Russia and China begin war games in Sea of Japan after Trump nuclear threat
Though pre-planned, the joint naval exercises that began on Sunday came a day after Donald Trump moved US nuclear submarines closer to Russia in response to inflammatory comments from Russia's former president Dmitry Medvedev.
The Joint Sea-2025 drills were launched in waters near to Vladivostok, Russia's largest port on the Pacific Ocean, according to a statement from China's Defence Ministry.
Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, will be participating in the three-day exercises.
This will include 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat', followed by naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'.
Russia and China, which signed a 'no-limits' strategic partnership shortly before Russia went to war in Ukraine in 2022, conduct regular military exercises to rehearse coordination between their armed forces and send a deterrent signal to adversaries.
Though Russia and China have both said that no third country is being targeted by their military cooperation, Japan has objected to the drills.
It said that greater strategic coordination between Beijing and Moscow poses a 'strong concern' for its national security.
Announcing the drills on Wednesday, Zhang Xiaogang, a spokesman for Beijing's defence ministry, criticised US Air Force drills with Japan and others in the western Pacific.
'The US has been blindly flexing its muscles in the Asia-Pacific region and attempting to use military drills as a pretext to gang up, intimidate and pressure other countries, and undermine peace and stability in the region,' Zhang claimed.
China and Russia have held military exercises together for more than two decades, with 'Joint Sea' exercises beginning in 2012.
However, their cooperation, which was once sporadic, has deepened considerably over the past decade, with Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping having met more than 40 times.
Mr Trump said his submarine order was made in response to what he called 'highly provocative' remarks by Mr Medvedev about the risk of war between the nuclear-armed adversaries.
Russia and the United States have by far the biggest nuclear arsenals in the world. It is extremely rare for either country to discuss the deployment and location of its nuclear submarines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is Trump building a political dynasty?
America has had its fair share of political dynasties – the Bushes, the Cheneys, the Kennedys – but has Donald Trump been quietly moulding his own family to become a political force long after he leaves office? Who from within the family fold could be a successor to the president? Or does Trump simply see the presidency as an opportunity to enrich himself and promote the Trump family brand? In this episode, reporter Rosie Gray paints a picture of Don Jr taking over from his father in politics. Dan Adler introduces us to the younger members of the Trump family, and why, in particular, the ever-silent Barron excites the Maga base so much. And Eric Cortellessa explains why Trump might not envisage a blood relative taking over from him at all – it could be a successful in-law. Archive: ABC News, Bloomberg News, Forbes, Fox News, Kai Trump YouTube, Newsweek, PBS Newshour, Theo Von
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK academics studying topics sensitive to China face harassment, survey finds
Academics and students of Chinese studies in Britain are being subject to harassment, surveillance and pressure to self-censor as they seek to avoid disruption to funding, a survey of universities by a transparency group has concluded. The findings by UK-China Transparency coincide with new government guidance stating that universities may be breaching rules by having partnerships with foreign governments that require academic staff to pass ideological tests – for example, by hosting Confucius Institutes. Academics working on topics that are politically sensitive to the Chinese Communist party (CCP) reported instances of harassment from colleagues and pressure from university administrators related to the financial consequences of damaging relations with China. One academic involved in sensitive research stopped teaching after experiencing harassment from a visiting scholar from China, who whispered 'we're watching you' in one case and interrogated the academic about their personal history at another event. Another scholar experienced a severe campaign of online harassment. A respondent stated that their Chinese students had confided in him that they had been asked to spy on campus events by Chinese police, and another said they were told by Chinese students that surveillance was omnipresent and that students were interviewed by officials on their return to China. The results suggest that the academic landscape is mixed, with some institutions demonstrating higher resilience and supporting scholars working on sensitive topics than others. They are based on 50 responses to a questionnaire circulated last year among China studies scholars working at UK universities. Nearly two-thirds – 64% – of respondents thought their universities' financial dependency on international students from China affected administrators' 'sense of the importance of relationships with the Chinese government', compared with 16% who felt that this was not the case. Twenty-two per cent said they had been told by a manager or administrator that relations with China were a factor in their institution's decision-making, and a further 10% said they believed they were, while 52% said they were not. And 38% thought these concerns made it 'more difficult to study or conduct original investigative research on sensitive issues', compared with 46% who said this was not the case. One academic said they had faced pressure to remove teaching elements that could offend nationalist Chinese students and had been asked by funders whether planned research would offend the Chinese government. The same academic said their university's recruitment team had received threats from the Chinese government in relation to their sensitive research. Another respondent said their faculty had been opposed to a sensitive event and another gave a secondhand account of an incident at another university where a research project had been cancelled and its funding returned because of Chinese government pressure on the university's management. Other respondents argued that specialising in sensitive research work created opportunities, with one respondent suggesting that in the current environment 'a strongly anti-Chinese stance' could create 'a stifling effect on those who wish to discuss nuance'. Another respondent said that 'sensitive topics are welcomed by some institutions but not others'. A Chinese embassy spokesperson said: 'The relevant report is completely groundless and absurd. China has always adhered to the principle of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs, and respects freedom of speech and academic freedom in the UK and other countries. China consistently requires its citizens, including overseas students, to abide by local laws and regulations. 