Gaza aid crisis: Why Gazans are dying of hunger or being killed by Israel on a near daily basis
The United Nations says more than a thousand people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking food since late May, when a controversial new Israel- and US-backed aid group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, began operating.
Of those, hundreds have died near GHF sites, according to the UN. The GHF was created to replace the UN's aid role in Gaza and has been widely criticized for failing to improve conditions.
All 2.1 million people in Gaza are now food insecure. On Tuesday, Gaza's health ministry said 900,000 children are going hungry, and 70,000 already show signs of malnutrition.
But how did it come to this?
Before the war, Gaza was already one of the most isolated and densely populated places on earth, with around two million people packed into an area of 140 square miles. Israel has maintained tight control over the territory through a yearslong land, air and sea blockade, with severe restrictions on the movement of goods and people. More than half of its residents were food insecure and under the poverty line, according to the UN.
Between 500 and 600 truckloads of aid entered Gaza daily before the conflict. That number has since plummeted to an average of just 28 trucks per day, a group of humanitarian organizations said Wednesday. It's unclear if the figure includes trucks used in GHF's operations.
Following Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack, which left 1,200 people dead and more than 250 taken hostage, Israel ordered a 'complete siege' of Gaza, halting the supply of electricity, food, water and fuel.
A humanitarian crisis swiftly unfolded, as trapped residents faced both hunger and a devastating Israeli military campaign in response. Human rights groups have repeatedly criticized Israel's use of food as a 'weapon of war' and accused it of imposing 'collective punishment.'
Following international pressure, the first trucks carrying aid entered Gaza in late October. A temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas began on November 24, 2023, slightly increasing aid flow. But the truce collapsed a week later.
Aid deliveries subsequently dwindled again, and stringent Israeli inspections further delayed shipments. Israeli authorities said screening was necessary to prevent Hamas from diverting supplies but humanitarian officials accused Israel of deliberately throttling aid.
Further compounding the crisis was the Israeli campaign against the UN and its aid delivery system, which Israel said was ineffective and allowed aid to fall Hamas' hands. The UN denies this.
Among the agencies targeted was the UN's Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), which Israel accused of having staff involved in the October 7 attack. A UN investigation found that nine of UNWRA's 13,000 Gaza-based employees 'may have' participated and no longer worked at the agency.
In January this year, Israel banned UNRWA from operating in Gaza, cutting off viral services like food, health care and education to hundreds of thousands of people.
As Israel's campaign leveled much of Gaza, displacing most of its residents and weakening Hamas' grip on the territory, lawlessness began to spread.
Looting became a new hurdle for UN trucks, and casualties mounted at aid delivery points. Israel has repeatedly blamed Hamas and armed gangs for the chaos.
The UN warned just weeks into the war that civil order was beginning to collapse, with desperate Palestinians taking flour and hygiene supplies from warehouses. By November 2024, the UN again raised the alarm, saying the capacity to deliver aid was 'completely gone.'
In 'one of the worst' looting incident, over 100 trucks were lost, it said. Drivers were forced to unload trucks at gunpoint, aid workers were injured, and vehicles were damaged extensively.
As Hamas' grip on Gaza waned and the territory's police force was hollowed out, gangs emerged to steal aid and resell it. Israel has also armed local militias to counter Hamas – a controversial move that opposition politicians have warned will endanger Israeli national security.
The arming of militias appears to be the closest that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has come to empowering any form of alternate rule in the strip. Since the start of the war, the Israeli leader has refused to lay out a plan for Gaza's governance once the conflict ends.
On January 19, another temporary ceasefire was reached. Aid resumed, but remained well short of what was needed.
Israel reinstated a total blockade of Gaza on March 2 after the truce expired. Two weeks later, it resumed fighting, with officials saying the goal was to force Hamas to accept new ceasefire terms and release hostages.
By July, the World Food Programme (WFP) assessed that a quarter of Gaza's population was facing famine-like conditions.
At least 80 children have died of malnutrition since the conflict began, the Palestinian health ministry says. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), most of these occurred after the March blockade.
In May, GHF, the controversial new Israeli- and American-backed organization, announced it would begin delivering with Israel's approval. Just days before GHF began operating, its director Jake Wood resigned, saying it was impossible to do his work 'while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.'
