Who owns World Liberty Financial, the company that links Pakistan with Trump family
ADVERTISEMENT
According to official information from WLF, the company is primarily owned by DT Marks DEFI LLC, an entity affiliated with Donald Trump and some of his family members. DT Marks DEFI LLC holds approximately 60% of the equity interests in WLF Holdco LLC, the holding company that fully owns World Liberty Financial, Inc. WLF Inc. is a Delaware-based corporation responsible for developing the WLF blockchain protocol and operating its governance platform.
Despite the close ties through ownership, none of Donald Trump, his immediate family members, or executives associated with the Trump Organization hold direct management or operational roles at World Liberty Financial or WLF Holdco LLC, with one notable exception — Eric Trump serves as a manager on the board of WLF Holdco LLC. This limited managerial involvement highlights that day-to-day operations and strategic decisions may be carried out by professionals outside the Trump family.
DT Marks DEFI LLC and certain Trump family members also hold a significant stake in the company's native digital currency, $WLFI tokens. Reports indicate that they collectively own 22.5 billion tokens. Under a service agreement, DT Marks DEFI LLC is entitled to receive a large share of proceeds from the sale of these tokens, specifically 75% after deducting certain reserves and expenses.
ADVERTISEMENT WLF has faced scrutiny over its foreign investments and potential conflicts of interest. Chinese billionaire Justin Sun invested $30 million into WLF shortly after Trump's 2025 inauguration, and a subsequent SEC investigation into Sun was dropped. Additionally, a firm associated with the Abu Dhabi government invested $2 billion into WLF in 2025.The company's stablecoin, USD1, launched in March 2025, has been used in significant international transactions, including a $2 billion investment in the crypto exchange Binance by Abu Dhabi's MGX. This deal raised concerns among ethics experts about potential conflicts of interest.
ADVERTISEMENT World Liberty Financial recently signed a landmark deal with the Pakistan Crypto Council, a government-affiliated body aiming to develop the country's digital financial infrastructure. The deal outlines cooperation on blockchain innovation, stablecoin adoption, decentralized finance integration, and regulatory sandbox development.The partnership includes advisory roles from global crypto leaders such as Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder of Binance, indicating the ambition to position Pakistan as a significant hub in South Asia's crypto economy.
ADVERTISEMENT This deal is seen as part of a broader effort by Pakistan to accelerate its presence in the global digital finance arena. However, it also casts a spotlight on the Trump-linked WLF, bringing scrutiny regarding geopolitical and business interests intersecting in the emerging crypto space.
Also Read: Pakistan strikes deal with Trump family-backed crypto venture
ADVERTISEMENT WLF's operations have been criticized for blurring the lines between private enterprise and government policy. The New York Times described the company's activities as "eviscerating the boundary between private enterprise and government policy in a manner without precedent in modern American history." Critics argue that WLF's foreign investments and the Trump family's involvement raise questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of private business on public policy.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Volt face
Grim results of EV makers raise a question about viability The future of mobility is electric, and it should have been here by now, considering that Morris & Salom's Electrobat cars were running on Philadelphia's streets in 1894. In 1909, an electric car beat a gasoline car in Boston's busy traffic by 15 minutes. But electric cars are still at the 25% sales mark globally, and like most averages that figure is misleading. When 70% of all electric cars are made in China, and 65% are sold there, the picture looks distinctly ICE-y – short for internal combustion engine – for the rest of the world. Then consider market leader Tesla's woes. Its quarterly revenue has slumped. Half-yearly sales in Europe are down 33%. But more worrying for it is the drying carbon credits market under Trump. So far, Tesla's made billions selling these credits to makers of ICE cars. It earned $2.1bn from them in just the first nine months of 2024. Tesla also has to worry about the phase-out of the $7,500 tax credit for EV buyers in Sept. Carbon and tax credits are nothing but subsidies for the EV business in US and Europe, and the Chinese EV miracle was also built on subsidies. By some accounts, China spent $231bn over a decade to prop up the industry, which now has spare capacity of 3mn cars, leading to cut-throat competition at home and dumping outside. That raises an important question. If EVs have truly come of age, why do they need state support? In 1900, US had only 8,000 cars. By 1915, there were over 2mn. Henry Ford's Model T – launched for $850 in 1908 and priced at just $300 in 1917, thanks to economies of scale – brought the horseless revolution without any state help. It's time electric cars learnt to stand on their own four wheels. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Joy Taylor blasts Donald Trump over Epstein links just days after Fox firing amid sexual misconduct scandal
