
Nearly tapped out: Trump's tariffs and trade winds threaten America's craft brewers
Article content
'It's a corner tavern without the booze,' says co-founder Jason Klein, noting they only serve beer they brew on-site, not liquor. What customers don't see is the storeroom, where Klein is engaged in another game: playing Tetris with supplies.
Article content
Article content
U.S. President Donald Trump's aluminum tariffs have forced U.S. breweries to consider stockpiling cans as a hedge against rising costs, but for small brewers like Klein, space is limited.
Article content
Article content
'It's like a puzzle back there for us. We've had to sacrifice on things like grain so we could hook up on cans,' he says. But Klein is facing more than just logistical challenges.
Article content
Trump imposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum in February, citing the need to promote domestic manufacturing and protect national security. He then doubled them to 50 per cent in June, and small brewers are feeling the squeeze.
Trade talks are underway, with Canada looking for deals to reduce or avoid Trump's tariffs. Both sides aim to conclude a deal by July 21. If no deal is reached, the tariffs will remain. Meanwhile, higher costs threaten the thin margins and production capacity of smaller U.S. brewers, while trade tensions are limiting export opportunities for the larger ones, particularly in their biggest market, Canada.
Article content
Article content
An industry on the edge
Article content
American craft brewing took off in the 2010s but has since faced challenges, including oversaturation, COVID, and inflation. 'Everything's gone up,' Klein says. 'Grain has gone up. Hops have gone up. Storage has gone up.' With input prices rising, brewers feel pressure to raise prices but worry about going too far.
Article content
'At some point, you're not going to pay $14, $15, $16 for a six pack,' Klein says, noting that sales have already slipped.
Article content
The whole industry is grappling with this trend. U.S. craft beer production peaked in 2019 and has since declined, according to the Brewers Association. The U.S. craft brewing industry saw a 3.9 per cent drop in barrel production between 2023 and 2024 and a slight decline in its overall U.S. beer market share, dropping to 13.3 per cent. Its retail value grew by 3 per cent to $28.9 billion, but that was largely due to price hikes and strong taproom sales.
Article content
Now, the industry is facing even higher production costs related to the price of aluminum cans.
Article content
Aluminum cans are the go-to for US breweries because they are light, easy to ship, and more environmentally friendly, as aluminum is recyclable. As of January, cans accounted for 75 per cent of the craft beer market share, according to Beer Insights, so there was plenty of panic when the tariffs were introduced.
Article content
Much of the aluminum used for canning in the U.S. comes from domestically recycled products, while just 30 per cent is sourced from raw aluminum, largely from Canada. It's only the raw imports that are directly impacted by tariffs, which means the feared price spikes have been minimal, thus far.
Article content
But the price of aluminum generally is based on the London Metal Exchange (LME) and the Midwest Premium indices, and while the LME hasn't changed much this year, the Midwest Premium has soared, hitting a record 60 cents per pound in early June — a whopping 161 per cent rise since January. Distributors peg their rates to these indices quarterly.
Article content
Article content
For distributors like Core Cans, a California-based, family-run company specializing in the supply of aluminum cans and other packaging, this has meant only having to raise prices by 3 per cent thus far, says co-founder Kirk Anderson. For Craft Beverage Warehouse, a Midwest distributor, it has been closer to 4 per cent, according to co-founder Kyle Stephens.
Article content
But the tariffs will continue to put upward pressure on pricing, they warn, and the greater the market uncertainty and the higher the indices go, the more big suppliers and companies buy up greater quantities of aluminum to shore up their inventory. 'That's what impacts us the most,' says Stephens, noting that the reduced supply drives up the price. 'People are out there hedging, buying a ton of aluminum and driving that price up.'
Article content
By the third and fourth quarters, if the uncertainty continues, Sophie Thong, director of account management for Can-One USA, a manufacturer of aluminum cans in Nashua, NH, says craft brewers should expect prices to rise further. 'In Q3, it will be higher,' she says.
Article content
Article content
Smaller brewers say they have little choice when it comes to suppliers. Most major U.S. suppliers have raised minimum order demands so high that smaller players often rely on distributors or Canadian suppliers to get the smaller orders they can manage.
Article content
Klein, at Spiteful Brewing, noted that the Trump administration wants the industry to source their cans domestically but that he has to work with his Canadian supplier because his former U.S. distributor raised its minimal order from a single truckload, with 200,000 cans, to five truckloads – a whopping 1 million cans he doesn't have enough room to store.
Article content
Also, for many brewers, buying two or more times the normal amount is about more than just the space. 'It has a negative effect on cash flow, too,' Klein adds.
Article content
Faced with these challenges, many in the industry are finding creative ways around the pinch.
Article content
For distributors and suppliers, this means working with clients to keep costs at a minimum. Craft Beverage Warehouse, for example, has adopted shared shipping, which involves reaching out to breweries by region to see if they want to be part of a group order to reduce shipping costs.
