With 54% ownership, Dominion Lending Centres Inc. (TSE:DLCG) insiders have a lot riding on the company's future
50% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
Institutional ownership in Dominion Lending Centres is 22%
This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.
A look at the shareholders of Dominion Lending Centres Inc. (TSE:DLCG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Dominion Lending Centres.
View our latest analysis for Dominion Lending Centres
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Dominion Lending Centres. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Dominion Lending Centres, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dominion Lending Centres. With a 26% stake, CEO Gary Mauris is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 25% and 19% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Chris Kayat is also Top Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Dominion Lending Centres Inc.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own CA$366m worth of shares in the CA$677m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Dominion Lending Centres better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Dominion Lending Centres (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says August 1 tariff deadline 'not 100% firm', open to proposals
STORY: :: Trump says an August 1 tariff deadline is 'not 100% firm' :: July 7, 2025 :: Washington, D.C. Trump: 'I would say firm, but not 100% firm. If they call up and they say would like to do something a different way, we're going to be open to that. But essentially that's the way it is right now.' 'We are always subject to negotiate something that's fair. But we've talked to most of the countries and pretty much they've had their way for many, many decades. As you know. And it was time that we just wanted fairness." "We've made a deal with United Kingdom, we've made a deal with China. We're close to making a deal with India. Others we've met with, and we don't think we're going to be able to make a deal. So we just send them a letter. If you want to play ball, this is what you have to pay. So, as far as I'm concerned, we're done with sending out letters to various countries telling them how much tariffs they have to pay. Some will maybe adjust a little bit, depending if they have a you know, cause. But we're not going to be unfair about it. And actually, it's a small fraction compared to what we should be getting. We should be, we could be asking for much more, but for the sake of relationships that we've had with a lot of really good countries, we're doing the way I do it.' Asked if the deadline was firm, Trump said: "I would say firm, but not 100% firm. If they call up and they say we'd like to do something a different way, we're going to be open to that." Trump began telling trade partners - from powerhouse suppliers like Japan and South Korea to minor players - that sharply higher U.S. tariffs would start August 1, marking a new phase in the trade war he launched earlier this year.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The stock of a small crypto miner soared 3,000% in a week on a plan to amass a trove of ethereum
BitMine Immersion Technologies raised $250 million to buy Ethereum as a reserve asset. The company is aiming to follow Michael Saylor's Strategy playbook. Ethereum's role in stablecoins positions it for growth, with a $2 trillion market forecast. No profits, no problem. Just add Ethereum. That's the strategy BitMine Immersion Technologies is following. The blockchain infrastructure company, which specializes in crypto mining and digital asset management and reported a net loss in the three months through May 31, surged 3,000% in the five trading days ending July 3 after raising $250 million to add Ethereum to its balance sheet. BitMine sold more than 55 million shares to a group of crypto and venture investors at $4.50 apiece on June 30. The company plans to use the proceeds to buy ethereum as the company's primary treasury reserve asset. The company also appointed Tom Lee, managing partner and head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors, as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The stock is up almost 1,600% year-to-date despite not being profitable. However, the Ethereum-inspired rally is proving to be volatile: the stock began falling after market open on Monday, dropping 25% from its Thursday close of $136. The company is taking a page from Michael Saylor's Strategy playbook by creating a crypto treasury reserve. While many companies have mimicked Strategy by loading up on bitcoin, an Ethereum-focused treasury purchase plan is still rare. While BitMine will continue to focus on its primarily bitcoin-dominated business operations, the company is betting that Ethereum will become more mainstream. With stablecoins playing a growing role in the crypto ecosystem, BitMine is positioning itself as an early investor in the infrastructure behind them. Unlike bitcoin, Ethereum allows programmable tokens, which are a key feature for the smart contracts that power stablecoins. Ethereum runs on "proof of stake," which allows users to earn rewards by locking up their holdings to help validate transactions and secure the network. Bitcoin, on the other hand, still relies on "proof of work," where miners use energy-intensive computers to solve cryptographic problems to mint new bitcoins. Ethereum hosts over half of existing stablecoins, making the crypto critical to the stablecoin ecosystem. According to the investment platform AInvest, 30% of Ethereum's transaction fees are generated by stablecoins. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicts that the $250 billion stablecoin market could expand to over $2 trillion in the next three years, meaning that Ethereum is positioned to receive an outsized benefit from the industry's growth, Tom Lee said. "That is really the backbone and architecture of stablecoins," Lee said of Ethereum on CNBC on June 30. "It's important to create a project that essentially accumulated Ethereum to essentially protect and have some influence on the network," Lee added. "The more Ethereum that's accumulated, the more secure the network is." Ethereum has lagged bitcoin's big bull run in recent years. The second-largest cryptocurrency has fallen from its 2021 high, dropping 23% in 2025. But with increasing stablecoin tailwinds through a crypto-friendly administration, the GENIUS Act, and more mainstream adoption, BitMine is betting that Ethereum can achieve bitcoin-level success. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The America Party is right out of the 'Musk playbook'
