I tested ChatGPT-4o vs Claude 4 Sonnet vs with 7 prompts — the results were surprising
To find out, I gave both models the same set of 7 prompts; covering everything from storytelling and productivity to emotional support and critical thinking.
The goal: to see which chatbot delivers the most useful, human-like and creative responses depending on the task. Choosing the right AI often comes down to how you use it, which is why this kind of test really matters.
Here's how Claude and ChatGPT performed side by side, and where each one shines.
Prompt: "I'm overwhelmed by work and personal tasks. Create a 3-day productivity plan that balances work, rest and small wins. Include AI tools I can use to stay on track."
ChatGPT-4o was concise with a visually engaging format that offered optional tasks and emotional check-ins (e.g., journaling). It focused on quick wins and low-pressure creativity to manage workloads. However, it lacked Claude's explicit emphasis on rest and energy management, and its AI tool suggestions were less systematically organized.Claude 4 Sonnet offered a clear plan, including time-blocked framework with features such as energy management, small wins and recovery that explicitly prioritize balance.
Winner: Claude wins for better addressing the root causes of getting overwhelmed by combining strategic structure, intentional recovery and AI-driven efficiency. It's ideal for users needing a clear roadmap to rebuild control while safeguarding well-being.
Prompt: "Write the opening paragraph of a sci-fi novel set in a future where memories are traded like currency. Keep it gripping and emotional."ChatGPT-4o leveraged first-person immediacy with a strong hook. However, it prioritized plot setup over emotional depth and the story lacks the heart-wrenching specificity of Claude's familial loss.
Claude 4 Sonnet zeroed in on a universally resonant loss. This specific, intimate memory evokes visceral empathy, anchoring the sci-fi concept in raw human emotion.Winner: Claude wins for balancing sci-fi concepts with emotional stakes, making the reader feel the horror of memory commodification. Its vivid imagery and tragic focus on parental love elevate it beyond ChatGPT's solid but less nuanced approach.
Prompt: "I have 3 apples, 2 bananas and a mango. If each fruit takes 5 minutes to cut and I can cut 2 fruits at once, how long will it take me to cut everything? Explain your reasoning."
ChatGPT-4o used concise bullet points and emphasized efficiency: "each session takes 5 minutes... adds up to 15 minutes."
Claude 4 Sonnet structured the answer with labeled steps (Reasoning, Calculation) and explicitly described the batches: "two fruits in the first session... final two in the third."Winner: tie. Both answers are mathematically sound and logically explained. Claude's response is slightly more detailed, while ChatGPT's is more streamlined. Neither is superior; they achieve the same result with equally valid reasoning.
Prompt: Rewrite this sentence in the tone of a Gen Z TikToker: 'I didn't like the movie, but the soundtrack was amazing.'
ChatGPT-4o used concise, widely recognized Gen Z terms, which are instantly relatable. The rhetorical question structure mirrors TikTok's punchy, attention-grabbing style.
Claude 4 Sonnet used a term that feels slightly off-tone for praising a soundtrack, and the longer sentence structure feels less native to TikTok captions.
Winner: ChatGPT wins for nailing Gen Z's casual, hyperbolic style while staying concise and platform appropriate. Claude's attempt is creative but less precise in slang usage and flow.
Prompt: "Give me 5 clever ideas for a blog post series about using AI tools to become a better parent."
ChatGPT-4o responded with viral, snackable content ideas that lack depth and risk feeling gimmicky over time.Claude 4 Sonnet prioritized meaningful AI integration into parenting, addressing both daily logistics and long-term skills.Winner: Claude wins for blog series ideas with a better balance of creativity, practicality and thoughtful AI integration for modern parenting.
Prompt: Pretend you're a friend comforting me. I just got rejected from a job I really wanted. What would you say to make me feel better?
ChatGPT-4o responds in an uplifting and concise way but lacks the nuanced and effectiveness for comfort in the scenario.Claude 4 Sonnet directly combated common post-rejection anxieties and the explicit permission to 'be disappointed' without rushing to fix things, which shows deep emotional intelligence.Winner: Claude wins for better mirroring how a close, thoughtful friend would console someone in this situation.
Prompt: "Explain the pros and cons of universal basic income in less than 150 words. Keep it balanced and easy to understand."
ChatGPT-4o delivered a clear response but it over-simplified the debate using slightly casual language that leans more persuasive than analytical.
