Starmer says he was 'heavily focused' on international affairs before welfare u-turn
Sir Keir Starmer has said he did not get to grips with the growing rebellion over welfare reforms earlier as he was focused on international affairs.
He also said he took ownership for his decisions and believed as leader he should 'carry the can' when things do not go well.
The prime minister said he was occupied with the G7 and Nato summits and the escalating tensions in the Middle East for much of the past two weeks.
He said he was 'heavily focused' on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend and that his 'full attention really bore down' on the welfare bill on Thursday.
He defended the eventual U-turn, which came after more than 100 MPs launched a bid to kill the legislation with an amendment.
On Sunday, Wes Streeting said he is confident the government will win a crunch vote on welfare next week.
The Health Secretary told Sky News Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips the changes 'have put us in a much better position'.
'As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected,' he said.
Speaking to the Sunday Times, Starmer said: 'Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome.'
He said all the decisions were his and that 'I take ownership of them'.
There have been reports that rebel MPs blamed Starmer's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the government's approach.
Starmer said: 'My rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can.
'I take responsibility for all the decisions made by this government. I do not talk about staff and I'd much prefer it if everybody else didn't.'
Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but the concessions made leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere and point to possible tax rises in the autumn.
On Saturday, the prime minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'.
He said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work.'
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch will hit out at Starmer as 'incapable of sticking to a decision' after he backed down on his plans.
The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but the prime minister was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say in a speech next week.
The government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit.
Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition.
Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms.
The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment.
As a year in office nears, more than half of voters think Labour has underperformed in that time, polling released on Saturday showed.
The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations.
From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below...
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
After a dreadful first year, Starmer has no hope of fixing the economy
This Friday is the anniversary of Labour's victory at the polls, presenting us with an opportunity to assess Sir Keir Starmer's first year in office. I cannot comment on foreign affairs or domestic social issues. My bailiwick is simply the economy and the Government's influence over it. If a week is a long time in politics, then a year is a short time in the life of an economy. It is perfectly possible for things that have started badly to turn out well in the end and, equally, for things that started well to turn sour. So a judgment this early in a government's tenure must be provisional. We should start by acknowledging all the difficulties the Government has faced. It inherited a low-growth economy, accompanied by a serious fiscal problem. Notably, a deficit of nearly 5pc of GDP and a debt ratio not far off 100pc, and still climbing. Moreover, given the continuing war between Russia and Ukraine, and especially since Donald Trump's return to the White House in January, the international environment has not been favourable. With all that said, how has the Government done? Long ago, Labour's leaders acknowledged that the fundamental problem of the British economy was low economic growth, associated with weak productivity growth. They identified a low rate of national investment as the most important driver. Accordingly, much of Labour's wish list has been about increasing the rate of investment. It has undertaken a number of measures, including redefining the fiscal rules, to enable a higher rate of public investment. The effects of this change have not yet come through. And it has sought to reduce the planning obstructions to building more houses. As regards business investment, however, its approach so far has been woeful. It seems to have believed that, after the leadership chaos and infighting of the last 14 years, merely by not being Conservative, the new Labour Government would engender greater confidence. Things have turned out rather differently. For a start, the underlying problems were always more serious than Labour's diagnosis acknowledged. Moreover, the gloom and doom about the ' fiscal black hole ' relentlessly pumped out by the Chancellor didn't help develop any sense of optimism among business leaders. Then there were three key mistakes. The first was committed more or less immediately after taking office by caving in to the striking rail workers. This gave a green light to other militant groups to act, and it will surely take a long time for the Government to restore any sense of confidence that it will firmly resist militant union pay demands. In a similar vein, it conceded to junior doctors and thereby, in all likelihood, set off a wave of claims and industrial disputes across the public sector. Second, having boxed itself in with a pre-election commitment not to raise the main rates of personal tax and yet feeling that it had to increase some sort of tax to fund its increased spending, the Government then imposed a huge increase in business taxes in the form of increased National Insurance contributions for employers. Moreover, this came on top of a large increase in the minimum wage. To cap it all, the Government is in the process of getting the Employment Rights Bill through Parliament. This will greatly strengthen the bargaining position of workers against their employers. Many small businesses, in particular, are fearful that they will be in a weak position to stand up against rogue employees. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that business leaders feel depressed and are disinclined to invest or take on employees. Ultimately, it seems Labour really doesn't seem to appreciate the private sector or understand what makes businesses tick. Simultaneously, the Government has failed to understand the nature and scale of the problem concerning the public finances. Admittedly, most Labour Party supporters seem to think that we can increase the share of GDP accounted for by government expenditure without incurring any ill effects. Yet anyone reviewing the international evidence will conclude that government spending taking as high a share of GDP as it currently does is doing grave damage. One of the most important drivers of surging public spending is the ballooning benefits bill. Admittedly, the Government has made a nod in this direction by announcing various measures to combat the inexorable rise in welfare spending. But these measures have been pitifully small in scope. They amounted only to a total saving of some £6bn, compared to a projected total welfare bill (including pensions) this year of £326bn. Moreover, the Government has already retreated on some of its proposals. It may be about to abandon the rest of them this week. If you want to be optimistic, you could say that it is still early days. Even Margaret Thatcher's first year in office in 1979/80 was very far from an economic success story. Indeed, she began by agreeing to the pay recommendations of the Clegg Commission on public sector pay (no, not that Clegg). And her monetarist obsession caused interest rates to be jacked up from 12pc to 17pc, prompting the pound to soar and much of the British economy to go down the tubes. The economy picked up two years later, but it didn't really start to motor until after Thatcher's second election victory in 1983. Somehow, though, I don't see this Government's dire beginning leading to any sort of major recovery, let alone a Damascene conversion. With a tailwind from the international environment, things may get a bit better next year. But any sort of economic transformation looks unattainable. In that case, Labour's other aspirations will fall by the wayside. Meanwhile, the Government somehow has to find the wisdom to appreciate the peril that this country faces from foreign aggression – and to muster the political courage to spend what is necessary to defend us against it.
