Christopher Saines: Aussie lawyer CEO found dead at a Thai massage parlour in Koh Samui
Christopher Saines, the 43-year-old CEO of Brisbane-based law firm GLG Legal, was discovered unresponsive around 6am on Monday at the Siam Touch Massage parlour on the popular tourist island of Koh Samui.
Emergency services were called to the shop in Bo Phut, close to the villa where Warne died, around 7am after a masseuse noticed the lawyer wasn't breathing.
Police Lieutenant Colonel Phumaret Inkong from Bo Phut Police Station said officers found Mr Saines 'lying dead' when they arrived at the parlour near Chaweng Beach.
'He had just finished getting a massage, dressed, and went to the bathroom. Then, he asked to sit and rest on the bed for a moment, and he simply fell asleep,' he said.
'The masseuse said that he was snoring so loudly that they had to ask the guests nearby if they wanted to change rooms. He stayed like that until around 3am, when the shop closed, and the masseuse left him to sleep in the room.
'At around 6am, she came back up to wake him, but he didn't respond. She then called her friend to help check on him. That's when they discovered that he had passed away. It's believed that he died some time after 4am.'
Mr Saines was staying with his family at $4,000-a-night boutique hotel, Villa Mia. Police believe he left the luxury villa around midnight and paid 400 baht ($AU 19) for a one-hour traditional oil massage.
Initial inquiries indicate that the lawyer died of heart failure, the
Daily Mail
reported.
Mr Inkong revealed that officers found a zip lock bag in Mr Saines' trouser pocket, containing a white powdered substance.
'We can't confirm it yet, it needs to be sent for lab analysis,' he said.
'From initial field testing using police reagents, it's presumed to be an illegal drug, but we're not sure if it's actually cocaine.'
Mr Inkong said police are not treating Mr Saines' death as suspicious, as there appeared to be no sign of physical struggle or injury.
'Right now we are waiting for the results of the drug test and the autopsy report, which may take several days depending on the case, but we will try to expedite it as quickly as possible,' he said.
Mr Saines' wife was informed of her husband's death at 3pm on Tuesday.
His body is now at Surat Thani Hospital for a post-mortem examination.
Mr Saines has been described as an 'active member of the legal community' in a biography on the GLG website.
He was a member of the Queensland Law Society, committee member of the International Bar Association, committee member of Basic Rights, and a board member of Aged Care Review.
The Nightly has reached out to GLG Legal for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Bruce Lehrmann's claim phone call recordings were 'illegally obtained' in Toowoomba rape case dismissed
Former Liberal Party staffer Bruce Lehrmann will not pursue a claim that recordings of phone calls between his former lawyers and Queensland police were "illegally obtained". Mr Lehrmann is facing two counts of rape which are alleged to have occurred in Toowoomba in October 2021. He was not present in the Toowoomba District Court for a pre-trial hearing on Friday where his Sydney-based lawyer Zali Burrows appeared on his behalf. Ms Burrows's application for a "declaration that intercepted phone calls between the 30-year-old's lawyers and Queensland Police Service (QPS) [were] illegally obtained" was due to be heard in the court today. But within 40 minutes of the hearing getting underway, Ms Burrows withdrew the claim, which was then formally dismissed by order of Judge Benedict Power. The defence application related initially to four telephone conversations — two between a police officer and Mr Lehrmann's former lawyers and two between a police officer and legal receptionist. Ms Burrows's decision to withdraw the application came after Judge Benedict Power put a set of propositions to her including that it was quite usual for police and defence lawyers to discuss a matter. Ms Burrows agreed with all of his points. She also agreed there might be circumstances in which a defence lawyer may unknowingly breach legal privilege in such a conversation. Judge Power asked Ms Burrows if she agreed that to succeed in her application, the recording of the conversation must be illegal under either Queensland or federal law -- which it is not. Ms Burrows replied that in future she would not enter into any phone conversations with any Queensland officers and would confine all communication to writing. Judge Power asked Ms Burrows whether she no longer wished to press her claim. "Yes, Your Honour … I will simply refuse to speak to police on the phone and confine it to writing," Ms Burrows replied. The Sydney-based lawyer repeated this outside court, telling reporters: "All I can say is it's another world in the state of Queensland. " Ms Burrows denied it had been a legal tactic. "It wasn't a legal move, but can I just say we got some very important material today received on return of subpoena which will certainly support our stay application." In court, Ms Burrows also told Judge Power that her client was yet to decide whether to pursue a jury or judge-alone trial. "Mr Lehrmann has not made a decision yet," Ms Burrows said. Judge Power urged Ms Burrows and the parties to move to set a trial date for the matter. But before that can occur there are more hearings related to defence applications to receive unredacted versions of police notebooks and diary entries and from the forensic download of the complainant's mobile phone. Mr Lehrmann will also pursue a permanent stay of the charges against him when the matter returns to court next month. The case has been before the Toowoomba District Court on numerous occasions amid wrangling between the Crown and defence over disclosure of the police brief of evidence against Mr Lehrmann. He has not yet been required to formally enter a plea to the indictment, but it is understood he will defend the charges. The matter returns to court for mention on July 31 and for a hearing on August 28.
