logo
Parking balance: What's the right mix?

Parking balance: What's the right mix?

Yahoo17-05-2025
May 17—ROCHESTER — Dirk Erickson said the idea of building a 180-unit apartment complex with only 140 parking stalls never occurred to him before he began planning the Bryk at Broadway Apartments.
"I was a little concerned about going 80% (parking) when we were doing this, because we had always rented townhomes before, so everyone had their own garage and driveways to park in," he said.
Now planning a second downtown-adjacent project, Erickson, whose company is Stack Development, has no qualms about a ratio that provides fewer parking spaces than apartments.
City-required parking minimums changed with the 2022 adoption of a new unified development code, but now Rochester City Council members are asking whether such minimums are needed at all. They plan to discuss it during a June 9 study session.
With a proposed 109 parking spaces for 132 apartments near Silver Lake, Erickson said the reduced parking ratio has proven successful at Bryk, which lies roughly four blocks away, near the intersection of North Broadway and Civic Center Drive.
"So far, almost basically fully occupied, we are doing just fine with that," he said of Bryk.
While dipping below a one-to-one ratio for parking is becoming the norm near downtown, Rochester City Council members are asking whether a minimum for developers should be required at all, anywhere in the city.
"Let's not make the city's rules prevent them from going down to zero and see where we end up," Ward 5 Councilmember Shaun Palmer said. "Do I think they will go down to zero? I doubt it, but I think they will have limited parking."
The city's 2022 unified development code requires at least one off-street parking space for every two apartments in most areas of the city, but earlier standards were more complex.
"The parking standards, as they relate to multi-family, were pretty intense," Rochester Planning Supervisor Ed Caples said of previous requirements. "In most zoning districts, the minimum parking requirement was one parking space for a studio or one bedroom, 1.5 parking spaces for a two-bedroom, two parking spaces for a three-bedroom, and I believe three parking spaces for a four-bedroom."
The past standards allowed developers to ask to incorporate fewer spots into developments along transit lines and other amenities or businesses that could reduce the need for tenants to have personal vehicles. However, the process has been seen as time-consuming for developers and city staff, sometimes resulting in added costs or delays for a project.
Christine Lindsey and her husband went through the public negotiation process with the city's Planning and Zoning Commission, as well as the City Council, when they developed Cottage Grove at Saint Marys Townhomes with 15 rental units and no tenant parking.
Located across 14th Avenue Southwest from Saint Marys Hospital, the complex required special permission to build without off-street tenant parking, reserving a few spaces for deliveries and visitors. It's a model that Lindsey, a Rochester native, said her family experienced in other countries.
"My family's lived overseas for so long, we lived it every day, so I understood how it could work," she said.
Within two years, the townhome rentals have included a mix of long- and short-term rentals, leasing to international professionals and patients, as well as younger professionals who wanted to avoid buying a car.
"It's a choice," Lindsey said. "They could afford a car, but they decide they don't want one."
As Rochester invests $175.5 million in federal and DMC funds for the Link rapid-transit system through downtown, Lindsey said she expects to see less reliance on cars by people living and working near the downtown core.
Erickson says that's already happening, since people can go to work without needing a car, while a variety of delivery services and rideshare options exist to meet other needs. As the city continues to expand transit and provide safe biking and pedestrian options, he said tenants are less reliant on personal vehicles downtown.
Among them is Nathan Hoover, one of the Bryk's first tenants.
The 2017 Mayo High School graduate was introduced to the Bryk apartments while working on a marketing video for Realty Growth Inc., which was hired to lease commercial space in the building.
"I've always wanted to live downtown," Hoover said. "It's been a goal of mine, instead of living in the suburbs."
While his decision not to own a car or get a driver's license makes downtown living practical, he said market rents are beyond his reach. Bryk met his needs, allowing Hoover to have a lifestyle in which he gets coffee downtown before catching a bus to his northwest Rochester office.
As RGI's marketing director, he said he finds himself moving throughout the city, but can make it work with public transit and relying on others for a ride when needed.
When it comes to grocery shopping and some other personal tasks, it can be challenging, but relying on siblings and friends, as well as delivery options, means saving the costs of vehicle ownership is worth it.
"It's a blessing and a curse, but I definitely have made it work for my lifestyle," he said.
Going car-free is a choice for Hoover. But Kutzky Park Neighborhood resident Lindsey Rohe says that's not the case for everyone living without a car.
"I used to wear my car like a glove," she said. "I loved having a vehicle."
A 2013 disability left her paralyzed on half her body, ending her ability to drive.
Having lived in two downtown apartment buildings, and now on the edge of downtown, she says her power wheelchair frequently gets her where she needs to go. Otherwise, she relies on public and private transit services.
"It's not a choice, but it is a reality that I need to get a ride everywhere," she said, pointing out she's encouraged by some city efforts to increase accessibility, but also sees the need for more awareness for those who don't drive.
"I can get to Walgreens, Hy-Vee, and other stores at Barlow Plaza on my own," she said of retail locations within blocks of her apartment building. "The intersection (at Civic Center Drive and 11th Avenue) is super problematic. I fear for my safety every time I cross it, but I go anyway."
She said that as the city develops safer routes through and around the downtown area, she expects opportunities to open up for her and others without vehicles.
