Lee orders review of new defense control tower
'The defense industry is our economy's new growth momentum as well as a strong foundation of our defense capability,' Lee said, as he presided over a Cabinet meeting held in the morning.
'(I ask relevant Cabinet members) to review the launch of a new control tower for the growth of our defense industry … and put pan-governmental efforts into fostering talents, (expanding) investments into research and development and expanding overseas export channels,' he added.
Lee also urged Cabinet members to meet regularly and review arms export strategies. The meetings would be presided over by Lee himself, according to his campaign pledges.
Lee spotlighted the growth of the country's arms exports through the latest defense export deal with Poland, secured by Seoul, involving South Korean-produced K2 tanks. The deal is estimated to be worth around 8.8 trillion won ($6.46 billion).
'During the 1950-53 Korean War, South Korea had zero tanks (produced by our own country), but in just 75 years, we were able to grow into a top 10 global arms exporter. Most recently, we signed a deal worth around 9 trillion won with Poland to export K2 tanks,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Editorial] Korea's academic exodus](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Korea's academic exodus
As professors head overseas, South Korea's global academic standing comes under strain At Seoul National University, long regarded as the pinnacle of South Korea's higher education system, an unsettling pattern has emerged. Over the past four years, 56 professors have left for academic posts overseas, a quiet but steady migration to institutions offering not only higher salaries but also more generous research funding and fewer bureaucratic hurdles. The symbolism is hard to miss: Even South Korea's most prestigious university struggles to retain talent in an era when intellectual capital moves easily across borders. The numbers point to a deeper problem. Most of the departing professors headed to the United States, with others choosing academic positions in Hong Kong, Singapore and elsewhere. The exodus isn't limited to Seoul National University. The nation's top science and technology institutes — KAIST, GIST, DGIST and UNIST — have lost 119 professors over the same period. While some scholars moved to vacancies at Seoul National University, many others left the country altogether. The causes aren't new, nor are they difficult to diagnose. South Korean universities have long been constrained by structural barriers that leave them uncompetitive in the global academic market. Faculty pay, tied to rigid seniority-based systems and frozen tuition rates, has remained stagnant for more than a decade. The government's policy of keeping tuition low (once seen as a way to expand access) has instead restricted resources for institutions struggling to retain their best staff. Abroad, professors can earn three to four times more, but the draw isn't purely financial. Top universities overseas offer superior research facilities, larger budgets and streamlined administrations. These advantages are especially significant for scholars pursuing cutting-edge work in fields like artificial intelligence, semiconductors, biotechnology and economics. But this brain drain is about more than money. It points to a deeper institutional flaw. Political interference, particularly in setting research agendas and allocating funding, undermines academic autonomy. In South Korea, government transitions often bring abrupt shifts in research priorities and personnel, making long-term planning difficult. Professors have long voiced frustration with this volatile environment, which leaves little room for independent scholarship. The loss of academic talent is becoming self-perpetuating. Professors at regional institutions leave for Seoul; those at Seoul National University increasingly look overseas. The resulting vacuum weakens not only individual universities but also the broader academic ecosystem underpinning the country's research and innovation. The consequences are serious. As faculty exit, research capacity diminishes, graduate programs decline and national competitiveness suffers. International rankings already show South Korean universities slipping, with only a few maintaining a presence among the world's elite. The long-term risk is that South Korea could fall behind in critical fields vital for economic growth and national security. Yet the government's response appears out of step with the scale of the problem. President Lee Jae Myung's pledge to 'create 10 Seoul National Universities' by elevating nine regional universities may misread the crisis. Adding more institutions does little to address the core issue: Retaining and attracting world-class talent. Without serious reform, even Seoul National University may struggle to maintain its standing. What's needed isn't lofty slogans but structural change. Performance-based pay, already under discussion at Seoul National University, is a start, but not enough. Broader reforms must include competitive salaries, greater research autonomy and less political micromanagement. Efforts to support weaker institutions should avoid a one-size-fits-all approach. Targeted, merit-based investments offer a more effective, sustainable path. Above all, South Korea must rethink how it values academic work. In an era when AI and advanced technologies drive global competition, retaining and attracting researchers is a matter of national strategy. The goal should not merely be to stem the brain drain but to build an academic ecosystem that draws homegrown talent back — and invites the world's best to come.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Former, sitting lawmakers raided in election interference probe
