Parking pavement ban - is it illegal in Scotland?
People are still confused about pavement parking across Scotland and the rest of the UK
You should not park on the pavement in Scotland
(Image: Getty )
You may have heard that pavement parking is frowned upon. But is it actually illegal and where are the restrictions in place
According to RAC Drive, the Department for Transport (DfT) announced it's considering making the rest of the country follow suit with two places across the UK which have already made parking on pavements illegal.
These two locations are London and Scotland. And i f you ignore these rules, motorists may see themselves slapped with with a £70 fine.
Is it illegal to park on the pavement?
Motor experts at RAC Drive explained: "Parking on the pavement is not illegal outside of London and Scotland.
Drivers should be aware of the rules
(Image: Getty )
"You can, however, still get a fine for doing so in some instances, which makes the law quite a grey area." In fact, since 1974, Highway Code rule 244 has stated that drivers "MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London and should not do so elsewhere unless signs permit it."
Interestingly, they point out there are two key words you need to be aware of - this includes the words "must not" and "should not." With this in mind, they note: "In London and Scotland, you must not park on the pavement, the must indicating there is legislation behind this rule and you could receive a fine for breaking it.
"However, outside of the capital, Scotland, or "elsewhere", the Highway Code states drivers should not park on the pavement, meaning it is advisory and not, therefore, backed up by any legislation."
Why is it illegal in only London and Scotland?
A Private Members' Bill aimed at making pavement parking illegal across the UK was introduced in Parliament in 2015. However, it failed to progress past the second reading in the House of Commons due to concerns about where residents of narrow streets could park if off-street spaces were unavailable.
The Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 prohibits pavement parking, double parking and parking at dropped kerbs. There is of course specific exemptions granted by local authorities such as allowing safe access for emergency vehicles.
Since December 2023, local authorities can fine drivers £100 for parking on the pavement, reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days. As of June 2025, nowhere else in the UK has banned parking on the pavement, RAC stated.
How much will I be fined for parking on a pavement?
The fine could be hefty
(Image: Getty )
In Scotland, drivers can be fined £100; reduced to £50 if paid within 14 days. The fine for parking on the pavement varies across London.
Transport for London currently manages 5% of the capital's roads, where drivers can face a penalty of up to £130 for parking on pavements - or half that amount if paid within 14 days. The Greater London Council (General Powers) Act prohibits motorists from parking on urban roads with their vehicle's wheels on pavements, grass verges, or any land situated between carriageways.
What about the rest of England?
Whether you're going on a trip or live in England, Rule 242 states: "You MUST NOT leave your vehicle or trailer in a dangerous position or where it causes any unnecessary obstruction of the road." Using the word "must not" means, according to the RAC, if "your car is reported or seen by a police officer and judged to be either in a dangerous position or causing an unnecessary obstruction of the road, you could receive a Fixed Penalty Notice."
Article continues below
In the rest of the UK, pavement parking is allowed unless explicitly banned by a local authority via a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO), which will be indicated on nearby road signs, they conclude.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
On the Right Track: Dreams of being an F1 superstar may be on hold, but British speedster Jamie Chadwick's drive to inspire next generation of female racers is stronger than ever
There was a time, not so long ago, when Jamie Chadwick was being hailed as Britain's brightest hope for a female driver in Formula 1. Not since Scotland's Susie Wolff entered the fray in 2014 has a British woman attempted to make it onto the infamous grid. Wolff took part in practice sessions that year but, before her, only Maria Teresa de Filippis in the 1950s, and Lella Lombardi in the 70s, actually contested any races. Whoever succeeds them will, without a doubt, become a sporting mega-star. At one point, Chadwick seemed to be on course to do the business. The first woman to clinch an Indy NXT victory on a road course, the first female and youngest ever winner of the British GT, holder of three consecutive titles in the W Series and the founder of her own karting series for young girls, Chadwick is motorsport's marketing dream. Yet for all her remarkable achievements, F1 now seems a distant memory for the 27-year-old, who is carving her own history in the world of endurance. After Wolff worked for a while as a development and test driver for Williams, Chadwick followed suit, joining Williams as a development driver in 2019. She appears, however, to have ruled out a life in the fast lane of Formula 1; the hypercar of endurance racing her new target, and one which is infinitely achievable, should she continue to impress in the cut-throat world of the European Le Mans Series (ELMS). 