No Syro-Malabar representation in upcoming papal election as Cardinal Alencherry turns 80
According to Church protocol, only cardinals under the age of 80 are permitted to vote in the papal conclave, which decides the next pope. This leaves the Syro-Malabar Church, despite its sizeable community of 5.5 million members, without a voice in the selection process.
Fr. Antony Vadakkekara, Secretary of the Media Commission of the Syro-Malabar Church, noted that Cardinal Mar Baselios Cleemis of the Syro-Malankara rite of the Catholic Church and Cardinal Mar George Koovakkad will participate in the upcoming conclave. 'Although we cannot officially consider Mar Koovakkad as a representative of the Syro-Malabar Church, we still regard cardinals from Kerala as part of our broader spiritual family,' Fr. Vadakkekara said.
Eligible to vote
He also clarified that there are currently four cardinals from India eligible to vote in the conclave: Archbishop Antony Poola of the Hyderabad Archdiocese, Metropolitan Archbishop Filipe Neri of Goa, Cardinal Baselios Cleemis of the Malankara Church, and Cardinal Koovakkad.
However, Mar Koovakkad, though originally from the Syro-Malabar Church under the Changanacherry Archdiocese, now serves as a cardinal of the Latin Church and will not represent the Syro-Malabar Church in the election.
During the 2013 papal election that saw Pope Francis elected, both Mar George Alencherry of the Syro-Malabar Church and Mar Baselios Cleemis from the Malankara Church had voting rights. 'In that conclave, Mar Alencherry was the face of the Syro-Malabar Church in Rome. Had his 80th birthday fallen a few days later, he might have been able to cast his vote in the upcoming election as well,' a Church source observed.
The Syro-Malabar Church, based in Kerala, remains one of the most influential Eastern Catholic communities under the Holy See. However, the absence of a voting representative in the next conclave underscores the challenges Eastern Churches face in securing proportional representation within the global Catholic hierarchy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Who is Steve Bannon? The Harvard-educated banker who briefly served as Trump's chief strategist
When Steve Bannon recently proclaimed that 'no foreign students should be in the country right now' and called for an end to H‑1B visas, it sparked global headlines and fresh anxiety across Indian student and tech communities. But behind the controversy lies a career shaped by elite education, military discipline, high finance, and a polarising chapter in American politics. So who is Steve Bannon, really? From Norfolk to the Navy Born in 1953 in a working-class Irish-Catholic family in Norfolk, Virginia, Stephen Kevin Bannon's early years were unremarkable—but he stood out for his discipline and drive. He earned his B.A. in urban planning from Virginia Tech in 1976, where he was active in student government and edited the school newspaper. Rather than head directly to business or law school like many of his peers, Bannon joined the United States Navy, serving as a surface warfare officer aboard a destroyer and later as a Pentagon aide. Even while in uniform, Bannon was studying—earning a master's in national security studies from Georgetown University at night. Harvard Business School and the big break After leaving the Navy in the early '80s, Bannon set his sights on Wall Street. He enrolled at Harvard Business School, graduating with an MBA in 1985. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now Undo He later described the experience as transformative, saying Harvard 'taught him how the world really works.' His next move was into the high-stakes world of investment banking. He joined Goldman Sachs, where he worked on mergers and acquisitions, particularly in the media sector. Bannon rose quickly, eventually co-founding his own boutique firm, Bannon & Co. One of his smartest deals? Negotiating a small equity stake in Seinfeld 's syndication profits—a stream of income that would serve him well in the decades to come. Hollywood, documentaries, and a shift to ideology In the 1990s, Bannon moved to Los Angeles, pivoting into the world of media production. He produced several low-profile films and documentaries, but it wasn't until the early 2000s that his ideology began to clearly shape his work. He directed In the Face of Evil , a Reagan-era documentary that would later catch the attention of conservative circles. That project marked the beginning of Bannon's ideological transformation—from financier to nationalist firebrand. Breitbart and the rise of the alt-right In 2007, Bannon became involved with Breitbart News, a right-wing website founded by Andrew Breitbart. After Breitbart's death in 2012, Bannon took over and refashioned the site into what he famously called 'the platform for the alt-right.' Under Bannon, Breitbart trafficked in controversial and hyper-partisan content, gaining popularity among conservatives disillusioned with mainstream politics. He positioned himself as a cultural warrior, often blending economic populism with harsh rhetoric on immigration, Islam, and globalism. Trump's campaign and a brief White House stint Bannon's influence peaked when he joined Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign as its CEO during its most critical stretch. He helped sharpen Trump's messaging around nationalism, trade protectionism, and immigration, becoming an architect of what he called 'economic nationalism.' Following Trump's victory, Bannon was named White House Chief Strategist, a role he held from January to August 2017. His tenure was marked by clashes with other top officials and a controversial presence in policymaking. He was reportedly behind some of the administration's early hardline immigration and travel ban policies. But Bannon's time in the White House was short-lived. After months of infighting and negative press, he was pushed out. Trump later distanced himself from Bannon, calling him 'Sloppy Steve' after a very public fallout. Global nationalism and more controversy Since leaving the White House, Bannon has tried to shape nationalist movements in Europe and has remained a provocateur in American media and politics. He was indicted in 2020 on fraud charges related to a fundraising campaign for Trump's border wall—charges that were later dropped after a presidential pardon. As of 2025, Bannon is back in the spotlight for his hardline views on education and immigration, calling for: A ban on