Ukraine has repressed Russian-speaking people: Envoy
R
ussian ambassador Denis Alipov responded to one story ('If you take a gun to culture, you kill human spirit', July 4) in TOI 's eight-part series on price of war and fight for peace.
Excerpts:
The piece "If you take a gun to culture, you kill the human spirit" reflects a misunderstanding of causes and consequences of the ongoing conflict. Portrayal of the war as a 'self-inflicted wound for Russian society' is misreading events. Efforts to 'cancel Russia' have been central to policy in Kiev's regime that came to power following the 2014 coup. It has sought to marginalise Russian language, repress Russian-speaking population, dismantle monuments commemorating shared history, and persecute Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
An example is the 2019 law that established Ukrainian as the sole state language, effectively outlawing official multilingualism in a country where Russian is the native tongue for at least one-third of the population. This was followed by the national minorities (communities) law that curtailed rights/ freedoms of ethnic Russians - this even drew UN's criticism.
'Derussification' includes demolition of monuments to figures like Alexander Pushkin and Catherine the Great, and repression of Ukrainian Orthodox Church including a de facto ban on its activities, and attempts to seize the sacred Kiev-Pechersk Lavra, a spiritual cornerstone in both countries.
It's imperative to confront Kiev and its international sponsors, who've played a role in provoking the deadliest conflict in Europe since WWII. Their campaign has shattered peace & stability and damaged culture, historical memory, and people-to-people relations. Indeed, "taking a gun to culture" does kill the human spirit. But it's Ukraine, not Russia, that led this assault -- Russia sought to stop it by force only after its words fell on deaf ears.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Marco Rubio fumes after dead-end Ukraine peace talks with Russia's Lavrov: ‘I don't want to overpromise'
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio voiced disappointment over the lack of progress in negotiations to end the war in Ukraine after a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Rubio said he remained "frustrated" by the absence of movement toward a ceasefire, even as some ideas were exchanged during the discussion. "There were some ideas that were expressed today, some viewpoints that they expressed to us that I'll take back to the president for his consideration," Rubio said. "I don't want to overpromise," he added, citing the "acceleration" of Russian attacks on Ukraine. Rubio emphasised that while diplomacy requires "time and patience," the United States is eager for results. "We're also frustrated that more progress has not been made," Rubio said. 'Hopefully... we will have more clarity about what exactly the Russian position and priorities are.' US President Donald Trump has also expressed mounting frustration with Putin's conduct in the war. In a Cabinet meeting this week, Trump sharply criticised Russian President Vladimir Putin. "Putin is not, he's not treating human beings right," Trump said. 'We get a lot of b*******---- thrown at us by Putin... It turns out to be meaningless.' 'We're not happy with Putin. I'm not happy with Putin, I can tell you that much right now. Because he's killing a lot of people. And a lot of them are his soldiers.' Trump also said he would strongly consider backing a new Russia sanctions bill that aims to force Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war. Thursday's meeting in Malaysia was the second in-person encounter between Rubio and Lavrov since Rubio took office, following their initial meeting in Riyadh in February. The two have also had several phone calls in recent months. Russia's Foreign Ministry described the exchange as 'substantive and frank,' noting that the two sides discussed Ukraine, Syria, and Iran. According to Moscow, both officials affirmed 'a mutual commitment to finding peaceful solutions to conflict situations.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
A new nuclear shield for Europe: Macron wraps up London visit with key France-UK nuke pact
In a joint declaration, the UK and France agreed for the first time to coordinate the use of their nuclear deterrents in the face of 'extreme threats to Europe', according to a report read more French President Emmanuel Macron meets Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing Street in London, on Thursday for a UK-France summit. AP French President Emmanuel Macron will conclude his three-day state visit to the UK on Thursday with a landmark agreement to strengthen nuclear coordination between Britain and France, Europe's only nuclear powers. The pact, which reinforces defence ties amid rising global threats, marks a historic step toward a more integrated European nuclear posture. According to RFI, the state-owned international radio news network of France, in a joint declaration, the UK and France agreed for the first time to coordinate the use of their nuclear deterrents in the face of 'extreme threats to Europe.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While both countries maintain independent arsenals and are Nato members, the alliance's collective defence obligations do not explicitly cover the use of nuclear weapons. This new understanding, however, opens the door to a potential joint response if Europe's security is severely threatened, according to reports. The agreement gains significance against the backdrop of ongoing Russian aggression and growing instability on the continent. As Russia's war in Ukraine drags on, the prospect of a stronger, more unified European nuclear stance is likely to serve as a deterrent to further escalation. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Macron also reaffirmed their commitment to supporting Ukraine and tackling undocumented migration across the Channel. In a parallel move, the two countries will continue supplying Kyiv with Storm Shadow cruise missiles — long-range weapons jointly developed by both countries — and will begin work on a next-generation replacement system. Speaking ahead of Thursday's defence summit, the UK Ministry of Defence said the renewed nuclear cooperation reflects a 'refreshed' Lancaster House agreement, first signed in 2010. The pact is being reimagined to form a new 'entente industrielle,' positioning defence as a driver of economic growth and technological innovation. 'The threats we face are multiplying — from war in Europe, to new nuclear risks and daily cyber-attacks,' AFP quoted Starmer as saying. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As Nato allies with a deep history of defence collaboration, today's agreements take our partnership to the next level. We are ready to use our shared strength to enhance our capabilities, support thousands of jobs, and keep our people safe,' he added. Macron echoed that sentiment in a speech to London's financial sector on Wednesday night, saying Britain and France are 'stronger together.' Later on Thursday, Macron and Starmer were set to join a virtual meeting of the 'coalition of the willing' on Ukraine, alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. The group is discussing support for a future ceasefire and possible peacekeeping deployment. As the summit ends, the newly inked nuclear pact marks a powerful symbol of renewed Franco-British unity and potentially, the foundation of a broader European nuclear shield. With inputs from agencies
NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
Can India Help Pull Putin Away From Xi? Or, Should It?