'I think now, having transitioned into endurance racing, it's the place where I see a great opportunity,' said the Monaco-based driver. 'Yes, it is the goal now. I think Formula 1, when you're in single-seaters, is every driver's ultimate goal. But now, the way my career has taken me, endurance racing-wise, I want to find a career and a home here and I'm really enjoying it so far this year.' Her recent performance at the 24hr Le Mans race in France should certainly give her confidence. Despite her team failing to finish, thanks to problems with their car, Chadwick was quick to impress on her debut at La Sarthe. 'I think you take a lot away from it in terms of the roller coaster of emotions,' she told Mail Sport. 'You have to remember that Le Mans doesn't owe you anything. 'I think if anything, our expectations became a bit too high as the race went on, because of how smoothly it was going initially. However, I think that makes you more motivated. You know that it can be taken away from you in a heartbeat.' One of the hurdles for female drivers trying to get into F1 is that there is lack of power steering in F2 cars: the traditional pathway to F1. The strength therefore required to drive those cars puts women at a physical disadvantage, although — ironically — there is power steering in F1. 'It's a barrier that might not need to be there,' admitted Chadwick. 'The power steering or lack of power steering is a hurdle that could be a factor and it might be something that will prohibit women from having success. 'I know previously in junior categories the steering loads of a Formula 4 car or a Formula Regional car are as heavy as a lot of other cars and when you're a 16-year-old trying to drive these cars it's incredibly tough physically. 'I think it's something we can definitely think about. The reality is we do need more women coming through the system to verify this, and actually, they have changed a lot the steering ratios and everything to make it not so heavy to allow for drivers to have less issues with steering in the high loads. 'They have it (power steering) in Formula 1, they have it in Japan in different championships so I'm sure it's something they could put in there. 'Importantly, we need a woman to be knocking on the door of Formula 2 first before I think we're going to see this change.' This, however, may be some way off, should F2 cars remain such an obvious challenge. Tatiana Calderon became the first woman to drive the series in 2019, but failed to score a single point. Tom Stanton, CEO of More Than Equal — which was founded by David Coulthard and which enrols talent into a fully-funded Driver Development Programme designed with female drivers in mind — says there's no reason why women cannot compete alongside their male counterparts in Formula 2 — and he has called for changes to be made to cars in order for more women to be able to compete effectively. 'You could say its a red herring, but in fact it's the real truth,' he said. 'When you get to F2, those cars are super fast, super simple, super powerful, super difficult to drive. That's the same for both men and women. Is the female physiology slighter than their male equivalents? Yes, it is. There IS a real thing there about power steering. Why not put it in those cars? 'The oft-given response is cost, but I know plenty of team managers who would say that the cost is actually negligible. If you were learning to fly a fighter jet, you wouldn't be training in a helicopter. So why does the series preceding F1 have a different methodology, a different set up? 'I do think they should bring in power steering to F2 cars, because I don't think the reasons not to are valid. It helps everyone — not just female drivers.' Stanton, who played a vital role with British Cycling as Head of Academy and worked across Olympic and Paralympic cycles, has a long history of science and performance in sport. He told Mail Sport part of the challenge here remains around 'opportunity' — but he's adamant that women will compete one day in Formula 1. 'Everybody wants the first female F1 driver on the grid. Nobody necessarily wants to be responsible for developing them. I don't think it's fair to say, however, that that's their fault. 'Rather, I would acknowledge that a rising tide raises all boats, so everyone has to have some positive action in order to get there. 'I believe, having been a physiologist in performance sport, and in performance science for 20 years, that there's no physical reason why you can't get a female to be physically capable of turning that wheel at speed. 'There are fewer females there, but routinely, the biggest difference between male and female drivers is how much time they have for testing and racing, and how much physical prep they've completed. There's a significant gulf there between the most successful male drivers and the females in that space.' Chadwick, meanwhile, says she's confident motorsport is going in the right direction — as long as participation continues to grow. 'It's just a case of numbers for me,' said Chadwick, who is working with Mobil 1, a company investing heavily in women's sport. 'Ultimately, we will see a woman get to Formula 1 at some point, but I think the focus in the first instance, just needs to be on an increase in participation in the sport.'
