Congo gold miner says M23 rebels force staff to work without pay
M23 staged a lightning advance earlier this year in eastern Congo, taking control of more land than ever before in North and South Kivu provinces. The Twangiza Mining site is located in South Kivu province.
In May, the company said it had been ordered to suspend operations at the mine after M23 accused it of not paying taxes.
In a new statement dated Friday, Twangiza Mining, which is headquartered in Congo and describes itself as a Chinese firm, said its workers were being "held in captivity, forced to work in inhuman conditions, without any security measure, remuneration or medical coverage."
Reuters could not independently verify the company's assertions.
M23 and Congo's government did not respond to requests for comment.
The statement from Twangiza Mining also said production had been "paralyzed" and that the site was "entirely controlled" by a group of Rwandan nationals who, working with M23 and claiming to be new investors, have been exploiting the mine "for their own profit by treating our employees like slaves deprived of all protection".
Congo, the United Nations and Western powers say Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms.
Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces were acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Yolande Makolo, Rwanda government spokesperson, said on Monday that Rwanda had nothing to do with the dispute with Twangiza Mining.
"Rwanda is not involved in this situation, and the accusations against Rwandan citizens are without basis - there is no record or information of any Rwanda citizens involved in such activities," Makolo said.
"This is a local issue that should be taken up with the authorities in the area."
On Friday, the foreign ministers of Rwanda and Congo signed a U.S.-brokered peace deal, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more so far this year.
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration aims to attract billions of dollars in Western investment to Congo, which is rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium.
Qatar has been hosting talks between Congo and M23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Responsibility To Protect More Than A Principle — It Is A Moral Imperative
The meeting room inside United Nations headquarters, as seen in September 2015 in New York, United ... More States. (Photo credit: Chris Melzer/picture alliance via Getty Images) 'The responsibility to protect is more than a principle — it is a moral imperative, rooted in our shared humanity and the U.N. Charter' - with these words, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the importance of the political commitment made by the world's leaders some 20 years ago. Twenty years ago, at the 2005 World Summit, world leaders affirmed the responsibility of individual States to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, including through the prevention of these crimes and their incitement. They further agreed to encourage and help other States, as appropriate, to exercise that responsibility, and do so by using appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, among others. This political commitment of the Responsibility To Protect (R2P) was born from the horrors of the atrocities in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, and was to ensure that 'never again would the international community stand silent as innocent lives were destroyed by the gravest crimes.' Nonetheless, two decades later, the commitment appears to be greatly unfulfilled. U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, speaking before the U.N. General Assembly on June 25, 2025, stressed that the world is witnessing the highest number of armed conflicts since the end of the Second World War: 'Conflicts are becoming more protracted, complex and interconnected, while emerging threats such as the weaponization of new technologies and the proliferation of advanced weaponry require a constant adaptation to prevent the commission of atrocity crimes and to protect populations.' He added that 'too often, early warnings go unheeded, and alleged evidence of crimes committed by States and non-State actors is met with denial, indifference, or repression. Responses are often too little, too late, inconsistent or undermined by double standards; civilians are paying the highest price.' Shortly before the meeting, the U.N. Secretary-General published a report looking into the two decades of the R2P. The report highlights efforts achieved through national prevention mechanisms or under regional leadership, demonstrating that early diplomacy, early warning and institutional innovation can be effective in preventing and responding to atrocity crimes. The report emphasizes the need to mainstream atrocity prevention across the United Nations system — from humanitarian action to peacekeeping to human rights. The report also calls for integrating early warning, supporting national prevention mechanisms and embedding atrocity prevention in the broader agendas of sustaining peace, human rights and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The report emphasizes three priority areas for future action: (1) developing permanent prevention mechanisms at the national level, (2) enhancing regional dialogue to share lessons and strengthen cooperation, including through regional consultations, and (3) developing strategic and technical guidance on implementing the R2P at the domestic, regional and multilateral levels. During the meeting at the U.N. General Assembly, several States raised their concerns in relation to the progress made (or not made) over the last two decades. Among others, several countries stressed the importance of the prevention of atrocity crimes, as the only way to prevent deaths and suffering. The representative of the European Union, speaking in its capacity as observer, stressed that all Member States must support both the Code of Conduct regarding Security Council action against genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes, as well as the French-Mexican initiative on refraining from the use of veto (by the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council) in the case of mass atrocities. Australia's delegate, speaking also on behalf of Canada and New Zealand, referring to the reported violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Myanmar, Sudan, Ukraine and Yemen, stressed the importance of combating impunity and called for full accountability for atrocity crimes through appropriate national and international investigative and justice mechanisms, such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court. As atrocity crimes are raging on globally, States must ensure that they implement their political commitments, such as the R2P, but also their legal obligations, such as the duty to prevent genocide (enshrined in the U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide) and other international treaties. Protecting civilians and preventing atrocity crimes cannot be left to chance.
