A judge could advance Purdue Pharma's $7B opioid settlement after all 50 states back it
A judge on Wednesday is being asked to clear the way for local governments and individual victims to vote on it.
Government entities, emergency room doctors, insurers, families of children born into withdrawal from the powerful prescription painkiller, individual victims and their families and others would have until Sept. 30 to vote on whether to accept the deal, which calls for members of the Sackler family who own the company to pay up to $7 billion over 15 years.
If approved, the settlement would be among the largest in a wave of lawsuits over the past decade as governments and others sought to hold drugmakers, wholesalers and pharmacies accountable for the opioid epidemic that started rising in the years after OxyContin hit the market in 1996. The other settlements together are worth about $50 billion, and most of the money is to be used to combat the crisis.
In the early 2000s, most opioid deaths were linked to prescription drugs, including OxyContin. Since then, heroin and then illicitly produced fentanyl became the biggest killers. In some years, the class of drugs was linked to more than 80,000 deaths, but that number dropped sharply last year.
The request of U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Sean Lane comes about a year after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a previous version of Purdue's proposed settlement. The court found it was improper that the earlier iteration would have protected members of the Sackler family from lawsuits over opioids, even though they themselves were not filing for bankruptcy protection.
Under the reworked plan hammered out with lawyers for state and local governments and others, groups that don't opt in to the settlement would still have the right to sue members of the wealthy family whose name once adorned museum galleries around the world and programs at several prestigious U.S. universities.
Under the plan, the Sackler family members would give up ownership of Purdue. They resigned from the company's board and stopped receiving distributions from its funds before the company's initial bankruptcy filing in 2019. The remaining entity would get a new name and its profits would be dedicated to battling the epidemic.
Most of the money would go to state and local governments to address the nation's addiction and overdose crisis, but potentially more than $850 million would go directly to individual victims. That makes it different from the other major settlements.
The payouts would not begin until after a hearing scheduled for Nov. 10, during which Lane is to be asked to approve the entire plan if enough of the affected parties agree.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Emergency dispatch system impacted by heat in Baltimore during in-custody death, mayor says
Baltimore's emergency dispatch system failed due to the heat during a mental health response that ended with a man dying while in police custody, Mayor Brandon Scott confirmed. The failure of the Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system is under investigation, according to the mayor. Man dies while in Baltimore police custody The unidentified man died after being restrained by Baltimore police on June 24. According to a preliminary investigation by the attorney general's office, the man approached an officer who was in a patrol car stopped at a light. The incident occurred at the intersection of West Franklin Street and North Franklintown Road. While speaking to the officer, the man walked into the middle of the road several times, according to the AG's office. Officers put handcuffs and leg restraints on the man. He became unresponsive while he was restrained, and while police were waiting for medical personnel to arrive, the AG's office said. The AG's office noted that the incident began around 9:40 p.m., and by 10:30 p.m., EMS had still not arrived at the scene. The officers transported the man to a hospital in a patrol vehicle. He was pronounced dead the following day. During a review of dispatch audio, WJZ Investigates learned that the officer was asked several times if an ambulance had arrived. The Attorney General's Independent Investigations Division (IID) is still investigating the incident. Police dispatch system failure According to Mayor Scott, the failure of CAD is under investigation by the Baltimore Police Department. "We know that technology systems fail," the mayor said. "We are investigating what happened with that particular incident and how that played a part in the unfortunate incident that happened." "...That's all a part of the investigation, to go back and see exactly what happened, who did what, what happened with the system," he added. Scott emphasized that the city has backup systems in place. "There are backup procedures and things that are in place, and a part of the investigation is to go back and look and see how those were used in this situation as well," Scott said. WJZ reached out to Baltimore Police for further comment.


Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Big Beautiful Bill' Raises Threat of Default for Litigation Asset-Backed Securities
Legislation tucked inside President Donald Trump's landmark tax bill could make it difficult for asset-backed securities tied to litigation funding to make timely interest payments, according to a note by Kroll Bond Rating Agency. The Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act, which is part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act currently in the Senate, would impose substantial new taxes on profits from third-party litigation funding, says the June 27 note by authors including Joanne DeSimone and Zara Shirazi.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia stock just hit an all-time high. So could it still make sense to buy?
This year has been anything but boring so far for Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) shareholders. The Nvidia stock price has soared 66% in under two months to hit an all-time high in today's (3 July) US market session. That means that the chip company's stock now trades 1,572% higher than five years ago. That is the sort of return that would leave many investors laughing all the way to the bank. Looking at it, I wonder whether I am too late to start buying Nvidia stock now – or if it may move even higher in future. Let us begin with the current valuation. Nvidia stock is changing hands for 52 times earnings. That is definitely on the high side in my view of what constitutes value, even for a growth stock. In fact, that valuation alone means I am not willing to buy at the current price. However, while I think it is high, I do not think it is ridiculous. Some growth stocks trade on a three-figure P/E ratio. Tesla is an example – but Nvidia's short- to medium-term business growth prospects look better than Tesla's, in my view. One of the wildcards in all of this is Nvidia's earnings. Over the past five years, the company's basic earnings per share (EPS) have grown a staggering 2,700%. So, in one sense, Nvidia stock is actually cheaper now than it was five years back. Sure, the stock price has jumped 1,572%. But that is markedly lower than the growth in basic earnings per share. I see this as a wildcard because earnings movements are a critical factor in deciding what a fair share price might be. If Nvidia continues to grow EPS sharply – even at a far slower rate than before – its prospective P/E ratio could be far less than 52. Even the current share price could then turn out to be a long-term bargain. But what if recent earnings are a one-off blip due to high expenditure by firms on building AI infrastructure? Should that turn out to be the case – and there is a risk it will – the prospective P/E ratio could be much higher than 52. That may mean that Nvidia stock falls to a price far below its current record-setting level. Valuation is important because overpaying even for a great business can be a costly mistake. I see a lot to like about Nvidia. It is hugely profitable, has unique expertise, and proprietary designs, and is selling high-margin chips to a large installed customer base. I reckon that could mean the share moves even higher and of course I would like to benefit from that. But so I do not get carried away, I also need to feel comfortable with the margin of safety a share price offers me. Tariff disputes and growing competition are both risks to Nvidia's sales, alongside an unclear medium-term outlook for AI chip demand. So, at the current price, I am not willing to buy Nvidia stock. The post Nvidia stock just hit an all-time high. So could it still make sense to buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Nvidia and Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio