Real-Time Payments and the Future of Cross-Border Transactions: What Businesses Need to Know: By Parminder Saini
Waiting days or weeks for international payments to clear used to be the norm. That's no longer the case. Real-time payments are closing the gap between different economies, with financial activity now moving faster than it ever has. In many cases, the speed of transfers now determines how well a platform performs, how smoothly a sale goes through, or how long a user sticks around.
Cross-border transactions were traditionally slow, costly, and opaque. But the rise of real-time payments (RTP) is changing that. With near-instant transfers, standardized messaging protocols like ISO 20022, and fintech-led innovations, businesses now operate in a faster, more transparent financial environment. Real-time settlement across jurisdictions reduces reliance on intermediaries, slashes fees, and strengthens trust. Whether it's B2B payments or gig economy payouts, RTP is the future of global money movement.
Digital entertainment platforms that operate outside a user's home country rely on real-time payments to stay competitive. Streaming sites, international gaming platforms, and even gambling platforms have made this shift out of necessity.
How Real-Time Payments Are Transforming Cross-Border Business
Real-time payments are revolutionizing cross-border transactions with instant settlements, better transparency, and reduced costs. Learn how your business can benefit.
Faster settlements : Transactions that used to take 2–5 days now clear in seconds or minutes.
Enhanced transparency : ISO 20022 enables standardized messaging and better tracking.
Lower transaction costs : RTP reduces dependency on SWIFT and intermediary banks.
Improved liquidity : Real-time access to funds enhances cash flow and working capital.
Global adoption: Markets like EU, Singapore, UK, and India are embracing RTP for global trade.
For instance, fish gambling games are interactive, shooter-style games that offer huge win potential, with significant multiplier prizes and big payout opportunities. You rack up wins by aiming at high-value fish, and when those multipliers hit, the rewards can spike fast. That kind of instant excitement only works if the payments keep up. A review of fish game gambling sites shows that these platforms typically support flexible, fast payment methods like crypto, e-wallets, and even prepaid cards to make sure players get their money without delay. If withdrawals are slow or deposits fail to reflect instantly, users tend to leave. In spaces where there are dozens of alternatives, there's little tolerance for delays.
What used to take two or three days now happens in seconds. Across borders, this shift means users can pay for services, top up their accounts, or cash out without dealing with clearinghouse delays or timezone restrictions. That expectation now extends further than online entertainment. E-commerce retailers that cater to international customers want to be paid immediately after an order is placed. Small businesses exporting to other markets want to avoid the lag that slows down their supply chains. The speed of the transaction is starting to impact the pace of the business.
The UK hasn't always been at the forefront of this movement, but that's starting to change. The upcoming Real-Time Rail (RTR) system is designed to support faster domestic payments, but the bigger win lies in how it links up with global systems. As this framework rolls out, cross-border transactions are expected to see fewer hold-ups and better transparency. Payment confirmations within seconds will no longer be limited to closed-loop systems or major platforms. Smaller businesses and individuals will start feeling the difference as well.
In many remote and rural parts of the country, reliable banking infrastructure isn't always within reach. That's where real-time digital payments make a measurable difference. A contract worker in a smaller town can receive same-day payment from a client in another country. A student living away from home can get tuition support transferred instantly rather than waiting for the bank to release the funds. These are small changes on paper, but they make everyday life far less stressful.
Cross-border payments also play a big role in family support, especially among immigrant households. Remittances sent back home often carry emotional and time-sensitive weight. The faster they arrive, the better. A delay of even a day can disrupt rent payments, emergency healthcare needs, or school fees in the recipient country. Real-time options reduce that uncertainty. More platforms offering fast, reliable cross-border transfers now cater specifically to this type of personal transaction, responding to demand that simply didn't exist a few years ago.
On the business side, firms that rely on regular imports or contract-based labour across borders now prioritise payment speed just as much as price or quality. Many are moving away from traditional wire services and opting for platforms that integrate directly with their accounting systems and offer instant cross-border settlements. It cuts down admin time, gives a better sense of cash flow, and opens the door to working with more partners in more regions.
