after their stay. "I guess they were on the larger side and my house didn't perfectly accommodate their size," said the host. He claimed the guests said they couldn't fit through the doorway, after which the host commented, "I have standard door frames." He also said the guests claimed that "some of the furniture seemed shaky at best, and we felt scared we were going to break it." "And then they were like, 'I noticed your egg chair on your deck had a weight limit of 330 pounds on it.' That's the manufacturer that puts that [there], not me, and that's for one person," the host added. "Then they were like, 'Unfortunately, none of us could use that.'" The TikToker host claimed the Airbnb guests said his bed was super soft and they felt like they were going to cave into the middle when they were both on it. "I might say this house isn't a good fit for you," the host added in response, in part. The host concluded that it was "not a learning lesson" for him — but "hopefully [it was] just for them." Fox News Digital reached out to the TikToker and Airbnb for comment. The website of Airbnb lists various accessibility features that hosts can add to their listings. Some related features potentially pertaining to guests who are of a larger size could be the width of the home. The phrases "guest entrance wider than 32 inches" and "room entrance wider than 32 inches" are both listed. TikTokers took to the comments section to share their opinions on the matter. "As a plus-sized person, I cannot imagine being this entitled," wrote one woman. "It's no one's job but mine to make sure it's somewhere I'll be comfortable." A user asked, "If they couldn't fit through the door frame, how'd they know about the rest of the things?" "Thank you for handling this with professionalism. Unfortunately, entitlement comes in all sizes," said one woman. Another user wrote, "I'm plus size. This level of entitlement is crazy. I always check weight limits." Still another wrote, "I read the low reviews for this reason. Sometimes the issues do not apply to me." A different TikToker wrote, "I think you should have very sturdy furniture if you're going to [do] this. I think hotels use that kind of furniture." Airbnb began in 2007 "when two hosts welcomed three guests to their San Francisco home, and has since grown to over 5 million hosts who have welcomed over 2 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe," the company notes on its website. "Every day, hosts offer unique stays, experiences and services that make it possible for guests to connect with communities in a more authentic way."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Disney: a "Value" Story Waiting to Be Heard
Disney's financials were able to tell me a fascinating story, just like many of its movies and TV series. The story begins in 2019 with a deterioration that seemed not only drastically degenerative but also unfixable; then, with a surprise twist, it suddenly changed course over the past two years. The protagonist? The entertainment segment, specifically, DTC. Initially seen by the market as the villain of the story, precisely due to the unpredictability of its results; a factor that had previously scared off major investors like Buffett himself. Specifically, I wonder: how will Disney succeed in integrating its MOATs into the new entertainment vehicles? Well, in my view, there is one that gives it an incredible advantage here too. But first... Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with DIS. I immediately bring Buffett into play, and the stories shared by the Oracle of Omaha, always a cornerstone in my investment style. First, I'd like to mention that Disney has some of thoseunique and diverse qualitiesrequired to clear the first filter of a value investor, you will grin when I tell you that, at that point, Buffett himself had decided tosell out from DIS ... with regret. The reasons? The usual ones: unpredictable returns. And in this, his lifelong colleague Munger also finds justification, whose reasoning will help enrich the risk section of this article (we'll see that soon). Similar to Gayner, known as the mini Buffett, with Markel Gayner Asset Management Corp. Same uncertainties, but two different periods. The first ones, the uncertainty lay in the transition to cable TV with a volatile model. And for today's investors, From cable TV to the new DTC services. Since 1997, when Buffett was deciding whether to sell or hold DIS, Disney has changed. It is no longer just an entertainment vehicle, but a legacy conglomerate. From the 10-K we know that about 46% comes from the main segment: entertainment. Then the second source of income is experience (38%), followed by sports (ESPN and similar) at 19.7%. This is net of intersegment eliminations. 50% of the entertainment segment's revenue comes from DTC, which includes the streaming service. Here, it competes through Disney+, and partly also with Hulu, with around 186 million subscribers, behind the giant Netflix in this regard, which has over 260 million subscribers, not to mention it is also the most expensive platform. Disney holds a 4.6% share of the DCT segment, Netflix 8.5%, YouTube (11.1%). DIS's financials tell a story, and it's a pleasure to listen to it. You can feel a rising climate of tension from the statement that started in 2019; you wouldn't want to be in the shoes of the CEOs from that period. If you followed the events, both Bob Iger and Bob Chapek were criticized in turn: First for the acquisition of 21st Century Fox, then for the pandemic, dragged down by closed parks, empty theaters, and Disney+ running at a loss., empty theaters, and Disney+ running at a loss. And if it's true that numbers speak, at the time a value investor would indeed have had reason to be afraid. But