Bessent says child savings accounts in Trump law are 'a back door for privatizing Social Security'
Bessent's remark, which he made at a forum hosted by Breitbart News, was striking after Trump's repeated promises that he would not cut Social Security. Democrats quickly seized on the comment as a sign the GOP wants to revive a dormant but unpopular push to privatize the long-running retirement program.
'Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just said the quiet part out loud: The administration is scheming to privatize Social Security,' Tim Hogan, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, said in a statement.
The White House did not immediately respond to a message about Bessent's remarks.
The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill,' as the law is called, created a new children's savings program, Trump Accounts, which can be created for babies born in the U.S. and come with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury.
The accounts can grow over time, much the way college savings plans or other accounts do, and the accumulated funds can eventually be tapped in adulthood.
But Bessent on Wednesday allowed for another option for the accounts.
'In a way, it is a back door for privatizing Social Security,' Bessent said while speaking about the program.
Bessent's comments were striking for his casual revival of a polarizing issue.
Ever since the George W. Bush administration considered proposals to privatize Social Security more than 20 years ago, Republicans have publicly moved away from talking about the issue that proved politically unpopular and was swiftly abandoned.
Democrats at the time used GOP plans to privatize Social Security in the run-up to the 2006 midterm elections and won back control of both House and Senate in Congress.
The Democrats warned Wednesday that Republicans are again trying to dismantle the long-running retirement program.
'It wasn't enough to kick millions of people off their health care and take food away from hungry kids. Trump is now coming after American seniors with a 'backdoor' scam to take away the benefits they earned,' Hogan at the DNC said in the statement.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Switzerland could revise offer on Trump tariffs, business minister says
By John Revill ZURICH (Reuters) -The Swiss government is open to revising its offer to the United States in response to planned heavy tariffs, Business Minister Guy Parmelin said, as experts warned the 39% import duties announced by President Donald Trump could trigger a recession in Switzerland. Switzerland was left stunned on Friday after Trump hit the country with one of the highest tariffs in his global trade reset, with industry associations warning of tens of thousands of jobs being put at risk. The country's cabinet will hold a special meeting on Monday to discuss its next steps, with Parmelin telling broadcaster RTS that the government would move quickly before the U.S. tariffs are imposed on August 7. "We need to fully understand what happened, why the U.S. president made this decision. Once we have that on the table, we can decide how to proceed," Parmelin said. "The timeline is tight, it may be hard to achieve something by the 7th, but we'll do everything we can to show goodwill and revise our offer," he added. Parmelin said Trump was focused on the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland, which stood at 38.5 billion Swiss francs ($48 billion) last year, with Switzerland buying U.S liquefied natural gas (LNG) among the options under consideration. Another option could be further investments by Swiss companies in the United States, Switzerland's biggest export market for its pharmaceuticals, watches and machinery. "Look at the European Union, they promised to buy LNG. Switzerland imports LNG too — maybe that's one path," Parmelin said. "Maybe more investments. But to be sure it's a strong enough basis for continuing talks, we have to fully understand what the U.S. expects." Both Parmelin and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter were also ready to travel to Washington to pursue talks if necessary, he added. Swiss officials rejected reports that the higher than expected tariffs were imposed after a bad-tempered telephone call between Keller-Sutter and Trump late on Thursday. "The call was not a success, there was not a good outcome for Switzerland," a government source told Reuters. "But there was not a quarrel. Trump made it clear from the very beginning that he had a completely different point of view, that 10% tariffs were not enough. "We are working hard to find a solution and are in contact with the American side," the source added. "We hope we can find a solution before August 7." Tariffs would have a huge impact on Switzerland's export-orientated economy and raised the risk of a recession, said Hans Gersbach, an economist at ETH, a university in Zurich. Swiss economic output would be reduced by 0.3% to 0.6% if the 39% tariff was imposed, a figure which could rise to above 0.7% if pharmaceuticals - which are currently not covered by the U.S. import duties - were included. Prolonged disruptions could shrink Swiss GDP by more 1%, Gersbach said. "There would be a risk of a recession," Gersbach said. Swiss shares are expected to be hit by the tariffs news when the stock market reopens on Monday after being closed during the Swiss National Day holiday on Friday. The tariffs could also see the Swiss National Bank cut interest rates in September, said Nomura. "We expect one more 25bp policy rate cut from the SNB in September, which would take the rate to -0.25%," the bank said. "A hit to growth from U.S. tariffs on exports would likely weaken economic growth and cause further deflation pressures, adding to the likelihood of easing to a negative policy rate." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'We Can Keep Paying It, But Should We?' Why One Colorado Couple Wants To Cancel Their Homeowners Insurance
