
Amazon Web Services profits squeezed as AI arms race drives spending surge
An increase in Amazon Web Services spending cut into the cloud giant's profits in the second quarter as AWS raced to meet demand for AI against Microsoft, Google, and others.
While Amazon beat Wall Street's overall expectations, its shares fell in after-hours trading as investors focused on rising costs within the cloud unit, the company's biggest profit engine.
AWS revenue grew 17.5% year-over-year to $30.9 billion, in line with estimates. But the costs of competing in the AI arms race were evident in the cloud division's profits. AWS operating income grew less than 9% to $10.2 billion as its operating expenses surged to $20.7 billion, up from $16.9 billion a year earlier.
This resulted in an operating margin of 32.9% — the cloud giant's lowest profit-to-revenue ratio since late 2023, and well below the operating margin of nearly 40% in the first quarter.
On the company's earnings call with analysts, Amazon CFO Brian Olsavsky attributed the pressure on AWS's profit margin to a seasonal increase in stock-based compensation, unfavorable foreign exchange rates, and higher depreciation costs from ongoing investments in AI infrastructure.
Later on the call, analysts pressed Amazon CEO Andy Jassy to respond to a 'Wall Street narrative' that the company is falling behind rivals Microsoft and Google in pursuing the AI opportunity.
Amazon's results came a day after Microsoft disclosed annual revenue of more than $75 billion for its Azure cloud platform, with quarterly growth of 39%, far exceeding expectations.
Google Cloud's annual revenue run rate is more than $50 billion, with quarterly growth of 32% year-over-year, according to numbers disclosed by Google parent Alphabet last week.
AWS is a significantly larger business, with an annual revenue run rate of more than $123 billion, making it much more difficult to generate eye-popping growth rates.
But even at that size, Morgan Stanley analyst Brian Nowak asked Jassy if it would be possible for AWS growth to accelerate for the remainder of 2025, 'given the size of the opportunity' and the volume of the generative AI workloads expected to come online in the next 12 months.
While Jassy declined to give specific guidance for the AWS segment, he said he is 'optimistic about the AWS business' and its potential to accelerate.
He cited a combination of factors, including more enterprises resuming their migrations from on-premises data centers to the cloud, the expected increase in companies deploying AI applications into production, and more AWS capacity coming online in the coming months.
Jassy described long-term strategic advantages for AWS, including the fact that AI inference will eventually be treated as 'another building block' like compute, storage and database.
Because of this, he said, many customers will want to run their AI applications close to where their other applications and data already reside — creating a powerful advantage for Amazon, because 'there's just so many more applications and data running in AWS than anywhere else.'
Jassy said AWS has a key advantage with its custom-built chips, which he said offer 30% to 40% better price-performance for inference than other GPU providers.
He also pointed to what he called a 'very big difference' in security — alluding to problems that have plagued Microsoft without naming the company directly — and noted that AWS has a more significant, end-to-end set of AI services 'from the bottom of stack all the way to top.'
AI milestones for the company in the recent quarter included the launch of Kiro, a new agentic integrated development environment (IDE) that lets developers code in natural language, while the system automatically creates documentation and specs, and scans for security issues.
The company reported $31.4 billion in capital expenditures for the second quarter, up from nearly $25 billion in the first quarter, most of it related to technology infrastructure. Amazon's capex number is not directly comparable to Microsoft and Google due to its additional investments in fulfillment centers and its Project Kuiper satellite network.