let's bring some order to it. Here's a TLDR: from 2019 to 2023, revenue and EPS collapsed, and total debt doubled with the FOX acquisition; cash burn increased steadily, and no new cash was being generated. ROIC fell below WACC, weighed down by macro conditions. The market fled from DIS stock. Now it's worth taking a look at these indicators: Net income grew by 111% in 2024 year-over-year, and TTM results already show a 411% increase. The CFO is breathing again, up 41% YoY, confirming a significant upward trend also in FCF, both levered and unlevered grew by nearly 30%. All three business segments are recovering, but what I liked the most was the strong rebound in the entertainment segment, with income up 171%. A major contributor to this was the reduced loss in the DTC segment. The DTC segment has reached breakeven; and if it were to maintain its current margins, there would be a potential operating margin of 5.5% (considering $336 million in operating income on $6.118 billion in revenue), even though this projection is not confirmed by the guidance. Considering the negative role it has played in DIS's financials over the past years, in my view a new scenario is opening up for Disney, one that the market may begin to price in. The operating margin of the DTC segment in the 10-K was 142/22,776, approximately 0.63%; while in the FY2024 10-Q, it stands at 5.5%. And I ask myself: if we extend the time horizon to 10 years, is it really unreasonable to assume that DIS could maintain the FY24 Q1 operating margin? In my view, not at all, especially considering that Netflix operating margin is around 20%. And this is feasible given that Disney has one of the strongest MOATs in the entertainment landscape: the Disney Characters. Animated characters don't age and don't renegotiate contracts, leveraging a cross-generational appeal that remains valid for decades (natural loyalty), which other platforms don't have. And with the expansion of its IP base through Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, and 20th Century Fox, Disney will be able to keep its MOAT alive over the years, while also reducing competition in other sub-markets (like live-action). And this translates into the numbers through improved pricing power: it's no coincidence that the increase in prices (ARPU) and advertising revenues have driven the recovery of the DTC segment. So, what would a 5.5% operating margin contribute to DIS's overall EPS? Projecting the $6,118 million from the 10-Q across four quarters gives $24,472 million in annual revenue. At a 5.5% margin, that's about $1,346 million in operating income. Assuming only 26% of that becomes net income (as per total estimates), we get $350 million in incremental net profit. Considering that $4,972 million was reported in 2024, the DTC segment alone would generate a 7% increase in total net income. And this doesn't even factor in potential positive impacts on the other two segments, Experience and ESPN. But we can take it a step further: the FCF/Net Income ratio is about 1.5x. So the EPS increase generated by the DTC segment would translate into an incremental FCF of 7% 1.5 = 10.5%. This is the real reason why it might become attractive again to value investors. Over the past 10 years, FCF growth has been around 5%, but if that's the case, it wouldn't be so far-fetched to imagine it rising to at least 1015%, especially considering that entertainment is Disney's least capex-heavy segment (only 18% of the entertainment segment's FCO went into CAPEX, according to the latest 10-K). We now have the data to build a solid valuation section: If we assume that the DTC segment continues to contribute positively to FCF, and we apply an FCF/Net Income ratio of 1.5x, the EPS growth rate would reach 10% (i.e., 15% FCF growth 1.5). With a 10-year time horizon, that results in EPS10Y = 3.06 (1 + 0.10)? = 7.94 dollars. So, the forward P/E at 10 years would be 14x. Attractive. Using a simple DCF calculator from GuruFocus, I get a margin of safety of 33% with an 8% WACC, based on 10-year adjusted assumptions and an optimistic FCF growth rate of 15% over the next decade. Keeping the WACC fixed at 8%, which I consider reasonable, but lowering the FCF growth rate to a more conservative 10%, the model still yields a margin of safety of 5.78%. Would Buffett and Munger see more clarity in today's Disney? And would the mini Buffett be justified in holding it? In my opinion, Munger would disagree. To prove it, I refer to the Discovery case, appreciated by Munger because it lacked live-action content; a component that in theory represents Disney's MOAT. And that's a problem because it would erode the compounding effect generated by cash flows from the DTC segment, the very engine that supports my thesis. To quantify the risk, I follow an unorthodox but practical method, the Star Wars method: compared to Star Wars: Episode VII, the average budget for the following two films increased by +29%, while ROI dropped from 8x to 4x (from the reading of box office data). Film Budget WW Box Office ROI Episode VII (2015) $245M $2.07B 8.4x Episode VIII (2017) $317M $1.33B 4.2x Episode IX (2019) $275M $1.08B 3.9x This is a pattern not seen in other animated series, like the classic Toy Story, which maintained a ROI close to 5x with more linear budgets. While I recognize this doesn't depend solely on actor costs, on average, live-action films tend to see production costs increase progressively by around 20% (in line with these figures), and this directly impacts ROI. What if this cancels out the incremental EPS growth estimated for the DTC segment? In that case, EPS would grow by only +4.18% over the next 10 years. As a result, the forward P/E at 10 years would be 25x,which would be excessive, even compared to today's forward P/E distribution. In essence, the price would become congested. And that's a risk. I find it fascinating to see how Disney's management has been able to navigate the complications that emerged after 2019. And although the market hasn't fully caught on yet, the financials clearly reflect this recovery, and between the lines, a segment emerges: DTC. This could become the engine for a new level of cash generation and profit. With the right time horizon, Disney's unmistakable MOAT, which I identify in the Disney Characters, will once again play a decisive role, and in my view, DIS stock prices will have to adjust to these new prospects. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
