logo
Jail for drunk driver who couldn't remember how he ended up in different county

Jail for drunk driver who couldn't remember how he ended up in different county

A Co Wexford man who couldn't remember how he ended up drunk behind the wheel of a car at the other end of the country has been jailed for a total of eight months and put off the road for 10 years.
Father-of-four Martin O'Brien appeared before Letterkenny District Court in Co Donegal charged with a number of offences.
It comes after an incident on June 24 last, when a member of the public reported a car being driven in an erratic manner in Letterkenny.
Garda Sergeant Jim Collins told the court that O'Brien has 95 previous convictions and outlined the charges against the 43-year-old.
The offences include public order, theft, dangerous driving and driving without insurance for which O'Brien had served some time in prison.
Sgt Collins said Gardai received an anonymous call from a member of the public on the day after they saw a silver Vauxhall car being driven "all over the road" at Ballyraine in Letterkenny.
The driver, a Martin O'Brien, of The Elms, Park Avenue, Gorey, Co Wexford, was arrested and brought to Letterkenny Garda Station.
When in custody, Gardai discovered that O'Brien was not the owner of the car, he was not insured to drive the car and he also tested positive for alcohol.
O'Brien was charged that at Lidl Carpark, Ballyraine, Letterkenny, Co Donegal a public place in the said District Court Area of Letterkenny district no 1, while being a specified person as defined in section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 2010 as amended by section 9 of the Road Traffic (No. 2) Act 2011, did drive a mechanically propelled vehicle while there was present in his body a quantity of alcohol such that, within three hours after so driving, the concentration of alcohol in his blood did exceed a concentration of 20 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood, to wit 124 milligrams.
The charge was Contrary to section 4(2)(b) & 4(5) of the Road Traffic Act 2010.
He was also charged that on the same date and location he did unlawfully use a mechanically propelled vehicle without the consent of the owner or without other lawful authority.
The charge was Contrary to Section 112 of the Road Traffic Act, 1961, (as amended by Section 65 of the Road Traffic Act, 1968, and as amended by Section 18 of the Road Traffic Act, 2006).
O'Brien was also charged - on the same date and place - with being the user of a mechanically propelled vehicle, such vehicle being one for which neither a vehicle insurer nor an exempted person would be liable for injury caused by the negligent use of said vehicle at that time and for which there was not then in force an approved policy of insurance as required by Part VI of the Road Traffic Act, 1961, as amended by Part VI of the Road Traffic Act, 1968.
That charge was Contrary to Section 56(1) & (3) Road Traffic Act 1961 as amended by Section 18 of the Road Traffic Act, 2006.
Solicitor for the accused, Mr Robert Ryan, told the court that his client had a long addiction to heroin and had been on a methadone programme when he previously came out of prison.
He had turned to alcohol since but Mr Ryan said his client presented as a very different man from when he was arrested.
He said O'Brien had suffered a number of tragedies in his life but was trying to get his life back on the straight and narrow.
He added that on the day in question, O'Brien had little or no memory of the incidents and doesn't even know how he ended up in Co Donegal.
The accused had put up his hands to the charges and now wanted to put them behind him.
Judge Eiteain Cunningham sentenced O'Brien to a total of eight months in prison and also banned him from holding a driving licence for 10 years.
Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government urged to clarify military intelligence powers in new phone tapping legislation
Government urged to clarify military intelligence powers in new phone tapping legislation

Irish Examiner

time4 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Government urged to clarify military intelligence powers in new phone tapping legislation

An oversight judge on phone tapping said it was 'imperative' the Government urgently clarified in law the roles and powers of military intelligence in safeguarding the security of the State. In his 2025 report, Mr Justice Tony O'Connor said the Defence Forces recently built a new high-security facility for the Irish Military Intelligence Service (IMIS). The service moved into the building last March, but the service is still awaiting Government measures to modernise and legislate for its national security remit. Mr O'Connor is the designated judge for the Interception of Postal Packets and Telecommunications Messages Act 1993 and Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011, as amended by the 2022 act. In his report to the Taoiseach for May 1, 2024, to April 1, 2025, Judge O'Connor repeated his calls for online communication, including encrypted services to be included in the laws. This includes Gmail, Outlook, Microsoft Teams, FaceTime, Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. The interception legislation is now 32 years old and successive governments have promised updated laws, with the current administration telling the Dáil a draft bill is due later this year. An Garda Síochána and the Defence Forces utilise powers of interception, the former for the investigation of serious crime and State security and the latter for State security only. Other agencies, such as Revenue and Fiosrú (formerly Gsoc), have powers under the 2011 act on communication (not content) data. The role of designated judges have now been taken over by the new independent examiner of security. Mr O'Connor, like designated judges before him, does not provide statistical data on the number of phone interceptions, with Mr O'Connor maintaining he sees 'little merit' in doing so. The High Court judge said applications from the gardaí were 'low' and were 'down in numbers', adding all were granted by the minister for justice. 'The number of authorisations granted pursuant to section 4 [serious offence investigations] were not significantly higher than those made under section 5 [security of the State],' the judge said. In his previous, 2024 report, he said the number of interceptions 'relative to the State's population size appear low'. He said the existing and anticipated developments on communication known to An Garda Síochána 'should be accommodated' in the new legislation. Mr Justice O'Connor said military intelligence moved to a 'new bespoke secured facility' last March. 'The new facility is a welcome development and affords a modern and professional aspect,' he said. 'The new building is purpose-built to top secret clearances and security specifications.' He said the old Irish Military Intelligence Service building, which they had used since the 1980s, was transferred to new Joint Cyber Defence Command in May. Judge O'Connor pointed out military intelligence uses the acts only in matters relating to the security of the State and the integrity of its institutions. It is for intelligence purposes only. The report said the use of the 1993 and 2011 acts for military intelligence 'was limited' over the last 11 months, but added the 'significance and value of those provisions for the PDF should not be underestimated'. He said he supported the 'urgent call' made by the Commission on the Defence Forces in its February 2022 report for clarification of the role, functions and powers of military intelligence in new legislation. 'There is an imperative to clarify the role, functions and powers of the IMIS in underpinning legislation,' he said. Read More National Development Plan allocates almost €4bn for defence and justice capital spends

