'No more empty statements:' Iran ex-detainees press Sweden over death row academic
Ahmadreza Djalali, an academic who was sentenced to death in 2017 on espionage charges he denies, suffered a heart attack in Tehran's Evin prison, his wife said Friday.
Djalali, 53, is among a number of Europeans held by Iran in what some countries including France call a deliberate hostage-taking strategy to extract concessions from the West at a time of tension over Tehran's nuclear programme.
Djalali's condition, "worsened by years of medical neglect and psychological torment, is now dire," said the 21 former detainees including British-Iranian Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, Australian Kylie Moore-Gilbert and US-Iranian Siamak Namazi, who were freed only after years-long ordeals in prison.
"While the Islamic Republic and its heinous practice of hostage diplomacy is the clear culprit here, we are deeply troubled by your government's failure to use the means at its disposal to rescue Dr Djalali," they said in the letter addressed to Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson via Stockholm's embassy in Washington.
"No more empty statements. Sweden must act with the same urgency and resolve it has shown in securing the freedom of other citizens," they added in the letter seen by AFP.
Djalali was granted Swedish nationality while in jail.
- 'A path home' -
The letter said Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had offered a possible way forward in a recent social media post that it said "implicitly linked" the case to Iran's inability to access treatment for epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a disease that affects hundreds of Iranian children and can be fatal without proper care.
"The specialised wound dressings required to treat EB, produced by a Swedish company, have long been blocked due to over-compliance with sanctions," the letter said.
In a post on X last week that lamented a "regrettable shift" in bilateral relations, Araghchi said "Sweden ceased non-sanctionable exports of medicines, including specialised and unique gear for children afflicted with EB".
In June 2024, Tehran freed two Swedes held in Iran in exchange for Hamid Noury, a former Iranian prisons official serving a life sentence in Sweden. To the disappointment of his family, Djalali was not included in the swap.
In the letter, the ex-detainees told Kristersson: "A path to bring Dr Djalali home -- alive, not in a coffin -- appears within reach.
"If Sweden fails to pursue it seriously and this Swedish citizen dies in captivity, history will record that your government had more than one chance to save him -- but chose not to. That responsibility will rest squarely with you."
cf-sjw/as/js
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran: Still a chance for peace talks with US
Iran's foreign ministry has told Sky News there is still a chance for peace talks with the United States. In an interview in Iran's foreign ministry in Tehran, a senior Iranian official said despite the attacks on his country by America and Israel, back-channel efforts are under way to restart the search for a diplomatic solution. The comments will be seen as an olive branch for the administration to seize as it explores a diplomatic way forward. Sky News is one of only a handful of foreign news organisations allowed access to Iran following We also filmed the impact of Israel's attacks on ordinary Iranians in Tehran. In the wake of declared by Donald Trump, Esmaeil Baqaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman, said the US must show it is genuine in its desire for peace. "Diplomacy must not be abused or used as a tool for deception or for simply a sort of psychological warfare against their adversaries." Iran felt diplomacy had been betrayed, he said. US-Iranian talks were on the verge of reconvening when Israel attacked his country. And America had breached international law in its support of what he called "Zionist aggression". But Mr Baqaei said "diplomacy never ends, there are contacts, indirectly. My minister is talking to Oman, Qatar and others". President Trump says he is ready to talk with Iran, but major stumbling blocks need to be overcome. The US wants Iran to give up nuclear enrichment completely. Iran has long insisted it has the right to carry on. Read more from Sky News: Across town, we witnessed the impact of Israel's attacks in Gisha, an upmarket neighbourhood of Tehran. Israel claims its attacks on Iranian figures were precision-targeted. In reality they appear to have been far from surgical. The airstrike came at 10.30 Friday morning two weeks ago. It ripped a hole through four floors of reinforced concrete in the residential apartment block. The target may have been a nuclear scientist living there, but everyone in the building is now without a home. Engineers say it will almost certainly need to be torn down. The mood in the Iranian capital seems subdued and tense. Iranians fear Israelis will renew their air campaign despite the ceasefire. There is widespread resentment of the leadership after nationwide social unrest and massive economic problems. But the Israeli attacks have rallied many Iranians around their government all the same. They had hoped diplomacy with America could deliver a new deal and an end to sanctions, then Israel began its 12-day aerial onslaught Iranians hope somehow talks can be restarted, but they also know the chances of progress are for now at least not great.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ethiopia has finished building mega-dam on Nile, PM says
Ethiopia says it has completed building a mega-dam on the Blue Nile that has long been a source of tension with Egypt and Sudan. Launched in 2011 with a $4bn (£2.9bn) budget, the dam is Africa's biggest hydro-electric plant, and a major source of pride for Ethiopians. Ethiopia sees the dam as vital to meeting its energy needs but Egypt and Sudan see it as threatening their water supply from the Nile. In a statement announcing the completion of the project, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed sought to reassure his neighbours. "To our neighbours downstream - Egypt and Sudan - our message is clear: the Renaissance Dam is not a threat, but a shared opportunity," he said. US President Donald Trump said in 2020 that Egypt had threatened to "blow up" the dam - officially known as the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (Gerd). In a conciliatory move, Abiy said that both Egypt and Sudan would be invited to its official inauguration in September. "We believe in shared progress, shared energy, and shared water," he said. Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Sudan's military chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan met earlier this week and "stressed their rejection of any unilateral measures in the Blue Nile Basin", AFP news agency reports. More than a mile long and 145m high, the dam is on the Blue Nile tributary in the northern Ethiopia highlands, from where 85% of the Nile's waters flow. Ethiopia wants the dam to produce desperately needed electricity, as the majority of its population - about 60% - have no supply. Egypt relies on the River Nile for nearly all of its fresh water, and fears that the flow of water could be disrupted. It has argued that just a 2% reduction in the amount of water it gets from the Nile could result in the loss of 200,000 acres of irrigated land. Sudan is also heavily reliant on water from the Nile, and shares Egypt's concerns. Abiy said Ethiopia was "willing to engage constructively" with the two countries. However, previous talks have failed to resolve differences. Why is Egypt worried about Ethiopia's dam on the Nile? Nile Dam row: Egypt and Ethiopia generate heat but no power River Nile dam: Why Ethiopia can't stop it being filled Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