Wyatt Ryan sees a similarly low reliance on cars at Nicholas Apartments, on West Center Street, where he lives. While he owns a car and rents a stall there, he rides his bike to work daily at Mayo Clinic, embracing the flexibility of living near downtown.
"A lot of (medical) residents and med students do live here, and I know a lot of them don't have vehicles," he said.
He said the current state of Rochester makes it difficult for him to consider giving up his car permanently, but he sees potential for the city to move in that direction.
"I love the idea of not needing a vehicle, but I think depending on where those developments would be, it would be really hard," he said.
Caples, from the Planning Department, says many cities are shifting expectations for apartment parking with such cases in mind.
"It's an ever-evolving field and an ever-evolving understanding of what impacts are for requiring minimum or maximum parking requirements," he said.
It means Rochester won't be alone if it drops parking minimums for future downtown apartment buildings.
Strong Towns, a nonprofit advocacy organization addressing development patterns, reported that nearly 100 U.S. cities, including Duluth, Minneapolis and St. Paul in Minnesota, had removed parking requirements by 2021.
More recently, Northfield dropped its required parking minimums with unanimous city council support.
Northfield Community Development Director Jake Reilly said the effort was gradual, starting with dropping the required parking in the city's downtown historic district several years ago and taking it citywide last year.
"We believe the private market knows its parking needs better than we do and therefore removing minimums means that the business owner can determine its need for constructing or including parking spaces in a project," he said.
Caples said Community Development staff are still studying impacts of changes in other cities and potential consequences locally in preparation for the council discussion next month. There are some potential risks for the city, he said.
"I would say, by and large, reducing to zero, off-street parking requirements and leaving it to the developer leaves open the possibility of spillover on the adjacent roadways and whatnot and the utilization of other parking areas," Caples said of potential negative consequences.
Permit programs and seasonal parking requirements can reduce the amount of on-street parking in an area. However, developers and tenants acknowledge that some car owners spill into the streets when they don't want to pay for off-street parking or none is available.
Palmer said the concern about added on-street parking is why he doesn't want to eliminate off-street parking requirements in neighborhoods outside the city core. However, he said, city efforts are reducing the potential conflict downtown by opening park-and-ride opportunities at the ends of the rapid-transit system and elsewhere.
His fellow council member, Nick Miller, said he sees potential to eliminate parking minimums city-wide for multi-family complexes, but he is willing to start on more limited terms.
He said flexibility in regulations, especially downtown, can advance the city's housing and affordability goals.
Developers estimate that when costs are broken down, the construction of just one interior parking stall costs between $20,000 and $40,000. While outdoor parking lots are cheaper to build, land prices and availability downtown make them difficult to consider.
Since 100 parking spaces can cost $2 million at the low end, the potential high-end rent of $200 per month per space means it would take more than eight years to recoup costs, without accounting for monthly expenses tied to heating the garages, providing security and routine maintenance.
Sioux Falls, South Dakota-based developer Nate Stencil said such costs can jeopardize an apartment's affordability when too many spaces are required and left empty.
For projects like the recently opened Silver Lake Crossing Apartments on Seventh Street Northwest, near Broadway Avenue, he said providing a parking space for 75% to 80% of the apartments meets tenants' needs without unnecessarily adding to development costs.
"At the end of the day, we're the people putting a ton of money at risk to do those types of projects," he said. "If we're comfortable and feel as if the parking won't be an issue to the tenants or won't cause a big enough problem where the building isn't successful, I think it should be up to the developer owner to proceed with those projects within reason."
Could a developer put forward a project with zero parking? That's unlikely, especially with the largest projects, said Chris Osmundson, a representative of Minnetonka-based Onward Investors, which is planning a 283-apartment complex on the south side of Civic Center Drive .
"Most banking institutions, whether it's debt or equity — and this goes for the market-rate and the affordable housing world — they also need to know that the tenants will in fact rent here," Osmundson said. "They do need to have car parking, so a lot of times debt and equity won't let you build a project with no parking."
Onward's project, which is seeking state support to keep rents low, is proposed with 185 spaces for those 283 apartments. That ratio, Osmundson said, hinges on the proximity to downtown and growing transit options.
Council member Miller, who himself rarely drives, said it seems like a logical step with more people finding they don't need cars.
"When we think about how much of our population is not driving, it gives us more flexibility," he said.
Council member Andy Friederichs, who owns three apartment buildings within walking distance of downtown, said his tenants highlight that flexibility.
"Very few of our tenants have cars," he said, pointing to buildings populated with medial researchers, students, nurses and physicians seeking to reduce costs.
With that insight, he tends to support reducing or eliminating parking requirements for future apartment development.
"I do believe it should be up to the discretion of the owner, how they would like to do that," he said. "They are the ones assuming the risk of having no parking."
If at least four council members agree, potential changes to the parking requirements could be voted on later this year, with additional updates to the unified development code.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Guzman y Gomez looks to open second Naperville restaurant on Route 59
Guzman y Gomez looks to open second Naperville restaurant on Route 59

