One chart shows how brutal the housing market has become for first-time buyers
For first-time buyers the situation is tough, with rates and prices stubbornly high.
Apollo economist Torsten Slok highlighted just how sharply the share of first-time buyers has plunged.
Even as fresh data points to the US housing market turning in buyers' favor, first-time buyers are still struggling to break in.
Torsten Slok, the chief economist of Apollo Global Management, recently highlighted just how tough it is for people looking to get into the housing market, with the share of first-time buyers plummeting in the last 15 years.
"In 2010, 50% of all homes sold were purchased by first-time home buyers. Today, the share is 24%."
The data is a stark reminder that buyers and sellers are at a stalemate midway through 2025. Even as housing inventory piles up across the country, prices aren't budging and rates remain restrictive. Redfin reported recently that there was a record $700 billion in unsold housing stock in the US in April, a month when prices rose 17%.
Meanwhile, new home sales plunged by almost 14% in May, another datapoint showing the deep freeze that the US housing market has fallen into.
In its US Housing Outlook, published May 2025, Apollo said that 44% of consumers believe that "this is a bad time to buy a house because of high mortgage rates and tight credit." It also noted that 34% of Americans have said that if they were to move, they would rent.
Part of the problem is the so-called lock-in effect. Current homeowners are hesitant to sell as they cling to the low rates they locked in during the era of low rates during the pandemic.
Meanwhile, economic uncertainty is still high as the US economy navigates tariffs and the outlook for interest rates remains clouded, adding to difficulties for buyers trying to enter the housing market.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Economic uncertainty casts shadow over June's solid jobs report
The American labor market keeps hanging on, even as signs of weakness crop up. Why it matters: Hiring is solid, defying expectations that the worrisome macroeconomic backdrop — huge uncertainty about trade, immigration, and the fiscal outlook — would keep more employers on the sidelines. But Thursday's Bureau of Labor Statistics report stops well short of giving an "all-clear" for the economy. Beyond the headline, labor supply is dwindling and demand for workers is narrowing. These issues could plague the labor market in the months ahead. By the numbers: Employment increased by 147,000 last month, surpassing the gain of 115,000 jobs forecasters anticipated. The unemployment rate edged down a tick to 4.1%. The government revised up payroll figures for April and May, noting that employment in the prior two months was higher by a combined 16,000 than initially forecast. The report showed that 80.7% of the prime-age population — those aged 25-54 — was employed, just 0.2 percentage point shy of the peak seen in this economic cycle. Zoom in: Conditions look less cheery beneath the surface. The private sector added just 74,000 jobs in June, almost half as many as the previous month. Jobs growth was overwhelmingly concentrated in state and local government, with less impressive gains in the most cyclical sectors — that is, those most exposed to the weakening economy. State and local government added 73,000 jobs, offsetting the continued declines in federal government (-7,000) from DOGE-related layoffs. The other big gainer was health care, which added 39,000 jobs. While the number of unemployed Americans fell, the labor force also continued to shrink for the second consecutive month, helping keep downward pressure on the unemployment rate. Another 130,000 workers exited the workforce in June. What they're saying:"There are real weaknesses in the market — including concentrated job gains, slowing wage growth, and falling participation — that have persisted for months, and there are scant signs of those concerns fading anytime soon," Indeed economist Cory Stahle wrote Thursday morning. The big picture: Stahle compared the current labor market to a sturdy tent, but one that is "increasingly held up by fewer poles." Among those poles are structural forces, including a shortage of workers from America's aging population and the immigration crackdown. There is also an "ongoing reluctance among employers so far" to layoff workers in masse, a scarring effect of the pandemic when it was impossible to find and train staff. Yes, but: There are profound economic changes underway that look set to supersede those factors; the adoption of AI is already shifting employers' hiring plans. President Trump is ending the era of free trade, making it more costly for businesses to get goods from overseas — a dynamic that will force a reckoning among companies about their other expenses, including labor.