Claude 4 Sonnet prioritized clarity and depth, making it more useful for someone seeking a quick, factual overview.
Winner: Claude wins a response that better fulfills the prompt's request for a structured, comprehensive breakdown while staying objective. ChatGPT's answer, while clear, simplifies the debate and uses slightly casual language that leans more persuasive than analytical.
After putting Claude 4 Sonnet and ChatGPT-4o through a diverse set of prompts, Claude stands out as the winner. Yet, one thing remains clear: both are incredibly capable and excel in different ways.
Claude 4 Sonnet consistently delivered deeper emotional intelligence, stronger long-form reasoning and more thoughtful integration of ideas, making it the better choice for users looking for nuance, structure and empathy. Whether it offered comfort after rejection or crafting a sci-fi hook with emotional weight, Claude stood out for feeling more human.
Meanwhile, ChatGPT-4o shines in fast, punchy tasks that require tone-matching, formatting or surface-level creativity. It's snappy, accessible and excellent for casual use or social media-savvy content.
If you're looking for depth and balance, Claude is your go-to.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
5 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Anthropic pulls OpenAI's access to Claude — here's why
Anthropic, the company behind Claude AI, recently made a bold decision. The company has revoked OpenAI's API access to its models, accusing the company of violating its terms of service. According to Wired, which broke this news, Anthropic spokesperson Christopher Nulty said: 'Claude Code has become the go-to choice for coders everywhere, and so it was no surprise to learn OpenAI's own technical staff were also using our coding tools ahead of the launch of the latest version of ChatGPT in GPT-5. Unfortunately, this is a direct violation of our terms of service.' Anthropic's commercial terms of service state that customers can't use the service to 'build a competing product or service, including to train competing AI models or reverse engineer or duplicate services.' Anthropic's commercial terms of service states that customers can't use the service to 'build a competing product or service, including to train competing AI models or reverse engineer or duplicate services.' This could be a big blow for OpenAI as it prepares to launch GPT-5 — the latest version of the company's technology. While it isn't clear what OpenAI was accessing Claude for, Anthropic has quickly become known for its coding ability. However, according to Wired's sources, OpenAI was plugging Claude directly into its own internal tools instead of using the regular chat interface. This would have allowed the company to run tests to measure Claude's capabilities against its own model. This would, in theory, help OpenAI to determine its own model's behaviour and safeguard under similar conditions, giving them a competitive advantage in testing. 'It's industry standard to evaluate other AI systems to benchmark progress and improve safety. While we respect Anthropic's decision to cut off our API access, it's disappointing considering our API remains available to them,' OpenAI's chief communications officer, Hannah Wong, said in a statement to WIRED. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. In response, Nutty stated that Anthropic will 'continue to ensure OpenAI has API access for the purposes of benchmarking and safety evaluations as is standard practice across the industry.' Reports now suggest that GPT-5 could be here any day. Researchers are already in the early stages of testing the technology, and OpenAI has been hinting at a launch in the next week. With this in mind, OpenAI has likely now done all of its early comparisons against other tools. While this will be a small blow to OpenAI, it is likely to change GPT-5 at all. AI companies seem to be getting scrappier in recent months. Staff talent is being stolen from each other and, in cases like this, they are getting more private with their technology. As two of the main AI companies around right now, Anthropic and OpenAI are likely to keep clashing well into the future. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Got You the Job. Now It's Getting You Fired.