H‑1B visas Immediate departure of foreign graduates after finishing U.S. degrees The dismantling of post-study work programs like OPT These statements have drawn strong reactions from tech leaders, universities, and immigration advocates, with critics calling them economically self-defeating and socially divisive. Bannon's lasting influence Bannon is no policymaker today, but he remains an influential voice in far-right circles, particularly those shaping conservative views on immigration, education, and globalisation. For students and aspiring professionals, his words are a reminder that U.S. immigration policy can shift with the winds of political ideology, even if not immediately. Understanding the thinkers behind these positions, including their backgrounds, helps decode the bigger picture. Steve Bannon is a man of contradictions: a Harvard graduate who now rails against elite institutions, a former investment banker who became a voice of economic populism, and a media producer who once helped elect a president, only to be cast aside by him months later. Whether you agree with him or not, Bannon's journey from classrooms and boardrooms to political war rooms reveals the winding paths that education, ideology, and ambition can take, especially in America's volatile public sphere. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Karoline Leavitt, 27, has a net worth of $7 million: Here's the secret behind how Trump's youngest star amassed such fortune
US President Donald Trump recently offered high praise for the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt for her work and commented on her brain, face and lips. During an interview with Rob Finnerty on Newsmax, Trump declared her the finest Press Secretary to have served any President and expressed admiration for the 27-year-old. "She's become a star. It's that face, it's that brain, it's those lips, the way they move. They move like she is a machinegun…. She is a star, she is a great person actually," Trump said in the discussion broadcast on August 1. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Technology Project Management others Leadership Cybersecurity Finance Public Policy Operations Management Product Management MBA Data Analytics Degree Digital Marketing Management Data Science Others CXO MCA Design Thinking Data Science healthcare Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details He further commented on Karoline Leavitt, "I don't think anybody has ever had a best Press Secretary than Karoline Leavitt. She has been amazing." However, netizens did not find Trump's comments very pleasing. His remarks have sparked swift reaction across social media, with many users describing his language as 'uncomfortable,' 'cringey,' and 'unprofessional.' ALSO READ: Duke Dennis handcuffed after bizarre mall game in San Antonio. What are the charges against him? Live Events Who is Karoline Leavitt? Karoline Leavitt is the youngest person to hold the position of White House Press Secretary and comes into the role with a significant net worth and experience. She also served in the White House press office during the first Trump administration. A native of New Hampshire, Karoline Leavitt studied communications and political science at Saint Anselm College, a Catholic college in her home state, reported BBC. Leavitt began working for the first Trump White House shortly after graduating in 2019, first as presidential speechwriter and later as assistant press secretary, according to the website for her 2022 run for Congress. Trump has praised the 27-year-old press secretary as "smart, tough and highly effective" when she made history as the youngest press secretary. ALSO READ: Social Security in August: Recipients to receive their checks on these dates. How can you make the most of it? Karoline Leavitt's net worth Karoline Leavitt made headlines as President Donald Trump's press secretary in his second term. Estimates of her net worth hover at around $7 million, but the real number could be higher, according to NewsWeek. Since Leavitt is the youngest to take on the public role, her background, finances and personal life remain of interest to many Americans, especially as Trump's inner circle has been one of the richest in presidential history. Karoline Leavitt's estimated annual income is about $1.5 million and a predicted White House salary of $180,000, as per the Publicist Paper. That, plus media opportunities and real estate investments, provides her a net worth estimated at $7 million. Her husband Nicholas Riccio has a net worth of $6 million, largely from his real estate portfolio, according to Distractify. Leavitt's financial success is likely to rise as she continues working as Trump's press secretary and after the president's second term. Future earnings could be amassed from book deals, TV appearances or taking on new media or political adviser positions. ALSO READ: 'Rage Against The Regime' protests: Over 300 US cities hosting anti-Trump demonstrations today on JD Vance's birthday. Full list Karoline Leavitt love life Karoline Leavitt is married to Nicholas Riccio, who is 32 years senior to her. Karoline Leavitt and her husband, Nicholas Riccio, met in 2022 before getting married three years later. The White House press secretary, 27, and Riccio, 59, welcomed their son, Nicholas Robert Riccio, nicknamed 'Niko,' in July 2024. Their relationship has drawn many eyes as Leavitt is 32 years younger than her husband Riccio, prompting rumors over how they met and how their relationship works. "A mutual friend of ours hosted an event at a restaurant that he owns up in New Hampshire, and invited my husband. I was speaking and we met, we were acquainted as friends, and we fell in love," Leavitt said previously on The Megyn Kelly Show. ALSO READ: This US city has worst air quality in the world due to smoke from Canadian wildfires. Check tips to protect yourself "Of course. I mean it's a very atypical love story, but he's incredible," Leavitt said regarding the age gap in her relationship. "He is my greatest supporter, he's my best friend, and he's my rock." Leavitt also said her husband's real estate success has allowed her to fully pursue her own career. "He's built a very successful business himself, so now he's fully supportive of me building my success in my career," she added during the interview. "He's the father of my child, and he's the best dad I could ever ask for. And he is so supportive, especially during a very chaotic period of life."
