
The reality of a nuclear EMP attack: Why the US needs to be prepared
Historian William Forstchen, a New York Times bestselling author and an expert on EMPs, discussed with Fox News Digital how the U.S. – and everyday Americans – can prepare for the "existential threat" that the attack poses.
"This is a very real threat," he said. "EMP is generated when a small nuclear weapon, 40 to 60 kilotons or about three times the size of a Hiroshima bomb, is detonated 200 miles out in space above the United States. It sets up an electrostatic discharge which cascades to the Earth's surface, feeds into the millions of miles of wires which become antennas, feeds this into the power grid, overloads the grid and blows it out."
Forstchen, citing Congressional reports from 2002 and 2008, said that 80%-90% of Americans would be dead a year later if an EMP strike happened.
While an EMP strike, at first glance, appears to be more science fiction than fact, Forstchen said that the potential for such an attack was recognized decades ago.
"The thread of an EMP was first realized during the 1962 Starfish Prime high-altitude nuclear test. What happened was that it blew about 500 miles away from Hawaii and 200 miles up," he said. "They were able to bring the system back within a matter of days, but what would it be like if it took a month, six months, a year, or five years to fix?"
The late Peter Pry, a nuclear weapons expert, and former staff director at the Congressional EMP Commission, agreed. Before his death in 2022, Pry warned that Kim Jung Un's launch of a high-altitude ballistic missile was a test of North Korea's EMP capabilities against the United States.
"Cars would be paralyzed," Pry told Fox Business' Lou Dobbs Tonight in May 2017. "Airplanes could fall out of the sky. You'd have natural gas pipeline explosions, nuclear reactor overloads. And worst of all, if you had a protracted blackout, it would be a serious threat to the survival of the American people."
The threat of EMP propelled President Donald Trump, during his first term in 2020, to issue a study with the Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
"Just within the last couple of days, the Trump administration is again talking about Israel's Iron Dome but in the United States," he said.
Forstchen shared three ways that the U.S. could prepare for a potential EMP attack.
Calling the current electrical grid "antiquated," Forstchen argued that it needs to be updated for the 21st century.
"It's scary to realize that almost all of our electricity is pumped on systems that are 30, even 40 years old," he said.
Joseph J. Brettel, communications consultant and former energy spokesman, wrote in a Fox News Digital opinion piece that the electrical grid "is in desperate need of investment and modernization."
"This isn't just an infrastructure problem; it's an economic opportunity," he wrote. "By unleashing vast resources and problem-solving determination toward the grid, the President could solve a decades-long challenge while creating thousands of direct and indirect jobs."
Similar to Israel, the U.S. needs an Iron Dome, Forstchen said.
"Ronald Reagan proposed it in the '80s, it was known as Star Wars," he said. "But that was impossible back then, but with the technology we have today and guys like [Elon] Musk, it's very possible that we could make one for relatively minor cost compared to some other things."
Trump has ordered the construction of an advanced, next-generation missile defense shield to protect the United States from aerial attack. In January, he signed an executive order that tasks Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth with drawing up plans to build an "Iron Dome for America" that will protect Americans from the threat of missiles launched by a foreign enemy.
In doing so, Trump kept a campaign promise to prioritize missile defense.
"By next term we will build a great Iron Dome over our country," Trump said during a West Palm Beach event on June 14. "We deserve a dome…it's a missile defense shield, and it'll all be made in America."
Forstchen encouraged people to prepare for the potential threat by stockpiling necessities.
"I urge every American citizen to take this seriously and prepare a little bit. I'm not talking about turning your home into a fortress," he said. "I am saying to have a month or two worth of emergency supplies on hand."
As a resident of Asheville, North Carolina, Forstchen said that the devastation following Hurricane Helene has been "horrific," leaving some still homeless months following the natural disaster.
"And this is a small regional event, imagine if it was the entire United States," he said.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
More than 200 NASA employees sign letter opposing Trump budget cuts: Here's what it said
More than 200 current and former NASA employees have signed an open letter known as the Voyager Declaration that is pushing back on "harmful" proposed cuts to the world's largest space agency. The letter, which was made public Monday, July 21, was released at a time that NASA faces a historically steep budget reduction and has grappled with widespread layoffs and resignations. President Donald Trump in May put forth a proposed budget for the next fiscal year that would slash $6 billion from NASA's budget – equivalent to nearly a 25% cut. At the same time, the U.S. space agency has found itself without a full-time administrator since Bill Nelson stepped down Jan. 20, the day of Trump's inauguration. Trump appointed Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy as NASA's interim administrator earlier in July. Here's what to know about the letter NASA workers signed, as well as the agency's response. NASA budget cuts: Here's a look at 6 space missions that could be axed under Trump's proposal Workers sign letter opposing NASA budget cuts: 'Catastrophic' The letter, addressed to Duffy, included 287 signatures from both public and anonymous current and former NASA employees. Released on the day after Moon Day – an unofficial celebration of the 56th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing – the letter comes at a turbulent moment for NASA. Facing the agency is a potentially looming budget cut from $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion, which includes a substantial hit to a significant portion of the agency's science missions and activities. "The last six months have seen rapid and wasteful changes which have undermined our mission and caused catastrophic impacts on NASA's workforce," the letter argued, pointing to "arbitrary" funding cuts that undermine programs that Congress had elected to fund. Washington D.C.-based nonprofit Stand Up for Science collected signatures for the letter. "Dismantling this American institution is a travesty," Colette Delawalla, founder and executive director of Stand Up for Science, said in a statement. "No one voted to willfully give our global dominance in science to other nations in exchange for tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy." What is the NASA letter opposing? The letter specifically opposes budget cuts and management decisions that Stand Up for Science claims "interfere with the agency's mission." That includes: Changes to NASA's Technical Authority, a process that is a part of the agency's system of checks and balances to provide independent oversight of programs and projects to ensure safety and mission success Canceling active science missions or missions still in development that have Congressional funding "Indiscriminate cuts" to NASA science and aeronautics research Termination of NASA contracts and grants for reasons unrelated to performance Staffing reductions that would "jeopardize NASA's core mission" Is NASA based in Florida? What is Kennedy Space Center? While NASA's official headquarters is in D.C., most of the agency's space program has operations in Florida's Cape Canaveral area. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has also been vocal about his desire for NASA to move its headquarters to the Sunshine State, specifically the Kennedy Space Center near Cape Canaveral. Located on the east coast of Florida on Merritt Island in Brevard County, the Kennedy Space Center is NASA's primary spaceport where a majority of the space agency's missions get off the ground. The center manages the launches of both crewed and uncrewed spaceflights to the International Space Station and partners with commercial companies like SpaceX, which conduct their own rocket launches at the site. Most of the launches take place from the historic Launch Complex 39A – the site of NASA's Apollo moon mission launches. How did NASA respond to Voyager Declaration? In a statement to FLORIDA TODAY, NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said the agency will never compromise on safety, and "any reductions – including our current voluntary reduction – will be designed to protect safety-critical roles." "We must revisit what's working and what's not so that we can inspire the American people again and win the space race," Stevens said. "Despite the claims posted on a website that advances radical, discriminatory DEI principles, the reality is that President Trump has proposed billions of dollars for NASA science, demonstrating an ongoing commitment to communicating our scientific achievements." What other space orgs are speaking out against Trump's NASA policy? Among the most vocal opponents to Trump's proposed budget cuts has been the Planetary Society, a nonprofit organization co-founded by Carl Sagan in 1980 whose chief executive is now Bill Nye. The organization has widely condemned the White House's proposed 47% cuts to NASA science activities under the budget proposal, which it views as "an extinction-level event" for many cornerstone missions. "It will damage the agency's highly skilled workforce, abandon national priorities, and gut STEM education and outreach," the Planetary Society said in a May 30 statement when Trump's full proposal was made public. Earlier in July, the organization shared an open letter signed by all seven living former heads of NASA's Science Mission Directorate. In the letter, the leaders warned that Trump's proposal would 'walk away from dozens of current, extraordinarily successful and productive science missions' and halt nearly all future investments in exploration and innovation. Congress advances bill to restore NASA funding Meanwhile in Congress, U.S. Senate and House members approved appropriations bills that would rebuff proposed cuts and maintain NASA's annual budget at $24.9 billion. The Planetary Society lauded Congress in a statement for resisting "unprecedented, unstrategic, and wasteful cuts" at NASA. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: NASA workers sign letter opposing Trump budget cuts: 'Catastrophic' Solve the daily Crossword

Wall Street Journal
4 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The AI Market Debate Is Old
Regarding Marian L. Tupy and Peter Boettke's op-ed 'Algorithms Can't Replace Free Markets' (July 22): Economists have already debated whether AI could replace the market some 80 years ago when they argued over the Lange model. Polish-American economist Oskar Lange's utopian—or dystopian—idea was to have a big, futuristic computer replace market dynamics so that an economy could be centrally planned.


Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Penny Pritzker Warns Trump Cuts Threaten US in Global Tech Race
President Donald Trump's cuts to research funding are putting the US at risk of losing the technological race against other countries including China, said Penny Pritzker, former US commerce secretary and chair of Harvard University 's powerful governing body. The Trump administration has frozen billions in research dollars for US universities from Northwestern to Princeton, and halted some $2.6 billion directed at Harvard. Trump has also sought to prevent foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, the oldest and richest American university.