Pakistan treats muhajirs as enemies, Not citizens; Altaf Hussain Demands UN-backed freedom
'The sacrifices of our forefathers created Pakistan, yet today the very architects of this nation, the Muhajirs, are treated as outsiders in their homeland,' Hussain declared. He described how Muhajirs, migrants from post-Partition India who settled in urban Sindh, face exclusion from education, employment, and basic civil rights.
Referencing the UN Charter, he demanded the same right to political freedom that is guaranteed to all peoples under international law. He recounted historical flashpoints, from the 1964 violence against Fatima Jinnah's supporters to the 1972 language riots and the imposition of rural-urban quotas, as proof of deliberate marginalisation.
'Why are military operations only ever launched in Karachi or Balochistan, not Punjab?' he asked, accusing Pakistan's military of targeting Muhajir strongholds, killing activists, enforcing media blackouts, and dismantling MQM's political base.
Rejecting the label of 'ethnic separatist,' Hussain emphasised MQM's inclusive stance: 'We have stood by Baloch, Pashtuns, Sindhis, Kashmiris, Hazaras -- every persecuted group. MQM never propagated hate; we stood for inclusion and human dignity.'
He called the 2016 Nine Zero raid 'state barbarism' and condemned the branding of MQM as a terrorist organisation without due process. Urging Muhajir activists to submit reports of abuse to the UN, he framed documentation as the 'only peaceful and lawful path forward.'
Hussain highlighted a series of pivotal events in Pakistan's history that, he claimed, demonstrate the enduring oppression of the Muhajir community, including the state-backed violence against Fatima Jinnah's supporters in 1964, the enforcement of the 1972 language bill in Sindh, and the implementation of a biased rural-urban quota system during Bhutto's rule. According to him, these measures were deliberately designed to suppress Muhajir identity and eliminate their influence in the country's political sphere.
Hussain urged the UN, human rights groups, and democratic nations to act against what he described as arbitrary arrests, extrajudicial killings, and the systemic marginalisation of Muhajirs. He ended with a firm but conciliatory appeal: 'We don't seek war. We seek dignity. But we shall never surrender our identity or our right to exist with dignity.' (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
15 minutes ago
- The Print
Kutch was the cue, Sindoor the signal. India needs a 6-month, 2-yr & 5-yr plan for Asim Munir
Pakistan launched the war having learned the wrong lessons from Kutch. We might hope for better sense six decades later. But hope isn't a plan or strategy. The Subcontinent's record tells us this is not the best place to be in. We have a precedent in the short Kutch conflict of 9 April, 1965. Both sides called a truce, but the first full-scale India-Pakistan war followed five months later. While it is only India that still formally calls Operation Sindoor an unfinished business, both countries are seeing it as something of a trailer. Or a prelude to the next round. Not an issue fought to any conclusion. It takes a lot for Pakistan to accept defeat, liberation of Bangladesh in 1971, or a clear capitulation in Kargil, for example. Anything less than inarguably decisive, you can count on them to call it a victory. And once they psych themselves into 'see we won that little war' state of mind, you can expect them to come back, sooner rather than later. At this point, each side is drawing its own lessons. Just hours before I sat down to write this column, Lt Gen Rahul Singh, one of the three deputy chiefs of Army staff, reflected on some lessons learnt and pointers for the future. This is good thinking. At least one side (the good side, us), isn't mindlessly celebrating victory, but thinking ahead. This too has parallels with Kutch. India drew its lessons, too, more sensibly and realistically and the result was a strategic victory in the subsequent war. Strategic victory for India because Pakistan was the only side with an objective (grabbing Kashmir) and started the war. The objective was denied, and it was forced back on the defensive across the entire frontier. A stalemate, with the aggressor and first-mover Pakistan on the defensive, was victory for India. In the end, the difference was the lesson the two sides drew from Kutch. India was now preparing for a counter-offensive towards Lahore and Sialkot, in case Pakistani pressure on Kashmir mounted. It's a recorded fact that it was sometime in the late summer following the Kutch ceasefire that then defence minister Y.B. Chavan, Home Minister Gulzari Lal Nanda along with top Army commanders met at the XI Corps headquarters in Jalandhar, and conferred on plans to open out new fronts into Pakistani Punjab if needed. This plan, Operation Riddle, was months in the making. This was a post-Kutch learning and preparation for India. The most succinct and uncomplicated reading I would recommend is War Despatches by Lt Gen Harbakhsh Singh, then Western Army commander. Western Command then included J&K too. Kutch is our most forgotten war, though it lasted much longer (9 April to 1 July) than the 87 hours of Operation Sindoor. There are parallels in learnings from both. Also Read: India is re-hyphenating itself with Pakistan all over again. It needs a new 3D strategy The 'lesson' Pakistan learnt became its establishment's grandest miscalculation. It concluded that Lal Bahadur Shastri accepted defeat in agreeing to a ceasefire and international mediation. That was just the impetus it needed to launch Operation Gibraltar first (massive armed infiltration in Kashmir) followed by Operation Grand Slam, the big armour thrust to try taking Akhnoor and cutting off much of Kashmir next. While we hope and pray for peace and stability, we have to keep that history in mind. The Pakistani military's brain, I have said multiple times, is not located in its head. Theirs is located somewhere lower down in the anatomy that I'd rather not elaborate on. The nation with the higher stake in peace and progress must prepare for the miscalculations of an adversary that compulsively thinks tactically. As we had noted in this National Interest on 31 May, 2025, Asim Munir has limited time. While Pakistan's army will continue to own the country, his own lease over his army isn't permanent. In the course of time, probably over the next few months, he will see challenges to his unconstitutional and un-institutional power from his uniformed peers and the politicians. What's the meaning of un-institutional. In the past, Pakistan's military dictators have had their army take over power formally as an institution. In this indirect takeover, not only has Munir collected that additional star, he has also grabbed political power as an individual. This is too cosy to last. He's the first to know it. That's why you can count on his impatience leading to a new adventure. He'd think, learning erroneously from Operation Sindoor as his military ancestors did from Kutch, that another skirmish will be good. That India's stakes in stability, its economic growth are too high for it to risk a longer conflict. The big powers will move in. He would think short conflicts like these will keep India off-balance, destabilise the Kashmir Valley, but most importantly, protect his own public support. He'd think he has India gamed. A terror attack in Kashmir, the inevitable military response from India and then a few days of dust-up. It will also keep the region 'internationalised'. His first move with Pahalgam, he'd think, succeeded in shifting the world's understanding of the issue in the Subcontinent from terrorism to nuclear conflict. So he's got something to work on. We've already told you where in their bodies their brains rest. Also Read: India-Pakistan terms of engagement: H-word, M-word & the Trump hyphenation We can't time when this miscalculation will come, but it's nearly inevitable. India, therefore, needs a graded plan. For six months, two years which takes us closer to the next general election, and five years, respectively. Five years should be the deadline for us to build deterrence to a level where this Munir, or another, won't have the same temptations. For the six months India has to fill in all the critical gaps in missiles, ammunition, sensors and stockpile in the fastest possible manner, focusing on the critical instruments that worked this time. Brahmos and SCALP missiles, long-range 'smart' artillery shells (Excalibur category), make the multi-layered air defences much denser. Naval platforms should also have their vectors topped up and war wastage reserves built. Most of it can be done domestically and on a war footing. Not the usual Acceptance of Necessity (AON) today and trials 18 months hence. Remember, you said Operation Sindoor is not over yet. Over two years, India must have at least two more (more than that isn't impossible) of Beyond Visual Range (BVR) capable fighters. Long-range artillery should be improved and increased to a level that it becomes a pulverising deterrent in itself. You can have most of it made here and some smart ammunition bought from overseas. This will be quality with quantity. And over five years, begin with upping your defence spending from 1.9 to 2.5 percent of the GDP over the next three years, and then keep it there for the following two. It will be a stretch, but India can afford it. Our national resolution has to be that if we get five years, there will never be an occasion when India will be outranged, out-gunned or out-watched in a conflict with Pakistan even for a few hours. Despite the Chinese. Focus on economic growth, diplomacy and alliances alongside. All of that goes without saying. But you cannot do any of this without guaranteeing your own security. I'd borrow the advice to India from Israel Ambassador Reuven Azar at ThePrintOTC conversation last Monday. Strengthen your defence and liberalise your economy, he said. Because, he elaborated, for investors to come in, they have to have the confidence that your defence is strong. To think that this is a strategic lean-back period will be an unforgivable historic blunder. This is a lean-forward, all-hands-on-the-deck moment. The success of Operation Sindoor is a success to savour, but more importantly, it's impetus for the future. Also Read: Op Sindoor is the first battle in India's two-front war. A vicious pawn in a King's Gambit
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
PM Narendra Modi lands in Argentina to a warm welcome; to hold talks with President Javier Milei
Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Argentina on Saturday as part of his five-nation visit. The Indian community welcomed him in the capital, Buenos Aires. PM Modi is in Argentina on an official visit on July 4 and 5, at the invitation of the President of the Republic of Argentina, Javier Milei.(DPR PMO) Argentina is the third leg of PM Modi's five-nation tour after Ghana, and Trinidad and Tobago. It will be followed by visits to Brazil for the 17th BRICS Summit and to Namibia. Ahead of Modi's visit, Indian ambassador to Argentina Ajaneesh Kumar hailed it a "momentous occasion," noting it will be the first bilateral visit by an Indian PM in over five decades. Laying out the itinerary of the PM's visit, Ambassador Kumar told ANI that the PM will pay homage to Jose de San Martin, widely regarded as the Father of the Argentine Nation, at the Plaza de San Martin in Buenos Aires. PM Modi will also hold delegation-level talks with Argentine President Javier Milei. Afterwards, he will visit the famous Boca Juniors Stadium to observe Argentine football. Ambassador Kumar also emphasised that this will be the Indian Prime Minister's first visit in over five decades and mentioned the "multifaceted" relations between both nations. "Prime Minister had the occasion to meet the President of Argentina last November during the G20 in Brazil. This visit will only consolidate the points discussed during the last meeting. India and Argentina relations are multifaceted. We have cooperation across a range of subjects. It was only last year that we celebrated 75 years of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries," he said. The rest of PM Narendra Modi's five-nation visit PM Modi is in Buenos Aires at the official invitation of the President of the Republic of Argentina. After completing his visit to Argentina, PM Modi will head to Brazil from July 5 to July 8 to attend the 17th BRICS Summit 2025. In the final leg of his five-nation tour, the PM will visit Namibia and also address its parliament.
