Air India warned over ‘serious violations' of pilot oversight
In an order given on 20 June, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) told the Tata Group-owned airline to immediately strip a divisional vice president, a chief manager of crew scheduling, and a planning executive of all responsibilities related to rostering.
It also instructed the airline to begin disciplinary proceedings against them without delay.
The order raised concerns over 'repeated and serious violations voluntarily disclosed by Air India concerning flight crew being scheduled and operated despite lapses in licensing, rest, and recency requirements'.
'Of particular concern is the absence of strict disciplinary measures against key officials directly responsible,' it said.
These breaches came to light during a post-transition review of the airline's switch between two different software systems for managing its crew scheduling, according to the Press Trust of India.
Two specific instances of non-compliance, on flights from Bengaluru to London on 16 May and 17, exceeded the 10-hour maximum flight duty limit for pilots, Reuters reported.
The airline has been instructed to move the three officials to non-operational roles until corrective reforms in scheduling practices are completed, and to ensure that they do not hold any position with direct influence over flight safety or crew compliance until further notice.
Air India confirmed in a statement that it had implemented the regulator's order.
'In the interim, the company's Chief Operations Officer will provide direct oversight to the Integrated Operations Control Centre (IOCC). Air India is committed to ensuring that there is total adherence to safety protocols and standard practices,' the airline said.
Earlier this week, Reuters reported that regulators had warned Air India for flying three Airbus aircraft without conducting timely checks on emergency escape slide equipment.
The airline is facing heightened scrutiny following the 12 June crash of a London-bound flight shortly after take-off in Ahmedabad, killing 241 people onboard and 29 on the ground. Experts from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau are investigating the crash with assistance from US and UK authorities, as well as officials from Boeing.
Over the last week, dozens of Air India flights were delayed, diverted, or cancelled amid heightened safety checks ordered by the DGCA.
As part of efforts to stabilise operations in the wake of the Ahmedabad crash, Air India on Thursday announced a temporary reduction in its international flight schedule. Between 21 June and 15 July, the airline will suspend flights to three overseas destinations and cut services on 16 international routes.
The move, according to the airline, is aimed at restoring schedule reliability and minimising last-minute disruption for passengers. This follows an earlier statement that wide-body flight operations would be reduced by 15 per cent over the same period.
Air India was taken over by Tata Sons in 2022, returning the airline to private hands nearly 70 years after it was nationalised. The $2.4bn deal to offload the debt-laden public carrier represented a full-circle moment for the airline, which began as Tata Air Services in 1932.
Since the acquisition, the airline has placed orders for hundreds of new aircraft worth over $70bn, unveiled new livery, absorbed Tata's other airline ventures and committed millions to upgrading older planes and digital systems.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tories warned Labour about Rachel Reeves' tears 17 minutes BEFORE PMQs started
Keir Starmer 's claim that he did not know Rachel Reeves was in tears was branded 'nonsense' last night after the Tories insisted they gave Labour 'early warning' of her distress. Tory MPs revealed they alerted Labour whips to the fact that the Chancellor was weeping in the Commons to ensure she got help. They say that was at 11.43am – 17 minutes before Prime Minister's Questions when Ms Reeves had tears rolling down her cheeks as she sat next to an apparently oblivious Sir Keir. One Tory MP said: 'It simply beggars belief that with that much warning, the PM wasn't told. 'Nearly 20 minutes before PMQs began, we could see Reeves was already tearful sitting on the front bench and we alerted Labour whips to the problem. 'It's nonsense to say Starmer wouldn't have been aware.' Last night Downing Street was still insisting Sir Keir spent the entire half-hour session of questions unaware of her trauma. But amid continued confusion, party sources claimed last night that Labour whips were so worried at Ms Reeves' state of mind, they tried to stop her appearing alongside Sir Keir. They said whips pleaded with Ms Reeves – who had briefly come out of the Chamber – not to go back inside. But sources close to the Chancellor said there was 'no truth' in that claim. Ms Reeves said yesterday she regretted going into PMQs in tears 'after a tough day in the office'. She told The Guardian: 'It was a personal matter but it was in the glare of the camera. 'And that's unfortunate, but I think people have seen that I'm back in business and back out there.' The events – which sparked turmoil on financial markets – began after Ms Reeves was rebuked by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle as she entered the Commons over taking too long to answer Treasury questions the previous day. She was overheard replying that she was 'under so much pressure' before briefly taking her seat but then leaving afterwards in what appeared to be distress. To the surprise of some Labour MPs, Ms Reeves then reappeared to take her place at Sir Keir's side when he arrived for PMQs. But to the horror of colleagues, the self-styled Iron Chancellor then wept beside the PM. MPs were surprised that Sir Keir was seemingly oblivious to how upset she was, even after Tory leader Kemi Badenoch pointed out how 'absolutely miserable' she looked. Sir Keir also forgot to guarantee that his Chancellor's position was safe after her role in last week's humiliating U-turn on saving almost £5 billion from controversial welfare cutbacks. The Government was forced to deny reports that Sir Keir and his deputy Angela Rayner had rows with Ms Reeves over the benefits fiasco which had upset her. The Treasury insisted her distress was caused by a personal matter, while Ms Reeves sought to bounce back next day with an unexpected appearance at the launch of the Government's ten-year health plan. But questions have remained over how Sir Keir could not have been aware of her state of mind – especially as his parliamentary aide Chris Ward tapped her on the shoulder to check she was OK. Later on Wednesday, Sir Keir told the BBC that Ms Reeves would be Chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. Reeves Paves Way for Tax Rises Rachel Reeves refused to rule out tax rises in the wake of the Government's embarrassing – and expensive – U-turn on welfare reforms. The Chancellor, whose tears in the Commons on Wednesday spooked the financial markets, said: 'I'm not going to apologise for making sure the numbers add up. 'But we do need to make sure that we're telling a story, and a Labour story. We did that well in the Budget and Spending Review, we increased taxes on the wealthiest and businesses.' Asked whether she was prepared to rule out further tax rises, she said: 'I'm not going to because it would be irresponsible for a Chancellor to do that. 'We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement. 'So we'll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.' Reacting to the welfare U-turn, she said: 'It's been damaging. I'm not going to deny that.'