Olsavsky said AWS will continue to invest more capital in data centers and other resources 'to pursue this unusually large opportunity that we have in generative AI.' Operating margins, he said, will 'fluctuate over time, driven in part by the level of investments we are making.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Amazon Stock Is Plummeting Today
Key Points Amazon's shares slipped after Q2 earnings revealed slower-than-hoped-for AWS growth that lagged growth seen by its rivals. New tariffs imposed by President Trump complicate its operations. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Shares of Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) are falling on Friday, down 8.3% as of 3:28 p.m. ET. The move comes as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite have lost 1.7% and 2.3%, respectively. Amazon released its Q2 financials, which, while beating many of Wall Street's expectations, fell short of lofty targets in a few key areas. News of additional tariffs is also affecting shares. Amazon's cloud business is growing, but not fast enough for some investors Amazon's Q2 earnings report revealed the company beat consensus estimates for both earnings per share and revenue. The company delivered $1.68 per share on $167.70 billion in sales, while $1.33 per share on $162.09 billion was expected. However, investors were paying close attention to growth in the company's data center business, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and how it compares to its competition. The 18% year-over-year growth was much less than that of Microsoft's Azure or Alphabet's Google Cloud, which recorded 39% and 32% growth, respectively. Still, CEO Andy Jassy drove home the point that AWS is still by far the dominant player, saying, "I think the second player is about 65% of the size of AWS." Trump's new tariffs President Trump signed an executive order updating "reciprocal" tariff rates for many countries, with new rates from 10% to 41%, on the August 1st deadline. Markets appear to have thought another extension would be announced, and stocks are down across the board. Because of Amazon's reliance on international trade, its stock was hit particularly hard. Despite the tariff news and the somewhat underwhelming Q2 report, Amazon remains an incredibly profitable company with major growth potential. Should you buy stock in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Amazon Stock Is Plummeting Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Micah Parsons' dad once named Chiefs, Steelers, Lions as preferred trade destinations
With Micah Parsons officially requesting a trade from the Dallas Cowboys, an old clip of his father, Terrence Parsons, talking about preferred destinations for his son in a hypothetical trade scenario has resurfaced. During an appearance on the "Life in the Stands" podcast in December 2024, Parsons' dad stated that his preferred trade landing spots for the superstar edge rusher are the Kansas City Chiefs, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Detroit Lions. "I know Pittsburgh fans are like, 'whoa,' but I'm sorry, him [Micah Parsons] and [T.J.] Watt together would be like cheating," Terrence Parsons said. "Him and [Aidan] Hutchinson together in Detroit would be like cheating. I love it. Kansas City, that's who they are right now." Parsons requested a trade out of Dallas due to the franchise's lack of communication with his agent. The 26-year-old's relationship with the Cowboys and owner Jerry Jones seems to be completely destroyed. Dallas has no plans of trading Parsons, but if they can't agree on a long-term extension with him, they may be forced to move him at some point. Parsons' father's landing spots for the four-time Pro Bowl edge rusher are bold. Adding Parsons to Kansas City's defense would be lethal, while pairing the disgruntled Cowboy with Watt or Hutchinson in Detroit would also be pretty much unstoppable. However, none of the teams Parsons' dad listed as preferred spots have the money to sign Parsons to a record-breaking extension. The Chiefs are slated to have negative $61 million in cap space next offseason, and the Steelers already have two expensive edge rushers in Watt and Alex Highsmith. As for the Lions, the team must prioritize getting an extension done with Hutchinson first, which likely takes them out of the running for Parsons. It's possible that Parsons lands with one of three destinations his dad spoke about during a podcast appearance last year, as all three franchises are playoff contenders, and two are legitimate Super Bowl contenders in Kansas City and Detroit. However, it remains to be seen whether any have the money to sign Parsons to a new deal after trading valuable picks for him while also keeping their core together. MORE:Infamous Raiders trade used as measuring stick for potential Micah Parsons deal
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla ordered to pay $200 million in punitive damages over fatal crash
Tesla was found partly liable in a wrongful death case involving the electric vehicle company's Autopilot system, with a jury awarding the plaintiffs $200 million in punitive damages plus additional money in compensatory damages. The case, which took place in a Miami courtroom over the last couple of weeks, centered on whether defects in Tesla's self-driving technology ultimately contributed to the death of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon in 2019. Along with the $200 million in punitive damages, Tesla was also ordered to pay around $43 million in compensatory damages directly to the plaintiffs. Leon was killed when a man driving a Model S Tesla equipped with Tesla's Autopilot technology plowed through a T-shaped intersection and struck her and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Angulo survived but was gravely injured. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility in the incident and that George McGee, the Florida driver who lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone, was not entirely to blame. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives," said the plaintiffs' attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement shared with CBS News. The plaintiffs in the case originally asked for $345 million in damages during closing arguments on Thursday. During the trial, lawyers for the plaintiffs alleged that Tesla either hid or lost key evidence after a forensic data expert was able to recover data from the accident that Tesla said had been deleted. Tesla disputes ruling and will appeal "Today's verdict is wrong, and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility." Tesla also said it plans to appeal the decision. The case was a big test for the electric vehicle maker, which has been under scrutiny over the safety of its cars. Similar cases have been brought against Tesla, although many have been dismissed. "This will open the floodgates," said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. "It will embolden a lot of people to come to court." Arkansas officials reveal new details about Devil's Den murders of husband and wife Trump says nuclear subs to be positioned after former Russian president's remark Trump says he's ordered the firing of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner