US Simulates ICBM Attack by Nuclear-Armed North Korea
The missile defense simulation was conducted during Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll's visit to Fort Greely. Newsweek has contacted the U.S. Army for further comment by email.
The North Korean Embassy in China did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
North Korea is one of the nine nations armed with nuclear weapons, and the country has an estimated 50 warheads. In October last year, it test-launched an ICBM that has a potential range of up to 9,320 miles, an expert said, capable of launching a nuclear attack on the U.S. mainland.
The U.S. has established the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system to defend the homeland against North Korean ICBM attacks. A total of 64 interceptor silos were built at Fort Greely and Vandenberg Space Force Base in California for targeting incoming missiles.
The Trump administration is pushing for the so-called "Iron Dome for America," a next-generation missile defense shield that will defend against the threat of attack by ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, as well as other advanced aerial attacks.
Driscoll visited two bases in Alaska, Fort Wainwright and Fort Greely, from April 23 to 24, according to photos released by the U.S. Army Public Affairs Office on its Flickr account.
During his visit at Fort Greely, the secretary "received a briefing on the GMD missile crew tactics, techniques, and procedures utilized by the crews operating the GMD Fire Control System during a simulated ICBM attack against the United States," the U.S. Army revealed.
John Plumb, who served as assistant secretary of defense for space policy from 2022 to 2024, said in a speech in April last year that the GMD is designed to protect the homeland, including Hawaii and Alaska, against ICBM threats from North Korea and potentially Iran.
However, the GMD is neither intended for, nor capable of, defeating what it called "the large and sophisticated ICBM, air-, or sea-launched ballistic missile threats" from both Russia and China, said the 2022 Missile Defense Review, which is the Pentagon's strategic document.
Russia and China each possess hundreds of long-range ballistic missile launchers, while the North Korean ICBM force's operational status remains uncertain due to untrustworthy or limited public sources, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
According to a military observer on X, formerly Twitter, several photos show Driscoll inspecting what appears to be a Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) storage facility, where two interceptors were placed.
The GBI is a missile equipped with a payload, also known as the kill vehicle, which will be released in space toward the warhead carried by an ICBM, using the kinetic force of the direct collision to destroy the target warhead, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said.
The 2022 Missile Defense Review read: "Missile defense systems such as the GMD offer a visible measure of protection for the U.S. population while reassuring Allies and partners that the United States will not be coerced by threats to the homeland from states like North Korea and potentially Iran … Should deterrence fail, missile defenses can help mitigate damage to the homeland and help protect the U.S. population."
The U.S. Missile Defense Agency said: "The midcourse phase begins when the enemy missile's booster burns out and it begins coasting in space toward its target. This phase can last as long as 20 minutes, allowing several opportunities to destroy the incoming ballistic missile outside the earth's atmosphere. Any debris remaining after the intercept will burn up as it enters the atmosphere."
It remains to be seen whether the U.S. will further expand its missile defense system to cope with the threats posed by its nuclear adversaries to its homeland and overseas military bases.
Related Articles
Houthis Issue New Warning to Vessels Shipping US Weapons to IsraelPhotos Show US Launching Dark Eagle Hypersonic MissileUS Expands F-16 Threat Against North KoreaUS Warns Houthis it Will Increase Pressure After Hundreds of Airstrikes
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
41 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran to Hold Nuclear Talks With 3 European Countries
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Leaders from Iran, Germany, France, and Britain are finalizing plans to discuss Tehran's nuclear program, a major source of global tension, "in the coming week," a German diplomatic source told Newsweek on Sunday. Newsweek has reached out to press representatives for France, Britain, and Iran via email for comment on Sunday. Why It Matters Iran's nuclear program has long been a source of international concern. In 2015, Iran and several world powers including France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), an agreement aimed at limiting Tehran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. The JCPOA is set to expire in October. The United States withdrew from the accord in 2018 under the Trump administration, reimposing sanctions and reigniting diplomatic friction. Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is intended for civilian purposes, while the U.S. and some of its allies like Israel have accused Tehran of seeking nuclear weapons capability. Tensions spiked again last month when the U.S. conducted airstrikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, prompting Iranian retaliation with a strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar. What To Know The three European countries, known as the E3, "are in contact with Iran to arrange further talks in the coming week," a German diplomatic source told Newsweek in an email Sunday. Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported a source informed on the matter, saying, "The principle of talks has been agreed upon, but consultations are continuing on the time and place of the talks. The country in which the talks could be held next week has not been finalized." The organization of talks with E3 leaders and Iran comes just days after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held discussions with French, German and European Union (EU) officials. That was the first formal call since the Israel-Iran war. A German diplomatic source told Newsweek that "Iran must never possess nuclear weapons." They added: "Regarding the Iranian nuclear program, a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution that addresses the security interests of the international community is essential." The source continued: "If such a solution is not achieved by the end of the summer, the snapback mechanism will remain an option for the E3. We continue to coordinate closely with our E3 and U.S. partners on this issue." The E3 have warned they will trigger a "snapback" of sanctions on Iran by the end of summer if Tehran does not make progress on a nuclear deal. The snapback mechanism embedded in the 2015 deal allows sanctions to be reimposed if Tehran is found noncompliant. Washington and Tehran held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman this year. Talks halted after Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion," a military campaign against Iran that it said was meant to preempt a reportedly planned Iranian attack and disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities. The war intensified when the U.S. joined and bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, in the largest B-2 operation in U.S. history. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attends the 17th annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on July 7. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attends the 17th annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on July 7. AP Photo/Eraldo Peres What People Are Saying Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said earlier this week: "If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground." French President Emmanuel Macron said last month: "We don't want Iran to get a nuclear weapon. But the biggest error would be to use military strikes to change the regime because it would then be chaos and our responsibility is to return discussions as quickly as possible to be able to set a course again on the nuclear and ballistic question." What Happens Next? Details regarding the place and timing of the talks are still being finalized. Tasnim reported that the talks would be carried out by the foreign ministers of the four countries.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Former Obama speechwriter David Litt on finding neutral ground
Author David Litt, whose new book is called "It's Only Drowning: A True Story of Learning to Surf and the Search for Common Ground," knows plenty about the ways of Washington, and the workings of human nature: What happens when a former Obama speechwriter and a Joe Rogan superfan start surfing together? Well, if you're me, and the superfan is my brother-in-law Matt, what happens is this: You learn that in our divided country, "common ground" is even harder to find than you thought. But "neutral ground" is more important than you imagined. For a long time, Matt and I had basically nothing in common. He's an electrician who owns a pickup truck for work; I'm a writer who owns two computer monitors for work. He listens to death metal; I listen to Stephen Sondheim. Matt once threw out his back training to be a mixed-martial arts fighter, and I once threw out my back picking up a bag of cat litter. But Matt's a surfer, and during the pandemic, I started surfing, too. We began spending time together in the water, and even set our sights on a trip to Oahu's famously dangerous North Shore. I imagined that our journey would reveal the common ground you hear so much about these days. Nope! We still have basically nothing in common. We disagree about little stuff, like music and food. We disagree about big stuff, like voting and vaccines. But what we discovered is that our disagreements don't have to mean everything. The ocean became our neutral ground, a place where we could spend time together focused on something other than our differences. We learned from each other. We broadened each other's horizons. We became friends. And that friendship has led to real discussions – not just debates or arguments – on issues where we don't see eye-to-eye. That's more important than ever. As my old boss used to say, we have to be able to "disagree without being disagreeable." So, if there's someone in your life who you're afraid to talk with about political stuff – and these days, everything seems like political stuff – here's my advice: Find your neutral ground. Be open to unlikely friendships. Be willing to learn from someone, even if it's someone you don't fully understand. And also, if you're picking up a bag of cat litter, lift with your legs, not your back. For more info: Story produced by Annie Iezzi. Editor: Emanuele Secci.
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
Exclusive: Democrat on Bipartisan Push to Undo Part of 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, has introduced legislation that would restore the 100 percent deduction for gambling losses that Senate Republicans reduced to 90 percent late in the passing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB). Titus spoke with Newsweek about her Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation (FAIR BET) Act, which she says so far has garnered "10 times the response" from constituents in her state and beyond compared to other aspects of the OBBB. Republican Representatives including Troy Nehls of Texas and Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, also support Titus' bill. Why It Matters The roughly 900-page bill passed by Congress included a provision inserted by Senate Republicans without consent of the House that imposed a tax increase on Americans who gamble, reducing from 100 percent to 90 percent the amount of losses they can deduct from gambling winnings for their income taxes. The new provision, added by the Senate Finance Committee late in the legislative process ahead of the July 4 bill signing by President Donald Trump, means that gambling losses that have traditionally been fully deductible would no longer be so and gamblers could owe taxes even if they ended up with net losses in a year. For example, someone winning $100,000 and then losing that same amount may still owe $10,000 in taxes on that income—even though they broke even. What To Know Titus, in an exclusive interview, said the issue has drawn more widespread attention on the OBBB compared to other scrutinized portions of the legislation, such as Medicaid and food stamp cuts. "We've certainly heard from the industry, they've all kind of now gotten on board," Titus said. "But