Sky News
43 minutes ago
- Sky News
Police arrest 29 protesters on suspicion of terror offences after Palestine Action banned
Police have arrested 29 protesters on suspicion of terror offences after a ban on the Palestine Action group came into effect. The protest group was officially proscribed as a terrorist organisation from midnight on Saturday after a last-minute legal challenge at the Court of Appeal to delay it failed. The Metropolitan Police said on Saturday afternoon that the protesters had been held on suspicion of committing offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 following a protest in London's Parliament Square. "The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence," the force added. "Arrests are being made." MPs overwhelmingly voted in favour of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to ban the protest group under the legislation on Wednesday and the House of Lords approved the move the following day. The law change adds Palestine Action to the list of banned organisations along with the likes of al Qaeda, ISIS and Hezbollah, and makes membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Even wearing a T-shirt or badge with the group's name on attracts a maximum six-month sentence. On Saturday, a large number of Metropolitan Police officers circled around dozens of protesters carrying placards that said: "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." Israel has strongly denied any allegations of genocide. Campaign group Defend Our Juries said demonstrators were set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action. Officers who attended the protest were met with cries of "Met Police you are puppets of the Zionist state" and "leave them alone". Others were heard shouting, "British police off our streets", and "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free". Chants of "shame" were directed at police. A woman seen lying on the floor in handcuffs was carried away by officers and put in a police van. She was heard saying: "Free Palestine, stop the genocide, I oppose genocide, I support the rights of the Palestinian people, I support freedom of speech, I support freedom of assembly." A large group of people crowded around to film the scene. Officers placed her in a vehicle before returning to the square's Mahatma Gandhi statue. The protest started at about 1.10pm and officers were seen taking people away shortly after 1.30pm. Most of the officers dispersed at around 2.10pm. 'Creeping totalitarianism' Leslie Tate, 76, a Green councillor from Hertfordshire, said the group is not a violent organisation, and the proscription is wrong, adding the protest was "necessary to defend our democracy, and this is the creeping edge of totalitarianism". Among those removed by police was Reverend Sue Parfitt, who is 83. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action after two Voyager aircraft were allegedly damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on 20 June, which police said caused around £7m worth of damage. T-shirt could bring six-month jail term Even wearing a T-shirt or badge with the group's name on attracts a maximum six-month sentence. On Friday, the High Court heard the decision to ban the group was taken before the aircraft were allegedly damaged and as early as March this year. Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, is seeking to bring a legal challenge against the Home Office with a hearing for permission to bring a judicial review set to take place during the week of 21 July. On Friday, her lawyers applied for "interim relief" to temporarily block the legislation from coming into force until that hearing, arguing the Irish author Sally Rooney, who wrote Normal People, was among supporters who fear the "ramifications". But three judges, including the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, refused a bid to pause the ban coming into effect pending any Supreme Court bid at about 10.30pm on Friday, less than two hours before the ban was due to come into force. In their judgment, the judges said: "The role of the court is simply to interpret and apply the law.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Wise to incorporate in Jersey ahead of US listing
Wise intends to incorporate in Jersey as part of a controversial plan by the fast-growing payments business to shift its primary stock market listing to New York. In documents outlining its plans to move its main listing from London, the £10 billion company said it would still be resident in the UK for tax purposes. Wise did not make a pledge in the documents to keep its headquarters in London, although David Wells, the chairman, said that the company 'remained committed to the UK, where we first started and scaled and where today about one-fifth of the company is based'. Originally known as TransferWise, the business was founded by Estonians Kristo Kaarmann and Taavet Hinrikus in London in 2011 to help people send money abroad cheaply and easily. It floated in London ten years later and now employs 6,000 people. Kristo Kaarmann CHRISTOPHER L PROCTOR FOR THE TIMES Its decision to have its primary listing in New York exacerbated concerns about the health of the London Stock Exchange. • How to save London's stock market, by LSE boss David Schwimmer Kaarmann, the chief executive, owns 18 per cent of the shares but just over 50 per cent of the voting rights. This so-called dual-class structure is unusual in London but is more common in New York, and was due to expire next year. The circular to shareholders sets out the merits of retaining this structure, saying that 'major companies with dual-class share structures flourish in the US'. It added: 'These structures support management's ability to focus and execute on the long-term and founder-led vision. In a multitude of instances, we have seen that focus translate into shareholder value: studies suggest that US-listed companies with dual or multi-class share structures then outperform those with a single share class in both the short and medium term.' This appears to be the the first time that Wise has set out the merits of the dual-class structure so clearly. It had previously pointed to America as having the 'deepest and most liquid capital market' in the world and said it would 'drive greater awareness of Wise in the US', where it intends to seek growth. David Schwimmer, chief executive of the London Stock Exchange Group, said last week that he would be 'open minded' about changing UK rules to remove the three-year limit on dual-class share structures. However, such a move would be decided by regulators or the government. Wise's circular does not mention whether it intends to list on the New York Stock Exchange or the tech-focused Nasdaq market. Shareholders will vote on the move on July 28.