Chicago Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Guzman y Gomez looks to open second Naperville restaurant on Route 59

Naperville was the first city in the U.S. to have a Guzman y Gomez Mexican Kitchen when the Australia-based chain opened in 2020 along Naper Boulevard near Ogden Avenue. Now, the company is taking steps toward its second restaurant in Naperville, with the unanimous endorsement of the city's Planning and Zoning Commission for its request to build along Route 59. Guzman y Gomez won a positive recommendation for its plans to demolish a former Juicy O restaurant in the Fox River Commons shopping center and replace it with a 2,600-square-foot dine-in and drive-thru restaurant. Jason Trombley, head of U.S. development for Guzman y Gomez, said the new site at 844 S. Route 59 would help the company promote 'our food and our people' while growing its U.S. presence. The company's seventh store in the country opened this week in Des Plaines; all are in the Chicago area. 'We think brand awareness is a big part of this puzzle, and a second store (in Naperville) will provide sales to the southern part of Naperville and also boost the store on the northern side of the city,' Trombley said, referencing its first location at 1519 N. Naper Blvd. The site where Guzman y Gomez hopes to open its second Naperville shop is near recent redevelopments, including The Matrix Club and Mall of India. In documents submitted to the city, the company said its store — designed in brown and gray with white and yellow accents — will be a 'new-look building' that will 'brighten a center that needs new growth and revitalization.' 'I am excited about that location with everything that's going on there,' said Whitney Robbins, planning and zoning commission chairwoman. Guzman y Gomez's plans for the site require Naperville City Council approval for a major change to the planned unit development for Fox River Square and a final plat for the land. Adam Beaver, with the city's planning services team, said a restaurant is permitted within the property's B2 zoning, and city staff found no concerns with designs for the site. Plans call for an outdoor dining patio with seating for 25 people, a parking lot with 31 spaces, new sidewalks and a bike path connection along Route 59. The drive-thru would have two lanes for ordering that merge into one for pickup, and the entrance to the restaurant would be on the north end of the site to avoid traffic backups near the entrance to the shopping center. The fast-casual Mexican food chain, which is said to have something of a cult following in Australia, is the brainchild of America cofounders Steven Marks and Robert Hazan. At the time the first Guzman & Gomez store opened in Naperville, Marks told the Naperville Sun the goal was put down roots in the U.S. the same way they have in Australia, Japan and Singapore. 'We chose Naperville because of the community,' Marks said in 2020. 'We kept hearing about this city, which is ranked as one of the best places to live in the U.S., and the moment we arrived here and saw the site, we knew this was where our first U.S. restaurant had to be.'

