Welsh ministers refuse to release benefits cuts letter
Eluned Morgan had written to Liz Kendall on 11 March requesting a Wales-specific assessment, but it is not known whether any such work has been done.
On Friday, the first minister refused to back the reforms until she knew more.
Last week the chancellor confirmed a tightening of eligibility for personal independence payments and a freeze on some universal credit payments.
Plaid Cymru wrote to the FM on Sunday, with its leader Rhun ap Iorwerth demanding that Kendall's response "be published in full, without delay."
People 'terrified' by benefit reforms - Labour politician
Cycling plans in Wales at risk, warn campaigners
Tories vow to end Welsh government working from home
Morgan has previously said that the changes would have a greater impact in Wales because of the relatively high level of claimant rates.
The welfare reforms come as the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, looks to boost defence funding and tries to meet her own self-imposed fiscal rules, including not borrowing to pay for day-to-day spending.
In her Spring Statement on Wednesday she announced a number of benefit changes, including tightening qualification rules for Personal Independence Payments (Pips) - the main disability benefit - claimed by more than 250,000 working aged people in Wales.
In her address to MPs, Reeves said "it can't be right" to "write off" an entire generation who are out of work and improperly using Pips.
Reeves also confirmed health-related universal credit for new claimants, which was already due to be halved from April 2026 under a package announced last week, would be frozen at its new lower level of £50 per week until 2030.
Health-related payments will be frozen for existing claimants.
A DWP assessment found 3.2m families across England and Wales would be worse off as a result of the changes, with 250,000 more people pushed into relative poverty.
The issue has become politically-charged in Wales, because of the country's relatively high level of benefits claims and after Morgan revealed a fortnight ago that she "personally spoke to number ten" about her concerns.
A copy of Morgan's letter to Kendall, dated 11 March, was then released to the media.
But in a session of the Senedd's Scrutiny of the First Minister Committee last Friday the first minister confirmed that she had not spoken to the Prime Minister Keir Starmer and could not remember who she had spoken to.
In the same session Morgan said she was reserving her position until she had more information.
Other Labour politicians have been openly critical of the planned reforms.
The Blaenau Gwent MS Alun Davies warned that some of his constituents were "terrified".
The Labour MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr, Steve Witherden, repeated his calls for a wealth tax, and in a post on X warned that "lives would be shortened" by the changes.
The Welsh government said it would be up to the sender to release the letter.
BBC Wales has asked the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) if it intends to.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Businesses are passing along tariff costs, Fed reports
Businesses across the economy are passing increased input costs from tariffs along to consumers in the form of higher prices, the Federal Reserve's latest anecdotal survey of domestic economic conditions found. Higher costs from tariffs were reported by businesses in all of the Fed's 12 regional districts, and many made the choice to raise prices as a result. 'Many firms passed on at least a portion of cost increases to consumers through price hikes or surcharges,' the Fed's July beige book, released Wednesday, reported. Those businesses that didn't push the additional costs through to their customers saw restricted profit margins, the beige book said, noting consumers' 'growing price sensitivity.' Inflation in the Labor Department's consumer price index (CPI) jumped in June, partly as a result of the tariffs. The CPI ticked up to a 2.7-percent annual increase last month from 2.4 percent in May and 2.3 percent in April. The move was in line with expectations. Many economists have been predicting that inflation coming from tariffs would show up in prices over the summer after the clearing of inventories of wholesale goods purchases made prior to the tariffs. Fitch Ratings recently put the aggregate U.S. tariff rate at 14.1 percent, the highest in decades. While President Trump has instituted a 10-percent general tariff along with China-specific tariffs, and targeted tariffs on some individual goods, his country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs have been paused until Aug. 1 as trade negotiations continue. Import prices advanced by 0.1 percent in June and deflated by 0.2 percent relative to last year, the Labor Department reported Thursday. The number was below economists' expectations and reflected lower energy prices. Fuel import prices slid by 0.7 percent last month after dropping 5 percent during the previous month amid rising tensions and conflict in the Middle East. West Texas Intermediate crude oil is down more than 10 percent on the month. Taking out fuel and food imports, core import prices increased by 0.2 percent in June after rising 0.1 percent in May. The U.S. dollar is also losing value now relative to other currencies, having fallen about 9 percent since the beginning of the year amid President Trump's trade war. Economists say the weaker dollar could boost inflation. 'Since the Trump administration began imposing tariffs, the dollar has depreciated, which could lead to a larger pass-through from tariffs to consumer prices,' Michael Pearce, deputy chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, told the Reuters news agency. 'A weaker dollar boosts the likelihood that firms pass on a larger share of tariffs.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Voices: As unemployment hits a four-year high, Rachel Reeves must now do whatever it takes
