We cannot continue with dirty, scarce and expensive energy to power our society
renewables
, developing energy that is clean, secure and affordable for all. But this opportunity is not unique to us and if we don't act decisively, others will seize that chance ahead of us.
Ireland
has among the
highest electricity prices
in Europe, with household bills 30 per cent above the average. Some reports estimate up to 550,000 Irish households are in energy poverty.
Meanwhile, we sleepwalk towards costs as high as €26 billion in 2030 for
missing EU emissions targets
, putting us among the worst in
Europe
per capita. A significant portion of this is attributable to the energy system, despite enviable wind resources.
This is not just an economic issue, it's a social one, and every day it compounds the
climate crisis
. Historically, Ireland lacked the natural resources that fuelled previous industrial revolutions. But we have abundant wind and ample solar, which can be harnessed economically. There is unnecessary waste, in terms of the wind and solar we already produce and in how we use energy that pollutes. What we are missing is a unifying, system-wide vision and implementation plan. Without this, we remain a bystander in the electric revolution.
READ MORE
My father,
the late Eddie O'Connor
, saw the potential of Ireland's enormous renewable resources long before others. He challenged us to make the possible a reality. His big ideas, such as a European supergrid, are closer now than ever.
Inspired by his vision, along with my own observations and input from many stakeholders, I established Trifecta Ireland, a non-profit 'do and think tank' to catalyse system change.
The name refers to the triple objective of clean, secure and affordable energy for all. Our mission is to realise the social, environmental and economic opportunities of decarbonisation. We need a unified vision for our desired energy future, as well as a system-wide master plan dynamic enough to adapt to emerging technology. We must leverage innovation, international evidence and expertise.
Trifecta Ireland will work with the State and industry, science and society to create the conditions needed for investment in electrification and renewable energy infrastructure. Trifecta is focused on collaboration, bringing together experts from government, industry, research and communities to shape a shared path forward for Ireland's energy future.
One initial priority is to develop a credible vision and roadmap for transforming how we produce, use and manage energy. This plan will lay out clear, practical steps to reach a zero-carbon energy system by 2050. We will draw on top global systems change and mega-project delivery expertise. With the authors of How Big Things Get Done – a Financial Times Book of the Year nominee – we will apply the evidence-based principles of delivering mega-projects on time and on budget.
This will involve convening across sectors to find solutions for our immediate challenges and the multi-decade programme to transform our green economy. We will catalyse projects to accelerate emissions reduction, improve affordability and unlock investment at scale.
If we get this right, in addition to tackling climate change and delivering cleaner and more secure energy, we can achieve a reduction in our cost of living and doing business. It can bring about an economic transformation benefiting all of us.
In Europe, a competitiveness crisis rages on. The energy market is almost dysfunctional and favours fossil fuels. This will be felt acutely in Ireland unless we begin to plan differently for our energy, with a view to present and future. Our economy and society's most vulnerable people are at risk.
We cannot continue with dirty, scarce and expensive energy to power our society, when technology exists to secure the opposite in abundance. Ireland cannot succeed alone. We will require a substantial amount of private capital to support many of our efforts to reduce carbon emissions. But here, as elsewhere, there has not been sufficient investment.
Uncertainty, delay and the policy implementation gap are barriers to securing that funding. This is compounded by ongoing macro issues such as higher interest rates. Our Government and governments everywhere must recognise their responsibilities and prioritise resources for implementation.
By collaborating with industry, we can create the enabling investment conditions that have been missing. With credible long-term plans and deliberate regulation to reduce systemic risk, investor confidence will increase and capital will flow. Things can get moving at pace.
Collaboration between government and industry is vital. The role of communities in deploying today's solutions and driving tomorrow's transformation is critical. All sectors of Irish society must be actively engaged.
