
Appeals court reinstates 19-year jail term, whipping for man who raped, assaulted sister
A three-member bench, led by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah, allowed the prosecution's appeal to overturn the High Court's earlier decision, which had reduced the sentence to nine years' imprisonment and seven strokes of the cane.
The other judges on the panel were Justices Datuk Mohamed Zaini Mazlan and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin.
The man, who was 17 at the time of the first offence, had pleaded guilty at the Sessions Court to raping his sister in a flat in Jalan Ipoh, Kuala Lumpur, at night, sometime between 2018 and 2019.
He also pleaded guilty to a second charge of sexually assaulting her at the same location on June 12, 2021, when he was 20 years old.
In January 2022, the Sessions Court sentenced him to eight years' imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane for the rape offence, along with an additional two years' jail and two strokes under Section 16(1) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017.
For the 2021 sexual assault offence, the court imposed eight years' imprisonment and five strokes of the cane, plus an additional one year and two strokes under the same law.
The Sessions Court ordered all sentences to run consecutively, bringing the total sentence to 19 years' imprisonment and 19 strokes of the cane.
The court also directed that the accused undergo counselling throughout his imprisonment and be placed under police supervision for two years after his release.
However, in September 2022, the High Court reduced the sentence for the rape charge from eight years to five, set aside the 10 strokes of the cane, and removed the additional punishment under Section 16(1) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017.
However, the High Court maintained the sentences for the sexual assault offence and ordered the sentences for both offences to run concurrently, resulting in a total sentence of nine years' imprisonment and seven strokes of the cane.
During today's proceedings, deputy public prosecutor Tengku Shahrizam Tuan Lah argued that the sentence imposed by the High Court for the rape offence was manifestly inadequate as under Section 376(3) of the Penal Code, the offence carries a maximum sentence of 30 years' imprisonment and a minimum of 10 strokes of the cane.
He submitted that the High Court judge had erred by failing to consider the seriousness of the offence, particularly as it involved siblings.
Meanwhile, lawyer Khor Boon How, representing the man, urged the court to maintain the sentence handed down by the High Court, noting that his client was still considered a minor when he committed the rape offence.
He argued that reinstating the original sentence imposed by the Sessions Court would deprive his client of the opportunity to spend his formative years contributing to society.
– Bernama
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
S'gor police open inquiry paper to identify crimes linked to eHATI
SHAH ALAM: The police have confirmed that an inquiry paper has been opened to identify any criminal offence linked to the eHATI marriage motivation programme. Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan said several witnesses will be called soon to obtain confirmation include the use of water that allegedly caused hallucinations. "Currently, information has only been obtained from third parties and the police will call up any individual involved to prove whether there criminal offences exist. "As such, the police will open an investigation paper to secure direct statements and confirmation about the use of certain water or other offences under the Penal Code," he said when contacted today. He said the police are working with the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) according to their jurisdictions to obtain vital facts about the allegations against eHATI. Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari was reported to have asked Jais to look into allegations of immoral activities occurring during the organisation of eHATI programmes at a convention centre here and Jais director Datuk Mohd Shahzihan Ahmad issued a statement stating that the case was being investigated under Section 7 of the Syariah Criminal Offences (Selangor) Enactment 1995.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Bukit Aman probes leaked JAC meeting minutes amid police investigation
KUALA LUMPUR: Police have launched an investigation into the alleged leak of minutes from a Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) meeting that circulated widely on social media. Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail stated that Bukit Aman's Criminal Investigation Department (CID) is handling the case under multiple laws, including the Official Secrets Act 1972. The leaked document, believed to be from a May JAC meeting, first appeared on Reddit before spreading across Facebook and X. Mohd Khalid warned the public against sharing classified information, stressing that offenders would face legal consequences. Authorities are scrutinising the exposure and dissemination of the document both internally and online. 'All competent witnesses will be called to assist investigations,' he said in a statement. The case is being investigated under Section 8 of the Official Secrets Act, Section 203A of the Penal Code, and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. – Bernama


Malaysian Reserve
3 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Bukit Aman to look into alleged leaked JAC meeting minutes
KUALA LUMPUR — Police have confirmed that they are looking into the alleged leaked minutes of a Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) meeting that went viral on social media after a police report was lodged regarding the matter. Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail said the investigation is being handled by the Bukit Aman Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Classifed Crimes Investigation Unit. 'The case is classified under Section 8 of the Officlal Secrets Act, SEction 203A of the PEnal Code and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998,' he said in a statement today. The focus of the investigation is on the expose and spread of information internally and on social media, he said, adding that all competent witnesses would be called to assist investigations. Mohd Khalid also advised the public not to reveal any classified documents or information as those involved would face stern action. The alleged leaked minutes are purportedly from a JAC meeting that took place in May, and was believed to have originated from Reddit before it went viral on Facebook and X yesterday. — BERNAMA