The foundation was created to replace the UN's role in Gaza, while complying with Israeli demands that the aid not reach Hamas. The GHF said it would coordinate with the Israeli military, but that security would be provided by private military contractors.
The UN has refused to participate, saying the GHF model violates some basic humanitarian principles. Critics have noted that there are only a small number of GHF distribution sites, in southern and central Gaza – far fewer than hundreds under the UN's previous model. This has forced massive crowds to gather at limited locations.
The GHF has defended its system, saying it is a 'secure model (that) blocks the looting.'
But soon after it began operating on May 27, the plan turned deadly as those seeking aid increasingly came under fire near GHF aid sites.
Palestinian officials and witnesses have said Israeli troops are responsible for most of the deaths. The Israeli military acknowledged firing warning shots toward crowds in some instances, but denied responsibility for other incidents.
And the deaths aren't limited to the vicinity of GHF aid sites. On Sunday, Israeli forces killed dozens waiting for aid in northern Gaza, according to the Palestinian health ministry. Israel said troops fired warning shots after sensing an 'immediate threat'
The ministry of health recorded 10 deaths due to famine and malnutrition in 24 hours from Tuesday, bringing the total of Palestinians who died of starvation to 111.
On Wednesday, 111 international humanitarian organizations called on Israel to end its blockade and agree to a ceasefire, warning that supplies in the enclave are now 'totally depleted' and that humanitarian groups are 'witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes.'
An Israeli official said at a press briefing on Wednesday that they expect more aid to enter the enclave in the future.
'We would like to see more and more trucks entering Gaza and distributing the aid as long as Hamas is not involved,' the official said. 'As we see for now, Hamas has an interest: First, to put pressure on the State of Israel through the international community in order to (have) an effect in the (ceasefire) negotiation process; and second, to collapse the new mechanism that we have established that is making sure that they are not involved in the aid delivery inside Gaza.'
International pressure continues to mount on Israel, including from the United States.
And on Monday, the foreign ministers of 25 Western nations slammed Israel for 'drip feeding' aid into the Gaza Strip. Israel's foreign ministry said it 'rejects' the statement, calling it 'disconnected from reality.'
CNN's Tim Lister, Mostafa Salem, Catherine Nicholls, Oren Liebermann, Eugenia Yosef, Dana Karni, Mike Schwartz, Mick Krever, Eugenia Yosef and Jeremy Diamond contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
12 minutes ago
- New York Post
Columbia must make good on its promises and quash antisemitism
What do you know? The White House has managed to get Columbia University to 'fess up to its sorry record of antisemitism, pay a considerable fine and agree to fresh steps to set it on the right path. That's enormously encouraging — not least because it'll put pressure on other schools that have been resisting changes, like Harvard, to fall in line. President Donald Trump and his team worked hard to reach a deal and deserve great credit. They put the screws to the elite school, cutting off hundreds of millions of dollars in grant support until it agreed to reforms. Advertisement Now Columbia will pay a whopping $200 million to settle discrimination claims and another $20 million specifically to address antisemitism on campus. It also promised to stop racial discrimination in hiring and admissions. Plus, the school has agreed to vet international students more closely and share its data with the feds. That means it won't let in more terror-aligned foreign 'students' like Mahmoud Khalil whose real purpose is to sow chaos on American campuses. Advertisement And just a day earlier, Columbia meted out heavy punishments against more than 70 students for their antisemitic antics, suspending some and expelling others. These are all huge wins. Recall that the school had allowed a mob, including 'community activists' with no university affiliation, to occupy its main square with tents for weeks on end. This rabble harassed Jewish students and faculty, physically blocking their passage around the campus and into university buildings. Jewish students were shoved and bullied. Advertisement The deans did nothing as protestors invaded buildings, chanted antisemitic slogans and destroyed property. Indeed, Columbia abetted a climate of terror. Students wearing keffiyehs as masks disrupted a class on Israeli history taught by an Israeli professor and distributed incendiary fliers reading, 'Burn Zionism to the Ground.' This wasn't just a matter of leniency and laziness on the part of university officials. It was intentional. Advertisement Tenured faculty and top administrators expressed open support for the mayhem, and some were caught mocking Jewish students speaking up about the fear and intimidation they were suffering. Katrina Armstrong, the former interim president, told faculty members in private that she had no intention of making good on her promises to the administration to ban masked protests or reform admissions procedures. This lying and hypocrisy captures the elitist scorn of top Columbia faculty. Tenured radicals turned a blessed institution of culture and science into a pit of rancor and violence in the name of eliminating the Jewish state. Some of that may be about to change — though don't expect all the fixes to come overnight. Notably, Columbia has given in on all the points Harvard is fighting in court, and gotten its grant money restored. Let's hope that resonates with Harvard and nudges it, and other antisemitic schools, to straighten out, once and for all.
Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Do Japanese auto imports get a tariff edge with trade deal?
A day after the United States reached a trade deal that imposes a 15 percent tariff on imports from Japan, President Donald Trump declared that U.S. business would 'BOOM.' But early reads from auto analysts paint a murkier picture — if anything, some experts say, Japanese companies may benefit more than their rivals for now. 'I do think the 15% tariff on vehicles imported from Japan is unfair for American automakers especially if the latter are paying a 25% tariff on their Mexican and Canadian production exported to the US,' Morningstar Research analyst David Whiston wrote in an email to The Washington Post. Trump announced Tuesday that the United States had reached a 'massive' deal with Japan to levy 15 percent tariffs on Japanese imports — including automobiles and auto parts — instead of the 25 percent he threatened earlier this month. In exchange, Japan will remove trade barriers for U.S. auto and agricultural imports and invest $550 billion in the United States. It was the latest trade agreement the Trump administration has announced in recent weeks, as it races to complete deals with scores of countries it has threatened with high levies. 'This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it,' the president wrote on his social media site Truth Social. The Big Three U.S. automakers — General Motors, Ford and Stellantis — do not share Trump's confidence. Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, a lobbying group that represents the three automakers, said it was still reviewing the deal. But Blunt, the former Republican governor of Missouri, said that an agreement that has Japanese automakers paying a lower tariff rate on their imports than U.S. companies pay for parts 'is a bad deal for US industry and US auto workers.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Since the Trump administration threatened sweeping tariffs on most trade partners — including close allies such as Mexico and Canada — the U.S. auto industry has been trying to adjust. Supply chains cross multiple borders, particularly in North America, where goods from Mexico and Canada are subject to 25 percent tariffs. Manufacturers with U.S. operations have felt the impact. General Motors said Tuesday that tariffs cost it $1.1 billion in the second quarter. Stellantis — whose brands include Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat and Jeep — said it faced about $350 million in tariff costs in the first half of the year. Car prices suggest that automakers have absorbed much of the tariffs for the moment rather than passing them on to buyers. Kelley Blue Book data for June shows the cost of a new vehicle rose 1.2 percent year-over-year to $48,907. While that's the largest year-over-year growth of any month this year, it remains well below the average 10-year increase of 3.9 percent. Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive, said vehicles assembled in the United States will see the least added cost under the current trade regime, adding as much as 4 percent, or about $2,000, to what consumers pay. Many models — including Toyota Camrys and Ford Broncos — are assembled in the United States. But many cars from U.S. companies are also assembled in Mexico and Japan. Cox estimates that consumers will pay an added 9 percent, or $3,010, for cars assembled in Japan, which include some Toyota models, such as the Prius and the 4Runner. Vehicles assembled in Mexico will see the highest costs to consumers — about 10 percent or $3,550 — according to Cox. Those include the Honda Fit, the Chevrolet Equinox and Ford Maverick. 'It looks like the Japanese assembled vehicle gets friendlier treatment than vehicles assembled in North America outside of the U.S., but vehicles assembled in the U.S. receive the least amount of added costs from tariffs,' Smoke wrote in an email. Other analysts agreed that Japanese companies could have a near-term advantage. 'Having this agreement in place before any other foreign auto makers gives Japan a near-term advantage in terms of cost, even compared to some domestic U.S. product with a high degree of both foreign production and parts content,' Karl Brauer, iSeeCars executive analyst wrote in an email to The Washington Post. 'It also allows Japan's automakers to plan for future assembly plant and parts supplier locations.' Autos Drive America, which represents foreign automakers in the United States, said it was 'encouraged' by news of the Japan trade deal. 'International automakers have invested more than $124 billion in their U.S. operations over the past thirty years, and the certainty provided by this agreement allows them to plan for greater investment, bringing even more production to our shores and providing affordable options for American consumers.' Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, said in a statement. U.S. businesses may thrive in the long run, said Erik Gordon, a professor at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business. If North American tariffs settle at 25 percent, U.S. companies 'will move a lot of their manufacturing and assembly to the US from Mexico and Canada,' Gordon said in an email.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Portrayed as child executioners': Ex-Mossad official says Gaza war harms Israel's long-term image
