
‘This bill protects our precious waters': how a Florida environmental group scored a win against big oil
The Florida state congressman Jason Shoaf remembers how the threat affected the bay.
'It harmed our commercial fishing, aquaculture operations, and just the threat of oil kept tourists away for months,' Shoaf recalls. 'Businesses were forced to close, jobs were lost, and the disaster reshaped our region forever.'
Those memories were freshly triggered in April 2024, when the Florida department of environmental protection (DEP) granted a permit to Louisiana-based Clearwater Land and Minerals for exploratory oil drilling on the Apalachicola River basin. So area residents, along with environmental and business groups, formed a Kill the Drill coalition to oppose the permit.
A year later, the coalition's efforts and an administrative challenge to the DEP's permit by the non-profit Apalachicola Riverkeepers prevailed when Judge Lawrence P Stevenson recommended the department deny the permit.
In May, the DEP reversed course and denied the permit.
But that was not enough to convince those seeking to preserve the region's environment. Shoaf, who represents Florida's north-eastern Gulf coast region, applauded the DEP's decision but says the threat of oil exploration and drilling near north Florida's inland waterways would only be ended by a permanent ban. So to prevent future threats and the DEP from issuing other oil exploratory drilling permits, Shoaf and state representative Allison Tant co-authored House Bill 1143.
'While the permit to Clearwater Land and Minerals was denied, we can't assume the next one will be,' Shoaf says. 'HB 1143 protects our precious water resources and the ecosystems that depend on them by prohibiting drilling, exploration and production of oil, gas and other petroleum products within 10 miles of a national estuarine research reserve in counties designated as rural areas of opportunity. It also requires the Florida department of environmental protection to ensure natural resources are adequately protected in the event of an accident.'
In April, the legislature overwhelmingly passed HB 1143 with only one dissenting vote in the Senate. It was presented to Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, on 18 June. And, despite a poor recent record on protecting the environment, DeSantis signed the bill last week – handing the coalition that lobbied for it a cheering victory.
The area now saved from the oil industry is invaluable both to nature and the people who live there. The Apalachicola River, formed by the meeting of the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers, flows 160 miles (258km) to the Apalachicola Bay and the Gulf. Both the river and bay are critical to the region's tourism and seafood production industries.
For environmental campaigners, the success of their efforts might help lay to rest the ghosts of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion, which released nearly 3.19m barrels of oil into the gulf.
'Oil from the BP spill didn't reach our coasts, but the damage caused by the threat was enough,' Tant says. 'We've seen what can happen. We've lived it. This is not theoretical. It was a perilous time for small businesses and for those who lived in the area. It stopped tourism and shuttered small businesses. So it defies logic to think it's a good idea to drill for oil along the Apalachicola River.'
Adrianne Johnson is executive director of the Florida Shellfish Aquaculture Association which represents more than 350 shellfish farmers in Florida. Johnson, an Apalachicola native, became involved in the Kill the Drill movement for personal and business reasons.
'This region has a deep collective memory of how the Gulf oil spill devastated the regional economy and collapsed the oyster industry in Apalachicola Bay,' Johnson explains. 'And that was just the threat of oil. The majority of the state's oyster farms operate across Wakulla, Franklin and Gulf counties, and these areas downriver would be most impacted by oil drilling upriver (at the proposed site in Calhoun county). If there were to be a spill upriver because of drilling in the basin, it would have catastrophic environmental and economic impacts on the area that would be felt for generations.'
Johnson also points to the region's frequent weather-related natural disasters, such as hurricanes, as another reason why drilling had to be banned in the region.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
'Our shellfish farmers are still recovering from the multiple hurricanes of 2024,' she explains. 'But the reality of being a Florida farmer is having to contend with these weather-related events. Hurricanes and natural disasters are outside of our control. Permitting oil drilling in ecologically sensitive areas is very much within our control and is an unnecessary threat to our industry.'
Tant agrees.
'We are a hurricane-prone state,' she says. 'We can't get away from that. It's not a question of will we get hit by a hurricane because we know it's going to happen. But an oil spill caused by a hurricane would make the disaster 100 times worse.'
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa), the Deep Horizon oil spill caused the loss of 8.3 billion oysters, the deaths of nearly 105,400 sea birds, 7,600 adult and 160,000 juvenile sea turtles, and a 51% decrease in dolphins in Louisiana's Barataria Bay.
Craig Diamond, current board member and past president of Apalachicola Riverkeeper, says another factor behind the ban was the river system itself.
'A spill would be highly impactful given the existing stresses in the system,' says Diamond, who has worked with the Northwest Florida Water Management District and taught graduate courses on water resources at Florida State University. 'Apalachicola Bay Riverkeeper and its allies believe the long-term risks of fossil fuel exploitation in the floodplain or bay (or nearshore) far outweigh the short-term benefits.'
Shoaf says he was inspired to write HB 1143 by the community's grassroots efforts to defend the region's natural resources.
'This bill is essential to prevent unnecessary and irreparable harm to Apalachicola Bay, as well as the economies and ecosystems that depend on it,' he says.
