Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press.
In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported.
Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm.
'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.'
The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes.
The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'.
This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends.
Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request.
The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country.
'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could.
'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
14 minutes ago
- ITV News
What do this year's exam results mean for the future of the Scottish education system?
Around the time that Scottish school pupils were sitting their preliminary exams in February, people in the SNP were whispering in my ear that the Education Secretary, Jenny Gilruth, was vulnerable to being moved from her post in a Scottish Government reshuffle. Today, alongside many young people north of the border, the education secretary will be relieved at this year's exam results. She will see them both as a vindication of how she is doing her job – and the fact that she kept it. Overall attainment is up, with 30.8 per cent of pupils who sat a Higher exam receiving an A grade and 75.9 per cent passing their tests. That is a slight increase on last year and – in the case of top grades – a decent bump on the 2019 results, which were the last set of exams sat before the Covid-19 pandemic. The awards handed out during the various lockdowns were higher than usual as pupils had high-stakes exams removed. In 2020, they were based on heavily moderated teacher estimates before a series of smaller assessments were then used to determine grades the following year. These latest set of results were a key test after a series of controversies last year: from falling pass rates, to blank emails being sent to thousands of pupils instead of exam results, to controversy over how some exams were marked. Chaos, in other words. It had to go smoothly this year and, so far, it has for Gilruth. So, that's the good news. The downside is that the SNP is still being judged on a pledge made a decade ago by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. 'My aim - to put it bluntly - is to close the attainment gap completely,' she said in a 2015 speech. 'It will not be done overnight - I accept that. But it must be done.' The following year, the Scottish Government's programme for government said ministers were aiming to 'substantially eliminate the gap over the course of the next decade'. Well, we're 12 months out from that deadline, and while the gap has narrowed a little year on year, it is largely stuck at the same level as it was pre-pandemic. Indeed, it has widened for advanced highers. Gilruth, a former modern studies teacher, who was appointed to her cabinet post in 2023, believes that the key to progress is by focusing on what goes on in classrooms and listening to those leading them. Her family and friends still work in the profession, meaning she is left in no doubt about concerns from those on the frontline. She is determined to work with teachers and that has informed her approach to the new body, Qualifications Scotland, which will run next year's exams. Donna Stewart, Scotland's chief examining officer, is a former deputy headteacher, and others are being moved straight from classrooms into senior positions. Teachers at the sharp end say this is filtering down to them with a 'very positive' Curriculum Improvement Cycle, which was set up in 2021 to help develop how subjects are taught, listening to those in classrooms and being unafraid to criticise the outgoing Scottish Qualifications Authority. The SQA is being scrapped – and replaced by Qualifications Scotland – because of a series of exam controversies. The biggest of these was the decision to use an algorithm to use schools' past performances to change some pupils' grades when exams were first scrapped during the 2020 lockdown. After public protests from pupils and teachers – and a vote of no confidence being tabled in the education secretary of the day – 124,000 exam results were reinstated. So who was that education secretary, who survived that vote on his future only after U-turning on the original policy? It was the current First Minister, John Swinney. If these exam results are signs that a mess is being cleared up, his successor could argue that much of the untidiness is of her boss's making.
