Will Rachel Reeves's mortgage reforms help to ease the housing crisis?
Echoing the complaints of a generation of younger people, Rachel Reeves argues that tenants shouldn't be helping other people to pay their mortgages through exorbitant rents, and instead could be making themselves more financially secure in the long run. It all sounds very appealing, but there are problems, too...
What does Reeves want to change?
She wants to allow banks and building societies to lend money at 4.5 times a person's income, whereas the norm was once about two to three times, and to lower the minimum salary qualification from £35,000 to £30,000 per annum. She will also make permanent the government's mortgage 'backstop' guarantee scheme, which protects banks from default. The Bank of England is also ready to permit the banks to make riskier loans.
Who is it designed to help?
The government says some 36,000 additional mortgages will be approved in the first batch alone. So, quite a few potential voters.
Will it solve the housing crisis?
Obviously not; arguably, it might even make matters worse. In the first place, it is a small move, and there will still be many who don't earn enough, or have the capital available, to take advantage of the looser regulations. They will continue to rent (though the government is introducing the Renters' Rights Bill to give them some new protections).
However, insofar as it does increase demand, it will make housing dearer. As has been well observed, the problem with the property market overall isn't a lack of demand but a long-running shortage of supply. Angela Rayner 's drive to build 1.5 million homes in this parliament will help matters somewhat, but it will take time.
Are there any dangers?
Yes. Memories of the financial crisis of 2008 are clearly fading, because it was the excessive provision of mortgages to sub-prime customers, and relaxed financial regulation, that led to the collapse of the world banking system, triggering a sharp recession and a long-term hit to global economic growth. It could happen again.
For example, if there is a recession, people lose their jobs and the property market slumps (which it will one day), then these overstretched new borrowers are forced to sell their homes at a loss, which will often be suffered by the bank or building society. This in turn will reduce the capacity of financial institutions to lend, and send the economy into a credit squeeze and a downward spiral – not to mention bankrupting the unlucky first-time buyers.
If the government effectively guarantees the loans, losses will be suffered by the taxpayer, and the national debt could be substantially inflated. Eventually, a large portion of the mortgage market could end up nationalised, which carries unacceptable risks.
Not unless the housing market is in a permanent upswing. If not, then it is a potential catastrophe, and one that no government could (or should) survive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel strikes Syria's defence ministry in third day of attacks
The Israeli military struck the Syrian defence ministry in Damascus twice on Wednesday as it intervened in the clashes between the Syrian army and Druze fighters in southern Syria in the country's deadliest violence in months. The strikes collapsed four floors of the ministry and ruined its facade. The strikes killed one person and injured 18, Syrian officials said. It was the first time Israel had targeted Damascus since May and the third day in a row it had conducted airstrikes against the Syrian military. A spokesperson for the Israeli military said the strike on the defence ministry had been a message to the Syrian president, Ahmed al-Sharaa 'regarding the events in Suweida'. The Israeli military struck Syrian tanks on Monday and has continued to conduct dozens of drone strikes on troops, killing some soldiers. Israel has said it will not allow the Syrian army to deploy in the south of the country, and that it would protect the Druze community from the Damascus government. Many in the Druze community have rebuffed Israel's claim of patronage for fear of being viewed as a foreign proxy. The Israeli bombing added another complication to an already escalating conflict between Syrian government forces, Bedouin Arab tribes and Druze fighters. More than 250 people have been killed in four days of clashes, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). On Wednesday, the Syrian government and one of the three spiritual leaders of the Syrian Druze community announced a ceasefire. It was unclear if the truce would hold, however, as another spiritual leader, Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri, vowed to keep fighting, calling the government a collection of 'armed gangs'. A ceasefire announced on Tuesday broke down in similar circumstances. The clashes pitting mostly Sunni government forces against Druze fighters have prompted fears of a wider sectarian conflict. An attack in March by remnants of the ousted regime of Bashar al-Assad on security forces led to violence in which more than 1,500 people were killed, most of them from the minority Alawite community. The violence is the most serious challenge to Damascus's rule since the coastal massacres and has threatened to further push away everyday Druze from the state. The Druze, a religious minority in Syria and the wider Middle East, make up the majority of the population of Suweida province in the south of the country. They have been negotiating with the Islamist-led authorities in Damascus since the fall of Assad, in an attempt to achieve some form of autonomy. They have yet to reach an agreement that defines their relationship with the new Syrian state. The Syrian army entered Suweida on Sunday in an attempt to restore calm between Druze fighters and Arab Bedouin tribes. Fighting broke out after Bedouin tribe members robbed a Druze man on the main road south of Damascus, kicking off a cycle of retaliatory violence between the two groups. Intermittent violence between members of the Druze and Bedouin communities has been common in the area in recent years. Some Druze militias have vowed to prevent Syrian government forces entering Suweida and have attacked them, leading to escalating clashes. As government forces entered Suweida, accounts of human rights abuses began to emerge. On Tuesday around noon, armed gunmen entered a reception hall belonging to the Radwan family in Suweida and killed 15 unarmed men and one woman, three members of the family told the Guardian. The SOHR also reported the killings, though put the number of dead at 12. 'I just lost nine close friends and relatives. It just makes me feel so sad. There are no weapons allowed in the [hall], it's not like it's a military base,' said Maan Radwan, a 46-year-old London resident whose relatives were killed in the shooting. Video of the aftermath of the shooting showed unarmed men strewn across a room lying in pools of blood. Family members said men in army fatigues prevented ambulances from reaching the reception hall, which they thought was meant to ensure the wounded died from blood loss. 'We don't know who is with general security, who are jihadists, who are Bedouin tribespeople. It's impossible to tell who is killing us,' a 52-year old teacher and relative of the Radwan family in Suweida told the Guardian by phone. A surgeon at the Suweida national hospital said that the bodies of those killed in the Radwan house bore close-range gunshot wounds, adding that they knew many of those who were killed in the shootings personally. Sharaa issued a statement on Wednesday condemning the human rights violations. 'These criminal and illegal actions cannot be accepted under any circumstances and completely contradict the principles that the Syrian state is built on,' the statement said, saying perpetrators would be held accountable. The US special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack posted on X saying: 'Actions must follow to end violence, ensure accountability and protect all Syrians.' It was unclear who was committing the abuses against civilians, and witnesses said they could not distinguish between state security forces and militia fighters. On their private social media, two members of the government forces posted sectarian hate speech against Druze. One member of the government forces posted a video of him and two other soldiers driving through Suweida laughing as he said: 'We are on our way to distribute aid,' while brandishing a machete to the camera. He filmed himself inside a house in Suweida ripping a picture of Druze spiritual leaders off a wall and trampling it with his boots. 'If God grants you victory, none can defeat you. We are coming for you with sectarianism,' he continued. The Syrian defence ministry said it was 'adhering to rules of engagement to protect residents'. Several civilians in Suweida city described being locked inside their home as fighting continued outside, while electricity and other basic supplies have been cut off. One 52-year-old English teacher said they had watched as their neighbour was shot dead by a hidden sniper, and that no one could collect the body for fear of being shot. A 31-year-old resident of Suweida said he watched as armed men burned the shop below his house, calling the Druze 'swine' as they ransacked the neighbouring building. The Syrian interior ministry said the continued fighting could only be solved by integrating the Druze-majority province into the state and said it came 'in the absence of relevant official institutions'. The killings in Suweida provoked anger among the wider Druze community in the Middle East. Some Israeli Druze in the occupied Golan Heights managed to cross the fence into Syria before being retrieved by the Israeli army. The Israeli military also said that it had reinforced its presence along the Syria-Israel border. The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, issued a statement urging people not to try to cross the border into Syria. 'Do not cross the border. You are risking your lives; you could be murdered, you could be taken hostage, and you are impeding the efforts of the IDF,' he said. Relations between Israel and Syria had begun to thaw before this week, with Israeli and Syrian officials engaging in security discussions and military coordination. Syria's leadership has hinted it could eventually normalise relations with its southern neighbour. After the fall of Assad, the Israeli military launched hundreds of airstrikes against military assets in Syria and invaded the country's south, where it continues to occupy large swathes of territory.
South Wales Argus
25 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Embassies should see cars clamped for congestion charge debts
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb said the Government had 'far too much patience' with indebted foreign governments, while Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman Lord Purvis of Tweed called for ministers to discuss outstanding fees with US President Donald Trump during his September visit. Responding, Foreign Office minister Baroness Chapman of Darlington described diplomacy as 'an art'. A congestion charge sign in London (Philip Toscano/PA) She said the fee for driving in inner London was a 'charge' rather than a tax, which embassies should pay. According to Transport for London, the US embassy based south of the River in Nine Elms owes almost £15.5 million in congestion charge debts. The Japanese mission faces debts of more than £10.6 million, while the Chinese embassy racked up a £10.3 million debt between 2003 and March 31 2025. Lord Purvis referred to a diplomatic reception held at the Foreign Office in central London and asked: 'Should we not start instituting a drop-off and collection fee at King Charles Street just as long as we get our money back?' The Liberal Democrat also said Mr Trump 'would certainly not want a reputation of not paying fines' and said: 'When he comes for the state visit, can we ensure that this is part of the agenda so that there's no congestion in the city of London from the American delegation and they pay us what they owe?' Baroness Chapman replied that there was a 'whole range of measures' open to the Government, and that she would 'take on board' the one which Lord Purvis suggested. 'Others include encouraging the use perhaps of public transport or cycling or walking around our wonderful city, but he suggests that we raise these matters directly with our counterparts, and I can assure him that we do just that,' the minister added. Former London Assembly Labour leader Lord Harris of Haringey asked: 'Would it, for example, be possible to clamp the cars that have done this, because I suspect that might concentrate the minds?' Following him, the Green Party's Baroness Jones said: 'This has been going on ever since the congestion charge first came in. 