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Rachel Reeves ‘considers overruling' £44billion car finance Supreme Court decision in DAYS
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CHANCELLOR Rachel Reeves may step in to overrule the Supreme Court's decision relating to the £44billion car finance scandal. The Supreme Court is set to decide next Friday whether motor finance providers should compensate customers over undisclosed broker commission arrangements. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 The move aims to prevent the scandal from spreading to other financial products beyond car loans Credit: EPA But, the Government is looking at new laws to limit compensation claims against motor finance providers and making them less exposed to the scandal, according to The Guardian. These laws would set clear rules on disclosing broker commission fees and could even apply retroactively to existing cases. If passed, lenders like Lloyds, Santander, Barclays, and Close Brothers could face lower payouts. The move aims to prevent the scandal from spreading to other financial products beyond car loans. The move would be an exceptional step by the Treasury, which previously attempted to influence the Supreme Court proceedings in January. It's believed Government officials have been discussing the practicalities with both the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Business and Trade. In October, the Court of Appeal ruled that motor finance firms broke the law by not telling borrowers about broker commission terms. This decision could lead to £44billion in compensation for millions of people. Motor finance companies argue they believed their practices followed the rules but say the ruling requires much more transparency. Close Brothers and FirstRand Bank appealed the decision, and the Supreme Court heard the case in April. Martin Lewis explains potential new Financial Conducts Authority ruling The court will now announce its final decision on motor finance commissions on August 1. The Financing and Leasing Association, which represents motor finance companies, warns that if the Court of Appeal ruling is upheld, it could harm the motor finance market. They say it could lead to less lending, higher borrowing costs, and even company closures. The Government rarely steps in on compensation cases, but the Treasury is worried this scandal could scare off investors and hurt UK businesses. There are also fears that a huge compensation bill could damage the industry. Back in 2013, the coalition Government pushed through the Jobseekers (Back to Work Schemes) Act to "protect the national economy" from a £130million payout. A Treasury spokesperson said they want a fair decision that gives consumers proper compensation for their losses. They added: "We want to see a balanced judgment that delivers compensation proportionate to losses that consumers have suffered and allows the motor finance sector to continue supporting millions of motorists to own vehicles. "It is now appropriate to let the appeals process run its course." Paul Carlier, the whistleblower who first exposed the scheme in 2016, has accused the Treasury of acting dishonestly to protect motor finance firms at the expense of millions of customers. He claims the FCA and Ombudsman have already covered up the scandal in previous years, depriving consumers of billions in redress. Andy Agathangelou, founder of consumer advocacy group Transparency Task Force said: "This is at least the second time the Chancellor of the Exchequer has hoped to intervene, or should I say interfere, with the judicial process surrounding the car finance scandal. "It's not a good look for her, because she seems happy to in effect take money out of the pockets of innocent, harmed consumers, and put it in the pockets of banks and car finance companies that have broken the law." The Financial Ombudsman Service is struggling with a massive spike in complaints about commission practices, now totalling over 60,000 – triple the number since May 2024. The growing scandal could rival the infamous Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) debacle. In March, the Financial Conduct Authority confirmed it had been granted permission to intervene in the case and had submitted its arguments to the Court. Should the Supreme Court rule that motor finance customers have suffered losses as a result of widespread failings by firms, the FCA is expected to consult on the introduction of an industry-wide compensation scheme. Under a redress scheme, firms would need to figure out if their mistakes caused customers to lose money. If they did, the firms would have to pay the right amount of compensation. The FCA would create rules for firms to follow and make sure they stick to them. This scheme would make things easier for customers compared to making a formal complaint. While waiting for news on the redress scheme, customers can still make a claim directly, but the FCA has advised against using claims management companies or law firms to avoid unnecessary fees. WHAT'S HAPPENING AND WHO'S AFFECTED? By James Flanders, Chief Consumer Reporter What is being investigated? The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) launched an investigation last year into whether motorists were unknowingly overcharged when they took out car loans. The investigation by the City watchdog focuses on past practices where banks allowed car dealerships and brokers to set their own interest rates on loans. Under a now-banned discretionary commission arrangement (DCA), dealerships and brokers had a financial incentive to charge higher interest rates, as their commission increased proportionally. However, many customers were unaware of this practice. A landmark ruling in October 2024, deemed it unlawful for car dealers, acting as brokers, to receive commissions