Pakistan resumes forced expulsions of 1.4 million Afghan refugees despite UN concerns
The decision affects approximately 1.4 million Afghans holding Proof of Registration cards, whose legal status expired at the end of June. Many had hoped for a one-year extension to settle personal affairs, such as selling property or concluding business, before returning to Afghanistan.
In addition to PoR card holders, around 800,000 Afghans hold Afghan Citizen Cards. Police say they also are living in the country illegally and being detained prior to deportations in the eastern Punjab, southwestern Balochistan and southern Sindh province.
Monday's decision drew criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the U.N. refugee agency.
At least 1.2 million Afghans have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, according to a June UNHCR report. Repatriations on such a massive scale have the potential to destabilize the fragile situation in Afghanistan, where the Taliban government came into power in 2021.
A July 31 government notification seen by The Associated Press confirms Pakistan's decision to repatriate all Afghan nationals holding expired PoR cards. It states Afghans without valid passports and Pakistani visas are in the country illegally and must return to their homeland under Pakistani immigration laws.
Police across Pakistan are detaining Afghans to transport them to border crossings, according to two government and security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
They said there are no mass arrests and police were told to go to house-to-house and make random checks to detain foreigners living in the country illegally.
'Yes, the Afghan refugees living in Pakistan illegally are being sent back in a dignified way,' said Shakeel Khan, commissioner for Afghan refugees in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
The latest operation is the most significant step yet under orders from federal government in Islamabad, he said.
Rehmat Ullah, 35, an Afghan, said his family migrated to Pakistan's northwestern Peshawar city decades ago and now is preparing to return home.
'I have five children and my concern is that they will miss their education,' he said. 'I was born here, my children were born here and now we are going back,' he said.
Millions have fled to Pakistan over the past four decades to escape war, political unrest and economic hardship. The renewed deportation drive follows a nationwide crackdown launched in 2023 targeting foreigners living illegally in Pakistan.
The Interior Ministry, which oversees the campaign, did not immediately comment.
Qaiser Khan Afridi, a spokesperson for the U.N. refugee agency, expressed deep concern over the government's recent actions.
'Sending people back in this manner is tantamount to refoulement and a breach of a state's international obligations,' Afridi said in a statement, urging Pakistan to adopt a 'humane approach to ensure voluntary, gradual, and dignified return of Afghans' and praised the country for hosting millions of Afghan refugees for more than 40 years.
'We call on the government to halt the forcible return and ensure a gradual, voluntary and dignified repatriation process,' Afridi said. 'Such massive and hasty return could jeopardize the lives and freedom of Afghan refugees, while also risking instability not only in Afghanistan but across the region.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Iran 'asks Taliban for spy kill list' to exploit Britain's lost database exposing MI6 spies and special forces
Iran is plotting with the Taliban to exploit a lost database that exposed details of MI6 spies and UK Special Forces, it was claimed last night. Leaders of Iran's Revolutionary Guards are said to have asked Afghanistan 's warlords for 'access' to the bombshell list at the centre of a two-year super-injunction drama in the UK. The spectre of Iran's extremists and the brutal Taliban regime co-ordinating efforts to hunt down British agents is causing 'concern' in Whitehall, it is understood. The UK lost a vital database of Afghans and UK officials putting 100,000 people 'at risk of death'. When the Daily Mail discovered this data breach disaster in 2023, the Government secured a draconian court order to hush it up, triggering a 23-month battle in secret courts for open justice. Last month the Government finally abandoned its super-injunction and the public discovered ministers had secretly agreed a £7billion scheme, including a mass evacuation programme to rescue thousands of Afghans who had worked for British forces. But then ministers ordered lawyers to gag the Daily Mail and others with a second High Court injunction, to prevent us revealing how the lost list had included details of more than a hundred MI6 spies, Special Forces and other UK officials. Now details have emerged of Iran's efforts to get their hands on the highly sensitive list, 'so they can hunt down MI6 spies', according to reports. Iran and its fundamentalist leaders are desperately seeking leverage with the West ahead of nuclear negotiations this autumn. The so-called 'kill list' contains the names of 25,000 Afghans who were applying to a UK scheme to give sanctuary to those who had worked on the frontlines with British forces. The Daily Mail has seen a copy of the full dataset lost by the British government, and it is understood it also includes details of more than 100 British officials including MI6, Special Forces and senior military commanders, as well as MPs. Many of these were included to help officials verify legitimate claims. Although codes are used, and the list does not specifically identify any spies or special forces, it could be a valuable dataset for an enemy. A senior Iranian official in Tehran said the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had 'formally requested that the Taliban government share the leaked list', according to the Telegraph which added it is understood 'that MI6 intelligence assets will take priority' in the search. It quoted the official as saying the Iranian government has assigned a committee to the issue. The official added: 'There have been discussions on co-operation between Tehran and Kabul on this issue as it can help both countries for negotiations with the West.' For two years, the British government convinced the Royal Courts of Justice to suppress the Daily Mail's story of the data leak, in order to save lives. The Daily Mail's fight for open justice meant we took part in court hearings shown secret Whitehall briefing papers A bombshell document - never seen before - revealing how Labour ministers met in October 2024 and agreed a scheme to relocate about 25,000 Afghans to the UK at a cost of £7billion Daily Mail journalists faced jail by order of a Penal Notice if they revealed the Government's secret - or even breathed a word about the existence of the draconian court order The MoD argued that, if the Taliban learnt of the breach, it would try to get hold of a copy. The MoD believed the Taliban had never obtained the data. It is unclear if the Taliban has it today. The Taliban claimed last month it had obtained it in 2022, but experts pointed out that this is exactly what it would say, for propaganda purposes. It was accidentally leaked in February 2022 when a British soldier emailed the complete file to Afghan contacts instead of sending a small extract. The Daily Mail revealed last week how Afghan heroes who saved British lives are now in hiding in Iran with their families, yet face being deported back to neighbouring Afghanistan and 'certain death' by the vengeful Taliban. The Revolutionary Guard's demand comes after Britain, France and Germany threatened Tehran with a so-called snapback mechanism, which would restore UN Security Council resolutions against it, if no progress is made on negotiations over its nuclear programme by August 30.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Rwanda reached deal with US to take in up to 250 migrants, government says
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - The United States and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to potentially accept hundreds of migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump's administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration. The agreement, under which Rwanda would accept up to 250 migrants, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted. "Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation," said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo. "Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade." The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland. Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect some of the most fundamental human rights. In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States. The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public. Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. The Trump administration has pressed countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Rwanda signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Labour ‘must stop 8 in 10 migrant crossings' to break smuggling model
Britain and France will have to stop eight in ten attempted migrant crossings in order to destroy the business model of people smugglers, senior officials believe. The first migrants due for deportation to France as part of Britain's new returns deal will be detained by the end of this week, the Home Office said. The one in, one out migrant returns deal with France has been approved by the European Commission and will come into force on Tuesday. Dozens of beds have been freed up in immigration removal centres ready for any small boat migrant arrivals this week and Border Force officers have been prepared to start selecting those to be removed. Any adult migrant who arrives on small boats will face being sent back as part of an arrangement that will see an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers in France moving the other way — those with a family connection to the UK or from a country with a high rate of asylum claims granted, such as Afghanistan, Iran or Eritrea.