Last week, India's Deputy Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Rahul R Singh, confirmed what many defence observers had been saying, that China actively helped Pakistan during India's Operation Sindoor. Speaking at a Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) event, Singh acknowledged that China was hurting India using its ancient military doctrine of "36 stratagems", one of which involved killing the adversary with a "borrowed knife". We already knew that China was Pakistan's main military and diplomatic backer and has decided to sell Islamabad dozens of its 5th-generation fighter jets. But it is rare for an Indian military or even senior government official to name China as its main threat, despite the country's strategic policy being primarily aimed at its powerful neighbour. Singh's comment came barely two weeks after US President Donald Trump hosted the Pakistani military chief, Asim Munir, at the White House. Earlier, the US Central Command chief, Gen Michael Kurilla, had described Pakistan as a "phenomenal partner" in counter-terrorism and insisted that America needed both Pakistan and India. Post-Pahalgam Reckoning India's military action against Pakistan over the Pahalgam terror attack failed to get unequivocal support from major powers, disappointing many Indians who expected world leaders to recognise India's right to defend itself after a horrible terror attack. They condemned the attack but didn't go beyond that, despite their knowledge of China's military help to Pakistan. People were dismayed that Western leaders hyphenated India with Pakistan despite New Delhi's efforts in the past two decades to come closer to the West and expand economic and defence ties. Munir's welcome in Washington emphasised that Islamabad remained important to US interests in the region. As India has not been a treaty partner with the United States, having maintained its strategic autonomy in foreign policy, the Western reaction or lack of support should not have come as a surprise to New Delhi. Nevertheless, this has highlighted a major problem for India. The Chinese Threat India needs to review its strategic relationships to tackle the challenge posed by the ever-deepening military relationship between Pakistan and China. There is now a strong case for strengthening our strategic partnership with Russia, while maintaining such ties with the United States. As this essay explains later, Moscow would also like to reduce its dependence on Beijing, which has steadily grown since the Ukraine war. The US and other Western countries will welcome that too. In recent weeks, many in India have wondered if it was right to rely more on the West in recent years and weaken relations with its traditional ally, Russia. They recalled how Moscow stood by India during the 1971 war when the West and China supported Pakistan. Although Russia's reaction since Pahalgam has not been different from the West's, historically, the former has been loyal to India. When we conducted the first nuclear explosion in 1974 and nuclear weapons tests in 1998, Moscow stood by us and did not join the Western countries in slapping sanctions on India. It remained crucial for India's atomic programme during the country's nuclear isolation by the West. It was only in the last two decades that the United States built its strategic partnership with New Delhi, partly to counter the Chinese threat. But India still had to rely on Russia for nuclear-powered submarines, which the US constantly refused to provide. Now, of course, India is building such submarines itself. The Su-57 Russia has now offered us the fifth-generation stealth fighter Su-57, virtually on our terms - seven years after India pulled out of the joint-manufacturing jet project. It's ready to produce the fighter in India, happy to share its full source code, and has even offered to transfer technology, which the US or any other Western country is reluctant to do. This will help India in its project to produce the fifth-generation aircraft. Of course, the political leadership must respect military experts if their assessment doesn't back the Russian fighter and they prefer the American F-35, which is also on offer. But we do have the Russian option to consider. Why India Could Be A Better 'Partner' Russians have been more willing to partner with India in high-tech defence projects than with China. Moscow is particularly reluctant to share its aviation expertise with Beijing, an area in which China is believed to be still behind both the US and Russia. India and Russia may even co-produce the S-500 missile defence system, following the success of the S-400 system against Pakistan last month. The two countries have already been jointly producing several defence platforms, such as the Brahmos supersonic cruise missile, which was used against Pakistan in the recent conflict. Thus, although India has diversified defence relationships over the past decade, Russia remains its single biggest partner. The last three years have been tough for Russia after President Vladimir Putin decided to invade Ukraine, forcing the