logo
Dassault CEO Confirms India Lost One Rafale Jet But Not During Operation Sindoor Combat; Rejects Pakistans Claim

Dassault CEO Confirms India Lost One Rafale Jet But Not During Operation Sindoor Combat; Rejects Pakistans Claim

India.com08-07-2025
In a major revelation two months after the Operation Sindoor, Dassault Aviation chairman and CEO Eric Trappier has rejected Pakistan's claim of shooting down Indian Rafale fighter planes. Speaking to French website Avion Chasse, Trappier also said that while India lost one Rafale, the jet was not lost during combat but due to technical reasons.
Notably, the Pakistan Air Force had claimed to have downed five Indian Air Force fighter jets on May 7. The PAF claimed that it shot down three Rafales using Chinese PL-15E missiles launched using the J-10C multi-role combat aircraft. However, Pakistan has so far not furnished any evidence for its claims.
Notably, Dassault Aviation manufactures Rafale aircraft. Trappier has termed Pakistan's Rafale shootdown claim 'inaccurate and unfounded' while saying that the loss of one aircraft occurred without enemy contact. Confirming the loss, Trappier said it was due to a technical failure at a high altitude.
India launched Operation Sindoor on May 6-7 to avenge the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. While Pakistan had claimed of shooting down five Indian fighter jets, Indian government has also rejected the claim.
Sharing technical inputs, Dassault CEO Eric Trappier said that the Spectra electronic warfare systems onboard the Rafale jet did not record any hostile engagements and added that the flight logs received by Dassault also did not indicate combat loss.
This comes amid the report that China ran a malicious campaign post Operation Sindppr to defame Rafale jets and promote its fighter aircraft used by Pakistan. According to reports, Pakistan, via its embassies, ran a disinformation campaign to push Rafale's popularity down and Pakistan played a crucial role in it by making misleading claims.
India launched Operation Sindoor on the intervening night of May 6-7 in which it targeted nine terror sites across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. While India maintained that the nature of the precision strikes was non-military in nature, Pakistan escalated it to a military conflict by attacking Indian civilian and military sites. Following Pakistan's attack, Indian Armed Forces launched a massive counterstrike, destroying 11 airbases of Pakistan apart from various enemy military sites.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC to hear PIL seeking NRC in Bengal
HC to hear PIL seeking NRC in Bengal

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

HC to hear PIL seeking NRC in Bengal

A PIL has been filed in Calcutta High Court, seeking the implementation of NRC in Bengal and the issuance of national identity cards to distinguish Indian citizens from alleged illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, particularly in 10 border districts. The petition, filed by Paramita Dey, cites the NRC exercise in Assam conducted under Supreme Court supervision in 2014. A division bench of justices Sujoy Paul and Smita Das De is likely to hear the matter on July 29. The bench has asked the state to clarify whether any similar PIL has been filed.

TRF's terror tag bolsters India's case
TRF's terror tag bolsters India's case

Deccan Herald

timean hour ago

  • Deccan Herald

TRF's terror tag bolsters India's case

The designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), as a global terrorist organisation by the United States is a victory for India and a vindication of New Delhi's position on cross-border terrorism. It is significant in view of India's contention that the organisation was behind the April 22 Pahalgam attack. .TRF twice claimed responsibility for the attack though it later denied involvement, probably under pressure from its handlers across the border. India has mounted persistent diplomatic pressure on the US and other countries to recognise the existence of the terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan which is directed against India. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio noted that TRF had claimed responsibility also for other attacks, against Indian security forces. But it will be noted that Rubio did not name Pakistan, where the LeT is US has described TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and a front for the LeT. The LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammad have been marked for involvement in terrorist activities directed against India. Both organisations have been in the US FTO list from 2001. Pakistan has denied their existence while India has contended that both are active in that country. .India should continue its efforts to get TRF named as a terrorist outfit in the UN Security Council records. The UNSC resolution on the Pahalgam attack avoided mentioning TRF, under Pakistan's and China's pressure. The US designation will hopefully make the process easier, though Pakistan and China will continue to oppose it. The Ministry of External Affairs has welcomed the US decision and noted that it reflects the cooperation between India and the US on counter-terrorism. Earlier this year, the US had extradited Tahawwur Rana who was part of the conspiracy behind the 2008 Mumbai the US may have sent a positive signal to India with its stance on TRF, its position is not without contradictions. It has not fully accepted India's position on the Pahalgam attack and Pakistan's role in promoting terrorism in the country. Washington has played host to Pakistan's army and air force chiefs in recent weeks and sought to equate Pakistan with India. .The US and most other countries have the tendency to look at terrorism through the prism of their national interest and geopolitical considerations. India will have to initiate stronger diplomatic efforts to make its case fully heard and accepted. It will also not go unnoticed that the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack are yet to be arrested.

India-UK free trade deal approved: which luxury and labor-heavy industries will cash in big?
India-UK free trade deal approved: which luxury and labor-heavy industries will cash in big?

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

India-UK free trade deal approved: which luxury and labor-heavy industries will cash in big?

India's Union Cabinet finally approved the country's free trade agreement with the United Kingdom on Tuesday, July 22. This agreement, formally called the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, will be formally signed by India's Commerce and Industry minister Piyush Goyal, along with Britain's counterpart Jonathan Reynolds on July 24. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be there to witness the proceedings. The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement aims to smoothen out trade hurdles between India and the United Kingdom by imposing a zero-duty regime on Indian exports such as textiles, leather goods and footwear. The United Kingdom will also face reduced tariffs on luxury exports such as Scotch whiskey and premium cars. The India-UK free trade agreement benefits India's labor-intensive industries The free trade agreement that was just approved by India's Union Cabinet is focused on bolstering India's most labor-intensive industries. Textiles, leather goods and footwear continue to have high production costs due to the labor-intensive process required to ensure product quality. If the United Kingdom imposes zero import duties on these industries, a whole new market will open up. #WATCH | London, UK | Speaking on the UK-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) at the India Global Forum, Union Minister Piyush Goyal says, "It is unfair to call it a giveaway. Indian people add value to the UK economy when they come here...""This is not something we raised after… This trade agreement is part of a wider effort by Narendra Modi's government to maximize export opportunities for Indian industries, as well as attract foreign investment. As Indian exports become more profitable and sough-after, Indian enterprises may garner additional funding and investment from foreign parties. Likewise, the reduced tariffs on the UK's luxury goods ensure that the markets of that country open up to a new customer base of wealthy Indians. From 2024 to 2025, the value of India's exports to the United Kingdom has risen by 12.6% to $14.5 billion. The value of imports India received from the UK grew by 2.3% to $8.6 billion. The India-UK agreement is yet to be ratified by the UK parliament While India's cabinet has approved of the bilateral free trade agreement, the United Kingdom has its own process of ratification, which will occur after the signing ceremony on July 24. Due to the Labor party's majority in the parliament, this process seems unlikely to face any hiccups. India, UK concludes FTA; An elated UK PM releases video of his telephonic talks with PM Modi. Calls FTA historic Aside from the trade agreement on goods and services, India and the United Kingdom have also inked out an agreement on Social Security, known as the Double Contribution Convention. This will allow Indians who have short-term work contracts in the United Kingdom to avoid double contributions to their social security funds, ensuring they keep more of their earnings. The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement has been a long time in the making, with negotiations on the pact concluding on May 6. This agreement is projected to double the value of bilateral trade between the two nations to $120 billion by 2030.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store