Expanded food truck rules win Elgin panel's nod but plans for food truck park stall
Expanded food truck rules win Elgin panel's nod but plans for food truck park stall

Chicago Tribune

time08-07-2025

  • Chicago Tribune

Expanded food truck rules win Elgin panel's nod but plans for food truck park stall

Proposals to allow food trucks to operate in downtown Elgin, on publicly owned property and in Wing Park are headed to the Elgin City Council for approval, but plans for a food truck park stalled at Monday's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Food trucks currently are allowed on private property if the zoning allows for an eating establishment as a permitted use and the owner requests a temporary use permit, which typically lasts for 60 days, Community Development Director Marc Mylott said at the meeting. Food trucks also are permitted at special events, like those held at downtown Festival Park, Mylott said. Those rules would be widened under an amended ordinance so that food trucks that obtain a conditional use permit can operate on private property downtown and on public property like parks, Mylott said. Trucks would need to be within 400 feet of a business to apply for the conditional use, he said. The applicant would need to provide access to restrooms, have a litter collection plan, and pass Elgin Public Health Department and Elgin Fire Department inspections, Mylott said. Commissioners voted 4-0 to recommend the council approved the amended rules. However, only one of two food truck-related projects passed muster with the commission at the same meeting. The first, a food truck to be located next to the new Wing Park clubhouse, is proposed by the city's Parks and Recreation Department. It would be run by the same vendor being hired to operate a whiskey bar inside the clubhouse, construction of which is to start later this year, officials said. Menus for the indoor business and the food truck would be the same. Commissioners recommended the council approve the plan but tabled One Eleven Holdings' request to permanently establish a food truck park at 215 DuPage St., where it's currently operating on a temporary basis under the name The Spot. A temporary permit granted by the city allows several trucks to serve food from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. Thursday to Sunday through October. 'We are running under that special use, and it's kind of a stress test we're doing,' said Germina 'Mina' Vega, who runs the business with her sister Yesenia Echevarria. The Spot is located next to the residential Artspace Lofts on Spring Street. Resident Nicole Prokop said she isn't a fan of the proposal because the food trucks have created problems in the few weeks they've been operating there. While she loves the idea of a food truck park, which can offer diverse types of food and keep people shopping locally, 'I just don't think it's fair to have a food truck parked 25 feet from our building when (it causes) light pollution and noise pollution,' Prokop said. But Krzysztof Nowicki, who owns trucks selling Polish food and desserts at The Spot, said he believes a food concept like this can bring people together. 'I know what it means to take a dream, put it on wheels, (then) work day and night to share it with the community,' Nowicki said. 'Trucks like mine often start with a single family, a single recipe, a single hope. We do not have corporate sponsors. What we have is a passion, a work ethic, and a deep desire to be part of something bigger. And a food truck park gives us that chance.' Vega and Echevarria said they have taken neighbors' feedback seriously and reduced the number of trucks parked at The Spot. They're also willing to invest $20,000 to upgrade the electrical system so the trucks don't have to use generators, which produce noise, Vega said. Echevarria's husband, Kevin, owns Dream Hall at 51 S. Grove Ave. He is listed on the application and provides the use of Dream Hall's restrooms for the food truck business. But he is also a newly appointed Planning and Zoning Commission member. He recused himself from the discussions and votes related to the amendment and the Wing Park and The Spot applications. Commissioner Karin Jones said it's unusual for the commission to hear a proposal from a fellow commissioner. 'It makes my stomach feel unsettled,' said Jones, who is a downtown business owner. 'It just doesn't feel great to me' that the commission appears to be 'passing a text amendment to accommodate an applicant,' she said. Instead of voting on the request from The Spot, Jones made a motion — approved with a 3-1 vote — to table the application to get more information and gather additional feedback from residents and downtown businesses. Commissioner Nancy Abuali cast the only no vote on the motion. The request will be discussed again at the commission's Aug. 4 meeting.