Business Insider
33 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Global Gold Investments Offers Smart Strategies for Investing in Gold in 2025
Trusted Gold Experts Provide Families with Secure, Diversified Investment Solutions for a Stronger Tomorrow As families across the U.S. look for reliable ways to protect their financial future in 2025, expert guidance in gold investment has never been more critical. Global Gold Investments, a trusted leader in precious metals, is stepping forward with strategic solutions designed to help everyday Americans build a more secure financial legacy. From starting a Gold IRA to purchasing physical gold, the company provides customized options to help families navigate uncertain economic times with confidence. Safeguarding the value of wealth is more important than ever. At Global Gold Investments, the mission is simple yet powerful: to help clients protect and grow their family's financial future. Recognizing that retirement savings represent a lifetime of dedication, the team takes a personalized approach—crafting strategies that not only meet but aim to exceed each client's unique expectations. They understand that one of the smartest financial moves for 2025 is diversifying the investment portfolio. Gold and silver have long been valued for their ability to retain purchasing power and weather economic volatility. Incorporating gold and silver into the portfolio, either through direct purchase or a precious metals IRA, can help protect savings from inflation and market instability. Global Gold Investments makes it easy to begin this process. Whether the clients are new to gold or already have an IRA, their experts provide free portfolio analyses and help roll over high-risk retirement accounts into stable gold IRAs. Their commitment to educating clients and offering honest, tailored advice has earned them a reputation for excellence since 2006. For those interested in purchasing physical gold, the company offers expert insights into market trends and helps clients identify the best opportunities based on scarcity, demand, and long-term value. Every transaction is supported by 100% free shipping and insurance, and customers enjoy personalized consultations to guide their investment journey. 'At Global Gold Investments, we understand how important your financial future is—not just for you, but for your family,' says a company representative. 'That's why we take the time to get to know every client and offer solutions that are built around their individual goals. Whether you're rolling over a retirement account or buying your first gold coin, we're here to make the process easy, transparent, and rewarding.' With a long-standing commitment to top-tier customer service, Global Gold Investments stands out for its one-on-one attention, professional integrity, and track record of client satisfaction. They've helped thousands of individuals secure their retirement through smart gold investments—and they're ready to help many more in 2025. Users can learn more at Global Gold Investments, based in the United States, has been providing expert gold and silver investment solutions since 2006. Specializing in Gold IRAs, physical gold purchases, and diversified portfolio strategies, the company is known for exceptional service, experienced guidance, and a strong commitment to helping families secure their financial futures. Contact Details: Contact Person: Jimmy West Website: Contact number: 1 (888) 700-4148 Contact Jimmy West
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's big bill could have small economic impact, experts warn
The Senate version of President Trump's domestic policy bill will likely fall short of its ambitious promises for economic growth and fiscal responsibility, economists are warning. While the Senate version will have some substantial differences from the version passed in the House in May, the overall structure of the bill remains in place, with the big pieces of the 2017 Trump tax cuts featuring as the centerpiece. Republicans say the measures will boost growth, create jobs and won't balloon the deficit. The White House released a report Wednesday claiming the bill would boost economic growth by nearly 5 percent and create roughly 7 million jobs over the next four years — far higher than any independent analysis of the bill has found. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill is projected to deliver major economic gains in the first four years,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Wednesday social media post. Economists, investors and tax experts are telling a different story about the bill, tempering their expectations for growth and pointing to the bill's redistributive effects and its deficit expansion, much of which is being swept under the rug using some creative accounting. 'From a macroeconomic perspective, it probably has little effect,' Reuven Avi-Yonah, a professor of tax law at the University of Michigan, told The Hill. 'I'm always a bit skeptical of the growth potential resulting from tax cuts. And it increases the deficit significantly in a higher interest rate environment, and that's not ideal.' Official growth projections for the bill are modest. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), Congress's official tax scorer, predicted the House version of the bill would increase the average annual growth rate of real gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.03 percentage points, from 1.83 to 1.86 percent, through 2034. This is less than growth resulting from the tax cuts when they were first passed in 2017 and measured in 2018. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Congress's official legislative scorer, separated out the effects of the tax cuts in 2018 and found them to produce an increase in potential GDP of 0.2 percent, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS). GDP growth popped in the second quarter of 2018 above 4 percent, which may have been due to demand-side stimulus of the tax cuts. 'The growth effects tend to show a relatively small (if any) first-year effect on the economy,' the CRS concluded in 2018. The current bill includes additional tax cuts geared toward working Americans. As pledged by Trump, the House version canceled taxes on tips and overtime through 2028, though the Senate version institutes caps for those deductions. Tax experts say these provisions will have little to no effect on growth. 