Work on at synagogue despite notice: Plaint to civic chief
Shek, himself a Jew, revisited the synagogue on June 6 and found that labourers were continuing "heavy repair work" behind closed doors despite lack of requisite permissions. Police were called to the site.
Synagogue trust chairperson Solomon Sopher said no violations were being committed and that everything was in consonance with the law. "Propping work is on to safeguard schoolchildren who are only about 50ft away.
No additional repair work is undertaken until the necessary permission is obtained."
Arun Chavan, designated officer from BMC's E ward, said the trust has appointed an architect and a structural consultant. "We have been informed that scaffolding made of mild steel has been erected to support the ceiling. As approvals can take time, it is necessary to have temporary support to ensure the ceiling does not collapse."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2025: Steel Suppliers From Mexico At Lowest Prices (Take A Look)
Steel Suppliers | search ads
Search Now
Undo
He said the architect confirmed that the ceiling is wooden and requires support to avoid any structural failure.
"We shared photos of the structure and the scaffolding with the complainant, but he remained unconvinced."
Shek told TOI, "Community members informed me that a lot of civil work was happening behind closed doors even after the notice was issued. I called BMC, which denied any such work taking place. On June 6, my team shot videos of labourers with gas cutting machines, welding irons all working... I met the building and factories officer on June 11, seeking the permission letters granted. Thereafter, I met Gagrani, who promised to monitor the matter.
I also approached the civic heritage department."
Follow more information on
Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here
. Get
real-time live updates
on rescue operations and check
full list of passengers onboard AI 171
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is it defamation to call husband 'impotent' in court? Bombay HC draws line in marital disputes — here's what it said
Bombay high court (File Photo) NEW DELHI: In a society where reputation plays a vital role in leading a dignified life, can a sensitive allegation made during a marital dispute amount to defamation? This question came into sharp focus when a man accused his estranged wife of tarnishing his image by calling him impotent in her divorce and maintenance petitions. The matter reached the Bombay high court, raising a critical legal question: where does one draw the line between protecting individual rights and harming another's reputation? In its recent ruling, the high court made it clear that allegations of impotency made by a woman against her husband during matrimonial proceedings do not amount to defamation, if raised in the context of divorce or maintenance claims. This came after a single-judge bench of Justice SM Modak dismissed the man's criminal defamation complaint against his wife, stating that such claims are relevant under the Hindu Marriage Act and cannot be seen as defamatory when used to support her case. The court observed that when a marital dispute reaches the court, both parties are entitled to present facts that support their case. "This court feels that when litigation between spouses arises in a matrimonial relationship, then the wife is justified in making those allegations to support her interest," the judge noted in the order dated July 17, which became available on Friday. He further added that the same cannot be held as defamatory. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo The petitioner had filed a criminal complaint against his wife and her family, accusing them of defamation after she described him as impotent in her divorce and maintenance applications and in a police complaint. He argued that the documents were public and had damaged his reputation. However, the court held that such statements, made within legal proceedings to support claims of cruelty and justify divorce, cannot be treated as defamatory. The woman, along with her father and brother, had approached the High Court to challenge a sessions court order directing a magistrate to conduct an inquiry into the man's complaint. The High Court quashed the lower court's direction. Notably, this ruling stands in contrast to a 2018 judgment by the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court. In that case, the court had held that calling a person "impotent" amounts to defamation, especially if used outside the context of legal proceedings. Justice Sunil Shukre had then stated that such a term reflects poorly on a man's masculinity. He added that it can lead others to mock or disrespect him, thereby constituting an offence under Sections 499 (damage to reputation) and 500 (punishment for defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Savannah Chrisley cuts ties with sister Lindsie in new trailer; says, 'Lose our last name'