'The relevant parties should remain committed to actions that promote educational and cultural exchanges and cooperation between China and the UK, rather than the opposite.' David Tobin, a lecturer in east Asian studies at the University of Sheffield, said the report was 'addressing long-term pervasive issues in British universities that I've encountered since 2007'. He said he had experienced one incident in a previous job where a senior colleague invited representatives from the Chinese consulate and Chinese state media journalists to visit. After being left to wander around the building unattended, he said they entered his working area and observed the sensitive material he was working with on his computer screen. 'The key challenge academics like myself researching subjects that are considered sensitive by the CCP is that our access to the field is blocked if we write about anything that the party state does not approve of,' Tobin said. 'Chinese scholars here are as afraid as they would be in China because they are not protected when they are at home and their families are harassed inside the PRC [China] if they write about the party system.'
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chinese university students told to spy on classmates, report says
Chinese students at UK universities are being pressured to spy on their classmates in an attempt to suppress the discussion of issues that are sensitive to the Chinese government, a new report UK-China Transparency (UKCT) think tank says its survey of academics in China studies also highlighted reports of Chinese government officials warning lecturers to avoid discussing certain topics in their comes days after a new law came into force placing more responsibility on universities to uphold academic freedom and free Chinese embassy in London called the report "groundless and absurd", adding that China respects freedom of speech in the UK and elsewhere. The regulator, the Office for Students (OfS), says freedom of speech and academic freedom are "fundamental" to higher new legislation, which came into force last week, says universities should do more to actively promote academic freedom and freedom of speech, including in cases where institutions have agreements in place with other could be fined millions if they fail to do so, the OfS has the UKCT report says some universities are reluctant to address the issue of Chinese interference because of their financial reliance on Chinese student fees. The report alleges that some Chinese academics involved in sensitive research had been denied visas by the Chinese government, while others said family members back in China had been harassed or threatened because of their work in the sensitive topics can range from science and tech to politics and humanities, the report says, such as alleged ethnic cleansing in China's Xinjiang region, the outbreak of Covid or the rise of Chinese technology academics reported intimidation by visiting scholars or other Chinese officials, as well as by staff at Confucius are partnership organisations operating at several UK universities, which bring together institutions in the UK and China, as well as a Chinese government agency which provides promote Chinese culture and language on UK campuses, but have been criticised over alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party. OfS chief executive Susan Lapworth previously said she expected Confucius Institutes to be looked into under the new free speech laws, over concerns that they could present a threat to free speech on OfS already has powers to ensure free speech is upheld by universities, including against any threats from the influence of foreign states or powers are due to be strengthened with a new complaints system, in which university staff members and visiting speakers will be able to raise issues directly with the regulator also said universities should amend or terminate any agreements which threatened free speech on campus, including scholarships or schemes funded by foreign BBC understands the OfS expects universities to have "an appropriate level of curiosity" about any such arrangements, regardless of any potential loss of income for the university.A Chinese embassy spokesperson said the country had always adhered to its policy of not interfering with other countries' internal the UKCT says its survey responses from academics suggested some students from China had told their lecturers they had been asked to spy on their peers by Chinese students, of various nationalities, reported being uncomfortable discussing issues in class deemed sensitive to the Chinese government, and were reluctant to pursue further academic interest in these subjects, the report Minister Jacqui Smith said any attempt by a foreign state to intimidate, harass or harm individuals in the UK "will not be tolerated". "We are also working directly with the Office for Students to support universities in safeguarding free speech and tackling any form of harassment on campus," she said academic freedom was "non-negotiable in our world-leading institutions", adding that the implementation of the new legislation made that "explicitly clear".The record £585,000 fine handed down by the OfS earlier this year has "put universities on notice" that they must do their part to protect these freedoms, she added, or they will "face the consequences".Additional reporting by Education Editor Branwen Jeffreys