Elon Musk has announced his plan to form a new political party as he continues to feud with President Trump. It reflects a pattern in Musk's career of founding or buying entities to solve what he views as a big-picture problem. He founded SpaceX, Neuralink, and the Boring Company to focus on singular issues. If Elon Musk ever had to write a cover letter, he might say that he's the kind of leader who identifies an important problem and launches into action to find a solution — regardless of the odds. He wouldn't be lying. It's one of his primary traits as a business leader. Musk has a long history of founding and leading companies designed to tackle issues he feels need to be addressed. The latest example is his announcement over the weekend that he was moving forward with plans to create a new political party, the America Party for the "80% in the middle," to break the impasse formed by the two-party system in the United States. Musk has shown a tendency to identify a challenge and home in on it as the fixer without necessarily considering whether he's best suited to do so, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor, told BI. "That is the Musk playbook," he said. Musk didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. While Musk's America Party is his reaction to President Donald Trump's sprawling spending bill, which will likely add to the national deficit and which Musk has repeatedly criticized, he earlier described his new party as one that would represent voters in the middle of the political spectrum. Breaking the two-party system is a tall order. None of the many previous attempts have come close. Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party garnered 27% of the vote in 1912, and Ross Perot took in 19% of the vote in 1992 as an independent before forming the Reform Party for his 1996 bid. But Musk is not one to shy away from the difficult. "When something is important enough, you do it, even if the odds are not in your favor," Musk told "60 Minutes" in 2012. OpenAI's Sam Altman, with whom Musk is currently engaged in a legal battle, has put it another way. "Elon desperately wants the world to be saved. But only if he can be the one to save it," Altman said in a 2023 interview. When challenges arise at one of Musk's companies, he "goes all in on it," Andy Wu, an associate professor of business administration at Harvard Business School, previously told BI. Musk founded SpaceX a decade earlier, easily his most ambitious project, investing $100 million of his own fortune despite having no experience in aerospace engineering. With its reusable rockets, SpaceX overtook legacy aerospace giants to become the dominant launch provider for astronauts, satellites, and commercial payloads. Musk says his goal is to make space travel more accessible and to give life on Earth an option should the human race face extinction at home. "I've said I want to die on Mars — just not on impact," Musk said during a 2013 keynote at South by Southwest. Musk became an early investor in Tesla to tackle another problem he viewed as important: the environmental impact of fossil fuels. In 2006, before he became CEO, he wrote he was funding the company to "help expedite the move from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy towards a solar electric economy." While Musk went on to create the most profitable EV company in the world, it has more recently struggled as Musk's foray into government impacted the brand and confounded investors. Even The Boring Company, which Musk founded in 2017 to dig tunnels for underground transport, was born from Musk's frustration with Los Angeles traffic. "Traffic is driving me nuts," Musk posted in December 2016. "Am going to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging..." The Boring Company has since completed four operational tunnels in Las Vegas that are open to the public, while other proposed projects, such as a high-speed tunnel in Chicago and a Washington-to-Baltimore hyperloop, have been shelved. Musk's acquisition of Twitter in 2022 was a big swing — a $44 billion one, to be exact — to address another complex issue Musk saw as important. In the wake of the pandemic and civil rights unrest, Musk said he worried that the freedom to say anything you wanted was at risk. Buying Twitter was his solution. "This is a battle for the future of civilization," he said on Twitter in 2022 after acquiring it, six months before he rebranded it as X. "If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead." Musk has also voiced concerns about the future of artificial intelligence. He's gone to war with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman over that company's attention to its mission, which Musk helped craft as an early cofounder: to develop artificial general intelligence in a way that benefits humanity. Musk sees AGI as an existential threat, and said it is one of the reasons he founded xAI, the startup behind the Grok chatbot, in 2023. "I'm going to start something which I call TruthGPT or a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe," Musk told Fox News in 2023, adding that xAI "might be the best path to safety" that would be "unlikely to annihilate humans." AI is also part of his stated reasoning for founding Neuralink, which designs brain chips so humans can interact with computers. The chip is now in trials and used by a handful of disabled patients, who use it to more easily communicate, operate computers, or play video games. Musk has said that the ability for humans to integrate directly with machines can help ensure human control of AI. He said in a 2021 podcast appearance that he created Neuralink "specifically to address the AI symbiosis problem, which I think is an existential threat." Musk may not be able to apply the same strategy to solving massive political challenges, said Sonnenfeld, the Yale professor, who's also the founder of Yale's Chief Executive Leadership Institute. "He is great as a technology creator and entrepreneur, but not great in turnarounds and has been quite ham-handed in government, if not brutally offensive," Sonnenfeld said. With his efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk set out to cut what he described as fraudulent or excessive spending. The group's cost-cutting efforts spurred widespread layoffs across federal departments — actions that drew backlash from some on the political left. In the spring, Musk said that DOGE had been effective, though not to the degree he'd hoped. The spending cuts so far have fallen short of the initial target of slashing $2 trillion from federal outlays. There are signs that Musk, whose plans for a new party attracted support from Mark Cuban among others, is open to taking a measured approach with his latest political play. Musk said on Sunday that while the America Party may consider "backing a candidate for president" down the line, its main focus "for the next 12 months is on the House and the Senate." Sonnenfeld said that Musk doesn't appear to have the skills and diplomacy needed to build his party, adding that the reaction among many investors and consumers to his political efforts has been "overwhelmingly negative." "He's a brilliant technologist and an entrepreneur who doesn't know his limits — and he has them," Sonnenfeld said. Read the original article on Business Insider