'With tax-free tips, all you're doing is encouraging people to earn their income through tips and not wages. You're not creating any new economic activity,' Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told The Hill. The House version of the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years, according to the CBO. The JCT estimated the Senate's version of the bill would add $440 billion to the deficit. However, that estimate works from the 'current policy baseline,' whereby revenue effects from the extension of the 2017 cuts, which have been in place since 2018, are ignored in the accounting. In other words, Senate Republicans have calculated the total cost of their bill without including the key provisions that would expire without it. With the cost of those tax cut extensions factored in, the true cost of the legislation is between $4 trillion and $5 trillion over 10 years. That's close to 14 percent of the total U.S. debt stock of $36 trillion. 'On a current law basis, we estimate the Senate-proposed tax cuts would increase deficits by $4.2 trillion — nearly $500 billion above the House's equivalent proposals. That figure would rise to $4.8 trillion if temporary tax cuts in the bill were ultimately made permanent,' the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found in an analysis. The massive deficit expansion of the bill, which will be subject to increased debt service costs from elevated interest rates, has heads spinning in the financial world. Credit ratings agencies have downgraded U.S. debt levels from their triple-A rating status to the double-A range. Moody's was the last major agency to do so in May. Fitch's downgrade came in 2023 after a congressional standoff over the U.S. debt ceiling and cited an 'erosion of governance.' Different models from the JCT show different effects on capital and investment coming from the House bill. One model delivers an average increase in the U.S. capital stock of 0.3 percent over the 10-year budget window, while another shows a decrease in the capital stock of 0.9 percent that reduces overall economic output. Capital growth improved from 2017 to 2018 but was well within historical ranges, and it's hard to say if it was directly related to the tax cuts. This was true for nonresidential investment, plants, equipment and patents. CRS said in 2019 that they couldn't conclude 'that the higher rate of growth of nonresidential fixed investment was due to the tax changes.' One 2024 study out of UCLA, the Federal Reserve and the JCT found that investment improved slightly in 2018 and then jumped way up in 2019 as a result of the 2017 tax cuts. While the net investment rate declined for pass-through S-corporations, it improved markedly for C-corporations. 'Tax cuts cause increases in sales, profits, investment, employment, and payrolls, with earnings gains concentrated among highly paid workers and executives,' the researchers found. Many of the business tax breaks in the bill — which include permanent R&D credits, bonus depreciation and interest deductibility — have varying degrees of efficacy. Different studies of the R&D credit, for example, have shown that one dollar of the credit stimulated, on average, one dollar of additional intended investment. 'There is widespread agreement that the [R&D] credit could be more effective than it is,' public finance analyst Gary Guenther wrote for the CRS in 2022. Tax experts also think that bonus depreciation is good for capital investment. 'Bonus depreciation may affect investment,' Bradley Borden, a real estate tax specialist at Brooklyn Law School, told The Hill. 'As the activity picked up across 2020 and 2021, people were purchasing property and taking bonus depreciation deductions.' All of the JCT's models of the House bill show the labor supply increasing as a result of legislation, which is the main driver of the bill's modest projected GDP contribution. The CBO agrees, seeing the bill's lower marginal effective tax rates as increasing the incentive to work. The law would boost the labor supply by 0.6 percent and peak at 0.9 percent in 2026 —equivalent to increasing the number of employed people by 1.5 million, according to the CBO. However, numerous analyses suggest that this won't necessarily mean that workers will get paid more, as most of the wage gains from the 2017 bill accrued at the top of the income spectrum. Nominal wage growth was 3.2 percent between 2017 and 2018, but real wage growth, as deflated by GDP, was 1.2 percent, marking a smaller rise than overall compensation growth. This 'indicates that ordinary workers had very little growth in wage rates,' according to CRS. 'Distributional analyses of the tax change suggested that the tax revision favored higher-income taxpayers, in part because most of the tax cut benefited corporations and in part because the individual income tax cut largely went to higher-income individuals,' the agency found in 2019, summarizing previous forecasts. These were confirmed by measurements of the bill's effects. 'Average earnings for workers at the 95th percentile increased by approximately $2,000 per year, while gains for workers below the 90th percentile are statistically indistinguishable from zero,' the study by UCLA's Patrick Kennedy and others concluded. Just as wage and salary gains from the bill are likely to amass at the top, according to projections, the bill is also expected to redistribute wealth and resources toward the upper echelons of the income spectrum. While the bill doesn't expressly increase taxes on the poor, it does shift wealth away from them, with the lowest tenth of earners losing resources and the top tenth gaining them. Gains from the bill are increasingly skewed toward the rich, according to the CBO. The highest tenth of earners will get an additional $12,000 per year, while the second-highest tenth will get about $3,200, the third tenth will get about $2,100, and the fourth tenth will get about $1,500. The trend continues down the line. The seventh-highest tenth won't see much of a change in their annual wealth, while the bottom three deciles will be worse off. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
