‘You will be dominated': Huge China warning
The warning comes as Talisman Sabre, Australia's biggest war-games, reaches its tail end.
Some 35,000 troops from 19 of the country's allies are taking part in the military exercises — drills Taiwan is pushing to be part of in the future.
Mr Joyce, a former deputy prime minister, said on Monday Australia's 'strategic ambiguity' on Taiwan must be 'backed up with incredible strength'. Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce says Australia is putting future generations at 'threat' by not acting faster to bolster the military. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
'There's not multiple rules-based orders in the world — there's one,' he told Seven's Sunrise, citing French President Emmanuel Macron.
'If a country wants to be outside that by just taking the South China Sea, by what we've seen with journalists in Hong Kong just (being) taken off the street, with tennis players who disappear if they say the wrong thing.
'We've had a massive build-up of (China's) armed capacity, including their nuclear capacity, and no real explanation as to why and (Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong) brought that to our attention lately.'
Mr Joyce went on to say the 'Australian people really haven't grasped exactly what's before us'.
'We need to become as strong as possible as quickly as possible,' he said.
'We really are putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat.
'China does not believe in a democratic world order.
'They believe in an alternate order that does not include democracy and ultimately … where we lie in that, if we don't get this right, is as a vassal state.
'You will be dominated by economically, socially in your media, by a totalitarian regime.'
Adding that Australia is 'not as strong as we should be at the moment', Mr Joyce said the answer was working with allies to bolster collective defence.
Bringing Taiwan into the fold would mean Australia needs to 'look like you are strong enough to back yourself in'.
More to come
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Shameful and has to stop': French Foreign Minister condemns US, Israel-backed Gazan aid body as Trump envoy meets Benjamin Netanyahu
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot has branded the United States and Israel-backed aid distribution system in Gaza shameful, just hours before Trump administration envoy Steve Witkoff met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks over the growing humanitarian crisis. International outcry over the mass starvation in Gaza has grown in recent weeks, with European leaders joining United Nations and international aid groups in calling for a greater supply of food and water into the embattled region. Even US President Donald Trump, who has largely sided with Israeli narratives about conditions in the strip, told press in Scotland earlier this week there was "real starvation" in Gaza and suggested his administration would step up relief efforts. However, speaking to media on Thursday, local time, Mr Barrot called out the US' most likely method of providing aid, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation jointly founded with Israel, claiming it had resulted in the death of civilians. "I want to call for the cessation of the activities of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the militarised distribution of humanitarian aid that has generated a bloodbath in distribution lines in Gaza, which is a scandal, which is shameful, and has to stop," he said. The GHF, which distributes aid with support from the Israel Defence Force and armed private security contractors, has come under scrutiny after widespread reports of chaos in distribution lines and the killings of Gazans clamouring for food. Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry claimed on Thursday, local time, 111 people had been killed and 820 injured while queuing for aid in the past 24 hours. While the organisation does not differentiate between civilian and militant casualties, multiple verified reports of soldiers firing at those seeking aid have still prompted outcry from world leaders and humanitarian groups. Mr Witkoff is expected to visit and aid distribution site as part of his visit to Israel. Publicly, Israel has attempted to dismiss criticism of aid distribution within Gaza, with Mr Netanyahu even going as far as claiming there was no starvation among the millions living in the strip. President Trump also remains supportive of Israel's aim of completely eliminating Hamas from the region, posting: "The fastest way to end the Humanitarian Crises in Gaza is for Hamas to SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!!!" to his Truth Social platform on Thursday. Privately, however, Israel may face pressure from Mr Witkoff to make progress in ceasefire negotiations, which have largely stalled in recent months. Recent declarations from France, the United Kingdom and Canada they would acknowledge a Palestinian state should talks continue to falter could complicate US-led proposals for peace, with critics of the move arguing recognition would also embolden Hamas. However, a recent decision from the US could also complicate ceasefire efforts, with the State Department on Thursday moving to impose sanctions on Palestinian Authority officials and members of the Palestine Liberation Organization. The Palestinian Authority exercises limited control over the Israel-occupied West Bank and is generally regarded as the strongest contender to form government in a fully-realised Palestinian state. Despite this, US officials have been critical of the body, arguing it has done little to combat Hamas and prevent Iran from exerting influence over Gaza. "It is in our national security interests to impose consequences and hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments and undermining the prospects for peace," the State Department said.