ITV News
14 minutes ago
- ITV News
‘Nail in the coffin': Jeremy Corbyn criticises Angela Rayner over allotment sales
Jeremy Corbyn has criticised Angela Rayner for approving the sale of eight allotment sites in England since Labour took power, in order to raise money for councils budgets. The former Labour leader - who launched a new party with Zarah Sultana in July - said the government is putting a "nail in the coffin" for allotment holders. Rayner, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, has approved the sale of sites in Somerset, Oxfordshire, Hertfordshire, Nottinghamshire, West Sussex, Derbyshire and Kent. Under the Allotments Act 1925, land that is designated "statutory allotment" cannot be sold or repurposed without ministerial consent. Corbyn is a keen horticulturist and has been using an allotment near Islington, North London, for 22 years. Writing in The Telegraph, he said the move will "fill many with dismay". "Allotments have always been under threat from developers. Now, that threat seems to have government backing, which makes the future of these precious spaces even more perilous," he wrote. He added: "Once lost, they never return. Their loss makes us all poorer, as we become more and more detached from how food is grown and how nature interacts with us. "Allotments provide a vital space for community cohesion, biodiversity and social solidarity. These parcels of land, that cannot be individually fenced, provide growing space for many people." However, Corbyn has argued that "instead of contemplating sales of these wonderful spaces, the Government should be encouraging the growth of allotments, or where there is insufficient land, the growth of community and school gardens." While he acknowledged that social housing is "desperately needed", he disagreed that we should "sacrifice" allotments to build it. "Is this Government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon? The battle for the grass roots is on!" Green Party peer Jenny Jones also criticised the decision, saying "it seems there are no green spaces that are safe under this Labour government." "Allotments are valuable spaces to promote physical and mental health, help with local food security, encourage a gift culture amongst allotment holders and their neighbours, and offer a sanctuary for nature," she said in a statement. "Labour should know that they are especially important for people who don't have the privilege of their own garden, i.e. many of those who vote - or used to vote - Labour." She added that councils need to be offered "proper funding by central government, not pushed into selling off these vital community assets." In a statement, the National Allotment Society (NAS) said they wanted to "reassure plot holders and the wider public that no changes have been made to the statutory protections afforded to allotments in England and Wales." They added that statutory allotments cannot be sold or disposed of without following strict legal procedures, and without consultation with NAS. "We are aware of the allotment sites mentioned in the press," they said. "In each of those cases, due process has been followed, and in some instances alternative or replacement allotment provision has been secured as part of the disposal process." A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) spokesperson said: "We know how important allotments are for communities, and that is why strict criteria is in place to protect them. 'The rules on the sale of assets have been in place since 2016 and have not changed. 'Ministerial approvals for the sale of allotments in 2024 were lower than the average for recent years.'
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's tax raid on private schools is swerved by super-rich parents who avoid £100 million by paying early
Parents at top private schools like Eton escaped £100 million of Labour's tax raid by paying fees early, new analysis suggests. Families have paid up to five years in advance to avoid the new 20 per cent VAT on fees, which came into force on January 1. It means super-rich families, who can afford to pay upfront, were able to avoid the tax while less well-off people still had to pay. Annual accounts reveal the top 50 independent schools held £515 million last year in fees-in-advance schemes, which are used to pay school costs one or more years before they are due. This is up from just £121 million in 2023, according to the investigation by the Daily Telegraph. It suggests parents made the downpayments once Labour committed to the VAT in the run-up to the 2024 election. Parents at these top schools – typically the most expensive – may have avoided up to £103 million in VAT. There are more than 2,600 private schools across the UK, meaning the total figure is expected to be significantly higher. It means the Treasury may have overestimated how much money will eventually be raised by the tax. Mairéad Warren de Búrca, managing director at Alvarez & Marsal Tax, told the Daily Telegraph: 'It's not surprising that schools would have done this type of thing with parents and maybe encouraged parents to jump on the prepayment bandwagon. 'Only the very rich can afford to make those advance payments, so I'm not entirely sure [the Government] have managed to do what they intended.' Labour has repeatedly stated that its VAT raid on private schools will target the wealthiest families, to raise £1.8 billion a year for public services. However, sector leaders have highlighted that it is the smaller, cheaper schools which are being impacted the most. Brighton College, the most expensive private school in the UK, recorded total prepaid fees of £50.1 million in last year's accounts – up from £4.1 million in 2023. The number of pupils covered by the school's fees-in-advance scheme jumped from 86 in 2023 to 819 last year. At Eton College, where fees will reach more than £63,000 next year, the total money in its prepayment scheme rose from £16.6 million in 2023 to £52.7 million last year. Winchester College's fees-in-advance scheme leapt from £4.4 million in 2023 to £19 million in 2024, according to its latest accounts. Such advance payment systems have been commonplace at many of these schools for decades, but the figures indicate a rise in parents using them. The sums cover parents paying in advance for both one year of school fees and for multiple years. According to Labour's rules, all pre-payments have been subject to VAT unless they were made before July 29 2024. However, sources suggested that the Chancellor Rachel Reeves would consider ways to claw back the lost VAT. And a Government spokesman said: 'The OBR has already factored in the increased use of prepayment schemes.'
