Labour councils use petrol-guzzling tools despite net zero pledges
Some local authorities have failed to replace garden maintenance equipment such as leaf blowers, hedge trimmers and chainsaws that use old-fashioned two-stroke engines.
Such devices, used in public spaces including schools, have been found to emit 11 times the carbon monoxide and four times the nitrogen oxide of a small petrol family car.
Many of the worst offending councils are Labour-run and have introduced schemes such as low emissions or clean air zones and emission-based residents' car parking permits, which have made millions of pounds from motorists.
A series of freedom of information requests was submitted to councils that had promoted so-called 'clean air' schemes in an attempt to see whether they were being as 'green' as they claimed.
The authorities were asked if they knew what type of 'outdoor power equipment [is] used to maintain grounds, parks and other public green spaces' within their clean air zones. They were then asked what percentage of that equipment was petrol- or battery-powered.
Reliance on petrol power
Birmingham city council, a Labour authority, said 100 per cent of its grounds maintenance devices were petrol-powered, adding how it had 15 leaf blowers, 31 brush, line and hedge trimmers and 15 ride-on or push mowers. In London, Croydon, Harrow, Hillingdon and Sutton also admitted that all of its outdoor equipment was petrol-powered.
Redbridge revealed 95 per cent of devices were petrol-reliant, with Bristol and Portsmouth and the London boroughs of Barnet, Havering, Newham and Tower Hamlets declaring 90 per cent of their outdoor gear ran on petrol.
The London borough of Hammersmith and Fulham said 85 per cent of such devices were petrol-reliant, with Ealing council citing 80 per cent, Bradford 75 per cent, and Barking & Dagenham, Waltham Forest and Richmond and Wandsworth stating that 70 per cent used petrol.
In contrast, all of the outdoor equipment owned by the Conservative-run Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea was battery-powered.
Councils in Sheffield and Brent were also making promising strides, with battery-powered equipment now accounting for 85 per cent and 90 per cent of tools respectively.
Ego Power Plus, the company which obtained the data and which manufactures garden equipment powered by lithium batteries, claimed research had shown two-stroke engine petrol-powered tools were 'often associated with poor levels of fuel efficiency and high pollution levels'.
A two-stroke engine, invented in 1881, is an internal combustion engine that completes a power cycle with two strokes of the piston – an upward and a downward movement – in one revolution of the crankshaft.
Vince Brauns, of Ego Power Plus, said: 'Our most recent research into the use of outdoor power equipment by councils within clean air zones shows that, despite making clear commitments to improving air quality, many councils are still using highly polluting petrol-powered equipment.
'By focussing our research on councils who have made clear commitments to sustainability through clean air zones, we were keen to understand if councils have recognised the negative impact of petrol-powered tools, and how much progress has been made on their journeys towards a greener, battery-powered future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
21-06-2025
- Daily Mirror
UK heatwave leaves renters boiling as 1m private rent homes fail basic standards
One in five privately rented homes would fail the government's Decent Homes Standard - and of those, almost 400,000 can't be maintained at liveable temperatures More than a million privately rented homes are failing basic living standards - as soaring temperatures leave renters boiling. One in five privately rented homes would fail the government's Decent Homes Standard. And of those, almost 400,000 can't be maintained at liveable temperatures, according to Lib Dem analysis of House of Commons data. The party is calling on the government to commit to an emergency home insulation programme and urgently implement new decent home standards. "The condition of rented homes is shameful," Lib Dem Energy Spokesperson Pippa Heylings said. "After years of Conservative failure to commit to upgrading homes and implementing new decent standards, renters now pay through the nose for homes that don't meet the basic standards of safety and health. This cannot continue." as soaring temperatures leave renters boiling. Half a million (496,000) privately rented homes - more than 10% of all private rented accommodation in the country - are rated with category 1 hazards. This is the most serious rating and poses serious and immediate risk to people's health and safety. A further 298,000 homes were deemed not in a reasonable state of repair - this could mean anything from not being structurally sound, to damp, rot and pest infestations. And another 88,000 privately rented homes failed DHS because they did not have suitable modern services and facilities such as a working toilet.