The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Frankie Boyle joins call to halt proscription of Palestine Action
Signatories include the two Scots, as well as many others from north of the border, as well as the likes of Caroline Lucas, Max Porter and Vinay Patel. Boyle has been vocal in his support for Palestine and the group say it is an attack on the freedom of political expression if the proscription goes ahead. Speaking about it, Brady said: 'Civil disobedience, protest and the expression of political solidarity is not terrorism. To say that it is would be an indictment of the UK democracy and every self-respecting comedian should take a stand!' Frankie Boyle The Author Statement on the Right to Freedom of Speech adds: 'What is at stake here is the very principle of freedom of political expression as we know it in the UK. Whether we as individuals support Palestine Action is irrelevant: we oppose their proscription on principle. 'Civil disobedience is not 'terrorism', as history shows us, from the suffragettes to Martin Luther King Jr. It is the right of all citizens in a democracy. In 2004, Keir Starmer made this very argument when he represented an activist who sabotaged a military aircraft, making the case that his actions were lawful because they aimed to prevent an 'illegal war'.' The statement has been released to align with the vote on the proposed ban in parliament on Monday. It insists that support of Palestine Action is not the aim of the coalition but says it is against classing the group's action at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 as an act of terrorism and believes it is 'completely unprecedented' in the UK. The coalition, which is made up of signatories across the political spectrum, urges the government to reconsider its plans. It calls on the government to halt the proposed ban and uphold the essential principles of freedom of expression and the right to protest that are cornerstones of British democracy. Read More Novelist and screenwriter Nikesh Shukla is one who signed it and said: 'As a precedent for what constitutes free speech and appropriate civil disobedience, this is appalling. I hope all free speech advocates across the divide call this what it is: unjust and wrong.' Comedian Josie Long added: 'Comedians talk a lot about freedom of speech being under threat. But this is the real deal – it would make it illegal simply to express verbal support for Palestine Action. Keir Starmer's government is criminalising our right to express political solidarity. If they come for Palestine Action, make no mistake: they will come for you next. Every comedian, everyone with a platform needs to speak up.' Poet Rebecca Tamás said: 'If this government truly believes in free speech and freedom of expression, then it will not proscribe Palestine Action. This is the action of an authoritarian regime, not an open and trustworthy democracy.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Rod Stewart's wife Penny Lancaster and son Alistair wear leopard print in homage as they arrive at Glastonbury to support star in Legends slot
Penny Lancaster has arrived at Glastonbury festival to support her husband Rod Stewart as he headlines in the prestigious Legends slot. She was joined by her sons, model Alistair, 19, who was wearing a leopard print coat in preparation for his father's set and Aiden, 14. The matriarch, 54, looked very bohemian as she wore a tassel coat, oversized sunglasses, balloon trousers and a leopard print bag. The 80-year-old singer's teatime set comes the day after he claimed the country was 'fed up' with the Tories and that Labour was trying to ditch Brexit. He accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of giving Scottish fishing rights 'back to the EU', although the Government insists it has simply renewed an existing deal for European boats. His views represent a second volte-face given that he appeared to support Labour at last year's election – despite previously backing the Conservatives. Asked where Britain's political future now lay, he told The Times: 'It's hard for me because I'm extremely wealthy, and I deserve to be, so a lot of it doesn't really touch me. 'But that doesn't mean I'm out of touch. For instance, I've read about Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular. 'We're fed up with the Tories. We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well. What options have we got? I know some of his family, I know his brother, and I quite like him.' Asked what Mr Farage stands for aside from Brexit, tighter immigration and controversial economic promises he replied: 'Yeah, yeah. But Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit and I don't know how he's going to do that. 'Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip.' Sir Rod also seemed unconvinced that Sir Keir was going to fully address one of his personal pet hates. Three years ago, the singer donned a hi-vis jacket and rang around friends asking for help filling in potholes outside his Essex house. 'I took me Ferrari out. Nearly lost the f***ing wheel,' he said. 'And before I did in the Ferrari, I saw an ambulance that couldn't move, the wheel stuck right in there. 'So I took me mates out, and we knew what to do because I had builders in the house. 'We filled in a considerable length of the road, actually.' He added that potholes were still present 'all over Britain' in contrast to Europe.