Victim of alleged Dublin mugger got tetanus shot after accomplice 'dug' her fingernails into his arms
Victim of alleged Dublin mugger got tetanus shot after accomplice 'dug' her fingernails into his arms

The Journal

time5 hours ago

  • The Journal

Victim of alleged Dublin mugger got tetanus shot after accomplice 'dug' her fingernails into his arms

A MAN HAS been accused of punching a reveller in the back of the head before an accomplice 'dug' her fingernails into his arms, causing an infection, during a street mugging in Dublin. Robert Maguire, 35, was charged with robbery on Sycamore Street on 31 May last and refused bail by Judge Máire Conneely at Dublin District Court today. Garda Shane McConkey stated that at around 3.15am, the injured party was on his way home after socialising in the city centre. He turned onto Sycamore Street, in Dublin 2, when Maguire and a woman allegedly pursued him. The accused, who resided at a hostel on Merchant's Quay, Dublin 8, reportedly punched him in the back of the head, causing him to become disoriented. The pair then wrestled him into a doorway before another male became involved, and they threw him to the ground. The complainant dropped his iPhone 15. The second male robber picked it up as the female accomplice allegedly 'dug her nails into his forearm and attempted to pull his watch off of his wrist'. The garda who objected to bail stated that this caused the man extreme pain. 'He attempted to fight back but was overwhelmed when the third male returned and helped pin him to the ground.' It was alleged that the three suspects then rooted through his pockets. Advertisement The man shouted for help, and the trio fled when several members of the public approached. The court heard there was an unsuccessful bid to use his bank card, which had been in his phone case, in a shop at O'Connell Street. It was claimed the man suffered bruising to both his elbows, scrapes to his right forearm, and deep nail marks on his wrist and left bicep. He went to a doctor the following day and needed a tetanus shot due to the deep nail marks on his arms becoming infected. Judge Conneely was informed that the man had to take antibiotics for several days. He also missed work due to his injuries and psychological effects. CCTV footage was obtained. A decision awaits on whether the accused will be tried in the District Court or the Circuit Court, which has wider sentencing powers. Defence counsel Sam Friel argued that his client, who has yet to plead, was entitled to the presumption of innocence and could face a lengthy period of pre-trial detention. Garda McConkey agreed that the identification evidence did not come from the complainant but was based on the belief of gardaí that the accused was the person in the CCTV footage. However, he asserted that a jacket had been seized from the accused's hostel room, which matched the video evidence. Legal aid was granted. Earlier this month, a 34-year-old woman who allegedly dug her fingernails into the man's arms was refused bail after she too was charged with robbery.

Former TD Colm Keaveney banned from driving for four years
Former TD Colm Keaveney banned from driving for four years

RTÉ News​

time9 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Former TD Colm Keaveney banned from driving for four years

Former TD Colm Keaveney has been banned from driving for four years after refusing to provide a blood or urine sample to gardaí following a late-night road incident in Boyle, Co Roscommon. The former Labour TD for Galway East, who later joined Fianna Fáil, lost his Dáil seat in 2016 but returned to politics in 2019 when he was elected to Galway County Council. Mr Keaveney (54), of Milltown Road, Tuam, Co Galway, appeared before Judge Sandra Murphy at Carrick-on-Shannon District Court on 22 July, where he pleaded guilty to two charges: failing to provide a specimen under Section 12 of the Road Traffic Act, and failing to stop after a collision under Section 106. The incident occurred on 11 October last year when gardaí observed a Ford Focus being driven without lights through Boyle. The car veered to the wrong side of the road before colliding with a white vehicle that was waiting at a junction. The State solicitor told the court that the driver, identified as Mr Keaveney, did not stop after the collision and continued driving before eventually pulling over on St Patrick Street. When approached by gardaí, the court heard Mr Keaveney was unsteady on his feet, had glassy eyes, and smelled of alcohol. He was arrested and taken to Carrick-on-Shannon Garda Station, where he refused to provide a blood or urine sample to a designated doctor, despite a formal demand. His solicitor told the court that Mr Keaveney had no previous convictions and had been dealing with significant personal difficulties, including the recent loss of both parents. He also suffered from chronic back pain due to previous spinal surgery and had requested to see his own doctor at the garda station, which was not possible. He has three children, two adult and one infant. "Mr Keaveney is not the sort of person you would expect to see before the court," she said, noting his cooperation and the absence of any previous convictions. Judge Murphy imposed a €250 fine and a four-year disqualification from driving. Several other charges, including no insurance and no licence, were struck out after valid documentation was provided. Mr Keaveney was charged on 11 June 2024 with driving under the influence of drugs, relating to an alleged incident on 12 June, 2023.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store