How long can Koizumi stay frenemies with the agriculture lobby?
It's not just about his photogenic looks and deft use of traditional and social media. What's often depicted is a man taking on one of the most politically influential groups in the country — Japan Agricultural Cooperatives (JA).
'Never in my life have I thought about rice so much every day, from morning to night,' he said in an interview published in Bungei Shunju, a monthly magazine. 'I am prepared to take any measure without being bound by precedents.'
Since his tenure as chairman of the agricultural panel of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party from 2015 to 2017, Koizumi, 44, has advocated for a reform of the agriculture sector.
In the grand scheme of things, his previous attempts at transforming the industry were largely seen as inconsequential. This time around, his performance as farm minister will likely have an impact on his future career plans.
Three key sources of potential friction loom over Koizumi and his relationship with the agriculture lobby: government policy over rice production, the structure of agriculture cooperatives, and the logistics of rice distribution.
So far, Koizumi has taken an aggressive stance by advocating for a different approach to rice production and greater international competitiveness in the domestic rice industry.
This reform-oriented approach was what led Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba to name him farm minister after his predecessor's rice gaffe. Both Koizumi and Ishiba share an appetite to overhaul practices that have long dominated Japan's farm sector — so much so that Ishiba was even called , in his own words, the 'worst farm minister' during his one-year tenure in the post in 2008-09.
While the Cabinet has just launched a probe to find out the reasons behind the latest rice price surge, experts have cited decadeslong government-led acreage reduction as a factor.
Amid declining consumption of rice, farmers were encouraged, through the provision of subsidies, to convert rice paddies to other crops. That endeavor sought to stabilize prices and protect the livelihoods of farmers. Imports of foreign rice was also kept low for a long period of time.
In exchange for votes, politicians representing rural constituencies promoted the interests of the agricultural sector to the central bureaucracy, fighting with the finance ministry to obtain budget concessions.
JA, the country's largest confederation of small and midsize farmers, backed the acreage reduction policy before it was discontinued in 2018 in favor of a switch to production 'in line with demand.'
However, despite the reversal, rice production continued to decline. But to this day, LDP lawmakers elected in rural constituencies still voice their fears over overproduction and a consequent drop in the price of rice that could hit farmers.
In this context, Koizumi has said that he would not rule out raising imports of foreign rice — a real bugbear for domestic farmers — or pushing for a pivot to rice exports.
Koizumi inspects a warehouse storing stockpiled rice in Kanagawa Prefecture on May 30. |
REUTERS
Despite a low overall food self-sufficiency rate of 38% in fiscal 2023, Japan produces most of the rice it consumes.
Koizumi is not just taking issues with the way rice is produced in the country, but also the business model of agriculture cooperatives as a whole.
Since his appointment, he has stressed JA should give priority to the interests of consumers.
'I would like to see farmers explore markets where they can sell their higher-value products,' he recently told a news conference. 'The group should rely on its business activities to make money, not on financial services.'
Sales of agricultural products under JA amounted to ¥4.5 trillion ($31 billion) in 2023, according to the most recent data. This is equivalent to 47% of the entire sector, including farmers who don't belong to any of JA's cooperatives.
It is also only a fraction of the funds JA handles through the financial services it provides, such as mutual aid insurance and credit. In the same year, the group respectively controlled a total of ¥79 trillion in holdings — a sum higher than those held by more well-known insurance companies — and ¥108 trillion in savings.
While a declining number of confederated farmers under JA has affected overall production and sales over the years, the group's insurance and credit business segments have been performing well.
Consistent with his 'consumer-first approach,' Koizumi has also set his sights on the rice distribution network, calling it opaque.
The initial delay in the sale of stockpiled rice was traced to bottlenecks in the distribution of the first batch in the hands of JA.
Late last month, in coordination with the agriculture ministry, the transport ministry set up a task force to facilitate the transportation of stockpiled rice to remove bottlenecks.
'The distribution of rice is way too complex, and there's something unclear in it,' Koizumi told reporters after a meeting with Ishiba last week. 'It's essential to thoroughly review all aspects of the current distribution system and reassess how it functions.'
Koizumi's often direct style of communication — in which he bypasses official channels of communication and directly addresses his followers on social media platform X — stands in sharp contrast with that of the JA, an association that has long operated under the radar of most consumers.
So far, the two sides have avoided any public flare-up, displaying an intent to work together to stabilize rice prices.