'We believe in the dignity of work and we believe in the dignity of every worker.' So said the prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer, in making the case for a since neutered welfare reform programme. Yet at the very same time, other government policies have compromised the ability of people to find that work, as the latest official figures make clear. At 4.7 per cent, unemployment is now at its highest level in four years, while vacancies have fallen for three. The estimated number of openings came in at 727,000 between April and June 2025, 56,000 less than the previous three month quarter. The number of employees on payrolls for June 2025 decreased by 178,000 (0.6 per cent) on the year, and by 41,000 when compared with May. Wage rises also continued to trend lower. Their average was recorded at 5 per cent over the three months to May, from 5.3 per cent over the previous three month period. That represents the lowest rate of increase for nearly three years. Looking ahead, it doesn't get any more cheerful. The UK's stats agency also found a sharp rise in the number of potential redundancies, which jumped by 17 per cent in June 2025 compared with May. The number of employers actually proposing redundancies rose by 2 per cent but that number was 42 per cent higher when compared with a year earlier. Over the same span, the number of potential layoffs leapt by 68 per cent. Yes, the ONS has recently had all sorts of problems with its numbers and the Labour Force Survey is the biggest of those. However, there have been plenty of other independent survey data supporting the underlying premise, which is that the labour market is on the sick list, with more people battling for fewer jobs. The KPMG/REC report on jobs, released at the beginning of the week, said the same thing. It probably won't surprise you to learn that the TUC described this unhappy situation as 'another toxic Tory legacy'. It that fair? Some of the problems Labour is now grappling with do have their origins in decisions taken before it assumed office (looking at you, Brexit). Some. But not all. Because, as I have repeatedly argued, it was Labour that opted to fill the fiscal hole it faced after it won the general election by taxing jobs; by making employers pay more for every person on the payroll through higher national insurance contributions (NICs). Chancellor Rachel Reeves really doesn't need another headache, but there's one on the way. The unemployment claimant count is rising (to 1.74 million) and that increases the strain on a threadbare public purse. Increasing those employer NICs is proving to be a costly way of raising cash. The phrase 'cutting off your nose to spite you face' comes to mind. The problem is that we're stuck with the policy. Having executed more U-turns than a stunt driver in a Hollywood car chase, the government can't very easily reverse course on this one. With the public finances in a hot mess, it can't afford to. A minister might very well now ask what I'd do to fix this. Sorry to say, there are no magic bullets to solve this knotty problem. Labour simply has to grow an economy that has lately looked stuck in the mud. To that end, it is planning to deregulate the City of London in a bid to boost the UK's chunky financial services industry, something that history tells us could easily blow up in all our faces. Anyone around during the financial crisis of 2007/08 can speak to that. A debt funded investment spending spree is also on the way, which is less dangerous if the government can find a few winners. Yes, there are dangers here, but I think we should give Reeves the benefit of the doubt. The economy has long been in need of greater investment. This will help. It's worth pointing out that part of the reason for UK plc's recent struggles is that it has been suffering from a hangover from the growth spurt it enjoyed in the first three months of the year that was driven by manufacturers going hell for leather to ship product to the US before the imposition of Donald Trump's tariffs. That hangover has been nastier than anyone expected but we should see its end reflected in future ONS releases. And one big consolation from the horrid figures in this latest missive is that it should lock in the expected interest rate cut from the Bank of England at beginning of next month, despite the unexpectedly steep rise in June inflation to 3.6 per cent. The trouble is, while most forecasters expect the economy to grow in the second half of 2025, it isn't expected grow quickly. There is also the impact of a tax raising budget to factor in, too. There's no sugar-coating it: Starmer and his team are caught in a nasty bind and the 'working people' they keep saying they want to help are trapped with them. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Keir Starmer says he will not be ‘deflected' from plans by repeat rebel MPs
Sir Keir Starmer said he would not be 'deflected' by Labour rebels after he stripped the whip from several MPs. The Prime Minister suspended the whip from Rachael Maskell, Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff. The four MPs all voted against the Government over the welfare reform legislation, but party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion. Sir Keir Starmer said he had to 'deal with people who repeatedly break the whip' and that everyone elected as a Labour MP needs to 'deliver as a Labour Government'. Asked at a press conference if his decision to punish MPs made him look weak, the Prime Minister said the party was elected to enact change and 'we've got to carry through that change, and we've got to carry through reforms'. He said: 'I'm determined that we will change this country for the better, for millions of working people, and I'm not going to be deflected from that. 'And therefore we had to deal with people who repeatedly break the whip because everyone was elected as a Labour MP on the manifesto of change and everybody needs to deliver as a Labour Government. 'This is about what we're doing for the country, and that's why I'm so determined to press forward with the reforms and the change that we need to bring about.' York Central MP Ms Maskell said earlier she thought Sir Keir's response was wrong, saying: 'On this occasion, I don't think he's got it right.' She told the BBC: 'I really hope from this process there will be reflection over the summer, but also learning. 'There needs to be a better reach-out to backbenchers to ensure that we are the safeguards of our Government.' Other MPs have been more supportive of the Prime Minister's decision, with one telling the PA news agency: 'Someone has to die in the square.' Arguing that politics was a 'team effort', they suggested the suspensions would make rebels 'think more about the politics'. Government minister Jess Phillips said the four should not be surprised by the action against them. The Home Office minister told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'There has to be an element of discipline otherwise you end up not being able to govern.' She added: 'I think that constantly taking to the airwaves and slagging off your own Government, I have to say, what did you think was going to happen?' On Sky News she said: 'We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the Government to deliver those things, I don't know what you expect.' Referring to a description of the rebels by an unnamed source in The Times, she told Sky News: 'I didn't call it persistent knob-headery, but that's the way that it's been termed by some.'