Article content
For breweries, some are storing as much as they can, leaning on taproom sales, and diversifying their products. 'If their beer volume is going down, maybe they're making a hop water or, if a state allows it, they might be making a hemp-derived THC product,' Stephens says.
Article content
The Canadian crackdown
Article content
While U.S. breweries do their best to adapt at home, the international market is presenting a new hurdle.
Article content
Canada is the biggest foreign market for American craft brewers, making up 38 per cent of U.S. craft beer exports as of early 2025. But now, amid Trump's trade war, they're dealing with rising input costs as well as retaliatory bans on the sale of U.S. alcohol in major provinces, including Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and others.
Article content
Article content
Last month, Alberta lifted its three-month ban on U.S. alcohol sales, but it remains in place elsewhere, and Ontario and Nova Scotia recently announced they would not order liquor stores to restock U.S. products. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has been vocal about the impact.
Article content
'Every year, LCBO sells nearly $1 billion worth of American wine, beer, spirits and seltzers. Not anymore,' he said. In 2024, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario reported more than $6.2 million worth of sales of beer from New England alone.
Article content
While most small craft brewers don't export their products, larger ones do, and they stand to lose tens of millions of dollars in lost sales in 2025 alone as a result of the Canadian sales ban. This is another trade irritant irking the U.S., according to US Ambassador Pete Hoekstra.
Article content
Like he did with Canada's now-dead Digital Services Tax, Trump may soon target these Canadian sales bans for leverage in the ongoing trade talks.
Article content
Article content
The final pint?
Article content
Craft brewing was a tough business before the tariffs. Last year, for the first time in two decades, more U.S. craft breweries closed than opened. Now, with packaging costs rising and trade uncertainty mounting, it's enough to drive some brewers to … well, drink, and hope for policy shifts.
Article content
Klein says policymakers should understand the demands Trump's tariffs are putting on smaller businesses.
Article content
'I think the policymakers need to understand that the only thing they're doing is increasing costs for small businesses,' he says, noting how they're punishing him for buying aluminum cans, which he can't source in America.
Article content
Many American craft brewers notably do use U.S.-based distributors and suppliers, and Can One-USA, for example, set up shop just over a year ago to meet the needs of these smaller players, offering smaller minimum orders and warehousing options. But brewers with domestic supply chains are still facing higher prices, thanks to the market uncertainty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
21 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Pierre Poilievre and the ballot box
Opinion The Aug. 18 vote in the Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot is more than a byelection to fill a vacant seat in Parliament. It is, for all intents and purposes, a referendum on one man's relevance in Canadian politics. That man is of course Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party of Canada leader who failed in his re-election bid for the Ottawa-area constituency of Carleton, which he lost to Liberal Bruce Fanjoy in April's federal election. Despite having increased the CPC's seat count (from 120 to 144) and share of the popular vote, Poilievre's electoral failure was twofold, losing his own seat as well as not delivering the Conservative majority that was, mere months earlier, considered a foregone conclusion. ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre Having successfully harnessed Canadians' dissatisfaction with then-prime minister Justin Trudeau's government, Poilievre had built such an overwhelming lead in public-opinion polls that it was assumed the next election would propel the CPC to a massive majority. But the smooth-paved path to a Conservative coronation was suddenly made very bumpy, first by Trudeau's resignation and second by a sudden shift in Canadian attitudes. For the past half-decade, Poilievre's strategy for attracting would-be voters into the CPC tent involved not much more or less than mirroring whatever seemed to be working for Donald Trump south of the border. Insults, name-calling, concocting alternate-reality 'facts,' demonizing opponents and the media, pandering to the extreme fringes of the right … you name it; if it worked for Trump, Poilievre seemed eager to give it a go. And it worked well — until it didn't. Trump's tariff threats and unhinged musings about annexing Canada as the 51st U.S. state did not sit well here; rather abruptly, trying to sound and act like Trump became the absolute worst thing for a Canadian politician to do. Poilievre, trapped in the Trump-lite image he had worked so diligently to create, saw his prime ministerial aspirations evaporate. On election night in Carleton — a Conservative stronghold he had held since 2004, through seven federal elections — Poilievre lost by more than 4,500 votes. The CPC remained in opposition; leader Poilievre was on the outside looking in and looking for a way back in. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. He and the party decided the most direct route back to Parliament Hill runs through Battle River-Crowfoot, a riding so deep Tory blue that incumbent CPC candidate Damien Kurek received 82.8 per cent of the votes cast last spring. At the first available opportunity, Kurek resigned so Poilievre could run in his place. The polling agency 338Canada currently puts the odds of Poilievre winning the byelection at 99 per cent. But that doesn't mean it won't get messy. Thanks to the mischief-inclined Longest Ballot Committee, more than 200 candidates have registered, forcing Elections Canada to create special ballots. And some in the rural constituency are unhappy that a 'parachute' candidate — one who's now touting his deep Alberta roots despite having left oil country behind more than two decades ago — is being foisted on them rather than the true-blue Albertan they chose as their MP. At a candidates' forum on Tuesday night, military veteran and independent candidate Bonnie Critchley — a self-described staunch conservative who voted for Kurek and views his exit to make room for Poilievre as cynical — put it this way: 'I firmly believe that Mr. Poilievre is too busy with his personal ambitions to give a rat's backside about us.' Time will tell how many more in this sparsely populated patch of eastern Alberta agree. Poilievre's reputation, and relevance, are on the line. Anything less than a massive landslide win will surely be viewed as a second consecutive ballot-box repudiation.