Special counsel looks into former first lady's alleged election interference, ties to Sambu stock manipulation case A special counsel team conducted multiple search and seizure operations Tuesday at offices and residences of main opposition People Power Party lawmakers as part of an investigation into alleged election interference involving political broker Myung Tae-kyun and former first lady Kim Keon Hee. Tuesday's raid by the special counsel team — led by Min Joong-ki to investigate multiple allegations concerning Kim — was conducted to look into allegations that the former first lady meddled in the then-ruling party's candidate nominations for the 2022 parliamentary by-elections. According to the special counsel team, investigators carried out a separate search and seizure of People Power Party Rep. Yoon Sang-hyun's office and home, along with the home of Kim Young-sun, a former five-term lawmaker of the conservative party, to secure documents and digital data related to the then-presidential couple's possible election interference. The election interference scandal centers on Myung, who is suspected of receiving about 90 million won ($65,800) from former lawmaker Kim on several occasions from 2022 to 2024. This was allegedly in exchange for Myung's help in securing her nomination on the party ticket ahead of the 2022 by-elections. The prosecution, which had investigated this case prior to the special counsel in 2024, previously revealed that Yoon Sang-hyun's name was brought up in a recorded call between Myung and then-President Yoon Suk Yeol, who said he would ask Rep. Yoon and the People Power Party to support Kim, since 'he (Rep. Yoon) is the party's nomination committee chair, after all.' Investigators also searched the home of former prosecutor Kim Sang-min to look into Myung's allegation that former first lady Kim Keon Hee attempted to offer a ministerial post or a position as the head of a state-run agency to Kim Young-sun if she would agree to help the former prosecutor win the 2024 general election in Uichang-gu of Changwon, South Gyeongsang Province, which is a district previously won by Kim Young-sun. Meanwhile, the special counsel team, also tasked with probing Kim Keon Hee-related allegations including stock price manipulation, summoned key executives of Eurasia Business Association and Sambu Construction on Tuesday to examine ties between Kim and organizations involved in Ukraine reconstruction projects in 2023. According to the special counsel, a former president of Eurasia Business Association — a Korea-based consulting agency that organized the Ukraine Recovery Conference in 2023 — appeared for questioning on how the conference was planned and whether there was any attempt to orchestrate a stock-price surge at a midsized South Korean construction firm. The investigators reportedly examined the association and its officials' connections to former Land Minister Won Hee-ryong, former CEO of Black Pearl Invest Lee Jong-ho and other Eurasia Business Association executives. This measure is interpreted as an effort to secure evidence proving the relationships among those involved in one set of allegations against Kim. The allegations center on a surge in Sambu's stock price. Shares skyrocketed within a three-month period amid market rumors that the company was set to take part in Ukraine reconstruction projects in 2023. The stock price surge allowed former and current owners and executives of the company to unload company shares and reap profits worth tens of billions of won. The Sambu case first caught public attention after a message from Lee sparked controversy in July 2024. The company had previously announced it had signed a memorandum of understanding for cooperation on Ukraine's postwar reconstruction efforts with multiple organizations, including the Eurasia Business Association, in 2022. Though the stock price showed no noticeable change at the time, the Democratic Party of Korea later argued that the company's trading volume and stock price surged after Lee posted a text message saying, 'Check Sambu tomorrow' in a group chat that reportedly involved high-ranking military officials and a former Presidential Security Service official, among others, on May 14, 2023. On May 16, the then-presidential couple met with Ukrainian first lady and presidential envoy Olena Zelenska in Seoul. The company gained attention as a Ukraine reconstruction-themed stock and hit the daily price ceiling after the former land minister and major shareholders of Sambu attended the Ukraine Recovery Conference on May 22. Sambu's stock price skyrocketed as the company announced it had signed multiple memorandums of understanding with local Polish governments during the conference and promoted the agreements through press releases. Having stayed below 2,000 won (about $1.50) until May, the stock price surged to 5,500 won by July, when Yoon and Kim visited Ukraine. The Democratic Party raised suspicions of stock manipulation and suggested that Kim could have been involved, citing her personal ties with Lee, who was suspected of another case of stock price manipulation with Deutsch Motors that the former first lady was also accused of taking part in. The minor opposition Rebuilding Korea Party meanwhile questioned how Sambu, which had virtually no experience in overseas business barring a single road construction project in Pakistan in 2021, was able to attend the Ukraine Recovery Conference with the land minister. When Sambu's CEO, former and current owners were previously accused of inflating the stock price in April this year, authorities did not file a complaint with the prosecution against the former first lady and Land Minister Won at the time, saying they had found no evidence they had done anything criminal. The special counsel team is scheduled to summon Lee Il-jun, chairperson of Sambu Construction, for questioning on Wednesday as it widens investigations in regard to the stock price manipulation case.