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Lehrmann's solicitor slams police after court loss
Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has suffered a legal defeat in the first of multiple court battles aimed at halting a rape trial against him. Lehrmann's Sydney-based solicitor Zali Burrows on Friday took aim at Queensland Police after withdrawing a bid to prove officers had illegally recorded two conversations between Lehrmann and his previous legal team. Ms Burrows had also been seeking a court injunction to prevent Queensland Police from recording any future conversations with any of Lehrmann's legal representatives. Lehrmann, 30, appeared by phone on Friday when the matter was heard at Toowoomba District Court. Judge Benedict Power dismissed the application after the claims were withdrawn by Ms Burrows, who conceded her entire case would depend on proving officers had broken the law in Queensland. Outside court, Ms Burrows told reporters she would never again speak to a Queensland Police officer on the phone. "All I can say is that it's another world in the state of Queensland," she said. Ms Burrows' application was part of a wider bid to seek a permanent stay on proceedings which, if granted, would halt a pending trial against Lehrmann on two counts of rape. Lehrmann, who is on bail, is accused of raping a woman twice during the morning of October 10, 2021 after they met at a strip club the previous night in Toowoomba, west of Brisbane. The former ministerial staffer to Liberal senator Linda Reynolds was charged in January 2023 and is yet to formally enter a plea. But his former solicitor had previously told a magistrate he intended to contest the charges. Ms Burrows on Friday agreed with Judge Power's contention that the officers might have followed proper procedure for keeping accurate notes during the early stages of an investigation. "You need to establish as a matter of law that what (the investigating detective) did was unlawful," Judge Power said. Ms Burrows said police would have an "unfair tactical advantage" if they had a recording of any conversation where a lawyer accidentally disclosed legally confidential material. Judge Power said that would not be the fault of police and any of Lehrmann's solicitors could make a separate claim if there was confidential material. Crown prosecutor Caroline Marco was not required to argue in court against Ms Burrows except to agree with Judge Power's proposed order to dismiss. She told Judge Power the application to halt the trial could only be heard once all other applications were dealt with. Judge Power told the lawyers they needed to be in a position by July 31 to nominate a date for when the trial might begin. Ms Burrows told Judge Power that while Lehrmann's previous solicitor had indicated he would make an application for a judge-only trial, her client no longer had a position on whether any trial should be heard by a jury. The matter will return to court for an August 28 hearing concerning Ms Burrows' efforts to subpoena the Commissioner of Queensland Police for access to all materials involved in the case. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
National law firm investigating potential class action against First Guardian Master Fund and Shield Master Fund after accusations of operating Ponzi scheme as more than $1bn on the line
Lawyers from Slater and Gordon are investigating a potential class action on behalf of investors against two collapsed superfunds - First Guardian Master Fund and Shield Master Fund - as they face accusations of running a Ponzi scheme. The national law firm has advised not only are 12,000 Australians expected to be affected by the alleged scheme, but more than $1b is at stake of being lost to the collapsed funds. Keystone Asset Management, the responsible entity for the Shield Master Fund, and Falcon Capital, the manager of the First Guardian Master Fund, have both entered into liquidation with ASIC understood to be carrying out a range of investigations against all parties involved. Previously ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said ASIC's investigations are looking at the entire chain, including conduct of the lead generators, the financial advisers, the superannuation platforms, 'who we think have a real role here', and the research houses that 'listed these funds as investable'. Slater and Gordon principal lawyer in class actions Andy Wei confirmed the firm is investigating claims that investors were advised to roll their superannuation assets into largely unreliable funds, which has now caused great uncertainty amongst investors on how much of their funds would be recoverable. 'What we're seeing here is potentially deliberate misleading of investors, many of whom are everyday Australians looking to secure their nest eggs,' Mr Wei said. 'They were repeatedly assured that their superannuation would flow into diversified portfolios with steady returns.' He said despite this assurance, 'recent information shows that these funds were largely illiquid with their values grossly overstated.' Mr Wei added illiquid assets such as real estate, retirement accounts, collectibles and private equity could be harder to recover without 'significant loss of value'. He affirmed there is a chance that more than 12,000 Australians could be left out of pocket, with more than $1bn in superannuation 'potentially wiped out'. 'These are people's savings, and they deserve far better than this,' he said. 'Superannuation is meant to be tightly regulated, and many investors likely believed their money was safely managed by trusted, blue-chip superannuation companies.' A Slater and Gordon spokesman highlighted conduct issues at First Guardian 'observed' by FTI Consulting liquidators and accused the superfund of operating a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australian's superannuation. 'Slater and Gordon understand that the liquidators of First Guardian have observed issues arising from co-mingling of investor funds, such that investors' monies were mixed up and used to pay for other investors' redemptions, or investment commitments and management fees, when ordinarily those redemptions, commitments, and fees should have come from income generated through investment activities,' they told NewsWire. 'Conduct of this kind is common to that seen in Ponzi schemes, and how this was allowed to occur forms a part of our investigation.' Mr Wei has urged investors who have been affected to come forward and contact the firm to help shaped the best path forward for recovery of their funds.