Former Mossad official Rami Igra warned that the Gaza war is damaging Israel's global reputation and called for an immediate end to the conflict, emphasizing the need for a long-term solution. Former Mossad official Rami Igra warned that the ongoing images emerging from Gaza will harm Israel's reputation for generations and called for an immediate end to the war in Gaza on Wednesday on the 103FM program with Anat Davidov and Odi Segal. During the interview, he also discussed ongoing negotiations to reach a deal with Hamas. Igra, the former head of the Hostages and Missing Persons Division in the Mossad, said, 'From the outset, Hamas has had one primary goal, which is the end of the war—not a ceasefire, but the complete end of the war. As long as this goal hasn't been reached, Hamas will not agree to anything and will continue fighting." "This presents a rather unusual situation. On one hand, Israel is discussing a ceasefire or a pause in the fighting to facilitate the release of the hostages, while on the other hand, Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu repeatedly declares that he will return to fighting immediately after this pause." "Clearly, no one will accept this, which means that if a ceasefire occurs, Hamas will likely secure concrete guarantees from the Americans to halt the fighting,' Igra explained, pointing to the main obstacle in the hostage release negotiations and Hamas's demands. 'I assume that if Hamas agrees to any deal, it will only be because they have American guarantees they believe in. We also need to look at the other side of Israel. As Israelis, we don't see the images coming out of Gaza. What has been happening there in recent months is the worst destruction of Israel's values we've ever seen." "We saw this just yesterday with the events in Syros. To put this into context, let me bring up a tragic historical event: the St. Louis ship. The ship left Germany with hundreds of Jewish refugees who were not allowed to disembark anywhere. This comparison, while extreme, highlights the global sentiment. It illustrates that Israelis are increasingly unable to travel abroad,' Igra remarked. 'We are being portrayed as child executioners' He continued, 'This erosion of values is not just for Israelis but also for Jews worldwide. The images coming out of Gaza have provided the world with a reason to hate Israelis and Jews. These images tell a story that we were not always warned about—that we are 'businessmen' or 'thieves'—but now, we are being portrayed as child executioners and oppressors of populations. Whether or not it is true, or how much of it is fabricated, this is the perception globally. We, too, will pay for Gaza. Our children will pay for it, our grandchildren will pay for it, and Netanyahu doesn't understand this.' Igra then addressed Israel's ability to destroy Hamas, stating, 'It's true that Hamas is a dangerous and ruthless organization, and we all want to see its destruction. Deep down, we want to eliminate every last Hamas terrorist. However, that is not feasible. The alternative facing us is either to agree to the end of the war and create, through negotiations with the Americans, the Emirates, and the Saudis, some kind of alternative in Gaza that will dismantle the ideology behind Hamas, or we continue this senseless war, which serves no real purpose.' Furthermore, Igra pointed out that Israel's political decision-makers still do not fully understand Hamas's nature, as evidenced by their recent statements: 'There are people who still don't grasp what Hamas truly is, just as they didn't understand it on October 7. They ignore the fact that the majority of the Arab population in Judea and Samaria supports Hamas. Hamas is a religious ideology that cannot be dismantled by force. It must be dismantled through a long-term process, not merely by improving economic conditions, but by establishing an alternative government in Gaza." "There is no simple solution. You can kill the last Hamas fighter and continue fighting endlessly, but that would only add more casualties and further destabilize the region. And in the end, we would not be a state in the Commonwealth. We wouldn't know what kind of country we would be. Take a look at the operation, 'Gideon's Chariots'—what did it bring Israel other than sorrow, terrible public relations, and countless casualties? It was a futile effort. In my opinion, if a deal is reached, it will be because Hamas believes the war is over and that the Americans have made promises to them," Igra concluded.