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shinde chants 'Jai Gujarat', draws flak from Oppn
Mumbai: Deputy chief minister and Shiv Sena chief Eknath Shinde on Friday ended a speech at an event in Pune attended by union home minister Amit Shah with the slogan 'Jai Gujarat', setting off a controversy with opposition parties slamming him and alleging that his real face had been revealed as he had shown his loyalty to Shah who hails from Gujarat. Shinde, however, defended the action in the evening, saying he had simply hailed the Gujarati community as he was attending their function. Union Home Minister Amit Shah inaugurates the newly constructed Jairaj Sports and Convention Centre in Pune on Friday. Maharashtra deputy chief ministers Eknath Shinde and Ajit Pawar also present. (ANI) Shinde, while addressing a gathering during the inauguration of the Jairaj Sports and Convention Centre in Pune, built by the Gujarati community, ended his speech saying, 'Jai Hind, Jai Maharashtra, Jai Gujarat.' His remarks came amid a row in Maharashtra over the imposition of Hindi in schools and violent incidents in Bhayandar and Pune, wherein shopkeepers and traders were attacked for refusing to speak in Marathi. After videos of Shinde's speech surfaced on social media, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut referred to the Shinde-led Shiv Sena as (Amit) Shah Sena, and said, 'It is not surprising. Shinde's Sena was born in Gujarat with Shah's blessings.' Raut was referring to events during the split in the Shiv Sena in 2022, when Shinde and MLAs from his faction were holed up in Surat. The Shiv Sena (UBT) MP also posted two separate videos of Shinde's speech in Pune on social media, saying, 'Shah Sena! Amit Shah's duplicate's Shiv Sena's true face was exposed today. In Pune this man (Eknath Shinde) gave the slogan 'Jai Gujarat'! What to do? How can this man remain in the Maharashtra cabinet.' NCP (SP) national spokesperson Clyde Crasto said though the Shiv Sena claimed to represent the Marathi manoos, they were lusting for power and trying to please Amit Shah. 'When Eknath Shinde was made chief minister, many projects meant for Maharashtra went to Gujarat. Now, it is proved that Shinde was working for the benefit of Gujarat,' Crasto said. State Congress chief spokesperson Atul Londhe said Shinde was only saluting his master Amit Shah as he wants to become chief minister again. Shinde, who reached Mumbai in the evening, clarified his stand in a hurriedly convened press conference. The function had been organised by the Gujarati community and he was only appreciating them for building a sports complex which could be used by all, the deputy chief minister said. 'The Gujarati community has been living here for decades and contributed to the progress of Maharashtra,' Shinde said. He also showed a video of Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray purportedly speaking at a function in Gujarat, where he too said 'Jai Gujarat'. Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis supported Shinde, saying leaders make remarks at functions they attend according to the sentiments of people in front of them. Hailing Gujarat was not the same as hating Maharashtra, he clarified. 'If Shinde has said so, it does not mean that he has no love for Marathi. Leaders speak according to the sentiments of people sitting in front of them. It is a narrow minded thought to criticise him for it,' Fadnavis said. Even Sharad Pawar had said 'Jai Karnataka' while inaugurating the statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in Chikodi in Karnataka in the past, he noted, adding, 'That does not mean that he loves Karnataka more than Maharashtra.' Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut responded to Fadnavis' remarks, saying Thackeray and Pawar had hailed Gujarat and Karnataka respectively when they were speaking in those states. 'In the case of Shinde, he spoke in Pune which is in Maharashtra. What was the need to utter the slogan except to appease someone,' he said. Meanwhile, NCP – the third major partner in the ruling alliance – said the controversy should have been avoided. 'Eknath Shinde is a responsible politician. It would have been better if he had avoided this,' said NCP spokesperson Sanjay Tatkare.