Winnipeg Free Press
21 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's ill-advised trade war with Brazil
Opinion It's worth remembering that Brazil and the United States, long regional rivals, are deeply suspicious of the others' motives, are concerned about issues around dominance, control and independence and are locked in a tug-of-war to be recognized as the major power-broker in the wider region. The Brazilians, in particular, are open to cordial relations with Washington, but will not take their marching orders from the U.S. White House. The Americans, for their part, just want Brasilia to advance a policy agenda of supporting U.S.-friendly countries, following the U.S. lead, ensuring open markets and an attractive investment climate and fostering a stable order in the Americas. Recently, Trump did something ill-conceived, impulsive and counterproductive by imposing a stiff 50 per cent tariff (higher than any other country in this second tariff round) on all imports from Brazil — which is the largest economy in the region — on Aug. 1. In turn, Brazil's leftist president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, promised to respond in kind against U.S. products entering the South American country. Eraldo Peres / The Associated Press Supporters of Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro stormed the Brazilian Supreme Court building, in Brasilia, in Brasilia, Brazil, in January, 2023. U.S. President Donald Trump is levying tariffs against Brazil to try to stop Bolsonaro's prosecution for attempting a coup to topple President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Of course, there is nothing new about Trump imposing trade tariffs on other countries — as Canada can well attest. But what is new (and potentially very troubling) is that he appears to be doing so not on economic or commercial grounds. In fact, the U.S. actually registers a trade surplus with Brazil of some US$7.0 billion in 2024 — and roughly US$410 billion over the last 15 years. Some of America's largest businesses, such as Exxon Mobil, BlackRock and General Motors, have also found a welcoming corporate investment environment in Brazil. Instead, Trump has singled out Lula and Brazil's efforts to prosecute former far-right Brazilian president, and Trump's close friend and fellow traveller, Jair Bolsonaro for trying to discard the 2022 presidential electoral outcome. It is well known within Brazil that Bolsonaro had concocted plans to immediately call the election results fraudulent, to mobilize a supportive Brazilian military, to assassinate Lula (along with his vice president and a Supreme Court Justice) and to unconstitutionally cling to power through a coup d'état. Not surprisingly, Trump sees things much differently. He argues that Bolsonaro has been the victim of a political 'witch hunt' and much worse. In his July 9 letter to Lula, Trump noted angrily: 'The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace.' (There are also U.S. complaints against the Brazilian government for taking regulatory action against major American tech companies and social media platforms for disseminating misinformation and disinformation about Brazil's 2022 presidential election and its aftermath.) Bolsonaro, once dubbed the 'Trump of the Tropics,' was ideologically aligned with Trump and his MAGA base when he held political office from 2019-2022. Remember, there were people in Trump's inner circle in early 2023, such as Steve Bannon and Jason Miller, who wanted Bolsonaro to remain in South Florida and thus avoid facing prosecution for his alleged crimes. Since April of this year, though, the Brazilian National Congress passed the enabling legislation that would grant President da Silva the power to retaliate in kind against any U.S. trade levies. After Trump's recent tariff threat, he stated that 'any measure to increase tariffs will be addressed in accordance with the Brazilian Economic Reciprocity Law.' There is no disputing the fact that Brazil is deeply concerned about triggering a reduction of potentially 75 per cent of its exports to the U.S. (After all, the U.S. is Brazil's second largest trading partner after China.) But what Trump often fails to consider is the negative repercussions of his tariff tantrums. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. For instance, one-third of the coffee and half of the fresh orange juice that Americans consume at their breakfast table comes from Brazil. That means that Americans will automatically be paying more for those imported products and adding to their overall cost of living angst. I also can't imagine that Trump would want to anger his political base even more than he already has over the last few weeks. Secondly, Brazilians are very angry over what they believe is Trump's blatant interference in the country's domestic political affairs. As Lula pointed out: 'Brazil is a sovereign nation with independent institutions and will not accept any form of tutelage.' Accordingly, Trump's bumbling tariff move has only served to bolster Lula's standing in the polls. Then there's China. The Middle Kingdom has quickly become an important trade partner for Brazil. And Trump's latest move will only push Brasilia even closer to Beijing and thereby strengthen China's growing economic and political presence in the Americas. Clearly, countries that engage in trade wars invariably end up shooting themselves in the foot. Notwithstanding what Trump says, there are no winners in the types of clashes. The best thing for both sides would be for Trump and Lula to take a step back, allow cooler heads to prevail, and to recognize the mutual benefits of their important bilateral relationship. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.