Daily Mirror
18-06-2025
- Daily Mirror
‘I'm a mum of two disabled teenagers - brutal PIP cuts make our life impossible'
Mum Nicola Holmes says that if Personal Independence Payments (PIP) are removed under a Labour shake-up, it is an assault on families like theirs, and it will push them further into poverty Former actor and beauty therapist Nicola Holmes , 55, lives in Tewkesbury with husband Wayne, an electrician, and their two children Ethan, 18, who has autism, Down's syndrome and severe anxiety, and Ella, 16, who has PDA (pathological demand avoidance) anxiety and is situationally mute. Vulnerable people, like Nicola and her family, who are claiming PIP have accused the government of targeting society's most vulnerable by stopping benefits as part of the new Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. This is despite Department of Works and Pensions (DWP) confirmation that benefit claimants affected by proposed changes to PIP will have their payments protected for a 13 week transitional period. Existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers' Allowance and the carers' element of Universal Credit, who will receive the additional protection, feel it is nowhere near enough. Mum Nicola says the cuts will push families like hers deeper into poverty. The family relies on husband Wayne's income as self-employed electrician, PIP for Ethan, universal credit and carers' allowance. Reacting to today's benefits announcements, she tells The Mirror: 'This Is not reform. This is collapse. As a mum of two disabled teenagers, both autistic, and one who also has Down's syndrom, I feel completely abandoned by a system that was supposed to protect us. READ MORE: 'I'm having panic attacks over PIP shake-up - I don't know how ministers sleep at night' 'It almost feels too late for them now, as if the bureaucracy is simply determined to age them out of the system, rather than ever step up and support them properly. 'I can't work, not out of choice, but because I am caring full-time for two incredible, vulnerable human beings in the total absence of meaningful provision. I also have a chronic health condition, brought on by the relentless stress of caring. The system has failed my young people again and again, and in doing so, has failed me and my husband as their parents. As a family, we have been left behind. 'Now, the government plans to make brutal cuts to Universal Credit and PIP. Making the process even more nefarious and complex. 'Disability should not be scored by numbers. Lifelong conditions should be accepted as just that and not be needed to be reassessed. Disabled people should not have to prove their worth in society. 'It's a direct assault on families like mine…families already surviving on the bare minimum. We are constantly exhausted, financially drained, emotionally spent. These cuts won't just make life harder. They will make it impossible. 'PIP and carers' allowance are intrinsically linked. Removing them from thousands will have a violent domino effect of astronomical proportions. Carers allowance is not meant to be a wage and yet it is included as earnings and therefore taxed as one. The Government makes out people are getting something for nothing – but carers provide the equivalent of a second NHS. 'This will be catastrophic. Instead of rebuilding the foundations, the government is accelerating collapse by targeting those of us who were already barely hanging on. 'We're not seeing reform, we're watching the systematic removal of care and responsibility from governance. Social safety nets have become traps. Services have become mazes. 'It feels like the lives of disabled people, and those of us who care for them, simply don't matter anymore. We're seen as burdens to be managed or costs to be cut, rather than human beings with potential, rights, and futures worth investing in. 'This is very serious.'
Scotsman
15-06-2025
- Scotsman
West Lothian pupils could be asked to use public buses after councillor questions cost of school transport
Pupils in West Lothian could be asked to use public bus routes to get to school, after questions were raised over the cost of providing special transport. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The council pays £1, 245 per pupil to provide 'free' school transport – but with the Scottish Government also providing free bus passes to under 22s, one councillor questioned why pupils were not being asked to use normal buses. And the council has confirmed they are looking at 'crossover' areas where normal public transport may be a suitable alternative. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The cost to the council for school transport in the last year was more than £3m – but the 'use the bus pass' option is not the simple answer it might appear. Pupils in West Lothian could be asked to use public bus routes to get to school, after questions were raised over the cost of providing special transport. Conservative councillor Alison Adamson, speaking at a recent Environment Policy Development Scrutiny Panel meeting, said: 'I hate using the expression free transport . It costs the council £1,245 to take each child to schools. That's not free in anyone's language.' 'I don't understand the Scottish Government saying that anyone up to a certain age gets free transport, but we have to find the money for school children to get to school so my question is. Can we find a way of tapping into free transport budget.? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Why is that free but councils have to find funding to get children to get to school. I find that very difficult to understand. A lot of people would too? Given how much money it costs I find it very very difficult to swallow.' Chairing the meeting Labour's Tom Conn said 'I think the answer will be that the council is obliged to take pupils to school. We have a responsibility under legislation to support that, but I take your point.' He added that school contract buses 'take children from A to B', directly to schools, whereas commercial networks don't. In East Lothian a proposal in this year's budget by the ruling Labour group to encourage schoolchildren who have nationally funded under-22 free bus passes to stop using school passes was challenged by opposition groups. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Under the Education (Scotland) Act 1980, the council has a statutory responsibility to provide school transport for those pupils living over the qualifying distance for home to school transport. Section 42 (4) of the Act clarifies that the statutory walking distance is two miles for any pupil under the age of eight, and three miles for any other pupil where attending their catchment school. The council can discharge this duty through contracted school transport, using council owned vehicles, utilising the commercial bus network or even through mileage payments to parents for self-travel. The council will consider a number of factors when considering which transport option is most appropriate including available resources, the needs of pupils and the suitability and availability of the bus network. The total 2024/25 cost for school buses was £3,194,373. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A West Lothian council spokesperson said: 'Although commercial bus routes may exist they may not provide sufficient connection to meet the council's statutory obligations for school transport. 'West Lothian Council has a generous home to school policy which provides transport for secondary pupils living 2 or more miles from their catchment school and 1.5 miles for primary pupils. 'However, work is ongoing to assess the crossover between the school network and the local bus network to identify if there are any opportunities to enhance and supplement the options for transport for school pupils in the future.'