The Chrisley family's internal rift continues to play out publicly, with the longstanding feud between sisters Savannah and Lindsie Chrisley taking center stage in the trailer for their upcoming reality show, The Chrisleys: Back to Reality, premiering September 1 on Lifetime. In the emotional teaser, Savannah, 27, alludes to a letter her older sister Lindsie allegedly wrote to the FBI, a move Savannah suggests was a betrayal during one of the family's darkest chapters. 'We're no longer family. Lose our last name,' Savannah states, referencing the turmoil that followed their parents' high-profile legal battle. Grayson Chrisley echoes his sister's sentiments, remarking, 'I mean, your blood will screw you over more than a stranger definitely will.' These remarks highlight just how deep the fractures within the Chrisley household have become since the legal downfall of Todd and Julie Chrisley. Todd and Julie were convicted in November 2022 on 12 counts including bank fraud, wire fraud, and tax evasion, leading to a combined prison sentence of 19 years. Although their sentences were later slightly reduced, the conviction took a heavy toll on the family. Todd's appeal was upheld, while Julie's initial reprieve was later overturned, reinforcing the weight of their legal troubles. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo In the show's trailer, matriarch Nanny Faye offers a poignant reflection on the family's current state, gesturing with her hands to show how distant they've all become: 'This family's been torn apart.' Lindsie, meanwhile, has shared her perspective on her estrangement from the family and the baggage that comes with the Chrisley name. On a recent episode of her podcast The Southern Tea, she opened up about her decision to distance herself from the legacy — and from the name itself. 'For a long time, I very much battled with carrying my maiden last name,' she said, noting that the association has brought more burden than benefit. Despite the public perception that the Chrisley surname opened doors, Lindsie asserts it did the opposite. 'It became very problematic with me being associated in any capacity, in business, and has been problematic for projects that I have done post-Chrisley Knows Best,' she explained. While Savannah remains devoted to protecting her parents' legacy and navigating the family's fractured dynamics, Lindsie is carving a path that further separates her from her reality TV past — and from her siblings. With the family now back in the public eye following Todd and Julie's release from prison — a development made possible through a pardon by former President Donald Trump, The Chrisleys: Back to Reality is poised to offer a raw and emotional look into how fame, legal troubles, and internal disputes have left deep and lasting scars on a once-unified household. As Savannah admits in the trailer: 'I told my parents I don't know if it can ever be repaired, honestly.' The Chrisleys' journey continues, but reconciliation still feels out of reach.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kolkata honeytrap racket: Bangladeshi mastermind of cross-border crime ring held; victims drugged, robbed via dating sites
Representational Image KOLKATA: A Bangladeshi national, the mastermind behind a cross-border honeytrap and robbery racket, was arrested by Bidhannagar police in connection with a series of crimes. Men were lured through matrimonial websites and dating apps and were robbed after being drugged in hotel rooms. The arrest follows the earlier apprehension of a woman on Sunday, accused of drugging and looting a man at a hotel near the city airport on July 1. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata On Thursday night, Md Mahmuddul Hasan (40), a resident of Rajshahi, Bangladesh, was picked up by police near Dum Dum Junction railway station. He was remanded to six days of police custody after being produced before a district court. Hasan was accused of receiving and smuggling stolen mobile phones across the border into Bangladesh, which were allegedly looted from victims by women operatives of the racket. The arrest came after the interrogation of one Rama Sau, alias Jia Singh, who was arrested from her Habra residence on Sunday. She allegedly posed as a prospective bride on a Bengali matrimonial website and lured Sudip Bose, a resident of Leningarh in New Barrackpore, to a hotel near Kolkata airport on July 1. In his complaint, Bose said he became unconscious after drinking tea offered by the woman in the hotel room. When he regained consciousness, his mobile phone and wallet were missing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo During police interrogation, the woman revealed that she passed on the stolen mobile phones to Hasan. Hasan admitted to receiving at least 10 such phones from her, which he smuggled into Bangladesh for resale. He also confessed to staying at various lodges during his visits, including his most recent stay at a guest house on Park Street. 'The case points to a broader network involving cross-border criminal activity and the exploitation of digital platforms to target victims. Further investigation is underway to identify other members of the racket and their operations on both sides of the border,' said a senior officer of Bidhannagar commissionerate. 'The users should maintain utmost caution while interacting with strangers on matrimonial and dating platforms.'
