Bexley village businesses blame Ulez expansion for falling trade
In February, it was revealed that London's drivers had paid more than £70m in penalty charge notices from Ulez in six years.Ms Melucci, who set up Melucci's in 2005, said: "Customers used to come regularly every single week. "Now they come maybe once a year, once every six months, because coming into Ulez becomes less and less attractive."If you're a customer coming from Dartford in Kent and you have the choice of coming to Bexley and spending £12.50 plus the car parking charges, which is nearly £15, to buy a cup of coffee, or you can go to Bluewater with free car parking and no Ulez, what would you do?"It's a no-brainer."
Nitrogen dioxide levels in outer London fell nearly 5% in the year after expansion, City Hall figures suggest.Jemima Hartshorn from Mums for Lungs, which campaigns for cleaner air, said children are worst affected by toxic air and that diesel vehicles "need to be phased out".She said: "The starting point for pollution in that area of London was so incredibly high that, even with this, we are all still breathing air that is toxic, and that stunts children's lungs, that exacerbates asthma."
Christina Calderato, TfL's director of strategy, said: "The Ulez expanded London-wide to tackle the triple challenges of air pollution, the climate emergency and traffic congestion, bringing cleaner air to five million more Londoners. "Visitor footfall in outer London increased by almost 2% in the year after the London-wide Ulez expansion."The Ulez is not about making money. The expanded Ulez has led to cleaner air while generating ever smaller net revenues, as has been the case with the previous expansion to inner London where people switched to greener vehicles."Any income generated from the Ulez is being reinvested back into the public transport network, including improving bus routes in outer London."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
How I plan to survive retirement without a state pension
Generally speaking, I'm not a huge fan of risky moves. I would rather wait an extra hour at the airport than stress over missing a flight, I find it hard to negotiate on price for fear of losing a deal completely and I refuse to get behind the wheel if I've had a single drink. With all these decisions, the anxiety caused by the potential loss outweighs any positive that the risk brings. Rushing through security to walk straight on to a flight may be exhilarating for some, but my heart rate would still be elevated when I landed at my destination. There is one area, however, where I'm simply going to have to take more risk: my pension pot. As a young (ish) saver, the safest thing to do is to assume that the entire responsibility of funding my retirement will fall to me. And that requires more risk. This week the work and pensions secretary, Liz Kendall, said she was 'formally announcing' the next government review of the state pension age. As the last review concluded in 2023 — and the government only has to review the age every six years — this was earlier than expected. It's looking likely that the age at which you get your state pension will rise sooner than planned. The state pension age is 66, increasing to 67 between 2026 and 2028. Another jump to 68 is pencilled in for 2046, but will probably be moved forward. To assume that the state pension age will stay at 68 by the time I get there (in about 38 years) would be foolish. In fact, to assume there will be any state pension at all is unwise. The state pension is a financial headache for the government. It costs about 5 per cent of GDP, up from about 3.5 per cent in the year 2000, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and is forecast to be 7.7 per cent by 2070. It's also getting harder to find the cash to fund it. People are living longer and having fewer babies — aka future taxpayers. The UK's old-age dependency ratio, the population aged 65 and over as a percentage of those of working-age (16 to 64), is set to increase from about 33 to 50 by the mid-2060s, according to the OBR. So my private pension is going to have to do the heavy lifting in my retirement — at least if I want to stop working before I'm 75. And the easiest and cheapest way to boost my pot is to increase my level of investment risk. • How to get a nation of savers investing 'It's important for younger savers to take risks with their pension — that just means investing in the stock market, not taking a punt on bitcoin. If you have 30 or 40 years until retirement, your pension should be heavily, if not exclusively, invested in shares,' said Laith Khalaf from the investment firm AJ Bell. 