'They've racked up these debts and I love Lord Harris's idea – we should clamp them all. 'We have a record of which cars have infringed the congestion charge. We clamp them all.' Lord Purvis of Tweed called for ministers to discuss outstanding fees with US President Donald Trump during his September visit (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) Baroness Chapman told peers: 'All I would say is that diplomacy is an art and it comes more naturally to some than to others perhaps.' She added: 'I think it's right that we don't escalate this issue above some of our very real concerns around security and defence and trade that we seek to work very closely with our counterparts on.' Their exchanges were triggered by a question from Labour peer Lord Faulkner of Worcester, who asked about Government efforts to claw back unpaid business rates, parking fines and London congestion charges in April and May. Baroness Chapman said that the Government had received 31 responses to the exercise earlier this year. 'Some agreed to settle debts, other disputed charges, and some refused to pay the London congestion charge claiming exemption under the Vienna Convention,' the minister said. 'FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) action since April 3 2025 has helped reduce national non-domestic rates debt by £287,142, car parking fines debt by £7,035 and London congestion charge debt by £7,430.' To laughter, Conservative shadow foreign office minister Lord Callanan said: 'I think there is unity across the House on this one. 'I think we're all amused by the prospect of some poor parking warden having to put a ticket on President Trump's limousine and what might happen to him from the actions of the secret service. 'But it is of course that conduct of diplomatic staff is a reflection of important values, respect, dignity and mutual recognition between nations, so following on from the reply that she gave to the Liberal Democrats, will (Baroness Chapman) consider linking future privileges or engagement opportunities to the good standing of diplomatic missions in their civic responsibilities, so as to encourage greater accountability?' The minister said she would keep the situation 'under close consideration'.
ITV News
25 minutes ago
- ITV News
Starmer suspends rebellious MPs
Sir Keir Starmer has carried out a purge of troublesome backbenchers as he suspended a number of MPs. Rachael Maskell, who spearheaded plans to halt the Government's welfare reforms, has lost the whip, alongside Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff. All voted against the Government's benefits reforms as part of a wider rebellion earlier this month, and all aside from Ms Maskell were first elected at last year's election. The York Central MP said she had been suspended for 'standing up for my constituents' over the benefits plans. Ms Maskell said she had a 'positive conversation' with the chief whip, adding: 'He knows my heart and why I did what I did. 'I explained there are lines I can't cross because of where I come from in politics with my faith.' She said she was 'not angry' but 'upset that we are in this place because I believe we are better than that as a party. I believe that strength comes from the backbenches.' Mr Duncan-Jordan has said he remains 'as committed as ever' to Labour values, but accepted that voting against the welfare plans 'could come at a cost'. In a statement, the MP for Poole said: 'Since being elected, I have consistently spoken up for my constituents on a range of issues, including most recently on cuts to disability benefits. 'I understood this could come at a cost, but I couldn't support making disabled people poorer. 'Although I've been suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party today, I've been part of the Labour and trade union movement for 40 years and remain as committed as ever to its values.' Mr Leishman said he is a 'proud Labour member' and remains 'committed to the party'. The office of the MP for Alloa and Grangemouth confirmed he had had the whip 'temporarily suspended'. 'I wish to remain a Labour MP and deliver the positive change many voters are craving,' Mr Leishman said in a statement. 'I have voted against the Government on issues because I want to effectively represent and be the voice for communities across Alloa and Grangemouth. 'I firmly believe that it is not my duty as an MP to make people poorer, especially those that have suffered because of austerity and its dire consequences.' A Labour backbencher described the suspensions as 'devastating' and said they did not signal a willingness from the Government to reset relations with the parliamentary party. As well as the suspensions, three other MPs have been removed from trade envoy jobs: Rosena Allin-Khan, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Mohammad Yasin. It is understood that those who have been suspended have had the whip removed due to repeated infringements when it comes to party discipline. Mr Duncan-Jordan raised concerns about the Government's changes to the winter fuel allowance before the U-turn while Mr Leishman has been a critic of the Government's response to the Grangemouth closure. Mr Hinchliff led a rebellion against ministers' planning Bill over environmental concerns. Shadow minister Richard Holden claimed that the suspensions are 'a desperate attempt to distract from yet another surge in inflation today'. Richard Burgon, who lost the Labour whip last year after he rebelled on the two-child benefit cap but has since had it reinstated said that those who have been suspended 'were simply standing up for their disabled constituents and following their consciences'. In a statement on X, he added: 'Challenging policies that harm our communities, that damage Labour's support and that make a Reform government much more likely is a key role of Labour backbenchers. 'The Prime Minister should be listening to these voices, not punishing them.' The Fire Brigades Union have called the move an 'outrageous and authoritarian act' and claimed the Labour leadership have 'learned nothing from the huge outpouring of anger that the cuts to welfare have provoked'.