Business of Fashion
an hour ago
- Business of Fashion
E-Commerce Firm Jumia Draws Takeover Interest From Axian
Jumia Technologies AG, the biggest e-commerce company in Africa, has drawn takeover interest from telecommunications company Axian Telecom, people familiar with the matter said. Axian, which is based in Mauritius and primarily offers telecommunications services in Africa, raised $600 million this week to refinance its debt and help fund a possible takeover of Jumia, the people said, asking not to be identified because the deliberations are private. No final decisions have been made and the companies may not come to an agreement, they said. Jumia has a market value of about $500 million. The deal would help both companies expand across the continent, the people said. Jumia, which started in Nigeria in 2012 and held an initial public offering in New York in 2019, could be delisted in any deal, they said. Axian has been building a stake in the company, and announced in May that it held 8 percent of shares. Representatives for Jumia and Axian declined to comment. Jumia's American depositary receipts jumped 5.7 percent to $4.25 at 10:54 a.m. in New York after earlier surging as much as 17 percent, the biggest intraday gain since May. The stock has risen 11 percent this year. Often referred to as the 'Amazon of Africa,' Jumia has had to do its own mapping in some of its markets and set up logistics networks to cater to a young and increasingly tech-savvy population that uses smartphones to bridge gaps in infrastructure and services. It was one of the first African companies to achieve 'unicorn' status with a valuation of more than $1 billion, but its shares have declined significantly since the IPO. By Loni Prinsloo Learn more: Jumia, Turkey's Hepsiburada Plan Africa E-Commerce Growth Push The Africa-focused online retailer and Turkey's Hepsiburada have partnered to expand their offerings across Africa, starting with Egypt and Morocco.
News24
3 hours ago
- News24
Zim court dismisses ZAPU's move to block Gukurahundi public hearings
The High Court in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, has dismissed an application by an opposition party seeking to halt the Gukurahundi massacres public hearing. More than 20 000 people accused of being dissidents fighting the government were killed by soldiers while former president Robert Mugabe was in office. President Emmerson Mnangagwa's government initiated public hearings to seek healing and compensation for the victims. The Bulawayo High Court in Zimbabwe on Tuesday dismissed an application by the opposition party, the Zimbabwe African People's Union (ZAPU), to stop the public hearings into the Gukurahundi massacres. According to the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Zimbabwe, more than 20 000 people accused of being dissidents were killed by former president Robert Mugabe's soldiers in the early 1980s. The massacres took place in Matebeleland, south-west Zimbabwe. The current government of President Emmerson Mnangagwa had initiated public hearings - to be led by traditional chiefs - to seek healing and compensation for victims. Mnangagwa was the security minister during the massacres. On Tuesday, Bulawayo High Court Judge Munamato Mutevedzi dismissed the urgent court application, saying: ZAPU did not act when they initially felt aggrieved but waited for the day of the public hearings to start and then bring their case before the courts. The public hearings were supposed to kick off last Thursday but were postponed due to the court application. ZAPU spokesperson Richard Gandari told News24 that this was a sad judgment and they were working on a way forward. 'As ZAPU, we tend to disagree with the judge that the matter is not urgent. We still have an urgent issue in the spirit of the law, but we will respect this outcome. 'As a matter of principle, we are going to pursue other avenues that are peaceful to get a resolution and get justice for victims of Gukurahundi. So that this issue, which has now spanned several decades, can be resolved once and for all.' Gandari said he felt the current public hearings would not bring any justice. 'It is our view that the shadowing process being led by traditional chiefs falls far too short when delivering genuine restorative justice for the victims. 'It is also silent on the role played by the perpetrators and making it a one-sided affair which is tantamount to interrogations of survivors of Gukurahundi. We don't believe any healing will come out of these hearings, and part of our urgent court application came from the nature of those hearings.' A Matabeleland region community-based advocacy group, Ibhetshu Likazulu, which has been calling for compensation for the Gukurahundi massacres, said the court's dismissed disadvantaged victims. 'There are critical issues about these public hearings. First, the issue of media being barred and the issue of privatisation of these Gukurahundi public hearings are about to start. Those are the issues people are complaining about. 'Especially the fact that the perpetrator [the government] is the one who is supposed to be giving people ground rules on what should be done and what should not be done. Will people have access to the final report? Those are the critical issues we need to address as a nation before the public hearing starts,' added the advocacy group's secretary-general, Mbuso Fuzwayo. Human rights activist Vumani Ndlovu, who is based in Matabeleland, said affected people made it clear the process 'must be driven by themselves and the perpetrator [the government] must not be the one who is telling them what to do'. Ndlovu added the best solution was to set up an independent commission led by a foreign leader. 'When few people were killed after the 2018 elections, the government constituted a commission that was run and chaired by a foreigner and a highly regarded somebody, Kgalema Motlanthe. Why not do the same with the Gukurahundi issue?'
