logo
Upcoming Chicago budget ‘grimmest picture of all' for Mayor Brandon Johnson, aldermen

Upcoming Chicago budget ‘grimmest picture of all' for Mayor Brandon Johnson, aldermen

Chicago Tribune2 days ago
On a warm, late June morning at Truman College in Uptown, Mayor Brandon Johnson welcomed attendees to the first of several budget roundtables.
He hit on a familiar litany of positive developments, touting a drop in crime, expanded mental and behavioral health services, and youth employment opportunities.
'Let's continue to expand and find innovative ways that we can bring true collaboration into the budgeting process to ensure that all of our residents are heard and that their needs are met,' Johnson said. 'I'm truly honored that you are all here to help guide this budget process. It will not be easy, but nothing ever worth fighting for ever is.'
It was the only allusion Johnson made to the disorder in Chicago's fiscal house that threatens the improvements and investments he's fought for: a more than $1 billion anticipated deficit for 2026, a major pending union contract, a fractious City Council resistant to both new revenues and cuts, federal threats to cancel grants to local governments and a school district long overdue on a promised pension payback.
Two days after that roundtable, Johnson's finance team would disclose the city ended 2024 with a $161 million deficit, emptying one of its key emergency funds. Adding to the bad tidings last week was a final $7 billion estimate for the cost of a state bill boosting benefits for police and fire pensioners through 2055.
That zeroed out 'unallocated' reserve balance is even lower than the depths of the 2008 recession, when it held just $226,000, according to the city's annual financial reports. It represents a serious financial alarm for the cash-strapped city, according to Justin Marlowe, the director of the Center for Municipal Finance at the University of Chicago
'I don't think we can overstate how important that is,' Marlowe said. 'It is the single most closely watched number in all of municipal finance.'
Given that the costs that drove that drawdown — the failure of Chicago Public Schools to pay back the city for a $175 million pension payment and a shortfall in state income tax revenues — were not surprises, that figure is likely to result in a rebuke or threat of a downgrade from ratings agencies, he predicted.
'It's not crossing the Rubicon, but it definitely draws a lot of attention to just how little flexibility the city has,' Marlowe said.
City policy is to have enough money in reserves to cover at least two months of general operating expenses. In a statement, budget spokeswoman LaKesha Gage-Woodard said the city is 'on track to rebuild fund balance levels' and adhere to its policy, thanks to overperforming revenues and lower expenditures so far this year.
Despite that inflexibility, shortly after revealing the deficit, Johnson expressed his staunch opposition to cuts that would detract from his stated mission to make Chicago the safest and most affordable big city in America. New regressive revenues or reductions to violence prevention efforts, he suggested, would be unacceptable.
Instead, the firm Ernst & Young is probing city procurement, benefits, real estate and fines and fees to find efficiencies, and Johnson convened a budget working group to make initial proposals by August.
But the mayor's major options for finding new, significant money are limited without state approval, again raising the possibility of a property tax hike, this time even closer to reelection for him and the City Council that roundly rejected such an increase last fall.
Other possibilities also face political headwinds. Many aldermen are flatly opposed to replacing the outgoing state grocery tax with a city grocery tax as they pressure the mayor to instead make spending cuts.
Their unwillingness to vote to bring in more money ties Chicago's hands in a critical moment, argued Ald. William Hall, 6th, tasked by Johnson with leading aldermen in identifying more revenue.
'What we're facing is more difficult when you have obstructionists who don't provide solutions,' Hall said. 'The political headline budgeting is dangerous, because people are very desperate right now.'
Ald. Nicole Lee, 11th, said she is already preparing constituents for 'what I believe is going to be a very, very difficult budget process' that 'will likely include a property tax levy.'
'I don't think any politician in their right mind would ever want to have to have to be in this position' this close to the 2027 election, said Lee, who voted against Johnson's last budget and said she and colleagues might not be willing to raise the tax again. 'But here we are, and this is the job. We don't really have a choice in that matter. It's got to be dealt with.'
Last week, the city also disclosed that one good piece of news from its 2024 year-end report — a slight boost in the funding levels of its four pension funds — would likely be short-lived.
A complete actuarial analysis of a new pension sweetener bill that passed the state legislature late last session found the change 'would increase the City's pension liabilities by more than $11 billion across the Police and Fire funds,' the city's financial office said, dropping the funding levels of both down to less than 18%. Those funds had only 25% of the money necessary to pay out future retirees at the end of 2024, but were slowly improving.
That bill awaits Gov. JB Pritzker's signature.
'Given the scale of the impact on the City's long-term pension obligations, changes of this magnitude should have involved broader stakeholder engagement and a more transparent public process,' said Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski. The change, sponsored by state Sen. Rob Martwick, would add an extra $60 million to the $1.5 billion pension tab owed for those two funds in 2027, the city's analysis found, and grow to more than $753 million for 2055.
It would represent a major setback to the city's efforts to right its pension ship. The retirement funds for city workers are among the worst-funded in the country.
Under former Mayor Lori Lightfoot, the city in 2023 began setting aside reserve funds to make steady, supplemental payments into its four pension funds. Those payments helped cut billions from the city's future liability, finance officials said, and convinced ratings agencies that Chicago's leaders were serious about tackling debts.
In a statement, the city's finance office said it had every intention of keeping that policy intact and expects the 2026 payment to be more modest. But with reserve funds back to pre-pandemic levels and underperforming casino revenues, the city will likely need to find supplemental pension money elsewhere in the budget.
Already, some aldermen are bristling at Johnson's efforts to even maintain the relatively modest 1% grocery tax that the governor terminated in his 2025 budget. It was a progressive victory for Pritzker but also forced municipal leaders to either take up their own equivalent or lose out on a key revenue source.
The tax costs the average household $50 to $66 a year. Without it, the city would miss out on an estimated $80 million next year. Voting to keep it, Johnson's team argues, would not equate to a tax hike. But many residents are unlikely to see a council vote to establish a city-level grocery tax as anything other than a new cost being foisted on them by City Hall.
The city must decide its fate by the end of September so that the state's Department of Revenue can continue collecting and remitting it.
Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2 is also rounding out the fourth year of its battle for a new collective bargaining agreement, which is currently in arbitration. The delay means retroactive contract costs continue to pile up on top of likely raises and other costly union demands, including the addition of new ambulances to the Chicago Fire Department fleet to respond to medical emergencies.
Despite the city's expectations, Chicago Public Schools didn't make its once-promised $175 million payment to cover a share of nonteacher employees in the municipal pension fund, helping contribute to the city's $161 million deficit at the end of 2024.
It seems the city will have to eat that cost. Interim CPS CEO Macqueline King tacked on the $175 million pension payment when announcing the district's roughly $730 million deficit, suggesting that the district planned only one pension payment in this year's CPS budget, which must be passed by the end of August. Gage-Woodard said the city 'is actively working with CPS leadership on their budget needs.'
The fate of the CPS pension payment is just one more financial straw on the camel's back as Johnson and aldermen head into the summer doldrums, then straight into the budget.
While he said he dreads every budget, Ald. Nick Sposato, 38th, said this year's 'seems to be the grimmest picture of all, looking forward.'
The dissension in the City Council will only the make the process of agreeing on solutions to close the gap — potential new taxes, fees, service cuts or furloughs — politically tougher.
'I'm not suggesting this, but if everybody supported the grocery tax, it would be like, 'Well, I guess they had to do it,'' Sposato said. But if 30 supported it and 20 didn't, 'then it's just like, 'John Smith stood up (to the mayor) but Nick didn't, he's a jerk, we've got to vote him out.' That's how people think.'
'Somebody's going to have to support something,' Sposato said. 'Pick your poison.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Soccer stadium still moving forward after protest halts Railyards financing deal, city says
Soccer stadium still moving forward after protest halts Railyards financing deal, city says