After DeSantis signed the bill into law, the threat of drilling has now receded into the distance for the foreseeable future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lawyers for MyPillow CEO fined thousands over error-strewn AI court filing about defamation case
Attorneys for MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell have been fined thousands of dollars over an error-strewn court filing written using artificial intelligence in his defamation case. A federal judge in the U.S. District Court in Denver, Colorado, ordered two lawyers for Lindell to pay $3,000 each, after they used AI to file a document that cited nonexistent cases and misquoted case law, according to the Colorado Sun. Judge Nina Wang ruled Monday that Christopher Kachouroff and Jennifer DeMaster violated court rules when they filed the motion, which included almost 30 inaccurate citations. 'Notwithstanding any suggestion to the contrary, this Court derives no joy from sanctioning attorneys who appear before it,' Wang said in her ruling. She added that the fines were 'the least severe sanction adequate to deter and punish defense counsel in this instance.' Lindell's defamation case came to an end last month when a jury found him liable for defamation after falsely claiming the 2020 presidential election was rigged. The document filed by the defense in the case misquoted court precedents and emphasized legal principles that weren't connected to the cases cited, the ruling stated. Kachouroff admitted during a pretrial hearing that he had used AI to write the motion. While he said that the motion was a draft filed by accident, Wang wrote that the final version the lawyer said was the right one still had 'substantive errors,' including several mistakes that were not in the motion originally filed. Wang said it was the lawyers' 'contradictory statements and the lack of corroborating evidence' that prompted the judge to think the filing of the motion created by generative AI wasn't 'an inadvertent error' and was worthy of a sanction. Wang also addressed the allegation from Kachouroff that the court was trying to 'blindside' him over the mistakes. The judge said the accusation was 'troubling and not well-taken.' 'Neither Mr. Kachouroff nor Ms. DeMaster provided the Court any explanation as to how those citations appeared in any draft of the Opposition absent the use of generative artificial intelligence or gross carelessness by counsel,' said Wang. The violating motion was filed on February 25 in response to a previous motion by a former director at Dominion Voting Systems, Eric Coomer, who alleged Lindell defamed him by spreading the conspiracy theory that Coomer helped rig the 2020 election. The federal jury in Denver ruled in favor of Coomer on June 16. The initial lawsuit was filed in May 2022 against Lindell, MyPillow, and FrankSpeech, another company owned by Lindell. He was ordered to pay $2.3 million in damages. Coomer had asked for $62.7 million, USA Today noted. Wang asked Kachouroff during a pretrial conference if the motion had been 'generated by generative artificial intelligence?' 'Not initially. Initially, I did an outline for myself, and I drafted a motion, and then we ran it through AI,' said Kachouroff. He told Wang that he had delegated the citation checking to DeMaster, according to the court order. Wang subsequently asked the attorney if he had double-checked the 'citations once it was run through artificial intelligence?' 'Your Honor, I personally did not check it. I am responsible for it not being checked,' said Kachouroff.


BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump meets with Netanyahu amid Gaza ceasefire talks
US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met on Tuesday evening for the second time in as many days to discuss the ongoing war in meeting comes after Trump's Middle East envoy Steven Witkoff said Israel and Hamas could be close to agreeing on a 60-day ceasefire arrived at the White House shortly after 17:00 EST on Tuesday (00:00 GMT on Wednesday) for the meeting, which was not open to members of the on Tuesday, Netanyahu met with vice-president JD Vance. He also met with Trump for several hours during a dinner at the White House on Monday. It marks Netanyahu's third state visit to the US since Trump's second term. Netanyahu also met with the Republican House of Representative Speaker Mike Johnson. After that meeting, the Israeli Prime Minister said he did not believe Israel's military campaign in Gaza was done, but that negotiators are "certainly working" on a ceasefire."We still have to finish the job in Gaza, release all our hostages, eliminate and destroy Hamas' military and government capabilities," Netanyahu later said that Israel and Hamas were closing the gap on issues that previously prevented them from reaching a deal, and that he hoped a temporary, 60-day ceasefire will be agreed on this added that the draft deal would also include the release of 10 hostages who are alive, and the bodies of nine who are told reporters on Monday evening that ceasefire talks are "going very well". But Qatar, which has played a mediator role in negotiations, said on Tuesday morning that more time was needed for negotiations. "I don't think that I can give any timeline at the moment, but I can say right now that we will need time for this," Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari they met for dinner on Monday, Trump and Netanyahu were asked about Israeli and US proposals suggested earlier this year to permanently relocate Palestinians from said he had co-operation for this from countries neighbouring Israel, while Netanyahu said he was working with the US on finding countries that will "give Palestinians a better future"."If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave," Netanyahu to force Palestinians out of Gaza has been met by condemnation from the UN, Arab leaders, human rights organisations, and Western countries, led by Egypt, have suggested an alternative plan involving massive reconstruction in Gaza while Palestinians stay there in temporary housing UN has warned that the deportation or forcible transfer of an occupied territory's civilian population is strictly prohibited under international law and "tantamount to ethnic cleansing".Before discussions resumed on Tuesday, a Palestinian source familiar with the talks told the BBC they have not made any latest round of negotiations between Hamas and Israel began on Sunday. The ongoing Gaza war began on 7 October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed at least 57,500 in Gaza according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Musk's feud with Trump has cost him billions
Elon Musk has lost $20 billion and his investors over $100 billion, since his public split with Donald Trump last month, according to an Axios analysis. The financial decline coincides with disappointing performance from Tesla, including a stock price slide and a 14 percent drop in second-quarter deliveries. The disagreement between Musk and Trump was rooted in Musk's opposition to the administration's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' spending package. Musk had previously spent over $250 million to support Trump's election, which initially saw Musk's wealth soar to $400 billion by December 2024. The deepening feud could pose significant risks to Musk's companies, Tesla and SpaceX, which are heavily reliant on federal regulation and government contracts.