Winnipeg Free Press
21 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The regular work of defending sovereignty
Opinion In September 1885, from a prison cell in Regina, Louis Riel — Métis leader and founder of Manitoba — penned one of the most audacious diplomatic appeals in Canadian history. Facing execution, he wrote to U.S. President Grover Cleveland, asking for the peaceful annexation of the Northwest Territories. It was a radical act, born not of betrayal but of desperation. 'Your humble petitioner respectfully asks, as an American citizen, for your kind and powerful protection… that the international line between the United States and the North-West be blotted out from Lake Superior to the Pacific Ocean, that the Hon. James W. Taylor, United States consul, at Winnipeg, be appointed governor-general of these vast territories… I, the undersigned, humbly ask you to appoint me as first minister and Secretary of the North-West…' Riel's appeal was rooted in a profound sense of injustice. He condemned the Hudson's Bay Company's monopoly, the illegitimate land transfer to Canada, and the deceitful arrival of armed surveyors masquerading as civil agents. His homeland, he believed, had been erased through colonial deception. He asserted the British government was 'guilty of an extraordinary crime against humanity.' Yet even in his final days, Riel's tone remained dignified and conciliatory. He wrote not with bitterness, but with hope — for protection, for peace, and for a future where his people might thrive. His letter is more than a historical footnote — it's a testament to the desperation of a visionary leader confronting the collapse of his world. Riel had few options left. His appeal to Cleveland was a last resort, not a calculated betrayal. As a naturalized U.S. citizen (Montana, 1883), he had a legitimate basis to seek protection. His proposal to erase the border and establish a new government under U.S. oversight was bold, but it reflected his belief that the Métis had been abandoned by Canada. Still, while Riel's appeal was understandable given his circumstances, it was also deeply misguided. The idea of annexation — however rooted in desperation — would be rejected by most Canadians today. It challenges the very notion of Canadian sovereignty and identity. Riel's words reflect a man who, despite facing death, still believed in the possibility of a better future. His appeal was not a surrender — it was a final act of leadership, rooted in the conviction that his people deserved protection, recognition, and a voice in shaping their destiny. Even in chains, Riel imagined a government that could serve the Northwest with dignity and justice. His plea was not just political — it was spiritual, a testament to his enduring belief in the power of institutions to uplift the marginalized. That vision, though dismissed in his time, continues to challenge Canada to live up to its promise. The tensions Riel faced were not isolated. His letter echoes earlier and later struggles for Canadian autonomy. American revolutionaries invaded Quebec in 1775–76. Quebec rejected American efforts to get them to join their rebellion and form a new country. Indigenous and settler forces repelled U.S. incursions in 1812. Annexationist movements in the 1840s through 1870s stirred fears of cultural erasure. These moments reflect Riel's desperation and the enduring tension between sovereignty and influence. Even today, echoes of Riel's plea reverberate. While Canada is now a sovereign middle power, recent provocations — such as U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks that Canada might be 'better off as the 51st state'— serve as cautionary reminders. But threats to sovereignty are not only external. Premier Danielle Smith's government in Alberta has introduced legislation that lowers the threshold for triggering a provincial referendum on separation. Her rhetoric, coupled with support from organized separatist groups, has stoked fears of a constitutional rupture. While Smith claims to support 'sovereignty within a united Canada,' her actions suggest a willingness to entertain separatist sentiment to appease her political base — quietly stirring forces that threaten national unity. Indigenous leaders have condemned these moves as a violation of treaty rights, warning that no referendum can override the foundational agreements between First Nations and the Crown. The Onion Lake Cree Nation has revived a lawsuit against Alberta's Sovereignty Act, citing the province's 'growing separatist agenda' as a direct threat to constitutional protections. Such developments remind us that sovereignty is not static — it must be defended not only from foreign influence but also from internal fragmentation. Riel's appeal, though misguided, was born of desperation and a desire for justice. Today, we must ensure that sovereignty is not weaponized for political gain, but upheld through reconciliation, pluralism, and respect for all peoples who share this land. Ultimately, Canada's sovereignty is not just about borders or trade — it's about justice, self-determination, and the promise of a nation that listens to all its voices. Riel's final plea reminds us that sovereignty is a living principle, defended in communities, courts, and the national imagination. Martin Zeilig is a journalist and writer based in Winnipeg.