'The Chit Show,' a new social media sketch comedy, has fans in stitches
Millions of social media users probably can't stop repeating the quirky catchphrase: "Do it lady!" A new TikTok sketch comedy, known as "The Chit Show," has gone viral since launching in May. The series of short social media videos follows Chit, a slightly awkward and slightly hunched office worker who sports a mean bowl cut and Jeffrey Dahmer-style glasses. As of July 3, "The Chit Show" had garnered more than 1 million followers on TikTok and now has its own merchandise line. The series seemingly gained popularity for its likeness to the sitcom, "The Office," due to its quick camera turns and characters who break the fourth wall to make prolonged eye contact with the viewer. The man behind Chit, Jay Renshaw, created the middle-aged character about six years ago. Renshaw is a member of The Groundlings Main Company, an improv school and talent group based in Los Angeles. He created Chit for a solo skit performance while part of "The Groundlings" amateur sketch comedy show. The initial skit Renshaw performed as Chit was the now-viral, "Do it lady!" In the skit, Chit and his coworkers are signing a birthday card for a coworker, in which Chit writes: "Do it lady!" His colleagues are confused by the sentiment. As his peers wonder what he means, Chit tries his best to convince everyone that "Do it lady!" is a real catchphrase. As of July 3, the "Do it lady!" TikTok video had more than 8.6 million views. Who is Chit? Chit is the main character of "The Chit Show." A middle-aged man with a silly and awkward personality, Chit doesn't appear to get much work done, as seen in many of the TikTok videos. But he cares about his colleagues, loves listening to Lil Wayne and Chappell Roan and can down a White Claw (of course, while on the clock). As for the name, Renshaw said "Chit" is a play on words. "It sounds like a small, ineffectual thing. Also, it has like a rhyme ... which has been so helpful to us to have Chit Show sound like (expletive) show," Renshaw told USA TODAY. "It just sounds something diminutive. The actual word means a little pay stub receipt, so it just fits his nature. It feels like also the relation of chitchat. There's so many possibilities." The making of Chit Renshaw and his colleague, Kiel Kennedy, who mans the camera and is an off-screen character in the sketch comedy, posted the first Chit video to TikTok on May 28. The video, as of July 3, had more than 6.3 million views. Currently, Renshaw and Kennedy film videos about twice a week, posting a new video every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Renshaw, who is the main writer of the show, said sometimes he pre-writes scripts verbatim as he wants to see them executed. Sometimes he comes in with a loose framework, and then other times, he and Kennedy just work out an entire idea together while filming. "The thing about social media is you get such a real-time response from your audience as to what they're really responding to and maybe what they're not," Renshaw said. "It's not to say we would ever deviate so far from what we intend for the series, but it can be helpful sometimes to know how to adjust the dial on certain characters based on the audience response." What are people saying? Social media users are loving Chit, especially his antics. "Someone get them on TV or a streaming service (please)," one TikTok user commented. Renshaw, who said he was off all social media from 2016 until launching the Chit series in May, said the outpouring of support online has been a bit like "whiplash." "I remember the first night I posted on TikTok, you were like, 'Yeah, I bet we could get to 50,000 in a month,'" Renshaw said to Kennedy. "I was like no way. That just seemed unfathomable. Fast forward to a million in a month. I still can't really wrap my head around it honestly." But beyond the follower count, Renshaw said it is the community that has come together around Chit that makes him proud. "I think equally delightful is seeing just how many audiences Chit has reached and touched," Renshaw said. "Just when I think (Chit) sort of extended his reach as far as it'll go, I find out there's a whole different demographic that is also loving Chit just as much. It's been this strangely universal thing, which (has), I think, been maybe the most rewarding part of it." What is the future of Chit? When asked about the future of "The Chit Show," Renshaw and Kennedy both said they are open to taking the comedy series wherever it leads. But most importantly, they want to stay true to Chit. "I think ultimately the goal is just to maintain the integrity of what we've created and protect the character because he's so beloved, not only by us, but by so many people now that we don't want to get involved in a process that would disrupt what we've made," Renshaw said. "We're definitely staying vigilant about not only potential opportunity for the show but also protecting what it is and the unique charm that it does have." Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