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Soccer stadium still moving forward after protest halts Railyards financing deal, city says

The City of Sacramento and Republic FC said Monday that there are still plans to move forward with the Railyards development after a protest to halt the expansion of a special taxing district was successful. In June, a group of residents in the Railyards submitted opposition letters over the city's financing agreement for the project. The city council approved a special taxing district that will allocate approximately $92 million toward building public infrastructure like roadways, pedestrian bike lanes, and traffic lights in the area around the new soccer stadium. Under state law, if half of the people who live in the district protest it, it must be put on hold for at least a year. On Monday, the residents announced a lawsuit, saying the city had yet to count the letters. We then reached out to the city, which confirmed that there were enough letters to halt the expansion of the special taxing district, but Mayor Kevin McCarty says the city council is still planning to move forward with the development using other means. "We are building alternative pathways – which will not impact the General Fund to support the project," McCarty said in a statement after the lawsuit was announced. "City council has already unanimously approved the railyards infrastructure, and developers are free to move forward with construction." The residents have been arguing that more affordable housing is needed in the Railyards. "The City has failed railyard residents – and the residents of Sacramento – by not counting these protests. It was their legal obligation to count the protests on June 24th. It's been 20 days since the signed protests were submitted," said Sacramento resident Alejandro Rayburn. "Affordable housing is one of the most urgent issues the city must address. It is shameful for the city to try to avoid this issue by ignoring residents' voices." Unite Here Local 49 issued a statement in support of the residents that said: "Local 49 congratulates the Railyards residents on the city's recognition that a majority of them successfully protested the Railyards financing deal with its shamefully low 6% affordable housing on a project receiving $92 million or more in taxpayer funds. We hope the developers and City will now listen to demands for more affordable housing, a grocery store, displacement protections, and more and bring back a deal that is good for ordinary people, not just a place for people who can afford luxury apartments." Mayor McCarty and Republic FC both said that construction on the new stadium is expected to start soon. "Now that the city has clarified the path forward, we're advancing our plans to build a transformational stadium and neighborhood that Sacramento needs and wants. Our work on the stadium has never stopped and we look forward to beginning construction very soon," said Todd Dunivant, president and GM of Republic FC.

Mamdani's worst threat: Unleashing City Council radicals' wildest, wokest dreams
Mamdani's worst threat: Unleashing City Council radicals' wildest, wokest dreams

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Mamdani's worst threat: Unleashing City Council radicals' wildest, wokest dreams

Love him or hate him, Mayor Eric Adams is New York's City Council firewall. Over the last three years, his veto threats have prevented some of the body's most disastrous proposals from seeing the light of day, and forced moderate concessions on several bills that became law. That could all change after November's mayoral election. Advertisement Absent Adams — or Curtis Sliwa or Andrew Cuomo — in Gracie Mansion, the next City Council stands ready to realize its unchecked radical dreams, if one of the most left-wing legislative bodies in the country gains an ally in a Mayor Zohran Mamdani. If he ever joins this collectivist keg party brewing at City Hall, Mamdani will egg on the wokesters like an Oneonta pledge master with a beer-bong full of Bolshevism. Advertisement In another era, we might hope that the council would elect a moderate as its speaker. But given the radical wave powering Mamdani's rise, it's hard to have much optimism that center-of-the-road members have the political will to form a viable coalition. Just like congressional Democrats Hakeem Jeffries, Dan Goldman and Jerry Nadler, none of the council's non-socialist Dems will want to rile up the Marxist Mamdani-backers and threaten them in whatever future race they fancy. Even if a moderate does pull it together, a City Council speaker's power isn't absolute — and legislative leaders are more often driven by their conference than drive it. Advertisement With the council's 18-member Progressive Caucus as the largest bloc in the chamber, they'll be the ones with their hands on the steering wheel. And nothing will stand in their way if the expression 'mayoral veto' evaporates from our parlance in January, disappearing like the words 'haberdasher' or 'dungarees.' To envision what a council without any counterweight could do, we need only look as far as the Progressive Caucus' existing proposals. Advertisement A quick glance at the group's website reveals a series of ruinous policies buried in a towering heap of woke euphemisms. The caucus demands an 'environmentally just city,' funded by a 'more inclusive budget.' Its members want schools that focus on 'human development rather than punishment or criminalization.' After they 'reduce the size and scope of the NYPD and Department of Corrections,' they will implement a 'holistic, multi-strategy approach' to law and order while funding an 'alternative safety infrastructure.' What does any of this actually mean? In practice, Progressive Caucus members have wasted their time on senseless yet seemingly innocuous bills — like the time Councilman Lincoln Restler tried to ban Mr. Softee unless he shows up in a solar-powered ice cream truck. Yet the caucus has also attacked our democratic rights, spearheading legislation that allowed non-citizens to vote (struck down, thankfully, by New York's top court). Advertisement Worse, the caucus has led the council on policies that are devastating the very communities they claim to serve. Lefty council members stood arm-in-arm with Mayor Bill de Blasio to open the nation's first 'safe injection sites.' Today, many of those same officials are simply stunned that their voters object to the 'fentanyl fold' addicts nodding off on their sidewalks all day. Still, they see this as a program worth expanding — and Mamdani, a sitting assemblyman, is a sponsor of such a bill in Albany. Advertisement Progressive Caucus housing proposals would cripple new residential development and stymie renovations of vacant rent-stabilized units. Albany leftists successfully pressured Gov. Kathy Hochul to include the construction-killing Good Cause Eviction law in the state budget — so don't expect Mamdani to put up even token opposition to the Community Land Act, the next item on the progressive punch list. It would abolish tax liens, requisition public land for housing and prevent desperate landlords from selling their underwater buildings until tenants and community groups have a chance to buy them out. When Mamdani & Co. use Marxist terms like 'seizing the means of production,' laws like the Community Land Act are the tools of their revolution. Advertisement The rest of their agenda includes rollbacks on public safety — eliminating the NYPD's successful gang database, for example — and an outright freebie free-for-all, from free daycare for all to unlimited housing for the homeless. Needless to say a Progressive Caucus-dominated City Council won't seek to tap the brakes on Mamdani's own $10 billion government giveaway plan. Instead, they'll keep trying to turn the city into an open bazaar of street vendors and sex-trafficking (aka Councilmember Tiffany Caban's 'sex worker opportunity program'). Advertisement For all their talk of a brave new world, these radical ideas scare the daylights out of me. Whatever challenges we now face, unrestrained leftist control of City Hall won't do anything but make matters worse. Perhaps Adams, for all his faults, deserves more credit for standing in the breach. Joe Borelli is a managing director at Chartwell Strategy Group and the former minority leader of the New York City Council.

