Council spends £30k removing ‘noisy' speed bump amid £45m deficit
A cash-strapped council has spent £30,000 to remove a 'noisy' speed bump that cost £4,000 to install last year.
Norfolk County Council built the speed bump and a zebra crossing in the town of Dereham to make the area safer for pedestrians, including pupils at nearby Northgate High School.
But residents complained that heavy lorries would make a loud rattling noise when they drove over the raised portion of road, prompting the council to remove it less than a year later.
The Tory-controlled town hall was forced to make sweeping cuts and tax rises to plug a £44.7m budget shortfall for the 2025-26 financial year.
Kay Mason Billig, leader of Norfolk County Council, has previously warned that the authority could go bust unless the Government helps with its growing financial pressures.
She said the authority was experiencing 'the toughest financial challenges the council has ever faced'.
The council has confirmed council tax will rise by 4.99pc in the April 2025-26 tax year – the maximum amount local authorities can raise the levy without a referendum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Immigration reforms for ‘complete reset' to be introduced in Parliament
Legislation to end the recruitment of care workers from abroad is set to be introduced as part of a raft of immigration reforms. New rules to be laid in Parliament on Tuesday will also seek to increase salary and skills thresholds up to degree level for skilled workers, which will cut eligibility for 111 occupations. A new time-limited temporary shortage list will also be introduced until the end of 2026 for below degree level, where recruiting foreign workers is key to build critical infrastructure or industrial strategy. But those workers will no longer be able to bring their families and will not be entitled to salary and visa fee discounts. The legislative measures are the first policy changes to be introduced from the Government's Immigration White Paper to tighten controls and cut migration to the UK. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'We are delivering a complete reset of our immigration system to restore proper control and order, after the previous government allowed net migration to quadruple in four years. 'These new rules mean stronger controls to bring migration down, to restore order to the immigration system and to ensure we focus on investing in skills and training here in the UK.' The changes, if approved by MPs and peers, will come into force from July 22. Further measures from the White Paper such as increasing English language requirements and raising the immigration skills charge are also expected to be in place by the end of the year. The White Paper is aimed at reducing numbers, clamping down on abuses of the system and ending a reliance on cheap foreign labour. Home Office estimates indicate that changes from the plan could reduce the number of people coming to the UK by up to 100,000 per year, when looking at eight of its proposals including on study and work routes and a higher level of English language requirement. But the move to scrap care worker visas has sparked concerns from the sector, with GMB national officer Will Dalton describing the decision as 'potentially catastrophic' as the care sector was 'utterly reliant on migrant workers' and still had more than 130,000 vacancies across the country. The Home Office believes there are 40,000 potential members of staff originally brought over by 'rogue' providers who could work in the sector while UK staff are trained up. Transitional arrangements for overseas care workers already in the UK have also been set out on Tuesday, according to the department.
STV News
24 minutes ago
- STV News
Future of Keir Starmer's welfare reforms to be decided by MPs
The future of Keir Starmer's welfare reforms are set to be decided on Tuesday when MPs will vote on the Prime Minister's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. Despite a significant U-turn last week, a Labour rebellion against the measures is still a possibility. Starmer was forced to yield to political pressure from within his own party after 126 Labour backbenchers signed their names to an amendment to halt the welfare reform legislation in its tracks last week. Among the rebels were nine Scottish Labour MPs. The Prime Minister's welfare reforms originally proposed to cut Universal Credit health top-ups for new claims from April 2026, and scrap the Work Capability Assessment (WCA). The reforms also vowed to review Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments and 'focus PIP on those with higher needs', while consulting on plans to delay access to the health top-up in Universal Credit until claimants turn 22. The cuts to Universal Credit would have directly impacted benefit claimants in Scotland, while the other changes would have impacted the amount of money coming to Social Security Scotland for devolved benefits, like Adult Disability Payments, which replaced PIP for Scots. The Scottish Government would have been responsible for making decisions about welfare and disability benefits based on its budget. However, Labour rebels argued the plans were rushed and would push vulnerable disabled people into poverty. After originally doubling down on the reforms, Starmer's government was forced to back-track ahead of Tuesday's crucial vote. Under the concessions, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said PIP claimants will continue to receive the benefits they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of Universal Credit. She said the planned benefit cuts will only hit future claimants. Campaigners have accused the latest proposals of creating a two-tier benefits system, and official government analysis released on Monday showed the reforms will still push 150,000 people into relative poverty across the UK, rather than the 250,000 first suggested. The U-turn will also leave UK chancellor Rachel Reeves scrambling to find £3bn due to the last minute U-turn. The concessions are believed to have won over the majority of the 120-odd MPs who had signed a wrecking amendment, but dozens of Labour MPs will still refuse to back the reforms on principle. The reforms will be put to a vote on Tuesday around noon. The House of Commons proceedings will be broadcast from the chamber. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Welfare rebellion looms for Starmer despite concessions to Labour rebels
The concessions included protecting people claiming personal independence payment (Pip) from changes due to come into effect in November 2026, and rowing back plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit. But backbench anger has continued to simmer, with a statement from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall laying out the concessions on Monday receiving a negative response. Liz Kendall received a negative response to several concessions on Monday (Dominic Lipinski/PA) Asked whether he was 'confident' that the concessions had done enough to secure passage of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would only tell Sky News: 'I certainly hope it passes.' Some 126 Labour MPs had previously signed a 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier that would have stopped the legislation if approved. That rebellion appeared to have been averted after Dame Meg described concessions agreed on Friday as a 'workable compromise'. But in the Commons on Monday, she was one of several senior Labour figures to raise concerns about the Government's revised proposals, while another MP involved in negotiations, Debbie Abrahams, suggested ministers had rowed back on what had been agreed. A second amendment rejecting the Bill has been put forward by York Central MP Rachael Maskell with the backing of 138 disability groups, saying disabled people had 'yet to have agency in this process'. Ms Maskell's amendment has been signed by 39 Labour MPs – far fewer than the 83 needed to overturn Sir Keir's majority, but enough to deliver the largest rebellion of his premiership just before the first anniversary of Labour's election victory. Other sceptical MPs are expected to abstain on Tuesday, but could vote against the Bill next week if there are no further concessions. Sir Stephen Timms said he hoped the Bill would pass (House of Commons/PA) Ms Maskell said there were 'loads more' who had said they would reject the Government's plans. She told BBC Breakfast: 'I engaged with so many people yesterday that were saying: 'I'm not signing the recent amendment but I am voting down the Bill.'' One of the chief concerns revolves around a review of Pip to be carried out by Sir Stephen and 'co-produced' with disabled people. His review is not expected to report until autumn next year, making it difficult to incorporate his findings into the Pip changes due to take place at the same time. Ms Abrahams suggested the timing meant the outcome of the review was 'pre-determined', while Sarah Owen, another select committee chairwoman, warned it could create a 'three-tier' benefit system. Groups including Disability Rights UK and Disabled People Against Cuts criticised the Government's claim that Sir Stephen's review would be 'co-produced' with them and urged Labour rebels to stand firm. They said: 'The Government have made it very clear that they are intent on slashing the support that so many disabled people rely on to work and live independently, no matter how many disabled people tell them what a harmful policy this will be.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said her party's MPs would vote against the proposals, describing them as 'not serious welfare reform' and saying ministers had 'watered down the small savings Labour were making'. The original proposals were expected to save £4.8 billion by 2030, but Ms Kendall revealed on Monday that the revised proposals were likely to save less than half that figure.