US foreign policy is now a one-man reality show
In his second term, President Trump's excessive personalization of foreign policy has been on full display. But far from being the deft strategist he portrays, Trump has turned American diplomacy into an impulsive, self-serving spectacle. The most recent example is telling: Trump's announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran blindsided even his own top officials. That a decision of such geopolitical magnitude was made without the knowledge of his senior advisors speaks volumes about his go-it-alone governing style. From suspending foreign aid to saying the U.S. should 'take over and redevelop Gaza,' Trump's uncoordinated, impulsive approach stands in sharp contrast to traditional U.S. diplomacy, which relies on strategic planning, inter-agency consensus and durable alliances. Trump's method instead favors drama, unpredictability and personal branding — often at the expense of the national interest. Trump has long treated foreign policy as theatrical performance, designed more to generate headlines than to achieve lasting outcomes. His habit of bypassing expert advice and established channels consistently undermines U.S. credibility — not just at home, but also among allies and adversaries. His approach has sown confusion within his administration and distrust abroad. Allies are left wondering whether Trump's statements reflect official policy or personal whim, and even his own Cabinet is often in the dark. Trump's foreign policy is less a coherent strategy than a string of dramatic set-pieces crafted for maximum personal visibility. Take the paradox of his recent Middle East gambit. Trump greenlit Israel's preemptive war on Iran, then ordered U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites — facilities that are subject to International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards and are monitored under Iran's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty commitments. After declaring victory, he touted a U.S.-brokered ceasefire as vindication of his strategy. Yet he conspicuously failed to acknowledge the crucial mediating role played by Qatar's emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. It was, in fact, the Qatari ruler who negotiated the truce that ended what Trump dubbed the '12-Day War.' But for Trump, who never misses a chance to claim center stage, downplaying others' key roles is par for the course. Trump claimed that he arranged the ceasefire between India and Pakistan following their military hostilities in early May. The confrontation was triggered by an cross-border terrorist attack in Indian Kashmir on April 22 in which Islamist gunmen targeted non-Muslims, killing 26 people. India maintains that the ceasefire came about through direct bilateral talks after Pakistan requested a truce via the military hotline. But that hasn't stopped Trump from repeatedly claiming credit and lobbying for a Nobel Peace Prize. 'They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda, or the Congo, or Serbia, Kosovo … The big one is India and Pakistan,' he recently declared. Ironically, Trump may believe that bombing Iran helps his case for the Nobel — a prize that, over the years, has gone to a surprising roster of militarists. Theodore Roosevelt (the champion of 'Big Stick' diplomacy), Henry Kissinger (the mastermind of the carpet-bombing of Laos and Cambodia) and Barack Obama (the serial interventionist who helped turn Libya into a failed state) all won it. Yet Trump's personalization of diplomacy brings risks that go beyond ego-driven showmanship. Major decisions made on impulse, for optics or without consulting national security professionals erode the foundations of U.S. foreign policy. They also increase the danger of strategic miscalculation. Foreign governments cannot know whether Trump's declarations reflect actual American policy or are merely the mood of the moment. By sidelining intelligence assessments and undercutting his own officials — as he did by floating regime change in Iran after his team publicly denied such intentions — Trump breeds internal disarray and external uncertainty. This policy chaos is amplified by Trump's compulsive communication style. No world leader talks more or posts more on social media. American officials are often left scrambling to explain statements they didn't anticipate, while global actors are forced to decipher whether the next move will be announced from the Situation Room or on Truth Social. The blurring of lines between national interest and personal gain further complicates matters. Increasingly, foreign policy appears to double as a mechanism for advancing private interests. In the past six months, Trump's personal wealth surged thanks to a string of cryptocurrency ventures and deals, and there is mounting evidence that the Trump family's crypto empire is influencing presidential decision-making. Consider Trump's handling of Pakistan in the wake of the Kashmir terror attack. Between the massacre and India's retaliation, Pakistan hurriedly signed a major investment deal with World Liberty Financial, a crypto firm founded by Trump and his sons before last November's election. Days later, Trump helped shield Pakistan from further Indian reprisals. Now he declares, 'I love Pakistan' — a country that harbored Osama bin Laden for years and still shelters global terrorists. In the end, Trump has reduced U.S. statecraft to spectacle. American foreign policy today looks less like the work of a global superpower and more like a one-man reality show — replete with cliffhangers, reversals, business deals and applause lines. Such theatrics may serve Trump's political ambitions, but they leave America's strategic credibility — and the international order it helped build — increasingly vulnerable. Brahma Chellaney is a geostrategist and the author of nine books, including the award-winning 'Water: Asia's New Battleground.'