'The exception would be if you have a nervous disposition and can't bear to see a fall in the value of your savings. Even then, the fact that you are saving regularly into a pension means you get a smoother journey even with a relatively high content invested in the stock market.' Historically, the stock market has provided the best investment returns in the long run. If, 30 years ago, you had invested £1,000 in the Investment Association's global sector of funds that are invested entirely in stocks, you would have £8,150 today. The sector of funds that are 40 to 85 per cent invested in the stock market would have returned £5,657, while the 20 to 60 per cent stocks option would have returned £4,362. But most pensions are not invested in 100 per cent equities, even for workers who are just starting out. Most pension savers are automatically enrolled into workplace pensions and put into 'default' funds — a one-size-fits-all option that has to be appropriate for 20-year-olds and 50-year-olds. This means that many default funds will only have about 60 to 70 per cent of their pot invested in shares. The rest will be in assets such as cash or bonds, that are considered less volatile but are also unlikely to grow at the same rate. Effectively, these pots are simply the least worst fit for the workforce as a whole. • How to stop the taxman taking a big slice of your pension I confess that this is still how my pension savings are invested. James Coker from the wealth manager Quilter Cheviot said this was unlikely to be my best chance at building a hefty pension pot. He said: 'Moving your pots into an equity portfolio will serve you well over the long term. Someone in their thirties or forties is arguably decades away from retirement and stocks have the greatest inflation-adjusted growth potential. Stocks have to form the basis, if not all, of your portfolio.' With the ever-increasing likelihood that my income in retirement will be on my shoulders alone, it's time to make the move. The cheapest way for me to do this is to move my pension pots into a global tracker fund, a low-cost option that replicates the performance of global stock markets. It may feel risky, but the alternative — a pot that doesn't plug the hole left by a disappearing state pension — feels even riskier. • Top of the pension pots: the best place for your Sipp
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Arsenal 'set to ramp up pursuit of Eberechi Eze' after finally landing Viktor Gyokeres as they look to strike £60m deal with Crystal Palace
Arsenal are ready to launch a fresh offensive to land Eberechi Eze after closing in on a deal for Sporting CP striker Viktor Gyokeres. The Gunners have fully agreed terms to sign the Sweden International and are expected to officially confirm the £63.5million move any day now – leaving the path clear to turn their full attention to Crystal Palace 's star playmaker. Eze, 27, has been heavily linked with a move away from Selhurst Park this summer after helping the Eagles to their first-ever major trophy last season as he scored the winner in the FA Cup final against Manchester City. The Gunners appear to be the team most keen to land him but are yet to submit an official bid for the player, as they have been preoccupied with securing Gyokeres. But now, Arsenal are preparing a £60m approach for Eze, possibly spread over three instalments, according to The Independent. This is less than the midfielder's £67m release clause, but it is understood that the club's boardrooms maintain good relations and will negotiate in good faith - a breath of fresh air for Arsenal, who have only now wrapped up their two-month pursuit of Gyokeres. Eze is understood to favour a move to the Emirates, with many close to the situation confident a transfer will go through in the coming weeks. If Arsenal are unwilling to part with a hefty sum of cash, there is a possibility that Reiss Nelson could be included in a deal as a make-weight. Furthermore, while Eze's signing does not hinge on this, Arsenal would prefer to sell one of their assets before splurging on the Palace star. If the north London club were to agree a deal for Eze in the region of £60m, it would take their summer spending past £250m, including Gyokeres. Also joining Mikel Arteta's ranks for the 2025-26 season are Martin Zubimendi, Noni Madueke, Cristian Mosquera, Kepa Arrizabalaga and Christian Norgaard.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Building products group Marshalls shares tumble as sales fall
Marshalls warned that it does not expect the landscaping market to pick up throughout the rest of the year, sending shares tumbling. The building products group said profits have been hit by a necessity to slash prices to maintain market share. Sales in its key landscaping products division fell 1 per cent to £135m over the six months to June 30, as margins were squeezed by price pressures. It slashed its profit forecast to between £42m and £46m – below the £55m the market had been expecting. Shares hit their lowest intraday level since October 2023, falling as much as 23 per cent. They closed at 209.5p.