Push to weaken Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's power to issue debt narrowly fails
Push to weaken Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's power to issue debt narrowly fails

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Push to weaken Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's power to issue debt narrowly fails

CHICAGO — A City Council push to wrest power away from Mayor Brandon Johnson and his successors by requiring more aldermanic support to issue debt narrowly failed to advance Monday. The City Council's Finance Committee voted 17-to-16 to reject an ordinance that would have raised the vote threshold from a simple majority to a two-thirds majority. The measure would have sharply weakened the control of Johnson and future mayors over debt issuances, making it harder to raise money for infrastructure spending. Before the vote, sponsor Ald. Marty Quinn, 13th, said the higher bar would force Johnson to work more closely with aldermen to pass bond plans and help Chicago avoid future credit downgrades. 'We cannot let this administration take on more debt and strap future Chicagoans with the bill,' Quinn said. 'It's time to be a more co-equal branch, partner and voice in City Hall. If not, what are we doing here?' But while Johnson critics praised the move as fiscally responsible, mayoral allies blasted it as a reckless effort to block the City Council majority's will. 'Essentially what this rule would do is empower a small group of people to hold everybody else hostage,' Budget Committee Chair Ald. Jason Ervin, 28th, said. 'This is not designed to help us. It is designed to empower a very small group of people who seem to be hellbent on driving us over a cliff.' Quinn introduced the measure in February as aldermen passed Johnson's $830 million bond plan in a close 26-to-23 vote. At the time, the Southwest Side alderman and other mayoral opponents blasted the plan's repayment structure as back-loaded and irresponsible. Fitch Ratings shifted the city's financial outlook to 'negative' in May. Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, argued before the vote Monday the measure could help rebuild confidence in a government that he said many Chicagoans do not trust. 'The people of Chicago don't trust government,' O'Shea said. 'What I've witnessed here these last two years, with our government — I'm talking about this building, this room — they're not wrong.' The Johnson administration has often lied to him in budget discussions, he added. 'There is not enough real, honest communication,' he said. 'If we communicate with each other, and enough information is provided to us, then we can make difficult decisions.' Earlier in the meeting, the committee advanced a $400,000 settlement to pay a woman injured after falling on a broken sidewalk. Aldermen also advanced $35.2 million in settlements related to wrong-location police raids, police misconduct and a botched police chase. Ald. Daniel La Spata, 1st, alluded to that broken sidewalk to push back against the debt ordinance. It is 'disingenuous' to say the city's infrastructure must be improved while making it more difficult for improvements to be made. 'I appreciate the desire for transparency… but there's a political reality that I recognize,' he said, referring to the committed bloc of aldermen who oppose most Johnson moves. Ald. Nicole Lee, 11th, said she could not remember when aldermen last hit 34 votes on a meaningful piece of legislation. 'I'm just really not sure we're going to be able to get to two-thirds,' Lee said before voting against the measure. While Johnson weathered the effort to take power away from him, the tight vote embodied many of the struggles he has had in winning over aldermen and controlling legislation, and not just because of what the ordinance sought to do. Johnson's appointed mayor pro tempore, Ald. Sam Nugent, 39th, used her position's powers to cast a vote against Johnson's position, even though she is not a committee member. Before Ald. Timmy Knudsen, 43rd, voted for the ordinance, he suggested he would have preferred a compromise. Knudsen had months ago proposed new guardrails on bond authorization to limit interest totals and back-loaded repayment schedules. But Johnson's administration would not agree to the policy he argued would have been a more moderate compromise, he said. 'Through months of good faith and transparent negotiation, I felt really confident that we were going to get somewhere,' he said. 'Two-thirds at least will get us the kind of negotiation leverage we need.' Aldermen did not consider whether or not they would replace the state's expiring 1% grocery tax with a 1% tax of their own. The lack of consideration on the thorny question sets up more discussion in September, when the City Council would need to quickly pass the tax if it plans to make the state's Oct. 1 deadline to do so. ____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store