While the infrastructure behind real-time payments is still evolving, what's clear is that people no longer treat payment speed as a bonus. It's an expectation. Whether they're streaming, gaming, paying a supplier, or sending money to family, users notice when a platform handles transactions quickly, and they leave when it doesn't.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Samsung Elec signs $16.5 billion contract to supply semiconductors
SEOUL, July 28 (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab said on Monday it has signed a contract valued at $16.5 billion to supply semiconductors to a major global corporation, in a regulatory filing. It did not name the counterpart. Samsung Electronics declined to comment on the contract. ($1 = 1,383.6800 won) ($1 = 1,383.6800 won)
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why we need a right not to be manipulated
Many nations already enshrine a right not to be defrauded, and even a right not to be deceived. If a company sells you a new medicine, falsely claiming that it prevents cancer, it can be punished. If a firm convinces you to buy a new smartphone, saying that it has state-of-the-art features when it doesn't, it will have violated the law. But in the current era, many companies are taking our time and money not by defrauding or deceiving us, but by practising the dark art of manipulation. They hide crucial terms in fine print. They automatically enrol you in a programme that costs money but does not benefit you at all. They make it easy for you to subscribe to a service, but extremely hard for you to cancel. They use 'drip pricing', by which they quote you an initial number, getting you to commit to the purchase, only to add a series of additional costs, knowing that once you've embarked on the process, you are likely just to say 'yeah, whatever'. In its worst forms, manipulation is theft. It takes people's resources and attention, and it does so without their consent. Manipulators are tricksters, and sometimes even magicians. They divert the eye and take advantage of people's weaknesses. Often they exploit simple ignorance. They fail to respect, and try to undermine, people's capacity to make reflective and deliberative choices. A manipulator might convince you to buy a useless health product, not by lying, but by appealing to your emotions, and by painting seductive pictures of how great you will feel once you use the product. Or they might tell you an anecdote about someone just like you, who used a supposed pain-relief product and felt better within 12 hours. Anecdotes have real power – but they can be profoundly misleading. More insidiously still, manipulators might know about, and enlist, some of the central findings in contemporary behavioural economics, the field that explores how people depart from perfect rationality. All of us are vulnerable in this regard, subject to the 'cognitive biases' elaborated by Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Richard Thaler and others, that affect our behaviour. These can be hard to recognize, and harder still to overcome. For example, human beings tend to suffer from 'present bias'. We care a lot about today and tomorrow, but the future is a foreign country, Laterland, and we are not sure we are ever going to visit. Tactics like 'buy now, pay later' take advantage of this. Another bias is 'loss aversion'; we tend to dislike losses a lot more than we like equivalent gains. That's why advertisers might claim 'you can't afford not to' buy their product. Inertia is a powerful force, and companies exploit 'status quo bias' by automatically subscribing you to something in the knowledge that even if it's possible to opt out, many won't bother. Our attention is limited, which means we are able to focus on only a subset of the things that come across our radars. Knowing this, manipulators present only the most attractive aspect of a transaction and downplay other, less inviting parts. So, manipulation is all around us, and rarely punished. But if we aim to create a right not to be manipulated, we will have to specify what we are talking about. A moral right can define manipulation broadly. A legal right should focus on the worst cases – the most egregious forms of trickery, those that are hardest to justify and that are most likely to impose real harm. Those worst cases occur when people are not given clarity that they are committing themselves to certain terms – and when the terms are ones they wouldn't consent to if they had full knowledge. For example, there should be a prohibition on billing people in accordance with terms to which they did not actively agree, unless it is clear that they would have agreed if they'd been asked. The underlying principle should be one of personal autonomy, which means that hidden fees and costs should be banned too. We know that rules designed to bring those fees and costs into the open can do a great deal of good. A couple of recent examples from the US: in 2024, the Department of Transportation created a rule that requires airlines and ticket agents to disclose charges for checked baggage, carry-on baggage, changing or cancelling a reservation and so on up front. Also in 2024, the Federal Communications Commission required internet service providers to display standardized 'broadband nutrition labels'. These include details of pricing, data allowances and broadband speeds, and enable customers to compare providers' offerings like-for-like, without tricks and obfuscation. But consumer protection is only the start. In 1890, two lawyers, Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis, proposed a new right: the right to privacy. They were not entirely clear about its contents, but the bedrock was the 'right to be let alone'. Warren and Brandeis's thinking helped to launch a thousand ships, including rules against the disclosure of private facts, against surveillance, and around personal choices (including the right to same-sex marriage). The right not to be manipulated now is a lot like the right to privacy back in 1890. At this stage, we cannot identify the full scope, and the appropriate limits, of that new right. The protection of consumers and investors is urgent. How it might apply to politics is a more delicate matter, and lawmakers will need to tread cautiously there. One thing is clear, though: manipulation is a threat to our autonomy, our freedom and our wellbeing. We ought to be taking steps to fight back. Professor Cass R Sunstein is the co-author of Nudge and founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard. His new book, Manipulation: What It Is, Why It's Bad, What to Do About It, will be published by Cambridge in August (£22). To support the Guardian order your copy at Delivery charges may apply. Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman (Penguin, £14.99) Misbehaving by Richard H Thaler (Penguin, £10.99) The Psychology of Money Morgan Housel (Harriman House, £16.99)
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shareholder revolt over Wise plans to move listing to New York
Wise faces a shareholder revolt today over its plan to move its primary listing to New York – after a falling out between its founders. Taavet Hinrikus – one of the fintech firm's founders – has urged investors to vote against the move on the grounds of concerns about shareholder rights that are tied up with the proposal. Wise's planned departure has been described as a 'hammer blow' to the City and will make it the latest in a string of UK-listed companies upping sticks for the US. Wise has said shareholders are 'overwhelmingly in favour' of the plans. A shareholder meeting to rubber stamp the move will be held today. Wise is led by boss Kristo Kaarmann, who founded it with Hinrikus, a fellow Estonian, in 2011. Hinrikus has since left the company but still owns a 5.1 per cent stake via his firm Skaala Investments.