former to embrace China more tightly. Three weeks before the invasion, Xi Jinping announced his no-limits partnership with Putin. With the West providing Ukraine with the latest weapons and air defence systems, Russia came under pressure, which only increased further after Western sanctions. Although officially neutral, China has been supporting Russia in the war. According to US officials, Beijing has been providing Moscow with significant quantities of machine tools, drones and turbojet engines, microelectronics and nitrocellulose, which Russia uses to produce propellants for weapons. Not All Is Rosy However, the China-Russia partnership also has its limits, and they view each other with suspicion. A recently leaked report from the Russian intelligence agency, FSB, describes China as "the enemy". The FSB assessment, reported in the New York Times last month, calls China a serious threat to Russian security. "Beijing is increasingly trying to recruit Russian spies and get its hands on sensitive military technology, at times by luring disaffected Russian scientists," it says. The FSB report warns that China is trying to encroach on Russian territory in the Pacific, where the two countries have a long-running dispute. It also says that China is increasing its influence in Central Asia and spying on Russia's vast territory in the Arctic. The warning by the Russian secret agency suggests that given an opportunity, Moscow could be persuaded to loosen its ties with Beijing. Although India is currently not strong enough to replace China, Russia would like to strengthen strategic ties with New Delhi. Beijing has not provided Moscow with its unflinching diplomatic support since the Ukraine conflict. Like India, it has also abstained in most UN resolutions on Ukraine in the past three years. China has also been putting pressure, though unsuccessfully, to dissuade Russia from selling some of its advanced defence systems to India, such as the S-400 anti-missile defence shield. Weaning Putin Away From Xi Trump, meanwhile, has also been trying to wean Russia from China with his continuing attempts to woo Putin. A strong alliance between Moscow and Beijing is a serious challenge to Washington. But if Russia can be persuaded, America can focus on the Chinese challenge. Even before his election in November last year, Trump had declared that he wanted to "un-unite" Putin and Xi. To achieve that, he first wants to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict so that Moscow's dependence on China could be curtailed. But Putin doesn't yet trust Trump or the American establishment, where he is not seen as a friend. America's European allies also see Moscow as a greater threat than China, at least for now. How The Ukraine War Benefits Beijing Xi Jinping, however, is concerned about Trump's attempts to pull Putin away from China. In February, soon after Trump intensified efforts to end the Ukraine war, Xi affirmed China's "no-limit" partnership. It is in China's interest that Russia stays engaged in the war. The end of the Ukraine conflict could lead to an improvement in Russia's relations with the US and a reduction in its dependence on Beijing. The war is also depleting a lot of American military equipment given the constant supplies to Ukraine, something that suits Beijing. Peace with Ukraine can also lead to the lifting of American sanctions and help Russia rebuild its economy and redevelop its arms industry, which is currently forced to rely on China for many components. This will also benefit India as Indo-Russian defence projects will get a new lifeline. Any reduction in the Chinese footprint in Russia will be good news for India. Since the Ukraine war, the Modi government has remained neutral despite pressure from the West. It has also been helped by a cheap supply of oil from Russia, which increased from just 2% before the war to 40% by last year. But Xi is unlikely to let Putin escape from Beijing's clutches so easily. Last year, Russia-China trade reached a record $245 billion, 66% more than in 2021, a year before the start of the Ukraine war. This increase was largely driven by a surge in Chinese exports of civil-military dual-use goods. China is now Russia's largest buyer of crude oil, ahead of India. Fears In Washington No doubt, India and Russia's closer strategic partnership will be seen with suspicion in Washington and other Western countries. But India should be able to convince its Western partners that unlike China, India is not ganging up with Russia to threaten them, and that the real aim is to weaken Moscow's dependence on Beijing. As part of its multi-polar policy, India must also continue to deepen its strategic relationship with the United States, the only power still capable of countering China. India and the US need each other to deal with the Chinese threat. Americans know that India has never posed any security threat to them. Pakistan may be useful to them, but it can harm its security, as it has done in the past. It is, after all, for this reason that the US is reluctant to sell its advanced military systems to Pakistan.