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Homeowners insurance is usually seen as a necessary expense for protecting one's biggest investment. But for some, the rising cost has raised a tough question: Is it worth it to keep paying? A Colorado Couple's Dilemma A couple in Colorado recently shared their frustration on Reddit about their homeowners insurance bill skyrocketing to more than $7,200 a year — an increase that felt hard to swallow, even with a fully paid-off home. They asked the online community: "We can keep paying it, but should we?" With no mortgage or loans against their house, they feel caught between financial pressure and the risk of going without coverage. They admit that if their home were destroyed, they couldn't afford to rebuild it. Renting in their area would likely cost between $2,500 and $3,000 a month, adding another financial strain. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Why Are Insurance Costs Rising? According to CBS News, Colorado is facing some of the highest homeowners insurance premiums in the country. The state ranks second nationwide for hail insurance claims and for the number of homes located in high-risk wildfire areas. This combination pushed average premiums up more than 50% between 2019 and 2022, especially after wildfires like the East Troublesome and Marshall Fires. "We are in the hardest market in a generation for property insurance," Carole Walker, executive director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Association, told CBS News. She explains that more people live in wildfire-prone areas than before, and "record-breaking catastrophes" are becoming more common. The Reddit couple isn't alone in these rising costs. For homeowners, like Melinda Endres of Broomfield, this has meant a sharp increase in bills, with some monthly payments jumping by nearly $440. Trending: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. The Risks of Canceling Insurance Many commenters on the Reddit thread and insurance experts caution against simply canceling homeowners insurance. One Reddit user, who is both a former insurance producer and a lawyer, warned: "Do not go without homeowners insurance!" Others shared stories of people who dropped their coverage only to face disasters they couldn't financially recover from. Insurance doesn't just protect the physical structure — it can cover liability issues such as injuries on the property or damage caused to neighbors, which can lead to costly lawsuits. How Some Are Coping Experts suggest shopping around and comparing insurance quotes to find a better deal. Increasing deductibles, bundling home and auto policies, and adjusting coverage to reflect the actual value of the home rather than an inflated replacement cost are all ways to manage premiums. LendingTree reports that 13.6% of U.S. homes are uninsured, leaving millions vulnerable. "Insurance has become more expensive and harder to get in recent years," says Rob Bhatt, a home insurance expert at LendingTree. "This is putting people just one disaster away from losing the physical and financial security their home provides." , Should You Cancel? For many homeowners, canceling insurance is a gamble. While the upfront cost savings may seem tempting, the potential financial fallout from disasters, liability claims, or unexpected damages can be devastating. If insurance premiums rise to unaffordable levels, it may be worth exploring options like high-deductible plans or seeking state-backed insurance programs designed to help high-risk properties. As the situation evolves, experts encourage homeowners to carefully weigh their risk tolerance, financial situation, and local hazards before making a decision. Read Next: With Point, you can Image: Shutterstock This article 'We Can Keep Paying It, But Should We?' Why One Colorado Couple Wants To Cancel Their Homeowners Insurance originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's former jobs data chief decries firing of successor
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump's firing of the chief labor statistician was criticized by her predecessor, who called it an unfounded move that will undermine confidence in a key data set on the US economy. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance 'This is damaging,' William Beach, whom Trump picked in his first term to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, said on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Trump on Friday fired Erika McEntarfer hours after labor market data showed weak jobs growth based in part on steep downward revisions for May and June. The move by Trump, who claimed the latest monthly report was 'phony,' prompted an outcry from economists and lawmakers. 'I don't know that there's any grounds at all for this firing,' said Beach, whom McEntarfer replaced in January 2024. 'And it really hurts the statistical system. It undermines credibility in BLS.' Studies indicate that the agency's data is more accurate than 20 or 30 years ago, including any revisions of the initial data, Beach said. Even so, he said he'll trust future BLS data because people working for the agency are 'some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine,' making the bureau 'the finest statistical agency in the entire world.' Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation, urged the US government to improve its data collection to avoid revisions that engender distrust. 'We watch what consumers really do. We watch what businesses really do,' Moynihan said, while not addressing the politics of the firing. 'They can get this data, I think, other ways, and I think that's where the focus would be.' He noted the revision for May and June data, while not unusual, was one of the largest in seven years. 'That creates doubt around it,' he said. 'Let's spend some money. Let's bring the information together. Let's find where else in the government money is reported.' McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Vice President JD Vance, then a senator, voted to approve her nomination. Kevin Hassett, Trump's chief economic adviser at the White House, alleged that the large jobs data revisions were poorly explained and were evidence enough for a 'fresh set of eyes' at BLS. He sought to contradict Beach's portrayal of the agency as politically neutral. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers,' Hassett said on NBC's Meet the Press. Pressed on whether Trump would fire anyone offering data he disagreed with, Hassett, who heads the National Economic Council, disagreed. 'No, absolutely not,' he said. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