'We are very worried about the decline in rice consumption,' Toru Yamano, chairman of the Central Union of Agricultural Cooperatives and the face of JA, said last week. 'It's important to build an environment where consumers can purchase rice easily.'
Yamano crucially avoided any direct reference to the price of rice — based on the apparent conviction that it should be set by the market.
This was unlike Koizumi, who — just days into receiving his mandate — said consumers should be able to buy a 5-kilogram bag of stockpiled rice at ¥2,000.
'At this stage, it would be a mistake to make policy decisions because we need to be careful not to offend certain groups,' Koizumi told reporters during his first news conference at the farm ministry.
In another news conference, Koizumi fended off insinuations over his alleged clash with the lobby, blaming the media for stirring up such a perception.
'I understand that stoking anxiety works better as a business model,' he said. 'But we don't do business here. We are committed to policies that bring joy, and inspire and encourage farmers.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy dig and 25% tariffs
Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested U.S. President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25% tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the domestic social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticizing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the "most strenuous and obnoxious,' in a Truth Social post on Wednesday. He added the U.S. may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them "dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25% tariffs kicked in as of Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath — and not the subject to the very highest rates — but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. 'Blunt-force' message "Overnight, the U.S.-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai based financial services firm. The levies "feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message.' Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal — or the lack of it — was the U.S. pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. As the U.S. released rates across the world on Aug. 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. "The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' said V. Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel-maker in the south Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur. "We were expecting something in the 15% to 20% range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbors on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being "very disturbed.' A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40% of its revenue from the U.S. selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest U.S. customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. "The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for "months and months,' he said he'll have to start cutting his workforce. The U.S. is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated $129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25%, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20% tariff, Vietnam got a 20% levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19% duties. "We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewelry Export Promotion Council. "We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called Modi "my friend' in a Feb. 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries "special.' India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting U.S. imports, according to people familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. "It is a storm in the India-U.S. relationship at this moment but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' said Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Program at Delhi-based Observer Researcher Foundation. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a U.S.-India trade deal continue. Negotiating tactic Jewelry businesses "are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favorable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. "The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing "seems like a knee-jerk reaction,' according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. "This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said.


The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Japan education ministry OKs plan to exclude foreign PhD students from living expenses aid
TOKYO -- The Japanese education ministry's human resources committee on July 30 broadly approved a plan to limit the recipients of living expenses aid for doctoral candidates to Japanese students only, to be implemented as early as the 2027 academic year. The aid program, known as the "SPRING" (Support for Pioneering Research Initiated by the Next Generation) initiative, was launched in academic 2021 by the ministry's Japan Science and Technology Agency. It pays doctoral candidates up to 2.9 million yen (about $19,200) annually for living and research expenses. In the 2024 academic year, of the total 10,564 recipients, about 40%, or 4,125 individuals, were international students, with Chinese nationals making up the largest number -- 3,151. This led to criticism from ruling Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers and others in the Diet. In response, the education ministry reviewed its policy, proposing at the July 30 committee meeting to limit the recipients of living expense support -- up to 2.4 million yen per year -- exclusively to Japanese students. Research funding, on the other hand, will continue to be available to international students. Additionally, the scope of research funding will be expanded to include working students with stable incomes, who were previously ineligible. Meanwhile, some 19,300 signatures collected under the statement, "Do not discriminate against students based on nationality," were presented to the ministry on the same day by people opposing the policy change, accompanied by a protest rally. A ministry official explained, "The policy change reflects the original intent to support Japanese students advancing to doctoral programs, but the ministry acknowledges the importance of supporting international students and plans to address this through other policies."


Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan's foreign minister urges Myanmar to restore democracy
Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya has urged Myanmar to restore democracy, after the Southeast Asian country lifted the state of emergency imposed when its military staged a coup in 2021. Japan strongly urges Myanmar's military to "swiftly restore the country's democratic political system," Iwaya told a news conference Friday. According to Myanmar's Constitution, a general election is to be held within six months after a state of emergency is lifted. "Japan is seriously concerned that if general elections are held without any moves toward political progress, it could provoke a strong backlash from the people of Myanmar," he said. Iwaya called for an immediate halt to violence and the release of political detainees, including democratic leader Aung San Suu Kyi. "Japan strongly hopes that a ceasefire throughout Myanmar and its credible implementation will be achieved and that all parties will make sincere efforts toward a peaceful resolution," he added.