I can tell you that we put out a lot of messages about that big, bad BS bill and we talked about Medicaid, we talked about food stamps, we talked about renewable energy, but this issue has gotten 10 times the response than any of those have." The congresswoman continued: "I think it's people who are on the internet, I think it's young people who found an issue that they can kind of identify with. And I don't think it's just limited to the people directly impacted by gaming in Nevada. It's a national issue because now everybody can gamble on their phone, and so they're writing in, they're texting in, they're calling in to say, 'We should fix this.'" Titus said she "found it hard to believe" that some Republican senators were unaware of this provision in the bill's final version. She doesn't believe it was inserted from an ideological or partisan standpoint, however, but rather based on tax policy. "Let's just make it clear these are not just high rollers, these are not just the big professional poker players who itemize," she said. "Think how many people bet on a football game or bet on their phone, and how much they advertise some of the sports betting apps. These are just ordinary people who bet." Titus added: "It's not fair...I don't think people are going to say, 'I'm not going to gamble,' but what they may say is, 'Why would I itemize? Why would I turn this in if I'm going to have to pay tax on losses?'" Gambling losses up to the amount of one's winnings can be claimed but only if one itemizes their deductions. However, most don't do that because they opt for the standard deduction and better tax break. Titus also has a front-row seat to the benefits of the gaming industry, noting how cities like Las Vegas are important economically. People travel to gamble, spend on dining and shows, or just to watch poker championships—the "full ambiance" as she described. "They're going to go gamble on unregulated sources, whether it's offshore or the black market or the predictions market that's coming on so strong," Titus said. "Those entities don't pay taxes to the state, they don't invest in brick and mortar, they don't hire good union labor. In that sense it also hurts industry and a community's economy." Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, tells Newsweek why she introduced the FAIR BET Act to restore the 100 percent deduction for gambling losses that Senate Republicans reduced to 90 percent in the One Big... Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, tells Newsweek why she introduced the FAIR BET Act to restore the 100 percent deduction for gambling losses that Senate Republicans reduced to 90 percent in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. More Americans Overwhelmingly Support Gambling In its August 2024 report on Americans' attitudes towards gambling, the American Gaming Association (AGA) said than half of all American adults (55 percent) participated in some form of gambling in the previous 12 months. Roughly 122 million adult Americans, or 49 percent of the population, visited a casino for gambling or other entertainment purposes in that span—the highest level of casino visitation on record. Nearly nine-in-10 (88 percent) Americans find casino gambling to be acceptable for themselves or others, the research found, with 59 percent of Americans finding gambling personally acceptable—another an all-time high. The AGA represents major trade partners including Churchill Downs, DraftKings, MGM Resorts International and other big companies online and in casinos. A gaming industry source told Newsweek that there is support for Titus' legislation, adding that lawmakers or the Trump administration did not convey why this provision was included in the final bill. "This could potentially have a very direct impact on a professional gambler or a very high-volume recreational gambler who chooses to itemize committed to working with Representative Titus, as well as her co-sponsors in the House," the source said. Asked if Titus' bill is unsuccessful, the source said there's time to make legislative fixes between now and the spring of 2027 when people go to file their taxes for their prior calendar year. "We're motivated to get this done," they said. Financial Hit to Nevada Efforts in the Senate, led by Democratic Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, sought unanimous consent to restore the full deduction for gambling losses. That was unsuccessful. Cortez Masto told Newsweek that she will continue to explore all options available to restore the 100 percent dedication for gambling losses and protect Nevada's gaming and hospitality industries. "Republicans' hastily put-together bill is full of provisions that are completely counterproductive and harmful to Americans," the senator said. "The provision limiting the wagering loss deduction will have a negative impact on Nevada, and it's one of the many reasons I voted no." What People Are Saying Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, in a statement to Newsweek: "The Republican budget would kneecap sports and gambling by making Americans pay taxes on gambling losses. This is deeply unfair. I'm proud to introduce the FAIR BET Act with Rep. Titus to restore the 100 percent tax deduction for gaming losses." Professional poker player Daniel Negreanu told "I'm going to do everything I can to help make sure this isn't a reality or a problem. And when I say everything, I mean everything. This law would be, as I understand good at all. I'm going to reach out to people who are smarter than me on this. And then take measures to see if I can help in any way. And hopefully I can." Rufus Peabody, a professional sports bettor, told The Wall Street Journal: "More likely than not, I would owe more money in taxes than I actually made in 2026 if I continue betting. And so, as it stands, it becomes untenable to be a professional gambler." Phil Galfond, a professional poker player, wrote on social media: "This new amendment to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would end professional gambling in the US and hurt casual gamblers, too," "You could pay more in tax than you won." What Happens Next The tax deduction change is going into effect on January 1, 2026, unless modified sooner by Congress. It won't affect Americans' tax returns until after that date. Titus said the timeframe provides "a little bit of breathing room" for changes to take hold.