Indian Express
14 hours ago
- Indian Express
Brinda Karat writes: Harassment of tribal youth, nuns raises urgent questions about minority rights
The arrest of two nuns, Sisters Preeti Mary and Vandana Francis, and Sukhman Mandavi, an Adivasi youth belonging to the Christian community in Chhattisgarh, has been widely reported in the media. I was part of a delegation of Members of Parliament and political leaders who met them in Durg central jail. The cases against them are of forcible conversion and human trafficking. They were released after being granted bail by an NIA court on Saturday. On July 25, three adult Adivasi women accompanied by Mandavi, their family friend, reached Durg station from their village in Orchha, Narayanpur. This was the first time they were travelling outside their district, and were understandably nervous. They were on their way to an Agra hospital to get trained as kitchen help to be employed in institutions run by the nuns. They were waiting at the railway station for two nuns who were to escort them to Agra. They had heard of the jobs through Mandavi's sister Sukhmati, who had worked at the Agra hospital for several years. Mandavi had not bought a platform ticket and was questioned by a passing inspector. This attracted attention and soon a crowd gathered, led by the local Bajrang Dal, who insisted that the group of Adivasis and the nuns, who had arrived by then, should be taken into police custody on charges of trafficking. The Adivasi women showed their Aadhaar cards, which proved that they were not minors. Their parents spoke to the police on the phone, assuring them that their daughters were travelling with their consent. They offered to make the journey from their village several hours away to make written statements to this effect. Thus, no charge of human trafficking was made out. They also stated clearly that they and their daughters had been Christians for several years. There was, therefore, no question of forcible conversion. These are the facts. But it is not facts that mattered. The police control room at the railway station became an arena for open hooliganism. There is video evidence of Bajrang Dal memebers, led by a woman, humiliating, intimidating and shouting at the nuns in filthy, sexist, abusive language. The video shows them beating Mandavi, threatening him to make him 'confess' to being part of the nuns' 'conspiracy'. The young women were taken one by one into an adjoining room and beaten and bullied into changing their statements and agreeing that they were being forcibly taken away. The police stood by while the Constitution, rule of law and the norms of human rights were shredded. Without any independent inquiry, on grounds of 'suspicion' on a complaint filed by a Bajrang Dal leader, the nuns were booked and arrested along with Mandavi. The terrorised Adivasi women were taken to a government home where they were isolated, and when their anxious parents arrived, they were not permitted to meet them. There has been tremendous pressure on the women and the parents to give statements against the nuns and the Church. The women were released after a week of what is termed 'counselling' by the government. Statements given under custodial pressure have little legal value. There are several issues that arise, apart from the utter lawlessness and targeting of Christians by Hindutva outfits backed by the BJP government. This is an attack on the constitutional right of a citizen to travel and work anywhere in the country. Does a young Adivasi woman who belongs to the Christian community have to get a passport stamped by a Sangh Parivar outfit to travel to another state? Why should adult Adivasi Christian women have to show evidence as to why and with whom they are travelling? This case establishes a terrible precedent that directly impacts the lives and livelihoods of young Adivasi women travelling out of their villages for work. A second issue is the nature of the attack on the nuns and the Adivasi women. Can anyone, man or woman, use language that amounts to verbal sexual assault against those in custody and not be prosecuted? This was also a sexist attack that concerns the rights of all women. Then again, the only time the brave Sister Preeti Mary broke down was when she narrated that she was accused by the hooligans of being a 'foreigner' and called a 'deemak' (termite) working against national interest: 'After all my years of work for the poor, for the leprosy-afflicted, in the most remote areas without any facilities, am I to be termed an anti-national termite? My religion inspires me to work for the poor — am I to be punished for that?' We have heard words like 'termites' used by the Home Minister to abuse Bengali-speaking Muslims routinely, as being 'illegal migrants'. Here, we have Christian nuns being called termites. The words we heard joined the dots between that cell in Durg jail and the bastis of Delhi and elsewhere, where Indian citizens are being harassed and tortured in the name of detecting of illegal immigrants: Anyone and everyone who does not fit into the framework of Hindutva can be termed a 'foreigner' and their rights curtailed. The deletion of lakhs of voters in Bihar — mainly the poor, Dalits and marginalised communities — in the Special Intensive Revision to 'purify' the electoral lists is also being done in the name of detection of foreigners. The number of foreigners detected is negligible, but the EC's demand for documents, impossible to procure, has basically robbed the poor of the fundamental right of every Indian to vote in an election. Join the dots of what is happening across India. The horrific aggression and arrest of the nuns and Adivasi Christians is not an isolated incident. To paraphrase what Pastor Martin Niemöller had said, 'If we stay silent today, there will be no one to protest when they come for us tomorrow.' The writer is a member of the CPI(M) Politburo