Bots write résumés. Bots screen candidates. But when AI runs both sides of hiring, companies like Spotify and IBM are redefining what readiness really means. More applicants are using AI to craft résumés—and more companies are using AI to screen them. The result? A hiring loop where bots talk to bots before a human ever gets involved. ullstein bild via Getty Images Exhibit 1: Shortcutting with AI? Melody didn't lie—well, not exactly. She just let the algorithm do the heavy lifting. Her résumé? It checked all the right boxes. Her cover letter? Eerily precise, masterfully echoing and referencing the job posting. Each of her interview responses? They were smooth. They were polished. And they were very well rehearsed. With minimal effort, Melody directed a few quick prompts to ChatGPT, then used an AI résumé tool to took care of the rest. All in all, none of her application content came from her. Nonetheless, she hit 'send'. Two weeks later, the call came: Offer extended. She was officially an analyst at a top global consulting firm. But that's when things got real. Melody now found herself fumbling through internal dashboards she didn't fully understand. She missed key analytical cues in meetings. And, she reworked client decks multiple times because her manager said they 'lacked strategic framing.' The AI got her in. But, it seems it didn't get her ready. When algorithms replace people, we risk losing more than inefficiency—we risk losing empathy, authenticity, and the nuance that makes someone truly a fit. Getty Images Melody is not the only one leveraging AI for job access and success; it's a rapidly pervasive occurrence. So, we have to ask: · What happens when AI writes your résumé—and screens it too? · Are we automating ourselves out of authenticity, alignment, and accountability? · Can soft skills survive when bots control both access and evaluation? The Data: AI Is Reshaping Hiring—From Both Ends We've entered a strange feedback loop. AI helps applicants craft their résumés, only to be judged by other AI tools before a human ever weighs in. And it's accelerating. Gartner estimates that nearly 80% of Fortune 500 companies now use AI-driven software to sift through résumés, long before a human recruiter ever sees a name. At the same time, SHRM reports that over 30% of job seekers now rely on generative AI to write their cover letters, refine their résumés, and prep for interviews. LinkedIn's AI résumé assistant, alone, has supported the creation of more than 6 million applications since its late 2024 debut. And, perhaps the most revealing stat of all? JobScan's research shows that up to 75% of résumés never make it to a human. Most are filtered out by applicant tracking systems (ATS) for formatting errors, missing keywords, or other company-specific baseline criteria. Getting the job is one thing. Performing in it is another. When AI shortcuts the prep, the cost often shows up on day one. getty Why This Trend Matters Now We're at a key inflection point. With the end of summer, companies are locking in fall placements and early 2026 hires—particularly across finance, consulting, education, and retail. It's a time when speed matters, and AI is increasingly driving hiring decisions. But, when fewer humans are involved in the process, the risks, arguably, grow. We may be matching people to jobs faster—but not always better. So, what are recommendations for combining the best of AI and human qualities? 5 Best Practices for Humanize the Hiring Funnel 1. Don't Delegate Fit to a Bot AI is helpful for initial screenings, but it can't assess emotional intelligence or leadership potential or cultural alignment. Those judgments? They require people. Take Unilever, for example. The company uses AI to evaluate candidates early in the pipeline. But final hiring decisions always include human interviews. That last step is essential to make sure new hires reflect Unilever's values and leadership expectations. 2. Make Prompting a Core Skill Knowing how to talk to AI—through clear, precise prompting—is fast becoming a foundational skill for both applicants and employers. Salesforce recognized this early and integrated prompt training into its Trailhead platform. Teams across departments now learn how to generate better outputs and interpret AI results more critically. As SVP Leah McGowen-Hare puts it, 'prompt fluency is the new digital literacy.' 3. Hire for Story, Not Just Syntax A résumé that checks every box might still tell you nothing about how someone thinks or leads. That's why Spotify's recruiting team began using structured 'story sessions' during interviews. These conversations encourage candidates to reflect on past decisions and challenges and moments of growth. Giving insight into problem-solving styles and values that don't show up in keyword-optimized résumés. Spotify shifted from résumés to 'story sessions' to understand how candidates think, grow, and lead—because algorithms can't capture human potential. picture alliance via Getty Images 4. Rebuild the Funnel for Human–AI Collaboration The best systems? They combine what machines do well with what humans do better. IBM has adopted this model under CHRO Nickle LaMoreaux. Résumés are scanned by AI to flag patterns, but job simulations and real-time human conversations ultimately determine fit. The result is stronger onboarding and smoother team integration. 5. Elevate Soft Skills as Core Hiring Criteria In tech-saturated workplace, human traits—like adaptability and communication and empathy—stand out more than ever. Deloitte has baked these into its process. For client-facing roles, the firm now uses rubrics to assess emotional intelligence and collaboration alongside technical capability. They call it 'human-centric leadership,' and it's becoming a hiring non-negotiable. To AI or Not? We're not just building faster hiring systems—we're creating ones that can quietly misfire if we forget what truly matters. AI might help you land the interview. It might even polish your pitch and follow-up. But, it can't show up for you in the moment that counts. And, it can't decide what leadership looks like. Only humans can do that.
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
5 ChatGPT Prompts To Make $100,000+ With AI (No Degree Needed) In 2025
Employers prefer to see evidence of how you've delivered business results, than seeing the results on your exam paper getty If you thought your degree alone would guarantee a six-figure income, you're in for a real surprise. Here are some intriguing stats about what really propels your salary in 2025, according to Upwork: Freelancers in the U.S. earn an average of $99,230 a year…that's literally $770 shy of a six-figure income. About 78% of CEOs assert that their top freelancers contribute more value than degree-holding employees. What's more, nearly half (48%) of CEOs are planning to boost freelance hiring in the coming year, looking ahead to 2026. And let's not forget, in 2024, freelancers in the US collectively earned more than $1.5 trillion. One of the core contributing factors to the freelance hiring and earning boom is AI. AI is enabling more professionals to profit off their skills independently, because: New job titles and specialisms are being created because of AI. AI implementation being top priority for employers, many are turning to consultants and freelancers to help them close the gap on tech integration. High demand for very specific, unique skill sets that are hard to find amongst employees. Employers becoming obsessed with operating lean, cutting HR costs, and being more efficient and agile, leading to a strong window of opportunity for freelancers. Any professional can start a business and use AI as an assistant to strategize, speed up delivery, improve quality, and automate many aspects of their workflow, leading to reduced barriers to entry as a budding entrepreneur--no degree or start-up fund needed. The best ChatGPT prompts are the ones that are detailed, provide context, and allow ChatGPT to help you think and operate at a high-level as a business owner. They help you move along each step with greater confidence, precision, and quality, than if you were working on your own, without needing to hire a business coach, at least to start with. Here a few ChatGPT prompts you can use and adapt to your specific needs: Here's my resume attached [attach your resume]. Based on the roles I've held over the past X years, make a list of all my monetizable skills that would be in high demand in 2025, and list some use cases or applications as examples for how I can use each one to make money. ChatGPT Prompt #2 Teach me [name of high-income skill, we'll use digital marketing in this example] digital marketing as if you were my tutor for a crash course on digital marketing in 2025. The goal is to learn and grasp key concepts of digital marketing, especially in the AI age, within 90 days. I need a study plan and lessons from you. Give me one lesson at a time. Each time you quiz me on what I've learned, using real-life scenarios and case studies, and I get the answers correct, move me along to the next lesson in the 90-day course. Top tip: Use ChatGPT's study mode for this prompt. To access study mode, open a new chat, go to tools, and click 'study and learn.' Then enter this prompt. The study and learn tool guides you on a journey of exploration and skill development, without spoon-feeding you the answers. See below photo of how this prompt works in ChatGPT's study mode: ChatGPT's study mode (also known as study and learn) in action Rachel Wells This is my background in [name of industry, then proceed to explain your background, and any non-conventional experiences you have that are relevant]. List some AI-powered business ideas that can help me achieve my goal of making $100,000 a year within 18 months. ChatGPT Prompt #4 How can I increase the perceived value of my offer in [name your offer and describe it] . ChatGPT Prompt #5 What are some of the best AI tools that optimize productivity and free up my time as a [your freelance job title] in [name of industry]? The goal is for me to make more money with less time and effort, gradually cutting back so I'm able to produce more even if extremely busy or under pressure. What Are The Best Ways To Make Money Online Without A Degree? Use any in-demand skill that you already have, to: Create guides and e-books Launch courses and paid communities/memberships Write a newsletter and have paid upgrade options Offer social media management services Offer video editing and production services, for specific business niches Create industry-tailored digital products like journals, content calendars, templates, swipe files, etc. Now, it's time to get to work. Every moment you delay and procrastinate here, deciding to read just one more article or do one more Google search to assure yourself you're doing the right thing, you're wasting precious time that could have been better spent, not researching, but acting on what you already know. Get out of your own way, get the ideas out of your head, and start designing your future. Because the future of work…starts with you. High demand for very specific, unique skill sets that are difficult to source in mainstream talent, provides you with a gap in the market as a freelancer getty What ChatGPT prompts make the most money? Prompts that concentrate on enabling you to solve a high-value problem and get paid for it are the most effective. How do I make $100,000 a year without a degree? Use the skills and experience you already have from your work. Find niche ways to apply them to solve the most revenue-driven problems, like sales, marketing, and AI enablement. Study microcredentials and remember, employers care more about the business results you deliver than the results on your exam paper. How much money can I make as a freelancer? The average freelancer in the U.S. makes about $99,000 a year, according to Upwork 2025 data.