Lesley O'Connor is founder of Trifecta Ireland
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Govt walks back plans to force companies to slap health warnings on booze amid rising cost pressure & Trump tariff fears
THE Government has canned plans to force booze companies to put health warnings on beer, wine and spirits. The measure has been slapped with a two-year delay due to concerns that it would hurt Irish 3 Frank Murray of Alcohol Action Ireland said there is a huge link between cancer and alcohol consumption 3 Tainiste Simon Harris brought the motion to cabinet Credit: PA The last The law was due to kick in next year but the Cabinet today agreed to put it on the long finger following backlash by the booze businesses. Industry figures had warned the Government that the introduction of the labels specifically for Ireland would create an added cost for businesses which could have an impact on prices for consumers. This increase in cost for companies was coming at a time when Trump is threatening tariffs of up to 30 per cent on all goods travelling from READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS Many Irish beer and whiskey companies rely on the US market for major sales, and tariffs run the risk of hurting their bottom line. In a bid to ease the pressure on these companies, the Cabinet today agreed to delay the introduction of the Tanaiste The Tanaiste told his Government colleagues that the delay will enable the Most read in Irish News However, one Minister told the Irish Sun that the alcohol labelling law will not see the light of day under the current Government. They said: 'That's that done. You won't be hearing about that again.' 'PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THOSE RISKS' Alcohol Action Ireland had previously slammed the Government's decision to delay the label law. Chairperson of Alcohol Action Ireland Professor Frank Murray told 'Unfortunately, the risk of alcohol consumption in terms of cancer, for instance, begins at very low levels of alcohol consumption, particularly breast cancer. 'Again, most people don't know that I'm afraid.' NEW PLAN The The proposal comes as part of a newly published ten-year NHS plan. There have also been similar initiatives in other countries — including 3 It was proposed that booze get slapped with a health warning Credit: Getty
Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the State's new investment plans: the work is only starting
The Government's plan to invest more to address the infrastructure deficits in the Irish economy is a move in the right direction. Shortfalls in housing, water, energy and transport are not only crippling competitiveness but affecting people's daily lives. The Government is correct to push ahead with its planning, despite the international uncertainty. A growing economy and a rising population have left recent administrations running to catch up. International investors have been increasingly outspoken about Ireland's infrastructural shortfalls. All of this needs to be addressed. And Taoiseach Micheál Martin is correct when he says that State investment spending must be protected no matter what. However, the plans published yesterday raise of number of important questions. The lack of any detail of the projects to be included in the plan is somewhat puzzling. Everyone knew in the final period of the last government and the opening months of this one that the review was due. So why has no list of projects been completed? Because of this, as Prof Alan Barrett of the Economic and Social Research Institute pointed out, we do not have any of the essential detail on how the projects all fit together. READ MORE There are, of course, a significant number of projects which we do know about and which will be funded by the money now being put aside. The focus on vital areas such as water, wastewater and energy is important. But with last-minute rows over housing in particular, it is unclear that the Government yet has a convincing plan in this key area. An updated housing plan, due in the autumn, needs to give a clear view . The Government is also – belatedly – looking seriously at the blockages and delays to project planning. This is welcome but long overdue. These issues have been hiding in plain sight in recent years, leading to extraordinary delays and additional costs in projects large and small. Too much time was lost here by the last government. This one needs to get serious on the issue of the delivery. This will be uncomfortable politically and it remains to be seen if the Government has the stomach for the necessary fights. The scale of the investment commitments being made are significant. And paying for it will use a lot of the leeway in the national finances and also the cash put aside from the Apple tax payment and the sale of AIB shares. This means a higher level of risk. To create the required leeway in the national finances – and ensure yet more cash is not pumped into the economy – the increased investment spending must be combined with much tighter control of day-to-day spending. This is the trade off. If this does not happen, then the scale of the financial risks facing the State will increase yet further. And they are already high enough.
Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Omagh bombing survivor wants High Court to compel State to hold public inquiry into atrocity
Two people directly affected by the Omagh bombing want the High Court to compel the Irish government to establish a public inquiry into the atrocity. Emmet Tunney, who survived the 1998 dissident republican bombing, says the Government is obliged to establish a public inquiry in circumstances where state authorities allegedly held 'actionable intelligence' relating to the attack. Mr Tunney's case states that a public inquiry is required to ensure an effective investigation of the atrocity. He alleges the State's failure to hold such an inquiry is a breach of his rights under the Constitution and under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). According to Mr Tunney's court documents, article two of the ECHR requires an 'effective, independent, prompt, and public' investigation in circumstances where state agents knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life. READ MORE Articles 40 and 41 of the Constitution require effective investigations of deaths involving potential state failures, his papers say. Shawneen Conway, whose 18-year-old brother Gareth was killed in the bombing, is seeking to bring an action similar to Mr Tunney's, the High Court heard on Tuesday. A total of 29 people, including a mother pregnant with twins, died and hundreds were injured when a car bomb planted by the Real IRA exploded in the centre of the Co Tyrone town on August 15th, 1998. An independent inquiry into the bombing established by the UK government opened in Omagh in January and is continuing. That inquiry is examining whether the atrocity could have been prevented by UK authorities. In the High Court on Tuesday, Ruaidhrí Giblin, for Mr Tunney, sought an early date for his application seeking the court's permission to bring the case. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty said she would hear Mr Tunney's and Ms Conway's applications for court permission next week. Mr Tunney, from Omagh, Co Tyrone, is seeking an order compelling the Government to establish a public inquiry into the bombing and he wants a court declaration that the Government's failure to establish such an inquiry to date is in breach of his rights. He wants to bring his case against the Government, Ireland and the Attorney General. His case claims some of the perpetrators of the bombing are believed to have operated within the Republic of Ireland. He alleges there were failures in intelligence sharing and co-operation between Irish and UK authorities before the bombing. Authorities in the Republic may have had prior knowledge of the Real IRA's planning, his documents claim. Mr Tunney also argues an Irish government inquiry is required in circumstances where there are limitations on the jurisdiction of the UK government's inquiry. For example, he says, the UK government cannot make findings as to whether Irish authorities are culpable for a failure to supply information relating to the bombing. In the UK Omagh bombing inquiry, its chairman, Lord Turnbull, heard arguments over the last two days regarding applications from some survivor and family groups seeking to be represented by special advocates. They said their interests should be represented in closed hearings and they raised a risk of damage to confidence in the inquiry if they were not. However, a lawyer for the UK government said no statutory public inquiry has had special advocates to date and there was no justification to have them in this case. Katherine Grange KC also contended no provision was made for such appointments in the 2005 Inquiries Act and she cautioned around avoiding unnecessary costs. At the conclusion of the hearings around special advocates on Tuesday, Lord Turnbull said the issue raised is 'important and interesting'. He will provide a written decision 'in due course'. – Additional reporting PA