The James Beard Award–Winning Restaurant the Whale Wins Is Closing Permanently
The James Beard Award–Winning Restaurant the Whale Wins Is Closing Permanently

Eater

time08-07-2025

  • Eater

The James Beard Award–Winning Restaurant the Whale Wins Is Closing Permanently

Renee Erickson's restaurant empire is going through a shake-up. Her Capitol Hill steakhouse Bateau (and the adjoining Boat Bar) have closed temporarily while Erickson and her team at Sea Creatures rejiggers the space. Two of the restaurant group's General Porpoise doughnut shops have closed permanently. And workers at Bateau, General Porpoise, and Erickson's famed oyster bar the Walrus and the Carpenter have unionized to push back against what they say amounts to a pay cut after management instituted a new service charge system. Now yet another shoe has dropped, and it's a doozy: The Whale Wins, the celebrated Fremont restaurant and pantry, is closing permanently on Tuesday, October 28. Its lease is expiring, and rather than renewing, Sea Creatures is pulling the plug. 'This was not an easy decision,' said Erickson in a press release. 'The Whale Wins has meant the world to us, and to so many people who've celebrated birthdays, anniversaries, graduations and ordinary Wednesdays at its tables. But like many restaurants, we're facing rising costs that have outpaced our sales — and we've also seen fewer guests walking through our doors.' The Whale Wins opened in 2012 to widespread acclaim. Bon Appetit named it one of the best new restaurants in the country and Eater put it on its national best restaurants list a few years later. In 2016, the Whale Wins earned Erickson a James Beard Award in the Best Chef: Northwest category. But those laurels haven't translated into sales, at least not lately. The Whale Wins 'has been losing money for a number of years now,' said Sea Creatures co-owner Jeremy Price in an email. 'We've tried just about everything there to turn things around—adding a larder / taking out seating, streamlining the bar program, adding lunch / brunch, taking away lunch, many different happy hour promotions, wine events, a wine club, and on and on. We just haven't been able to make it work, unfortunately. It is a fantastic restaurant, but is older, and we find that many diners gravitate to what's new, rather than becoming regulars at established, mature restaurants.' Price noted that Sea Creatures has a history of closing restaurants that aren't working and said this is not connected to the temporary closure of Bateau and Boat Bar — in that case, ownership is 'confident the Capitol Hill restaurants will return to profitability with some tweaks in layout and format.' It doesn't mean that Sea Creatures is shrinking, either; the group is opening three new restaurants in the Pioneer Square development Railspur later this year, and Price said that workers at Whale are being offered jobs there. But Whale's closure may presage a bad year for Seattle restaurants in general. Those same trends that Price identified as hurting the Fremont restaurant's bottom line are also problems for other businesses. 'It is a really difficult time for many restaurants,' Price said. 'We do not have more closures planned, but I think we will continue to see lots of restaurants going under in the next year or so.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store