from lenders without obtaining the customer's consent. This applied to both discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), where dealers set interest rates, and non-discretionary commissions. The Supreme Court is now preparing to rule on whether lenders should be held responsible for compensating drivers. Who is eligible for compensation? There are two criteria you must meet to have a chance at receiving compensation. First, you must be complaining about a finance deal on a motor vehicle (including cars, vans, motorbikes, and motorhomes) that was agreed upon before January 28, 2021. Second, you must have bought the vehicle through a mechanism like Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) or Hire Purchase (HP), which make up the majority of finance deals and mean you own the vehicle at the end of the agreement. Drivers who leased a car through a Personal Contract Hire, where you give the car back at the end of the lease, are not eligible. According to the financial regulator, on a typical £10,000 motor finance agreement, discretionary commission arrangements could have caused customers to pay an additional £1,100 in interest over a four-year term. The FCA extended the deadline for lenders to respond to complaints, meaning borrowers whose lenders received other forms of commission may now also be eligible for compensation. How can I make a claim now? Consumer finance website offers an email template to help you complain to your finance provider. You can download this by visiting Alternatively, you can complain directly without using the template. It's crucial for anyone who took out car finance to file a claim, even if a previous claim was denied. In your complaint, ask whether you were overcharged due to your broker receiving a commission and request the company to rectify this if it occurred. If you're unsatisfied with the company's response, you can escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) at no cost. You have until July 29, 2026, or up to 15 months from the date of the company's final response letter, whichever is longer. Avoid using a claims management firm, as they will take a portion of any successful claim.
Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Christian Horner tipped to become Lewis Hamilton's new Ferrari boss, day after Brit driver's brutal response to sacking
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FORMULA 1 legend Jacques Villeneuve says Christian Horner "doesn't seem to be affected by pressure" so could be Ferrari's team principal. However, if Lewis Hamilton's response to the news of Horner's sacking is anything to go off, it may not be the match Villeneuve thinks it could be. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Horner was sacked three days after the British Grand Prix Credit: Getty 4 Allegations of inappropriate behaviour were made against him by a female colleague in February 2024 Credit: Getty 4 He's been tipped to join Ferrari Credit: AFP 4 Villeneuve thinks he could 'shoulder the pressure' of Ferrari Credit: Getty Horner was sacked by Red Bull earlier this month after 20 years from his position as team principal. The team have not publicly provided a reason for his dismissal. Allegations of inappropriate behaviour were made against him by a female colleague in February 2024. Horner - who is currently out of work - has denied these allegations. Speaking to Vision4Sport, who provide Formula 1 tickets and packages, 1997 world champion Villeneuve said on the Brit: "Christian Horner to Ferrari would be an interesting one. read more in f1 Bel tolls Fears for future of iconic F1 track that's set to disappear from calendar "He's been solid, doesn't seem to have been very affected by pressure, even in tough times. "So, he might well be one that could be able to shoulder Ferrari." But on Thursday, Hamilton gave a brutal response to a question on Horner's sacking ahead of the Belgium Grand Prix. With a dead-pan look on his face, he said: "It doesn't change anything in my life." BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK That comment was followed by an awkward silence in the press conference. Hamilton - who stunned the F1 world when he switched from Mercedes to Ferrari - failed to podium at the British Grand Prix earlier this month. Lewis Hamilton looks close to tears in live TV interview after 'terrible' performance His fourth place finish brought an end to finishing in the top three for 12 Silverstone races in a row as he finished behind Lando Norris, Oscar Piastri and Nico Hulkenberg. Ferrari's Charles Leclerc finished second at the Monaco Grand Prix in May behind McLaren's Lando Norris. And Villeneuve thinks this inconsistent form is a reoccurring theme for the Italian team. He said: "It's like that every year. It's really bad, and then suddenly they win in Monaco. "Then it's great and they've turned the corner, then it goes back to being very bad and so on. So, let's wait." Ferrari principle Fred Vasseur has been in focus this season, with fans questioning if time will run out for him after a tricky season for the Italian team. Asked about Vasseur's future, Villeneuve said the job is always a "risky proposition". He said: 'The team principal at Ferrari is always under threat. That's the name of the game. "When you accept going to Ferrari, you know that you're walking on fire, you're walking on eggs. It's always a risky proposition. "And if you take that job, which puts you in the limelight, you have to accept the consequences, which means it's easy to just be chopped 'You live under constant pressure, and you have to accept it from the media, from everyone and you complain about it because a team principal there is always one who managed to remove his predecessor. "There's always a lot of politics. So, if it happens to Vasseur there should not be any surprise."