Korea Herald
10 hours ago
- Korea Herald
How Seoul's call to hold Japan to account was silenced at UNESCO
21-member UNESCO committee backed Japan over Korea, 7 to 3 South Korea lost its bid to spotlight Japan's longstanding failure to fulfill its promise to address its historical enslavement of Koreans at locations now listed as World Heritage sites, after losing a UNESCO vote Monday. The result was a stinging setback that exposed Seoul's limited sway at UNESCO, as well as UNESCO's lukewarm attitude to Seoul's pursuit of historical justice. For the first time, South Korea and Japan confronted each other in a formal vote at Monday's session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee in Paris, over a historical dispute stemming from Japan's colonial rule of Korea from 1910 to 1945. Seoul's position was simple: Japan's failure to fulfill the commitments it made a decade ago in 2015 — when 23 sites from Japan's Meiji Industrial Revolution were added to UNESCO's World Heritage List — should be addressed within the UNESCO platform. During the session, the South Korean government delegation pointed out that the Industrial Heritage Information Center in Tokyo, which opened in March 2020, focused solely on glorifying Japan's industrial achievements during the Meiji era (1868–1912), while neglecting the colonial-era history of forced labor involving Koreans. 'The materials on display still failed to reflect the experiences of Koreans and others who were brought against their will and forced to work under harsh conditions in the 1940s. This is not a minor omission — it silences the lived realities that official narratives too often exclude,' Ha Wie-young, the representative of the South Korean government delegation, said in English during the session. 'We also believe this discussion serves the World Heritage system. Interpretation shapes how heritage is understood, and thoughtful, historically grounded approaches are vital to upholding the Convention's credibility and relevance.' Seven of 23 sites, including coal mines on Hashima Island, also known as Battleship Island, are locations where numerous Koreans were forcibly mobilized and subjected to harsh conditins during Japan's colonial rule over Korea from 1910 to 1945. Seoul's last-ditch efforts During the session, the Korean government delegation made last-ditch efforts to persuade other members of the WHC, taking the floor six additional times ahead of the vote to underscore the legitimacy of revisiting Japan's unfulfilled pledge at UNESCO. In contrast, the Japanese delegation remained silent throughout the debate, speaking only once during its opening statement. Takehiro Kano, a representative from the Japanese delegation, argued that Japan's unfulfilled commitments had 'nothing to do with Outstanding Universal Value,' and maintained that bilateral dialogue between Korea and Japan — outside UNESCO — was the most appropriate way forward. 'Unlike in previous decisions, the World Heritage Committee did not request Japan to submit a State of Conservation report for examination by the World Heritage Committee, thus concluding the discussion," Japanese Ambassador to UNESCO Kano said during the session. Ha, from the Foreign Ministry in Seoul, immediately responded, 'My distinguished colleague from Japan just mentioned that we are trying to reopen this case. However, to the best of my knowledge, this case has never been closed.' Expected but bitter defeat South Korea initially proposed discussing the issue during the session of the World Heritage Committee that kicked off Monday. Japan later submitted an amendment to exclude the issue from discussion, which was eventually put to a vote. However, of the 21 World Heritage Committee members, only three supported South Korea's position, while seven backed Japan's amendment. Eight countries submitted blank ballots, and three were deemed invalid. With just six votes required for adoption under majority rule, Japan's proposal passed, effectively blocking further discussion of its unfulfilled commitments. South Korea's defeat at UNESCO was not entirely unexpected, especially given the structural imbalance of power between Seoul and Tokyo within UNESCO. South Korea ranks 14th in overall financial contributions to UNESCO. Japan ranks third — behind only the United States and China — with around $91.7 million pledged for the 2024–2025 period as of the first quarter this year, compared to South Korea's $31.9 million. This funding gap highlights the limits of Seoul's leverage in key decision-making processes within the institution. The latest session laid bare that disparity. The South Korean government delegation had to ask the same question multiple times — whether the matter of Japan's unfulfilled commitments had been formally concluded — as UNESCO officials initially avoided giving a clear answer. "I haven't heard anything about my first question, so again: has this case ever been closed? My delegation would like to know what we are trying to do here,' Ha said. "It's a simple question.' Korea's voice unheard Lazare Eloundou Assomo, director of the World Heritage Center, offered a procedural explanation that effectively echoed Japan's claim that Tokyo's failure to fulfill its historical pledge did not warrant further review at the current committee session. The director explained that the issue is not a threat to a World Heritage site and not a threat to its Outstanding Universal Value and integrity and authenticity of the sites under UNESCO mechanisms. 'The conclusion of the review did not conclude to take the site back to its status of conservation ... for examination by the World Heritage Committee, and this is what both the Secretariat and ICOMOS have concluded and communicated officially,' he said. 'So, I hope this time I have been clear.' In a somewhat cynical tone, Ernesto Ottone Ramirez, assistant director-general for Culture at UNESCO, responded, "Just to add: We are not a tribunal — there is no case. We don't discuss cases; we discuss inscriptions and state of conservation." Ottone Ramirez went on to say that 'it would take eight months to have this meeting' if the Committee were to review all 1,223 properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. 'That's the answer. So it's not a yes or no — and you know that very well.'