Joy Taylor takes a jab at Donald Trump over Epstein files (Getty Images) Just days after her departure from Fox Sports, Joy Taylor stirred public debate by weighing in on reports linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein 's files. Her pointed social media post signaled a bold return to the spotlight, suggesting she's no longer holding back when it comes to political commentary. Joy Taylor takes a jab at Donald Trump over Epstein files just days after Fox Sports firing On July 24, Joy Taylor reposted a story from Complex on her Instagram Stories revealing that Donald Trump had reportedly been notified by the Justice Department that his name appears in documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the late convicted sex offender. Alongside the post, Taylor wrote a biting caption: 'Water is wet.' The cryptic remark quickly caught fire online, with many interpreting it as a sarcastic confirmation that Trump's name showing up in such files was unsurprising — or perhaps long suspected. While Taylor didn't expand on her message, her decision to comment so soon after her Fox Sports departure suggests she's no longer interested in playing it safe in the public sphere. Joy Taylor's exit from FS1 followed sexual misconduct lawsuit and internal shakeups Taylor's social media moment arrives amid lingering questions surrounding her firing from FS1, where she co-hosted Speak with Keyshawn Johnson and Paul Pierce. Her name was recently included in a January sexual misconduct and discrimination lawsuit filed by former FS1 hairstylist Noushin Faraji. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The suit also named Skip Bayless and former executive Charlie Dixon, accusing Taylor of downplaying a groping allegation and mocking PTSD symptoms. Taylor has denied the accusations outright, calling them 'meritless and attention-seeking.' However, internal reviews reportedly uncovered additional concerns behind the scenes. Former FS1 host Cris Carter commented on the matter during a podcast appearance, saying, 'They had to tear all those shows down… That thing was ugly… Had to happen.' Donald Trump's Epstein ties spark renewed scrutiny amid political pushback Meanwhile, the Trump-Epstein connection continues to make headlines. A report from The Wall Street Journal claims that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump during a May briefing that his name had surfaced in DOJ files related to Epstein. The White House has dismissed the reports as 'fake news,' insisting that appearing in documents does not imply wrongdoing. Still, Joy Taylor's post suggests public figures are no longer willing to stay quiet — especially when they feel uncensored. Also Read: Joy Taylor's FOX Sports scandal: Everything about the backstage drama, show cancellations, and lawsuit that led to her exit FAQs 1. Why is Joy Taylor in the news after her Fox Sports exit? She posted a controversial reaction to reports linking Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, sparking political backlash. 2. What led to Joy Taylor's departure from Fox Sports? Taylor was named in a sexual misconduct and discrimination lawsuit, prompting a major shakeup at FS1. 3. Did Joy Taylor comment directly on Donald Trump? Yes, she shared a cryptic post seemingly mocking the resurfaced Epstein allegations involving Trump. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC cancels Rs 295 crore land payout order over bizman's fake claim
Noida: The Supreme Court has struck down a Rs 295-crore compensation award to Hyderabad-based businessman Reddy Veeranna, ruling that the payment was secured through fraudulent claims and a deliberate suppression of facts regarding land ownership in Noida. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A three-judge bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Ujjal Bhuyan set aside both the Allahabad high court's 2021 order and its own 2022 ruling that had granted enhanced compensation to Veeranna for land acquired in Sector 18. "The impugned order of the High Court dated October 28, 2021 passed in WP (Civil) 2272/2019 [Reddy Veeranna v State of Uttar Pradesh & ors] stands set aside, since fraud has vitiated the entire proceedings. As a corollary to the above, the judgment and order dated May 5, 2022 in Reddy Veerana (supra) (which too was obtained by playing fraud) is declared to be a nullity and stands recalled in exercise of our inherent powers," the court said in its order. The case revolves around over five bighas in Chhalera Banger village, jointly purchased in 1997 by Veeranna, Vishnu Vardhan, and T Sudhakar for Rs 1 crore. In 2005, Noida Authority partially acquired this land and later leased it to DLF for Rs 173 crore. The Mall of India now stands there. While the three co-owners initially contested the Authority's acquisition together, Veeranna subsequently began claiming exclusive ownership. He obtained a compromise decree from a trial court in 2006 — using a revoked power of attorney — which became the basis for recording his name as the sole owner in govt records. In 2019, Veeranna approached the high court, seeking enhanced compensation without making his co-owners party to the case. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The high court awarded him compensation at Rs 1.1 lakh per sqm. The Supreme Court not just upheld the HC order, but also removed a 50% development charge that had been deducted, raising Veeranna's total entitlement to around 360 crore. The payout eventually settled at 295 crore following discussions with the Authority. The apex court had, however, clarified then that it was not deciding on ownership. Vardhan, who claimed he was not informed about these proceedings, approached the SC in 2023, filing multiple petitions to challenge Veeranna's claim. He asserted that Veeranna had repeatedly misled the HC and SC, relying on an invalid decree procured through manipulation and concealment. In its judgment, the apex court found that Veeranna had consistently identified himself as a joint owner with Vishnu and Sudhakar in earlier proceedings, but abruptly changed his stance in 2019. The bench held that he had suppressed critical facts, including Vishnu's pending civil suit challenging the 2006 decree. "We have no hesitation to hold that Veeranna Reddy tailored a situation to suit his convenience by not impleading Vishnu as a party with the sole intention of obtaining an order in respect of not only the quantum of compensation payable for acquisition of the subject land but also a declaration as to his entitlement thereto — all, behind Vishnu's back. An attempt by Reddy to steal a march over Vishnu is clearly discernible which, without reference to anything more, does border on fraud," the court observed. The case has now been remanded in the high court for a fresh hearing of ownership and compensation with all parties present, including Vishnu and Sudhakar. While Veeranna has retained the compensation amount, he has furnished property securities worth Rs 295 crore through his firm Manyata-Pristine. It will remain deposited with the SC. Given the "magnitude of fraud", the SC has requested the high court chief justice to personally hear the case and conclude it preferably by the end of this year.