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
Mark Riley: Families of teen victims call for tougher laws as government focuses on age, not algorithms
Some people we meet look into our eyes, and we see them. Others do it in a way that allows us to see right into the very heart of them. Robb Evans, Emma Mason and Mia Bannister did that on Wednesday morning as they sat in the Prime Minister's suite at Parliament House, waiting to take part in an announcement they hoped would prevent the eyes of other parents from becoming windows to the boundless agony of losing a child. Robb Evans carried that pain with him as he cradled an urn containing the ashes of his daughter, Liv. She died of anorexia in April 2023. She was 15. It was important to Robb that Liv was there at that moment. Emma Mason's daughter, Tilly, and Mia Bannister's son, Ollie, were there in spirit, too. Anthony Albanese and Communications Minister Anika Wells could see them in their mothers' eyes. Tilly and Ollie both took their own lives. Tilly died in February 2022. She, like Liv, was 15. Ollie died in January 2024. He was just 14. All three teenagers had suffered through years of online torment and abuse. For those of us huddled against the Canberra cold in the Prime Minister's courtyard that morning, their presence could be felt as the next phase of the Government's social media ban for under-16s was laid out. It is far from perfect. Its impact will be real. But it will be limited. Kids, being kids, will get around it. But it tells social media giants that Australian legislators are determined to force them to accept responsibility for the vile, misleading and downright dangerous content their algorithms spew before susceptible young minds. Most of the companies say the right things. But they appear to do little. That's principally because governments have not yet found a way to hold them legally responsible for the treacherous rubbish their sites publish and broadcast. Scott Morrison tried. He proposed anti-trolling laws in 2021, partially as a response to the supercharged torrent of online abuse that flooded social media during COVID. Despite attracting the in-principle support of world leaders at various international forums, his domestic push failed. The intention was laudable. The legislation, though, was deeply flawed. Lawyers warned it would undermine existing defamation laws, human rights advocates said it would impinge on individual freedoms and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant cautioned that it would be impossible to 'arrest or regulate our way out of online abuse'. So, legislators went back to the drawing board and came up with the under-16s ban. It is hailed as a world-first piece of legislation. The fact that the social giants dislike it so much probably tells us that it will have some impact. And it brings some relief to the hearts of grieving parents. 'Ollie, Tilly and Liv. Their lives mattered,' Mia Bannister declared. It was a deeply touching moment. But I and others were struck by the penetrating feeling that Ollie, Tilly and Liv deserved something more. This reform only treats one side of the issue. The ban is on children, not the content. The legislation threatens the media giants with fines of up to $50 million if they allow under-16s to operate accounts. The objective is to let kids access social media only in a logged-off state so the algorithms can't curate a dangerous diet of content based on their profiles. But it doesn't stop that content from being published or broadcast in the first place. Nor does it stop the kids from finding it without having to log in. We stop 15-year-olds from using assault rifles by banning the kids and the guns. But we don't do that online, where words are too often used as weapons. Any mainstream media outlet that published or broadcast such dangerous content would be put straight up before the regulators and the courts and face having its operating license ripped up. Quite rightly. But social media sites publish and broadcast this dangerous rubbish every second with apparent impunity. I asked Anika Wells when governments would stop the platforms from allowing this stuff to be posted in the first place. She said that question was 'ultimately one for the social media platforms to answer'. But it's not. It is for governments. And until governments find that answer, ministers and prime ministers and the rest of us will continue to look through the eyes of shattered parents and into the misery of broken hearts that will never mend. Mark Riley is the Seven Network's political editor
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Endless debate' rages on in parliament over net zero
Sky News host Paul Murray discusses the 'endless debate' raging on in Australian parliament over net zero. 'The endless debate as people are ripping themselves in half about net zero, do we keep it, do we get rid of it? It is a little bit of a Goldilocks question for some in parliament right now,' Mr Murray said. 'We have people who are, of course, pushing said policies who, when asked about the benefits of them, won't answer.'
